Archaeoastronomy
2864
225904076
2008-07-15T23:08:27Z
128.119.130.31
/* Solar positioning */
[[Image:Newgrange ireland 750px.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The rising sun illuminates the inner chamber of [[Newgrange]], Ireland, only at the winter solstice.]]
'''Archaeoastronomy''' (also spelled '''archeoastronomy''') is the study of how peoples in the past "have understood the [[phenomenon|phenomena]] in the sky, how they used phenomena in the sky and what role the sky played in their [[culture]]s."<ref>Sinclair 2006:13</ref> Clive Ruggles argues it specifically is ''not'' the study of ancient [[astronomy]], as astronomy is a culturally specific concept and ancient peoples may have related to the sky in a different way.<ref>Ruggles 2005:19</ref> It is often twinned with '''ethnoastronomy''', the [[anthropology|anthropological]] study of skywatching in contemporary societies. Archaeoastronomy is also closely associated with [[historical astronomy]], the use of historical records of heavenly events to answer astronomical problems and the [[history of astronomy]], which uses written records to evaluate past astronomical traditions.
Archaeoastronomy uses a variety of methods to uncover evidence of past practices including astronomy, statistics and probability, anthropology, and history as well as archaeology. Because these methods are so diverse and pull data from such different sources the problem of integrating them into a coherent argument has been a long-term issue for archaeoastronomers.<ref>Iwaniszewski 2003, 7-10</ref>
Archaeoastronomy fills complementary niches to [[landscape archaeology]] and [[cognitive archaeology]]. Material evidence and its connection to the sky can reveal how a wider landscape can be integrated into beliefs about the cycles of nature, such as Mayan astronomy and its relationship with the agriculture.<ref>Aveni 1980</ref> Other examples which have brought together ideas of cognition and landscape include studies of the cosmic order embedded in the roads of settlements.<ref>Chiu & Morrison 1980</ref><ref>Magli 2008</ref>
Archaeoastronomy can be applied to all cultures and all time periods. The meanings of the sky vary from culture to culture; nevertheless there are scientific methods which can be applied across cultures when examining ancient beliefs.<ref>McCluskey 2005</ref> It is perhaps the need to balance the social and scientific aspects of archaeoastronomy which led Clive Ruggles to describe it as: ''"...[A] field with academic work of high quality at one end but uncontrolled speculation bordering on lunacy at the other."''<ref>Carlson 1999</ref>
==History of archaeoastronomy==
{{quote|In his short history of 'Astro-archaeology' John Michell argued that the status of research into ancient astronomy had improved over the past two centuries, going 'from lunacy to heresy to interesting notion and finally to the gates of orthodoxy.' Nearly two decades later, we can still ask the question: Is archaeoastronomy still waiting at the gates of orthodoxy or has it gotten inside the gates?|Todd Bostwick quoting John Michell<ref>Bostwick 2006:13</ref>}}
Two hundred years before Michell wrote the above, there were no archaeoastronomers and there were [[Archaeology#History_of_archaeology|no professional archaeologists]], but there were astronomers and [[Antiquarianism|antiquarians]]. Some of their work is considered the [[precursorism|precursors]] of archaeoastronomy, as antiquarians interpreted the astronomical orientation of the ruins that dotted the English countryside, as [[William Stukeley]] did of Stonehenge in 1740,<ref>Michell, 2001:9-10</ref> while [[John Aubrey]] in 1678<ref>Johnson, 1912:225</ref> and [[Henry Chauncy]] in 1700 sought similar astronomical principles underlying the orientation of churches.<ref>Hoskin, 2001:7</ref> Late in the nineteenth century astronomers such as [[Richard Proctor]] and [[Charles Piazzi Smyth]] investigated the astronomical orientations of the pyramids.<ref>Michell, 2001:17-18</ref>
The term ''archaeoastronomy'' was first used by Elizabeth Chesley Baity (at the suggestion of Euan MacKie) in 1973,<ref>Sinclair 2006:17</ref> but as a topic of study it may be much older, depending on how archaeoastronomy is defined. Clive Ruggles<ref>Ruggles 2005:312-3</ref> says that [[Heinrich Nissen]], working in the mid-nineteenth century was arguably the first archaeoastronomer. Rolf Sinclair<ref>Sinclair 2006:8</ref> says that [[Norman Lockyer]], working in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, could be called the 'father of archaeoastronomy.' Euan MacKie<ref>Mackie 2006:243</ref> would place the origin even later, stating: "...the genesis and modern flowering of archaeoastronomy must surely lie in the work of [[Alexander Thom]] in Britain between the 1930s and the 1970s.
[[Image:Auglish.jpg|left|thumb|250px|Early archaeoastronomy began by surveying alignments of Megalithic stones in the British Isles and sites like [[Auglish]] in [[County Londonderry]] in an attempt to find statistical patterns]]In the 1960s the work of the engineer Alexander Thom and that of the astronomer [[Gerald Hawkins]], who proposed that [[Stonehenge]] was a [[Neolithic]] computer,<ref>Hawkins 1976</ref> inspired new interest in the astronomical features of ancient sites. The claims of Hawkins were largely dismissed,<ref>Atkinson 1966</ref> but this was not the case for Alexander Thom's work, whose survey results of [[megalith]]ic sites also proposed widespread practice of accurate astronomy in the British Isles.<ref>Thom 1988:9-10</ref> Euan MacKie, recognising that Thom’s theories needed to be tested, excavated at the Kintraw standing stone site in Argyllshire in 1970 and 1971 to check whether the latter’s prediction of an observation platform on the hill slope above the stone was correct. There was an artificial platform there and this apparent verification of Thom’s long alignment hypothesis (Kintraw was diagnosed as an accurate winter solstice site) led him to check Thom’s geometrical theories at the Cultoon stone circle in Islay, also with a positive result. MacKie therefore broadly accepted Thom’s conclusions and published new prehistories of Britain.<ref name = "zkuawc">MacKie 1977</ref> In contrast a re-evaluation of Thom’s fieldwork by Clive Ruggles argued that Thom's claims of high accuracy astronomy were not fully supported by the evidence.<ref>Gingerich 2000</ref> Nevertheless Thom's legacy remains strong, Krupp<ref>Krupp 1979:18</ref> wrote in 1979, "Almost singlehandedly he has established the standards for archaeo-astronomical fieldwork and interpretation, and his amazing results have stirred controversy during the last three decades." His influence endures and practice of [[statistical]] testing of data remains one of the methods of archaeoastronomy.<ref>Hicks 1993</ref><ref>Iwanisewzski 1995</ref>
[[Image:Uxmal01-panorama.jpg|thumb|leftt|250px|It has been proposed that [[Maya civilization|Maya]] sites such as [[Uxmal]] were built in accordance with astronomical alignments]]The approach In the [[New World]], where anthropologists began to consider more fully the role of astronomy in [[Amerindian]] societies, was markedly different. They had access to sources that the [[prehistory]] of Europe lacks such as [[ethnography|ethnographies]]<ref>Zeilik 1985</ref><ref>Zeilik 1986</ref> and the [[history|historical]] records of the early [[Colonization of the Americas|colonizers]]. Following the pioneering example of Anthony Aveni,<ref>Milbraith 1999:8</ref><ref>Broda 2000:233</ref> this allowed New World archaeoastronomers to make claims for motives which in the Old World would have been mere speculation. The concentration on historical data led to some claims of high accuracy that were comparatively weak when compared to the statistically led investigations in Europe.<ref>Hoskin 1996</ref>
This came to a head at a meeting sponsored by the [[International Astronomical Union|IAU]] in [[Oxford]] in 1981.<ref>Ruggles 1993:ix</ref> The [[methodology|methodologies]] and research questions of the participants were considered so different that the conference proceedings were published as two volumes.<ref>Aveni 1982</ref><ref>Heggie 1982</ref> Nevertheless the conference was considered a success in bringing researchers together and Oxford conferences have continued every four or five years at locations around the world. The subsequent conferences have resulted in a move to more interdisciplinary approaches with researchers aiming to combine the contextuality of archaeological research,<ref>Aveni, 1989a:xi–xiii</ref> which broadly describes the state of archaeoastronomy today. Rather than merely establishing the existence of ancient astronomies archaeoastronomers seek to explain why people would have an interest in the night sky.
==Archaeoastronomy and its relations to other disciplines==
{{quote|...[O]ne of the most endearing characteristics of archaeoastronomy is its capacity to set academics in different disciplines at loggerheads with each other.|Clive Ruggles<ref>Ruggles 2000</ref>}}
Reflecting Archaeoastronomy's development as an interdisciplinary subject, research in the field is conducted by investigators trained in a wide range of disciplines. Authors of recent doctoral dissertations have described their work as concerned with the fields of archaeology and cultural anthropology; with various fields of history including the history of specific regions and periods, the history of science and the history of religion; and with the relation of astronomy to art, literature and religion. Only rarely did they describe their work as astronomical, and then only as a secondary category.<ref>McCluskey 2004</ref>
Both practicing archaeoastronomers and observers of the discipline approach it from different perspectives. George Gummerman and Miranda Warburton view archaeoastronomy as part of an archaeology informed by [[cultural anthropology]] and aimed at understanding a "group’s conception of themselves in relation to the heavens', in a word, its cosmology.<ref>Gummerman & Warburton 2005</ref> Todd Bostwick argued that "archaeoastronomy is anthropology – the study of human behavior in the past and present."<ref>Bostwick 2006:3</ref> Paul Bahn has described archaeoastronomy as an area of cognitive archaeology.<ref>Bahn 1996:49</ref> Other researchers relate archaeoastronomy to the history of science, either as it relates to a culture's observations of nature and the conceptual framework they devised to impose an order on those observations<ref>McCluskey 2001</ref> or as it relates to the political motives which drove particular historical actors to deploy certain astronomical concepts or techniques.<ref>Broda 2006</ref><ref>Aldana 2007:14-15</ref> Art historian Richard Poss took a more flexible approach, maintaining that the astronomical rock art of the US Southwest be read employing "the hermeneutic traditions of western art history and art criticism"<ref>Poss 2005:97</ref> Astronomers, however, raise different questions, seeking to provide their students with identifiable [[Precursorism|precursors]] of their discipline, and are especially concerned with the important question of how to confirm that specific sites are, indeed, intentionally astronomical.<ref>Schaefer 2006a:30</ref>
The reactions of professional archaeologists to archaeoastronomy have been decidedly mixed. Some expressed incomprehension or even hostility, varying from a rejection by the archaeological mainstream of what they saw as an archaeoastronomical fringe to an incomprehension between the cultural focus of archaeologists and the quantitative focus of early archaeoastronomers.<ref>Ruggles 1999: 3-9</ref> Yet archaeologists have increasingly come to incorporate many of the insights from archaeoastronomy into archaeology textbooks<ref>Fisher 2006</ref> and, as mentioned above, some students wrote archaeology dissertations on archaeoastronomical topics.
Since archaeoastronomers disagree so widely on the characterisation of the discipline, they even dispute its name. All three major international scholarly associations relate archaeoastronomy to the study of culture, using the term ''Astronomy in Culture'' or a translation. Michael Hoskin sees an important part of the discipline as fact-collecting, rather than theorizing, and proposed to label this aspect of the discipline ''Archaeotopography.''<ref>Hoskin 2001:13-14.</ref> Ruggles and Saunders proposed ''Cultural Astronomy'' as a unifying term for the various methods of studying folk astronomies.<ref>Ruggles & Saunders 1993:1-31</ref> Others have argued that astronomy is an inaccurate term, what are being studied are [[cosmology|cosmologies]] and people who object to the use of [[logos]] have suggested adopting the Spanish ''cosmovisión''.<ref> Ruggles 2005:115-117</ref>
When debates polarise between techniques, the methods are often referred to by a colour code, based on the colours of the bindings of the two volumes from the first Oxford Conference, where the approaches were first distinguished.<ref name = "jgswke">Aveni 1986</ref> Green ([[Old World]]) archaeoastronomers rely heavily on statistics and are sometimes accused of missing the cultural context of what is a social practice. Brown ([[New World]]) archaeoastronomers in contrast have abundant ethnographic and historical evidence and have been described as 'cavalier' on matters of measurement and statistical analysis.<ref>Hoskin 2001:2</ref> Finding a way to integrate various approaches has been a subject of much discussion since the early 1990s.<ref>Ruggles & Saunders. 1993</ref><ref>Iwanisewzski 2001</ref>
==Methodology==
{{quote|For a long time I have believed that such diversity requires the invention of some all-embracing theory. I think I was very naïve in thinking that such a thing was ever possible.|Stanislaw Iwaniszewski<ref>Iwaniszewski 2003:7</ref>}}
There is no one way to do Archaeoastronomy. The divisions between archaeoastronomers tend not to be between the physical scientists and the social scientists. Instead it tends to depend on the location of kind of data available to the researcher. In the Old World, there is little data but the sites themselves; in the New World, the sites were supplemented by ethnographic an historic data. The effects of the isolated development of archaeoastronomy in different places can still often be seen in research today. Research methods can be classified as falling into one of two approaches, though more recent projects often use techniques from both categories.
===Green Archaeoastronomy===
Green Archaeoastronomy is named after the cover the book Archaeoastronomy in the Old World.<ref>Aveni 1989:1</ref> It is primarily statistically led and is a particularly approach for prehistoric sites where the social evidence is relatively scant compared to the historic period. The basic methods were developed by Alexander Thom during his extensive surveys of British megalithic sites.
Thom wished to examine whether or not prehistoric peoples used high-accuracy astronomy. He believed that by using horizon astronomy, observers could make estimates of dates in the year to a specific day. The observation would require finding a place where on a specific data the sun set into a notch on the horizon. A common theme would be a mountain which blocked the Sun, but on the right day would allow the tiniest fraction to re-emerge on the other side for a 'double sunset'. The animation below shows two sunsets at a [[hypothetical]] site, one the day before the summer solstice and one at the summer solstice, which has a double sunset.
<center>[[Image:Doublesunset.ogg]]</center>
To test this idea he surveyed hundreds of stone rows and circles. Any individual alignment could indicate a direction by chance, but he planned to show that together the distribution of alignments was non-random, showing that there was an astronomical intent to the orientation of at least some of the alignments. His results indicated the existence of eight, sixteen, or perhaps even thirty-two approximately equal divisions of the year. The two [[solstice]]s, the two [[equinox]]es and four [[cross-quarter day]]s, days half-way between a solstice and the equinox were associated with the medieval Celtic calendar.<ref>Thom 1967: 107-117</ref> While not all these conclusions have been accepted, it has had an enduring influence on archaeoastronomy, especially in Europe.
Euan MacKie has most strongly supported Thom's analyses adding to which he added an archaeological context by comparing Neolithic Britain to the Mayan civilisation to argue for a stratified society in this period.<ref name = "zkuawc"/> To test his ideas he conducted a couple of excavations at proposed prehistoric observatories in Scotland. Kintraw is a site notable for its four metre high standing stone. Thom proposed that this was a foresight to a point on the distant horizon between Beinn Shianaidh and Beinn o'Chaolias on Jura.<ref>Ruggles 1999:25-29</ref> This Thom argued was a notch on the horizon where a double sunset would occur at midwinter. However, from ground level the site of the standing stone, this sunset would be obscured by a ridge in the landscape. The viewer would need to be raised by two metres. Therefore another observation platform was needed. This was identified across a gorge where a platform formed from small stones. The lack of artefacts caused concern for some archaeologists and the petrofabric analysis was inconclusive, but further research at [[Maes Howe]]<ref>MacKie 1997</ref> and on the [[Bush Barrow]] Lozenge<ref>MacKie 2006:362</ref> leads MacKie to conclude that while the term 'science' may be anachronistic, Thom was broadly correct upon the subject of high-accuracy alignments.
In contrast Clive Ruggles has argued that there are problems with the selection of data in Thom's surveys. meaning that the arguments for high accuracy astronomy are unproven.<ref>Ruggles 1999:19-29</ref><ref>Ruggles and Barclay 2000: 69-70</ref> A deeper criticism of Green archaeoastronomy is that while it can answer ''if'' there was likely to be an interest in astronomy in past times, its lack of a social element means that it struggles to answer ''why'' people would be interested which makes it of limited use to people asking questions about the society of the past. Keith Kintigh wrote: ''"To put it bluntly, in many cases it doesn’t matter much to the progress of anthropology whether a particular archaeoastronomical claim is right or wrong because the information doesn’t inform the current interpretive questions."''<ref>Kintigh 1992</ref> Nonetheless the study of alignments remains a staple of archaeoastronomical research, especially in Europe.<ref>Hoskin 2001</ref>
===Brown Archaeoastronomy===
In contrast to the largely alignment-orientated statistically-led methods of Green archaeoastronomy, Brown archaeoastronomy has been identified as being closer to the [[history of astronomy]] or to [[cultural history]], insofar as it draws on historical and ethnographic records to enrich its understanding of early astronomies and their relations to calendars and ritual.<ref name = "jgswke"/> The many records of native customs and beliefs made by the Spanish chroniclers means that Brown archaeoastronomy is most often associated with studies of astronomy in the Americas.<ref>Aveni 1989</ref>
One famous site where historical records have been used to interpret sites is [[Chichen Itza]]. Rather than analysing the site and seeing which targets appear popular, archaeoastronomers have instead examined the ethnographic records to see what features of the sky were important to the [[Maya civilization|Maya]]ns and then sought archaeological correlates. One example which could have been overlooked without historical records is the Mayan interest in the planet [[Venus]]. This interest is attested to by the [[Dresden codex]] which contains tables with information about the Venus's appearances in the sky.<ref name = "mlxqkn">Kelley and Milone 2005:369-370</ref> These cycles would have been of astrological and ritual significance as Venus was associated with [[Quetzalcoatl]] or [[Xolotl]].<ref>Kelley and Milone 2005:367-8</ref> Associations of architectural features with settings of Venus can be found in Chichen Itza.
[[Image:Chichen Itza Observatory 2 1.jpg|left|thumb|200px|"El Caracol" a possible observatory temple at Chichen Itza.]]The Temple of the Warriors bears iconography depicting feathered serpents associated with Quetzalcoatl or Kukulcan. This means that the building's alignment towards the place on the horizon where Venus first appears in the evening sky (when it coincides with the rainy season) may be meaningful.<ref>Milbraith 1988:70-71</ref> Aveni claims that another building associated with the planet Venus in the form of Kukulcan, and the rainy season at Chichen Itza is the [[Caracol]].<ref>Aveni 2006:60-64</ref> This is a building with circular tower and doors facing the cardinal directions. The base faces the most northerly setting of Venus. Additionally the pillars of a stylobate on the building's upper platform were painted black and red. These are colours associated with Venus as an evening and morning star.<ref>Aveni 1979:175-183</ref> However the windows in the tower seem to have been little more than slots, making them poor at letting light in, but providing a suitable place to view out.<ref>Aveni 1997:137-138</ref>
Aveni states that one of the strengths of the Brown methodology is that it can explore astronomies invisible to statistical analysis and offers the astronomy of the [[Inca]]s as another example. The empire of the Incas was conceptually divided using ''ceques'' radial routes emanating from the capital at [[Cusco]]. Thus there are alignments in all directions which would suggest there is little of astronomical significance, However, ethnohistorical records show that the various directions do have cosmological and astronomical significance with various points in the landscape being significant at different times of the year.<ref>Aveni 1989:5</ref><ref>Bauer and Dearborn 1995</ref> In eastern Asia archaeoastronomy has developed from the History of Astronomy and much archaeoastronomy is searching for material correlates of the historical record. This is due to the rich historical record of astronomical phenomena which, in China, stretches back into the [[Han dynasty]], in the second century BC.<ref>Xu ''et al.'' 2000:1-7</ref>
A criticism of this method is that it can be statistically weak. Schaefer in particular has questioned the how robust the claimed alignments in the Caracol are.<ref>Schaefer 2006a:42-48</ref><ref>Schaefer 2006b</ref>
Because of the wide variety of evidence, which can include artifacts as well as sites, there is no one way to practice archaeoastronomy.<ref> Iwaniszewski 2003</ref> Despite this it is accepted that Archaeoastronomy is not a discipline that sits in isolation. Because Archaeoastronomy is an interdisciplinary field, whatever is being investigated should make sense both archaeologically and astronomically. Studies are more likely to be considered sound if they use theoretical tools found in Archaeology like [[analogy]] and [[homology]] and if they can demonstrate an understanding of [[accuracy and precision]] found in Astronomy.
==Source materials==
Because archaeoastronomy is about the many and various ways people interacted with the sky, there are a diverse range of sources giving information about astronomical practices.
===Alignments===<!-- This section is linked from [[History of astronomy]] -->
A common source of data for archaeoastronomy is the study of alignments. This is based on the assumption that the axis of alignment of an archaeological site is meaningfully orientated towards an astronomical target. Brown archaeoastronomers may justify this assumption through reading historical or ethnographic sources, while Green archaeoastronomers tend to prove that alignments are unlikely to be selected by chance, usually by demonstrating common patterns of alignment at multiple sites.
An alignment is calculated by measuring the [[azimuth]], the angle from north, of the structure and the altitude of the horizon it faces<ref>Ruggles, 2005:112-113</ref> The azimuth is usually measured using a [[theodolite]] or a [[compass]]. A compass is easier to use, though the deviation of the Earth’s magnetic field from true north, known as its [[magnetic declination]] must be taken into account. Compasses are also unreliable in areas prone to magnetic interference, such as sites being supported by scaffolding. Additionally a compass can only measure the azimuth to a precision of a half a degree.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.brunton.com/manuals/current/Compasses/Transit.pdf |title=''Brunton Pocket Transit Instruction Manual'', p. 22|accessdate=2008-03-25}}</ref>
A theodolite can be considerably more accurate if used correctly, but it is also considerably more difficult to use correctly. There is no inherent way to align a theodolite with North and so the scale has to be [[calibration|calibrated]] using astronomical observation, usually the position of the Sun.<ref>Ruggles 2005:423-425</ref> Because the position of celestial bodies changes with the time of day due to the Earth’s rotation, the time of these calibration observations must be accurately known, or else there will be a systematic error in the measurements. Horizon altitudes can be measured with a theodolite or a [[clinometer]].
===Artefacts===
[[Image:NAMA Machine d'Anticythère 1.jpg|right|thumb|200px|The Antikythera mechanism (main fragment)]]For artifacts such as the [[Nebra skydisk|Sky Disc of Nebra]], alleged to be a Bronze Age artifact depicting the cosmos,<ref>Scholsser 2002</ref><ref>Meller 2004</ref> the analysis would be similar to typical [[Archaeology#Post-excavation analysis|post-excavation analysis]] as used in other sub-disciplines in archaeology. An artifact is examined and attempts are made to draw analogies with historical or ethnographical records of other peoples. The more parallels that can be found, the more likely an explanation is to be accepted by other archaeologists.
A more mundane example is the presence of [[astrological symbol]]s found on some shoes and sandals from the Roman Empire. The use of shoes and sandals is well known, but Carol van Driel-Murray has proposed that astrological symbols etched onto sandals gave the footwear spiritual or medicinal meanings.<ref>van Driel-Murray 2002</ref> This is supported through citation of other known uses of astrological symbols and their connection to medical practice and with the historical records of the time.
Another well-known artifact with an astronomical use is the [[Antikythera mechanism]]. In this case analysis of the artifact, and reference to the description of similar devices described by Cicero, would indicate a plausible use for the device. The argument is bolstered by the presence of symbols on the mechanism, allowing the disc to be read.<ref>T. Freeth ''et al''. 2006</ref>
===Art and Inscriptions===
[[Image:Fajadadiagram.JPG|thumb|250px|left|Diagram showing the location of the sun daggers on the [[Fajada Butte]] petroglyph on various days]]Art and inscriptions may not be confined to artefacts, but also appear painted or inscribed on an archaeological site. Sometimes inscriptions are helpful enough to give instructions to a site's use. For example an inscription on one Greek stele has been translated as:"Patron set this up for Zeus Epopsios. Winter solstice. Should anyone wish to know: off ‘the little pig’ and the stele the sun turns."<ref>Isager and Skydsgaard 1992:163</ref> From Mesoamerica come [[Maya codices|Mayan]] and [[Aztec codices]]. These are folding books made from [[Amatl]]. processed tree bark on which are [[glyphs]] in [[Maya script|Mayan]] or [[Aztec script]]. The [[Dresden codex]] contains information regarding the Venus cycle, confirming its important to the Mayans.<ref name = "mlxqkn"/>
More problematic are those cases where the movement of the Sun at different times and seasons causes light and shadow interactions with [[petroglyph]]s. A widely known example is the Sun Dagger of [[Fajada Butte]] at which a glint of sunlight passing over a spiral petroglyph.<ref>Sofaer 2008</ref> The location of the dagger on the petroglyph varies throughout the year. At the solstices a dagger can be seen either through the heart of the spiral or to either side of it. It is proposed that this petroglyph was created to mark these events. Recent studies have identified many similar sites in the US Southwest and Northwestern Mexico.<ref>Fountain 2005</ref><ref>Robins & Ewing 1989</ref> It has been argued that the number of solstitial markers at these sites provides statistical evidence that they were intended to mark the solstices.<ref>Preston & Preston 2005: 115-118</ref> If no ethnographic nor historical data are found which can support this assertion then acceptance of the idea relies upon whether or not there are enough petroglyph sites in North America that such a correlation could occur by chance. It is helpful when petroglyphs are associated with existing peoples. This allows ethnoastronomers to question informants as to the meaning of such symbols.
===Ethnographies===
As well as the materials left by peoples themselves, there are also the reports of other who have encountered them. The historical records of the [[Conquistadores]] are a rich source of information about the precolumbian Americans. [[Ethnography|Ethnographers]] also provide material about many other peoples.
Aveni uses the importance of zenith passages as an example of the importance of ethnography. For peoples living between the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn there are two days of the year when the noon Sun passes directly overhead and casts no shadow. In parts of Mesoamerica this was considered a significant day as it would herald the arrival of rains, and so play a part in the cycle of agriculture. This knowledge is still considered important amongst Mayan Indians living in Central America today. The ethnographic records suggested to archaeoastronomers that this day may have been important to the ancient Mayans. Alignments to the sunrise and sunset on the day of the zenith passage have been found in Mayan cities such as Chichen Itza. There are also shafts known as 'zenith tubes' which illuminate subterranean rooms when the sun passes overhead found at places like [[Monte Alban]] and [[Xochicalco]]. It is only through the ethnography that we can speculate that the timing of the illumination was considered important in Mayan society.<ref>Aveni 1980:40-43</ref>
[[Image:Chaco canyon pueblo bonito petroglyphs.jpg|thumb|250px|right|An alleged 'supernova petroglyph' at Pueblo Bonito]]Ethnographies also caution against over-interpretation of sites. At [[Pueblo Bonito]], in [[Chaco Canyon]] can be found a petroglyph with a star, crescent and hand. It has been argued that this is a record of the [[SN 1054|1054 Supernova]].<ref>Brandt and Williamson 1979</ref> However anthropological evidence suggests this is not the case. The Zuni who live in the region mark sun-watching stations with a crescent, star, hand and sundisc, which can also be found at the site.<ref>Ruggles 2005:89</ref> The local peoples appear to have adopted the supernova explanation ''after'' it was suggested by visitors to the site.<ref>Young 2005:23-25</ref>
Ethnoastronomy is also an important field outside of the Americas. For example anthropological work with aboriginal Australians is producing much information about their [[Aboriginal astronomy|indigenous astronomies]]<ref>Cairns 2005</ref> and about their interaction with the modern world including a new genre of Aboriginal UFO stories.<ref>Saethre 2007</ref>
==Recreating the ancient sky==
{{quote|...[A]lthough different ways to do science and different scientific results do arise in different cultures, this provides little support for those who would use such differences to question the sciences' ability to provide reliable statements about the world in which we live.|Stephen McCluskey<ref>McCluskey 2005:78</ref>}}
Once the researcher has data to test, it is often necessary to attempt to recreate ancient sky conditions to place the data in its historical environment.
===Declination===
{{main|Declination}}
[[Image:Star trails over mountain.jpg|thumb|200px|right|A time lapse photo showing the stars rotating around the celestial pole.]]To calculate what astronomical features a structure faced a coordinate system is needed. The stars provide such a system. If you were to go outside on a clear night you would observe the stars spinning around the celestial pole. This point is +90° if you are watching the North Celestial Pole or −90° if you are observing the Southern Celestial Pole.<ref name = "byuqqi">Ruggles 1999:18</ref> The concentric circles the stars trace out are lines of celestial latitude, known as ''declination''. The arc connecting the points on the horizon due East and due West (if the horizon is flat) and all points midway between the Celestial Poles is the Celestial Equator which has a declination of 0°. The visible declinations vary depending where you are on the globe. Only an observer on the North Pole of Earth would be unable to see any stars from the Southern Celestial Hemisphere at night (see diagram below). Once a declination has been found for the point on the horizon that a building faces it is then possible to say whether a specific body can be seen in that direction.
{{clear}}
[[Image:Decdiag600.jpg|center|thumb|600px|Diagram of the visible portions of sky at varying latitudes.]]
{{clear}}
===Solar positioning===
While the stars are fixed to their declinations the Sun is not. The rising point of the Sun varies throughout the year. It swings between two limits marked by the solstices a bit like a [[pendulum]], slowing as it reaches the extremes, but passing rapidly through the mid-point. If an archaeoastronomer can calculate from the azimuth and horizon height that a site was built to view a declination of +23.5° then he or she need not wait until [[June 21]] to confirm the site does indeed face the summer solstice.<ref>A.F. Aveni 1997:23-27</ref> For more information see [[History of solar observation]].
===Lunar positioning===
The Moon’s appearance is considerably more complex. Its motion, like the Sun, is between two limits — known as [[lunastice|''luna''stices]] rather than ''sol''stices. However, its travel between lunastices is considerably faster. It takes a [[Sidereal month#Sidereal month|sidereal month]] to complete its cycle rather than the year long trek of the Sun. This is further complicated as the lunastices marking the limits of the Moon’s movement move on [[Lunar standstill|an 18.6 year cycle]]. For slightly over nine years the extreme limits of the moon are outside the range of sunrise. For the remaining half of the cycle the Moon never exceeds the limits of the range of sunrise. However, much lunar observation was concerned with the ''[[Lunar phase|phase]]'' of the Moon. The cycle from one [[New Moon]] to the next runs on an entirely different cycle, the [[Sidereal month#Synodic month|Synodic month]].<ref>Ruggles 1999:36-37</ref> Thus when examining sites for lunar significance the data can appear sparse due the extremely variable nature of the moon. See [[Moon]] for more details.
===Stellar positioning===
{{Main|Precession of the equinoxes}}
[[Image:Earth precession.jpg|thumb|right|Precessional movement.]]Finally there is often a need to correct for the apparent movement of the stars. On the timescale of human civilisation the stars have maintained the same position relative to each other. Each night they appear to rotate around the celestial poles due to the Earth’s rotation about its axis. However, the Earth spins rather like a [[spinning top]]. Not only does the Earth rotate, it wobbles. The Earth’s axis takes around 25,800 years to complete one full wobble.<ref>Ruggles 2005:345-347</ref> The effect to the archaeoastronomer is that stars did not rise over the horizon in the past in the same places as they do today. Nor did the stars rotate around [[Polaris]] as they do now. In the case of the [[Egyptian pyramids]], it has been shown they were aligned towards [[Thuban]], a faint star in the constellation of [[Draco (constellation)|Draco]].<ref>Ruggles 2005:354-355</ref> The effect can be substanstial over relatively short lengths of time, historically speaking. For instance a person born on [[December 25]] in Roman times would have been born under the astrological sign of [[Capricorn (astrology)|Capricorn]]. In the modern period a person born on the same date is now a [[Sagittarius (astrology)|Sagittarian]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.montgomerycollege.edu/Departments/planet/M_AS101/Labs/WhatIsYourSignReally/What_is_your_sign_really.htm |title=Astrological Things What is Your Sign, Really ? |accessdate=2008-03-25}}</ref> due to the precession of the equinoxes.
===Transient phenomena===
[[Image:Tapestry of bayeux10.jpg|thumb|250px|left|Halley’s Comet depicted on the [[Bayeux tapestry]]]]Additionally there are often transient phenomena, events which do not happen on an annual cycle. Most predictable are events like [[eclipse]]s. In the case of [[solar eclipse]]s these can be used to date events in the past. A solar eclipse mentioned by [[Herodotus]] enables us to date a battle between the [[Medes]] and the [[Lydia]]ns, which following the eclipse failed to happen, to [[May 28]], 585 BC.<ref>{{cite book|author=Herodotus|authorlink=Herodotus|url=http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup=Hdt.+1.74.1|title=The Histories I.74|accessdate=2008-03-22}}</ref> Other easily calculated events are [[supernovae]] whose remains are visible to astronomers and therefore their positions and magnitude can be accurately calculated.
Some [[comet]]s are predictable, most famously [[Halley's Comet|Halley’s Comet]]. Yet as a class of object they remain unpredictable and can appear at any time. Some have extremely lengthy [[orbital period]]s which means their past appearances and returns cannot be predicted. Others may have only ever passed through the solar system once and so are inherently unpredictable.<ref>[http://www.space.com/spacewatch/050701_bright_comets.html Predicting the next bright comet], Space.com.</ref>
[[Meteor shower]]s should be predictable, but the [[meteor]]s are cometary debris and so require calculations of orbits which are currently impossible to complete.<ref>Steel 1999</ref> Other events noted by ancients include [[Aurora (astronomy)|aurorae]], [[sun dog]]s and [[rainbow]]s all of which are as impossible to predict as the ancient weather, but nevertheless may have been considered important phenomena.
{{clear}}
==Major topics of archaeoastronomical research==
{{quote|What has astronomy brought into the lives of cultural groups throughout history? The answers are many and varied...|Von Del Chamberlain and M. Jane Young<ref>Chamberlain & Young 2005:xi</ref>}}
===The use of calendars===
[[Image:AztecSunStoneReplica.jpg|thumb|250px|left|[[Aztec]] ''[[Aztec sun stone|Stone of the Sun]]'' replica in [[El Paso, Texas]], cast from the original to be found in Mexico's [[National Museum of Anthropology]]. A religious artefact showing how the [[Mexica]] people thought about time.]] A common justification for the need for astronomy is the need to develop an accurate [[calendar]] for [[agriculture|agricultural]] reasons. Ancient texts like [[Hesiod]]’s Works and Days, an ancient farming manual, would appear to contradict this. Instead astronomical observations are used in combination with [[ecology|ecological]] signs, such as [[bird migration]]s to determine the seasons. Ethnoastronomical work with the [[Mursi]] of [[Ethiopia]] shows that haphazard astronomy continued until recent times in some parts of the world.<ref>Turton & Ruggles 1978</ref> All the same, calendars appear to be an almost universal phenomenon in societies as they provide tools for the regulation of communal activities.
An example of a non-agricultural calendar is the ''[[Tzolk'in]]'' calendar of the [[Maya civilization]] of [[pre-Columbian]] [[Mesoamerica]], which is a cycle of 260 days. This count is based on an [[260-day Mesoamerican calendar|earlier calendar and is found throughout Mesoamerica]]. This formed part of a more comprehensive system of [[Maya calendar]]s which combined a series of astronomical observations and ritual cycles.<ref>Aveni 1989b</ref>
Other peculiar calendars include ancient [[Hellenic calendar|Greek calendars]]. These were nominally [[Lunar calendar|lunar]], starting with the [[New Moon]]. In reality the calendar could pause or skip days with confused citizens inscribing dates by both the civic calendar and ''ton theoi'', by the [[moon]].<ref>McCluskey 2000</ref> The lack of any universal calendar for ancient Greece suggests that coordination of panhellenic events such as [[Panhellenic Games|games]] or rituals could be difficult and that astronomical symbolism may have been used as a politically neutral form of timekeeping.<ref>Salt & Boutsikas 2005</ref>
===Myth and cosmology===
[[Image:Argo Navis Hevelius.jpg|thumb|250px|right|The constellation [[Argo Navis]] drawn by Johannes Hevelius in 1690.]]Another motive for studying the [[sky]] is to understand and explain the [[universe]]. In these cultures [[mythology|myth]] was a tool for achieving this and the explanations, while not reflecting the standards of modern [[science]], are [[cosmology|cosmologies]].
The [[Inca]]s arranged their empire to demonstrate their cosmology. The capital, [[Cusco]], was at the centre of the empire and connected to it by means of ceques, conceptually straight lines radiating out from the centre.<ref>Bauer & Dearborn 1995</ref> These ceques connected the centre of the empire to the four ''suyus'', which were regions defined by their direction from Cusco. The notion of a quartered cosmos is common across the [[Andes]]. Gary Urton, who has conducted fieldwork in the Andean villagers of Misminay, has connected this quartering with the appearance of the [[Milky Way]] in the night sky.<ref>Urton 1981</ref> In one season it will bisect the sky and in another bisect it in a [[perpendicular]] fashion.
The importance of observing cosmological factors is also seen on the other side of the world. The [[Forbidden City]] in [[Beijing]] is laid out to follow cosmic order though rather than observing four directions the Chinese saw five, [[North]], [[South]], [[East]], [[West]] and [[Centre (geometry)|Centre]]. The Forbidden City occupied the centre of ancient Beijing.<ref>Krupp 1997a:196–9</ref> One approaches the Emperor from the south, thus placing him in front of the [[Circumpolar constellation|circumpolar stars]]. This creates the situation of the heavens revolving around the person of the Emperor. The Chinese cosmology is now better known through its export as [[Feng Shui]].
There is also much information about how the universe was thought to work stored in the mythology of the [[constellation]]s. The Barasana of the [[Amazon Rainforest|Amazon]] plan part of their annual cycle based on observation of the stars. When their constellation of the Caterpillar-Jaguar (roughly equivalent to the modern Scorpius) falls they prepare to catch the pupating caterpillars of the forest as they fall from the trees.<ref>Hoskin 1999:15–6</ref> The caterpillars provide food at a season when other foods are scarce.<ref>Hugh-Jones 1982:191-3</ref>
A more well-known source of constellation myth are the texts of the Greeks and Romans. The origin of their constellations remains a matter of vigorous and occasionally fractious debate.<ref>Schaefer 2002</ref><ref>Blomberg 2003, esp page 76</ref>
===Displays of power===
[[Image:1st Pylon Karnak Temple.JPG|thumbnail|250px|left|The [[Precinct of Amun-Re]] was aligned on the midwinter solstice.]]
By including celestial motifs in clothing it becomes possible for the wearer to make claims the power on Earth is drawn from above. It has been said that the Shield of [[Achilles]] described by [[Homer]] is also a catalogue of constellations.<ref>Hannah 1994</ref> In North America shields depicted in [[Comanche]] [[petroglyphs]] appear to include Venus symbolism.<ref>Krupp 1997a:252–3</ref>
[[Solstice|Solsticial]] alignments also can be seen as displays of power. When viewed from a ceremonial plaza on the [[Lake Titicaca#Isla del Sol|Island of the Sun]] (the mythical origin place of the Sun) in [[Lake Titicaca]], the Sun was seen to rise at the June solstice between two towers on a nearby ridge. The sacred part of the island was separated from the remainder of it by a stone wall and ethnographic records indicate that access to the sacred space was restricted to members of the [[Inca]] ruling elite. Ordinary [[Pilgrimage|pilgrims]] stood on a platform outside the ceremonial area to see the solstice Sun rise between the towers.<ref>Dearborn, Seddon & Bauer, 1998</ref>
In Egypt the temple of [[Amun-Re]] at [[Karnak]] has been the subject of much study. Evaluation of the site, taking into account the change over time of the [[obliquity of the ecliptic]] show that the Great Temple was aligned on the rising of the midwinter sun.<ref>Krupp 1988</ref> The length of the corridor down which sunlight would travel would have limited illumination at other times of the year.
In a later period the [[Serapeum]] in [[Alexandria]] was also said to have contained a [[Sun|solar]] alignment so that, on a specific sunrise, a shaft of light would pass across the lips of the statue of [[Serapis]] thus symbolising the [[Sun]] saluting the god.<ref>Rufinus</ref>
==Major sites of archaeoastronomical interest==
{{Main|List of archaeoastronomical sites sorted by country}}
{{quote|At Stonehenge in England and at Carnac in France, in Egypt and Yucatán, across the whole face of the earth, are found mysterious ruins of ancient monuments, monuments with astronomical significance... They mark the same kind of commitment that transported us to the moon and our spacecraft to the surface of Mars.|Edwin Krupp<ref>Krupp. 1979:1</ref>}}
===Newgrange===
[[Image:Newgrange Eingang Stein.jpg|right|thumb|250px|The sunlight enters the tomb at Newgrange via the roofbox built above the door.]]
{{Main|Newgrange}}
Newgrange is a passage tomb in the Republic of [[Ireland]] dating from around 3,300 to 2,900 BC<ref>Eogan 1991</ref> For a few days around the Winter Solstice light shines along the central passageway into the heart of the tomb. What makes this notable is not that light shines in the passageway, but that it does not do so through the main entrance. Instead it enters via a hollow box above the main doorway discovered by Michael O'Kelly.<ref>O'Kelly 1982:123-124</ref> It is this roofbox which strongly indicates that the tomb was built with an astronomical aspect in mind. Clive Ruggles notes:{{blockquote|...[F]ew people - archaeologists or astronomers- have doubted that a powerful astronomical symbolism was deliberately incorporated into the monument, demonstrating that a connection between astronomy and funerary ritual, at the very least, merits further investigation.<ref name = "byuqqi"/>}}
{{clear}}
===The Pyramids of Giza ===
[[Image:All Gizah Pyramids.jpg|300px|The Giza Pyramids, part of the Giza Necropolis|right|thumb|250px|The pyramids of [[Giza]].]]
{{Main|Giza pyramid complex}}
Since the first modern measurements of the precise cardinal orientations of the pyramids by [[Flinders Petrie]], various astronomical methods have been proposed for the original establishment of these orientations.<ref>Belmonte 2001</ref><ref>Neugebauer 1980</ref> It was recently proposed that this was done by observing the positions of two stars in [[Ursa Major|the Plough / Big Dipper]] which was known to Egyptians as the thigh. It is thought that a vertical alignment between these two stars checked with a [[plumb bob]] was used to ascertain where North lay. The deviations from true North using this model reflect the accepted dates of construction.<ref>Spence 2000</ref>
Some have argued that the pyramids were laid out as [[Graham_Hancock#Orion_Correlation_Theory|a map of the three stars]] in the belt of Orion,<ref>Hancock 1996:168</ref> although this theory has been criticized by reputable astronomers.<ref name="Fairall">Fairall 1999</ref><ref name="Krupp">Krupp 1997b</ref>
{{clear}}
===El Castillo===
[[Image:Head of serpent column.jpg|right|250px|thumb|Plumed Serpent]]
{{Main|El Castillo, Chichen Itza}}
El Castillo, also known as Kukulcán, is a [[Mesoamerican pyramids|Mesoamerican step-pyramid]] built in the centre of [[Maya civilization|Maya]]n city of [[Chichen Itza]] in [[Mexico]]. It has a couple of features which have suggested it may have astronomical elements built into it. Each of the stairways built into the sides of the pyramid has 91 steps. Along with the extra one for the platform at the top, this totals 365 steps, which is possibly one for each day of the year. A more striking effect is seen every March and September as an unusual shadow effect occurs each equinox. A shadow appears to descend the west balustrade of the northern stairway. The visual effect is of a serpent descending the stairway, with its head at the base in light. Additionally the western face points to sunset around [[May 25]], traditionally the date of transition from the dry to the rainy season<ref>Krupp 1997a:267-269</ref>
{{clear}}
===Stonehenge===
[[Image:Summer Solstice Sunrise over Stonehenge 2005.jpg|right|thumb|250px|The sun rising over [[Stonehenge]] at the 2005 Summer [[Solstice]].]]
{{Main|Stonehenge}}
Many astronomical alignments have been claimed for Stonehenge, a complex of [[megalith]]s and [[earthwork]]s in the [[Salisbury Plain]] of England. The most famous of these is the midsummer alignment, where the Sun rises over the Heel Stone. However, this interpretation has been challenged by some archaeologists who argue that the midwinter alignment, where the viewer is outside Stonehenge and sees the sun setting in the henge, is the more significant alignment, and the midsummer alignment may be a coincidence due to local topography.<ref>Parker Pearson ''et al.'' 2007</ref>
As well as solar alignments, there are proposed lunar alignments. The four station stones mark out a rectangle. The short sides point towards the midsummer sunrise and midwinter sunset. The long sides if viewed towards the south-east, face the most southerly rising of the moon. Aveni notes these have never gained the acceptance which the claims solar alignments have.<ref>Aveni 1997:65-66</ref>
{{clear}}
===Uxmal===
[[Image:Uxmal-Palace-of-the-Governor.jpg|right|thumb|250px|The Palace of the Governor at Uxmal.]]
{{Main|Uxmal}}
Uxmal is a Mayan city in the Puuc Hills of [[Yucatan]], Mexico. The Governor's Palace at Uxmal is often used as an exemplar of why it is important to combine ethnographic and alignment data. The palace is aligned with an [[azimuth]] of 118º on the pyramid of Cehtzuc. This alignment is also towards a southerly rising of Venus which occurs once every eight years. By itself this would not be sufficient to argue for a meaningful connection between the two events. The palace has to be aligned in one direction or another and why should the rising of Venus be any more important than the rising of the Sun, Moon, other planets, Sirus ''et cetera''? The answer given is that not only does the palace point towards the rising of Venus, it is also covered in [[glyph]]s which stand for Venus and Mayan zodiacal constellations.<ref>Ruggles 2005:163-165</ref> It is the combination of the alignment and the ethnography which suggests that the city was built with cosmic order in mind.
{{clear}}
== Fringe Archaeoastronomy ==
{{quote|At least now we have all the archaeological facts to go along with the astronomers, the Druids, the Flat Earthers and all the rest.|Sir Jocelyn Stephens<ref>Sir Jocelyn Stephens quoted in ''The Times'', [[July 8]], [[1994]], 8.</ref>}}
Archaeoastronomy owes something of this poor reputation among scholars to its occasional misuse to advance a range of [[Pseudohistory|pseudo-historical]] accounts. During the 1930s Otto S. Reuter compiled a study entitled ''Germanische Himmelskunde'', or ''German Skylore''. The astronomical orientations of ancient monuments claimed by Reuter and his followers would place the Germans ahead of the [[Ancient Near East]] in the field of astronomy, demonstrating the intellectual superiority of the "[[Aryan Race]]."<ref>Pedersen 1982:269</ref>
Since the Nineteenth Century numerous scholars have sought to use [[Archaeoastronomy and Vedic chronology|archaeoastronomical calculations]] to demonstrate the antiquity of Ancient Indian Vedic culture, computing the dates of astronomical observations ambiguously described in ancient poetry to as early as 4000 BCE.<ref>Witzel 2001</ref> [[David Pingree]], a historian of Indian astronomy, condemned "the scholars who perpetrate wild theories of prehistoric science and call themselves archaeoastronomers."<ref>Pingree 1982:554-563, esp. p. 556</ref>
More recently Gallagher,<ref>Gallagher 1983</ref> Pyle,<ref>Pyle 1983</ref> and [[Barry Fell|Fell]]<ref>Fell 1983</ref> interpreted inscriptions in West Virginia as a description in Celtic [[Ogham]] alphabet of the supposed winter solstitial marker at the site. The controversial translation was supposedly validated by a problematic archaeoastronomical indication in which the winter solstice sun shone on an inscription of the sun at the site. Subsequent analyses criticized its cultural inappropriateness, as well as its linguistic and archeaoastronomical<ref>Wise 2003</ref> claims, to describe it as an example of "[[Pseudoarchaeology|cult archaeology]]."<ref>Lesser, 1983</ref>
==Archaeoastronomical organisations and publications==
There are currently three academic organisations for scholars of archaeoastronomy. [http://www.archaeoastronomy.org/ ISAAC—the International Society for Archaeoastronomy and Astronomy in Culture]—was founded in 1995 and now sponsors the Oxford conferences and ''Archaeoastronomy — the Journal of Astronomy in Culture''. [http://www.archeoastronomy.org/ SEAC— La Société Européenne pour l’Astronomie dans la Culture]—is slightly older; it was created in 1992. SEAC holds annual conferences in [[Europe]] and publishes refereed conference proceedings on an annual basis. There is also [http://www.arqueoastronomia.org/ La Sociedad Interamericana de Astronomía en la Cultura], primarily a [[Latin America]]n organisation which was founded in 2003.
Additionally the ''Journal for the History of Astronomy'' publishes many archaeoastronomical papers. For twenty-seven volumes it also published an annual supplement ''Archaeoastronomy''.
==See also==
* [[Cultural astronomy]]
* [[List of archaeoastronomical sites sorted by country]] Sites where claims for the use of astronomy have been made.
* [[List of artefacts of archaeoastronomical significance]] Artefacts which have been interpreted as being used for some astronomical purpose.
* [[European Megalithic Culture]]
* [[Australian Aboriginal Astronomy]]
** [[Aboriginal stone arrangements]]
* [[Lunar standstill]]
* [[Medicine wheels]]
* [[Mound builder (people)|Mound builders]]
* [[Petroforms]]
* [[Astronomical chronology]]
==Notes==
{{reflist|3}}
==References==
<div class="references-small">
* {{cite book|author=Aldana, G.|year=2007|title=The Apotheosis of Janaab' Pakal: Science, History, and Religion at Classic Maya Palenque|location=Boulder|publisher=University Press of Colorado|id=ISBN 0-87081-855-X}}
* {{cite journal|author=Atkinson, R.J.C.|year=1966|title=Moonshine on Stonehenge|journal=[[Antiquity (journal)|Antiquity]]|volume=49|issue=159|pages=212–6}}
* {{cite book|author=Aveni, A.F.|year=1979|chapter=Astronomy in Ancient Mesoamerica|title=In Search of Ancient Astronomies|editor=E.C. Krupp|publisher=Chatto and Windus|pages=154-185|id=ISBN 0-7011-2314-1}}
* {{cite book|author=Aveni, A.F.|year=1980|title=Skywatchers of Ancient Mexico|publisher=University of Texas|id=ISBN 0-292-77578-4}}
* {{cite book|author=Aveni. A.F. (ed.)|year=1982|title=Archaeoastronomy in the New World: American Primitive Astronomy|publisher=Cambridge University Press|id=ISBN 0-521-24731-4}}
* {{cite journal|author=Aveni. A.F.|year=1986|title=Archaeoastronomy: Past, Present and Future|journal=Sky and Telescope|volume=72|pages=456–60}}
* {{cite book|author=Aveni, A.F.|year=1989a|title=World Archaeoastronomy|publisher=Cambridge University Press|id=ISBN 0-521-34180-9}}
* {{cite book|author=Aveni, A.F.|year=1989b|title=Empires of Time|publisher=Basic Books|id=ISBN 0-465-01950-1}}
* {{cite book|author=Aveni, A.F.|year=1997|title=Stairways to the Stars: Skywatching in Three Great Ancient Cultures|publisher=John Wiley and Sons|id=ISBN 0471329762}}
* {{cite book|author=Aveni, A.F.|year=2006|chapter=Evidence and Intentionality: On Evidence in Archaeoastronomy|title=Viewing the Sky Through Past and Present Cultures: Selected Papers from the Oxford VII International Conference on Archaeoastronomy|editor=Todd W. Bostwick and Bryan Bates|series=Pueblo Grande Museum Anthropological Papers |volume=15|publisher=City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department|pages=57-70|id=ISBN 1-882572-38-6}}
* {{cite book|author=Bahn, P.|year=1995|title=Archaeology: A Very Short introduction|publisher=Oxford University Press|id=ISBN 0-19-285379-1}}
* {{cite book|author=Bauer, B. and Dearborn, D.|year=1995|title=Astronomy and empire in the ancient Andes: the cultural origins of Inca sky watching|publisher=University of Texas|id=ISBN 0-292-70837-8}}
* {{cite journal|author=Belmonte, J. A.|year=2001|title= On the Orientation of Old Kingdom Egyptian Pyramids|journal= Archaeoastronomy: Supplement to the Journal for the History of Astronomy|volume=32 (26)|pages=S1–S20}}
* {{cite book|author=Blomberg, P.|year=2003|chapter=The early Hellenic Sky Map reconstructed from Archaeoastronomical and Textual Studies|title=Ad Astra per Aspera et per Ludum: European Archaeoastronomy and the Orientation of Munuments in the Mediterranean Basin: Papers from Session I.13, held at the European Association of Archaeologists Eighth Annual Meeting in Thessaloniki 2002|editor=Amanda-Alice Maravelia|series=BAR International Series 1154|publisher=Archaeopress| pages=71-76|id=ISBN 1-84171-524-7}}
* {{cite book|author=Bostwick, T.W.|year=2006|chapter=Archaeoastronomy at the Gates of Orthodoxy: Introduction to the Oxford VII Conference on Archaeoastronomy Papers|title=Viewing the Sky Through Past and Present Cultures: Selected Papers from the Oxford VII International Conference on Archaeoastronomy|editor=Todd W. Bostwick and Bryan Bates|series=Pueblo Grande Museum Anthropological Papers |volume=15|publisher=City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department|pages=1-10|id=ISBN 1-882572-38-6}}
* {{cite journal|author=Brandt, J.C. and Williamson, R.A.|title=The 1054 Supernova and American Rock Art|journal=Archaeoastronomy: Supplement to the Journal for the History of Astronomy|volume=1 (10)|pages=S1–S38}}
* {{cite book|author=Broda, J.|year=2000|chpater=Mesoamerican Archaeoastronomy and the Ritual Calendar|title=Astronomy Across Cultures|editor=Helaine Selin|publisher=Kluwer, Dordrect|pages=225-267|id=ISBN 0792363639}}
* {{cite book|author=Broda, J.|year=2006|chapter=Zenith Observations and the Conceptualization of Geographical Latitude in Ancient Mesoamerica: A Historical Interdisciplinary Approach|title=Viewing the Sky Through Past and Present Cultures; Selected Papers from the Oxford VII International Conference on Archaeoastronomy|editor=Todd W. Bostwick and Bryan Bates|series=Pueblo Grande Museum Anthropological Papers |volume= 15|publisher= City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department |pages=183-212|id= ISBN 1-882572-38-6}}
* {{cite book|author=Cairns, H.C.|year=2005|chapter=Discoveries in Aboriginal Sky Mapping (Australia)|title=Current Studies in Archaeoastronomy: Conversations Across Time and Space|editor=John W. Fountain & Rolf M. Sinclair|location= Durham, NC|publisher=Carolina Academic Press|pages=523-538|id=ISBN 0-89089-771-9}}
* {{cite journal|author=Carlson, J.|year=1999|url=http://www.wam.umd.edu/~tlaloc/archastro/ae33.html|title=Editorial: A Professor of Our Own|journal=Archaeoastronomy & Ethnoastronomy News|volume=33|month=Autumn Equinox|accessdate=2008-03-22}}
* {{cite book|author=Chamberlain, V.D. & Young, M.J.|year=2005|chapter=Introduction|title=Songs from the Sky: Indigenous Astronomical and Cosmological Traditions of the World|editor=Von Del Chamberlain, John Carlson and M. Jane Young|publisher=Ocarina Books|pages=xi-xiv|id= ISBN 0-9540867-2-4}}
* {{cite journal|author=Chiu, B.C. & Morrison, P. |year=1980|title=Astronomical Origin of the Offset Street Grid at Teotihuacan|journal=Archaeoastronomy: Supplement to the Journal for the History of Astronomy|volume=11 (18)|pages=S55–S64}}
* {{cite journal|author= Dearborn, D.S.P., Seddon, M.F., & Bauer, B.S. |year=1998|title= The Sanctuary of Titicaca: Where the Sun Returns to Earth|journal=Latin American Antiquity|volume= 9|pages=240–258|doi= 10.2307/971730}}
* {{cite journal|author=Eogan, G.|year=1991|title=Prehistoric and Early Historic Cultural Change at Brugh na Bóinne|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy|volume=91C|pages=105–132}}
* {{cite journal|author=Fairall, A. |year=1999|url=http://www.antiquityofman.com/Orion_Fairall.html |title=Precession and the layout of the Ancient Egyptian pyramids|journal=Astronomy & Geophysics: The Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society|volume=40|issue=4|accessdate=2008-03-22}} <!-- The linked web version gives the source incompletely as Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society -->
* {{cite journal|author=Fell, B.|year=1983|url=http://cwva.org/wwvrunes/wwvrunes_3.html|title=Christian Messages in Old Irish Script Deciphered from Rock Carvings in W. Va.|journal=Wonderful West Virginia|issue=47|pages=12–19|accessdate=2008-04-27}}
* {{cite book|author=Fisher, V.B.|year=2006|chapter=Ignoring Archaeoastronomy: A Dying Tradition in American Archaeology| title=Viewing the Sky Through Past and Present Cultures; Selected Papers from the Oxford VII International Conference on Archaeoastronomy|editor=Todd W. Bostwick and Bryan Bates|series=Pueblo Grande Museum Anthropological Papers |volume= 15|publisher= City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department|pages=1-10|id= ISBN 1-882572-38-6}}
* {{cite book|author=Fountain, J. |year=2005|chapter=A Database of Rock Art Solar Markers |title=Current Studies in Archaeoastronomy: Conversations Across Time and Space|editor=John W. Fountain & Rolf M. Sinclair|publisher=Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press|id=ISBN 0-89089-771-9}}
* {{cite journal|author=Freeth, T. et al.|year=2006|url=http://www.antikythera-mechanism.gr/component/option,com_docman/task,cat_view/gid,44/Itemid,38/|title=Decoding the ancient Greek astronomical calculator known as the Antikythera Mechanism|journal=Nature|volume=444|month=30 November|pages= 587–591|accessdate=2008-03-22|doi=10.1038/nature05357}}
* {{cite journal|author=Gallagher, I.J.|year=1983|url=http://cwva.org/wwvrunes/wwvrunes_2.html|title=Light Dawns on West Virginia History|journal=Wonderful West Virginia|issue=47|pages=7–11|accessdate=2008-04-27}}
* {{cite journal|author=Gingerich, O. |year=2000 |url=http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=156832|title=Stone and star gazing|journal=Times Higher Education Supplement|month=24 March|pages=24|accessdate=2008-03-22}}
* {{cite book|author=Gummerman, G.J. & Warburton, M|year=2005|chapter=The Universe in Cultural Context: An Essay|title=Current Studies in Archaeoastronomy: Conversations Across Time and Space|editor=John W. Fountain & Rolf M. Sinclair|publisher=Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press|id=ISBN 0-89089-771-9}}
* {{cite book|author=Hancock, G|year=1996|title=Fingerprints of the Gods|publisher=New York: Three Rivers Press}}
* {{cite journal|author=Hannah, R|year=1994|url=http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/ElAnt/V2N4/hannah.html|title=The Constellations on Achilles’ Shield (Iliad 18. 485–489)|journal=Electronic Antiquity|volume=II.4|accessdate=2008-03-22}}
* {{cite book|author=Hawkins, G|year=1976|title=Stonehenge Decoded|publisher=Fontana|id=ISBN 0006323154}}
* {{cite book|author=Heggie, D.C.|year=1982|title=Archaeoastronomy in the Old World|publisher=CUP|id=ISBN 0-521-24734-9}}
* {{cite journal|author=Hicks, R|year=1993|url=http://www.wam.umd.edu/~tlaloc/archastro/ae9.html|title=Beyond Alignments|journal=Archaeoastronomy & Ethnoastronomy News|volume=9|month=September Equinox|accessdate=2008-03-22}}
* {{cite journal|author=Hoskin, M|year=1996|title=Book Reviews: Proceedings of Oxford 3|journal=Archaeoastronomy: Supplement to the Journal for the History of Astronomy|volume=21 (27)|pages=S85–S87}}
* {{cite book|author=Hoskin, M|year=1999|title=The Cambridge Concise History of Astronomy''|publisher=CUP|id=ISBN 0-521-57600-8}}
* {{cite book|author=Hoskin, M.|year=2001|title=Tombs, Temples, and Their Orientations: A New Perspective on Mediterranean Prehistory|publisher=Ocarina Books|id=ISBN 0-9540867-1-6}}
* {{cite book |last=Hugh-Jones |first=Stephen |editor=Anthony F. Aveni and Gary Urton |title=Ethnoastronomy and Archaeoastronomy in the American Tropics |edition= |series=Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences |volume=385 |year= 1982 |isbn=0-89766-160-5 |pages= 183-201|chapter= The Pleiades and Scorpius in Barasana Cosmology }}
* {{cite book|author=Isager, S. and Skydsgaard, J.E.|year=1992|title=Ancient Greek Agriculture|publisher=Routledge|id=ISBN 0-415-00164-1}}
* {{cite journal|author=Iwaniszewski, S.|year=1995|url=http://www.wam.umd.edu/~tlaloc/archastro/ae18.html|title=Alignments and Orientations Again|journal=Archaeoastronomy & Ethnoastronomy News|volume=18|month=December Solstice|accessdate=2008-03-22}}
* {{cite book|author=Iwaniszewski, S.|year=2001|chapter=Time and space in social systems - further issues for theoretical archaeoastronomy|title=Astronomy, Cosmology and Landscape: Proceedings of the SEAC 98 Meeting, Dublin, Ireland|editor=Clive Ruggles, Frank Prendergast and Tom Ray|publisher=Ocarina Books|pages=1-7|id=ISBN 0-9540867-0-8}}
* {{cite book|author=Iwanizsewki, S.|year=2003|chapter=The erratic ways of studying astronomy in culture|title=Calendars, Symbols and Orientations: Legacies of Astronomy in Culture (Proceedings of the 9th annual meeting of the European Society from Astronomy in Culture (SEAC), Stockholm, 27-30 August 2001|editor=Mary Blomberg, Peter E. Blomberg and Göran Henriksson|publisher=Uppsala|pages=7-10|id=ISBN 91-506-1674-9}}
* {{cite book|author=Johnson, W.|year=1912|title=Byways of British Archaeology|publisher=Cambridge University Press}}
* {{cite book|author=Kelley, D.H. and Milone, E.F.|year=2005|title=Exporing Ancient Skies: An Encyclopedic Survey of Archaeoastronomy|publisher=Springer-Verlag|id=ISBN 0-387-95310-8}}
* {{cite journal|author=Kintigh, K.|year=1992|url=http://www.wam.umd.edu/~tlaloc/archastro/ae5.html|title=I wasn’t going to say anything, but since you asked: Archaeoastronomy and Archaeology|journal=Archaeoastronomy & Ethnoastronomy News|volume=5|month=September Equinox|accessdate=2008-03-22}}
* {{cite book|author=Krupp, E.C.|year=1979|title=In Search of Ancient Astronomies|publisher=Chatto and Windus|id=ISBN 0-7011-2314-1}}
* {{cite book|author=Krupp, E.C.|year=1988|chapter=Light in the Temples|title=Records in Stone: Papers in Memory of Alexander Thom|editor=C.L.N. Ruggles|publisher=CUP|pages=473–499|id=ISBN 0-521-33381-4}}
* {{cite book|author=Krupp, E.C.|year=1997a.|title=Skywatchers, Shamans and Kings|publisher=John Wiley and Sons|id=ISBN 0-471-32975-4}}
* {{cite journal|author=Krupp, E.C. |authorlink=Ed Krupp |title=Pyramid Marketing Schemes |journal=Sky and Telescope |year=1997b |month=February |url=http://www.antiquityofman.com/Krupp_pyramid_marketing_schemes.html}}
* {{cite journal|author=Lesser, W.H.|year=1983|url=http://cwva.org/ogam_rebutal/lesser_cult_arch.html|title=Cult Archaeology Strikes Again: A Case for Pre-Columbian Irishmen in the Mountain State?|journal=West Virginia Archeologist|volume=35|pages=48–52}}
* {{cite journal|author=McCluskey, S.C.|year=2000|title=The Inconstant Moon: Lunar Astronomies in Different Cultures|journal=Archaeoastronomy: The Journal of Astronomy in Culture|volume=15|pages=14–31}}
* {{cite book|author=McCluskey, S.C.|year=2001|chapter=Etnoscienza dei Pueblo|title=Storia della Scienza, vol. 2, Cina, India, Americhe, Sec. 3, "Le Civilta Precolombiane"|editor=Sandro Petruccioli |Publisher=Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana|pages=1002-1009}}
* {{cite journal|author=McCluskey, S.C.|year=2004|title=The Study of Astronomies in Cultures as Reflected in Dissertations and Theses|journal=Archaeoastronomy|volume=16|pages=20–25}}
* {{cite book|author=McCluskey, S.C.|year=2005|chapter=Different Astronomies, Different Cultures and the Question of Cultural Relativism|title=Current Studies in Archaeoastronomy: Conversations Across Time and Space|editor=John W. Fountain and Rolf M. Sinclair|Publisher=Carolina Academic Press|pages=69-79|id=ISBN 0-89089-771-9}}
* {{cite book|author=MacKie, E|year=1977|title=Science and Society in Prehistoric Britain|publisher=Paul Elek|id=ISBN 0-236-40041-X}}
* {{cite journal|author=MacKie, E|year=1997|title=Maeshowe and the winter solstice: ceremonial aspects of the Orkney Grooved Ware culture|journal=Antiquity|volume=71(272)|pages=338–359}}
* {{cite book|author=MacKie, E|year=2006|chapter=New Evidence for a Professional Priesthood in the European Early Bronze Age|title=Viewing the Sky Through Past and Present Cultures: Selected Papers from the Oxford VII International Conference on Archaeoastronomy|editor=Todd W. Bostwick and Bryan Bates|series=Pueblo Grande Museum Anthropological Papers |volume=15|publisher=City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department|pages=343-362|id=ISBN 1-882572-38-6}}
* {{cite journal|author=Magli, G.|year=2008|title=On the Orientation of Roman Towns in Italy|journal=Oxford Journal of Archaeology'|volume=27 (1)|pages=63–71| doi=10.1111/j.1468-0092.2007.00296.x|doi_brokendate=2008-06-24}}
* {{cite journal|author=Meller, H.|year=2004|title=Star search|journal=National Geographic|month=January|pages=76–8}}
* {{cite book|author=Michell, J.|year=2001|title=A Little History of Astro-Archaeology|publisher=Thames & Hudson|id=ISBN 0500275572}}
* {{cite book|author=Milbraith, S.|year=1988|chapter=Astronomical Images and Orientations in the Architecture of Chichen Itzá|title=New Directions in American Archaeoastronomy|editor=A.F. Aveni|series=BAR International Series|volume=454|publisher=BAR|page=54-79|id=ISBN 0-36054-583-0}}
* {{cite book|author=Milbraith, S.|year=1999|title=Star Gods of the Maya: Astronomy in Art, Folklore and Calendars|publisher=University of Texas Press|id=ISBN 0292752261}}
* {{cite journal|last= Neugebauer|first= Otto| authorlink= Otto Neugebauer|title= On the Orientation of Pyramids|journal= Centaurus| volume= 24| pages= 1–3| date= 1980|doi= 10.1111/j.1600-0498.1980.tb00362.x }}
* {{cite book|author=O'Kelly, M.J.|year=1982|title=Newgrange: Archaeology, Art and Legend|publisher=Thames and Hudson|id=ISBN 0500390150}}
* {{cite journal|author=Parker Pearson, M. et al.|year=2007|title=The age of Stonehenge|journal=Antiquity|volume=81:313|pages=617–639}}
* {{cite book |last=Pedersen |first=Olaf |editor=D. C. Heggie |title=Archaeoastronomy in the Old World|year=1982 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge|isbn=0-521-24734-9|pages=265-274 |chapter=The Present Position of Archaeo-Astronomy }}
* {{cite journal|author=Pingree, D.|year=1982|title=Hellenophilia versus the History of Science|journal=Isis|volume=83|pages=554–563|doi=10.1086/356288}}. reprinted in Michael H. Shank, ed., ''The Scientific Enterprise in Antiquity and the Middle Ages'' (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Pr., 2000), pp.30-39.
* {{cite book|author=Poss, R.L.|year=2005|chapter=Interpreting Rock Art: European and Anasazi Representations of Spirituality|title='Current Studies in Archaeoastronomy: Conversations Across Time and Space|editor=John W. Fountain & Rolf M. Sinclair|publisher=Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press|pages=81-98|id=ISBN 0-89089-771-9}}
* {{cite book|author=Preston R.A. & Preston A.L.|year=2005|chapter=Consistent Forms of Solstice Sunlight Interaction with Petroglyphs throughout the Prehistoric American Southwest|title=Current Studies in Archaeoastronomy: Conversations Across Time and Space|editor=John W. Fountain & Rolf M. Sinclair|publisher=Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press|id=ISBN 0-89089-771-9}}
* {{cite journal|author=Pyle, R.L.|year=1983|url=http://cwva.org/wwvrunes/wwvrunes_1.html|title=A Message from the Past|journal=Wonderful West Virginia|issue=47|pages=3–6|accessdate=2008-04-27}}
* {{cite book|author=Robins M. & Ewing E.|year=1989|chapter=The Sun is in His House: Summer Solstice at San Carlos Mesa|title=Rock Art Papers, vol. 6|editor=Ken Hedges|series=San Diego Museum Papers|volume=24|publisher=San Diego Museum}}
* {{cite web |url=http://www29.homepage.villanova.edu/christopher.haas/destructioni%20of%20Serapeum.html |title=The destruction of the Serapeum |accessdate=2008-03-22 |author=Rufinus|authorlink=Rufinus}}
* {{cite book|author=Ruggles, C.L.N.|year=1993|title=Archaeoastronomy in the 1990s|publisher=Group D Publications|id=ISBN 1-874152-01-2}}
* {{cite book|author=Ruggles, C.L.N.|year=1999|title=Astronomy in Prehistoric Britain and Ireland|publisher= Yale University Press|id=ISBN 0-300-07814-5}}
* {{cite journal|author=Ruggles. C.L.N. |year=2000|title=Ancient Astronomies - Ancient Worlds|journal=Archaeoastronomy:Supplement to the Journal for the History of Astronomy|volume= 25 (31)|pages=S65–S76}}
* {{cite book|author=Ruggles, C.L.N.|year=2005|title=Ancient Astronomy|publisher=ABC-Clio|id=ISBN 1-85109-477-6}}
*{{cite journal|author=Ruggles, C.L.N. and Barclay, G.|year=2000|title=Cosmology, calendars and society in Neolithic Orkney: a rejoinder to Euan MacKie|journal=Antiquity|volume=74(283)|pages=62–74}}
* {{cite book|author=Ruggles, C.L.N. & Saunders, N.J.|year=1993|chapter=The Study of Cultural Astronomy|title=Astronomies and Cultures|editor=Clive L.N. Ruggles and Nicholas J. Saunders, |publisher=University Press of Colorado|pages=1-31}}
* {{cite journal|author=Saethre, E.|year=2007|title=Close encounters: UFO beliefs in a remote Australian Aboriginal community|journal=Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute|volume=13(4)|pages=901–915|doi=10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00463.x}}
* {{cite journal|author=Salt, A. & Boutsikas, E.|year=2005|title=Knowing when to consult the oracle at Delphi|journal=Antiquity|volume=79:305|pages=562–72}}
* {{cite journal|author=Schaefer, B.E.|year=2002|title=The Great Ptolemy-Hipparchus Dispute|journal=Sky and Telescope|volume=103 (2)|pages=38–66}}
* {{cite book|author=Schaefer, B.E.|year=2006a|chapter=Case Studies of Three of the Most Famous Claimed Archaeoastronomical Alignments in North America|title=Viewing the Sky Through Past and Present Cultures: Selected Papers from the Oxford VII International Conference on Archaeoastronomy|editor=Todd W. Bostwick and Bryan Bates|series=Pueblo Grande Museum Anthropological Papers |volume=15|publisher=City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department|pages=27-56|id=ISBN 1-882572-38-6}}
*{{cite book|author=Schaefer, B.E.|year=2006b|chapter=No Astronomical Alignments at the Caracol|title=Viewing the Sky Through Past and Present Cultures: Selected Papers from the Oxford VII International Conference on Archaeoastronomy|editor=Todd W. Bostwick and Bryan Bates|series=Pueblo Grande Museum Anthropological Papers |volume=15|publisher=City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department|pages=71-77|id=ISBN 1-882572-38-6}}
* {{cite journal|author=Schlosser, W.|year=2002|title=Zur astronomischen Deuteung der Himmelschreibe vom Nebra|journal=Archäologie in Sachsen-Anhalt|volume=1/02|pages=21–3}}
* {{cite book|author=Sinclair, R.M.|year=2005|chapter=The Nature of Archaeoastronomy|title=Current Studies in Archaeoastronomy: Conversations Across Time and Space|editor=John W. Fountain and Rolf M. Sinclair|Publisher=Carolina Academic Press|pages=3-13|id=ISBN 0-89089-771-9}}
* {{cite book|author=Sinclair, R.M.|year=2006|chapter=The Nature of Archaeoastronomy"|title=Viewing the Sky Through Past and Present Cultures; Selected Papers from the Oxford VII International Conference on Archaeoastronomy|editor=Todd W. Bostwick and Bryan Bates|series=Pueblo Grande Museum Anthropological Papers |volume= 15|publisher= City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department|pages=13-26|id= ISBN 1-882572-38-6}}
* {{cite book|author=Sofaer, A., ed.|year=2008|title=Chaco Astronomy: An Ancient American Cosmology|publisher=Santa Fe, NM: Ocean Tree Books|id=ISBN 978-0-84734-46-0}}
* {{cite journal|author=Steel, D.|year=1999|url=http://www.britarch.ac.uk/BA/ba45/ba45feat.html#steel|title=Stonehenge and the Terror in the Sky|journal=British Archaeology|volume=45|month=June|accessdate=2008-03-22|format={{dead link|date=June 2008}} – <sup>[http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=intitle%3AStonehenge+and+the+Terror+in+the+Sky&as_publication=British+Archaeology&as_ylo=1999&as_yhi=1999&btnG=Search Scholar search]</sup>}}
* {{cite journal|author=Spence, K|year=2000|title=Ancient Egyptian Chronoology and the astronomical orientation of the pyramids|journal=Nature|volume=406|month=16 November|pages=320–324|doi=10.1038/35042510}}
* {{cite book|author=Thom, A.|year=1967|title=Megalithic Sites in Britain||location=Oxford|publisher=Clarendon Press}}
* {{cite book|author=Thom. A.S.|year=1988|chapter=A personal note about my late father, Alexander Thom|title=Records in Stone: Papers in Memory of Alexander Thom|editor=C.L.N. Ruggles|publisher=CUP|pages=3-13|id=ISBN 0-521-33381-4}}
* {{cite journal|author=Trotter, A.P.|year=1927|title=Stonehenge as an Astronomical Instrument|journal=Antiquity|volume=1:1|pages=42–53}}
* {{cite journal|author=Turton, D. and Ruggles, C.L.N.|year=1978|title=Agreeing to Disagree: The Measurement of Duration in a Southwestern Ethiopian Community|journal=Current Anthropology|volume=19.3|pages=585–600|doi=10.1086/202140}}
* {{cite book|author=Urton, G.|year=1981|title=At the crossroads of the earth and the sky: an Andean cosmology|publisher=University of Texas|id=ISBN 0-292-70349-X}}
* {{cite book|author=van Driel-Murray, C.|year=2002|chapter=Regarding the Stars|title=TRAC 2001: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference Glasgow 2001|editor=M Carruthers, C. van Driel-Murray, A. Gardner, J. Lucas, L. Revell and E. Swift. Oxbow Books|pages=96–103, ISBN 1-84217-075-9}}
* {{cite web |url=http://cwva.org/ogam_rebutal/solstice_2002.html |title=The Observations of the 2002 Winter Solstice at Luther Elkins Petroglyph (46 Wm 3) |accessdate=2008-03-22 |author=Wise, R.B.|date=2003|publisher=Council for West Virginia Archaeology}}
* {{cite journal|author=Witzel, M.|year=2001|url=http://www.ejvs.laurasianacademy.com/ejvs0703/ejvs0703d.txt|title=Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Text|journal=Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies|volume=7:3|month=May|pages=§28–30}}
* {{cite book|author=Xu, Z. Pankenier, D.W. and Jiang, Y.|year=2000|title=East Asian Archaeoastronomy: Historical Records of Astronomical Observations of China, Japan and Korea|publsher=Gordon and Breach Science Publishers|id=ISBN 90-5699-302-X}}
* {{cite book|author=Young, M.J.|year=2005|chapter=Ethnoastronomy and the Problem of Interpretation: A Zuni Example|title=Songs from the Sky: Indigenous and Cosmological Traditions of the World|editor=Von Del Chamberlain, John Carlson and M. Jane Young|publisher=Ocarina Books|id=ISBN 0-6540867-2-4}}
* {{cite journal|author=Zeilik, M.|year=1985|title=The Ethnoastronomy of the Historic Pueblos, I: Calendrical Sun Watching|journal=Archaeoastronomy:Supplement to the Journal for the History of Astronomy|volume=8 (16)|pages=S1–S24}}
* {{cite journal|author=Zeilik, M.|year=1986|title=The Ethnoastronomy of the Historic Pueblos, II: Moon Watching|journal=Archaeoastronomy:Supplement to the Journal for the History of Astronomy'|volume=10 (17)|pages=S1–S22}}
</div>
==External links==
{{wiktionary}}
* [http://library.thinkquest.org/C0118421/main.html Archaeoastronomy] A Thinkquest website surveying archaeoastronomical sites across the world.
* [http://assets.cambridge.org/052157/2916/sample/0521572916web.pdf Astronomy before History, by Clive Ruggles and Michael Hoskins], a chapter from ''The Cambridge Concise History of Astronomy,'' Michael Hoskin ed., 1999
* [http://www.cliveruggles.net/ Clive Ruggles's webpage:] images, bibliography, software, and synopsis of his course at the [[University of Leicester]]
* [http://www.spaceimaging.com/gallery/ancientobservatories/ Space Imaging’s Ancient Observatories gallery] — Satellite pictures of ancient observatories.
* [http://www.traditionsofthesun.org/ Traditions of the Sun] — NASA and others exploring the world’s ancient observatories.
* [http://sunearthday.nasa.gov/2005/images/ao_poster.pdf Ancient Observatories: Timeless Knowledge] NASA Poster on ancient (and modern) observatories.
* [http://www.iol.ie/~geniet/eng/aarde.htm There is more between heaven and earth] — Archaeocosmology research: sites, myths and tools.
===Societies===
* [http://www.archaeoastronomy.org/ ISAAC], The International Society for Archaeoastronomy and Astronomy in Culture.
* [http://www.archeoastronomy.org/ SEAC] La Société Européenne pour l’Astronomie dans la Culture. Site in English.
* [http://www.arqueoastronomia.org/siac.htm SIAC] La Sociedad Interamericana de Astronomía en la Cultura.
* [http://www.shastro.org.uk Society for the History of Astronomy]
===Journals===
* [http://www.wam.umd.edu/~tlaloc/archastro/ae.html Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy News]
* [http://www.shpltd.co.uk/aa.html Archaeoastronomy: Supplement to the Journal for the History of Astronomy]
* [http://www.utexas.edu/utpress/journals/jarch.html Archaeoastronomy: The Journal of Astronomy in Culture]
* [http://www.cultureandcosmos.com/ Culture and Cosmos]
* [http://www.shpltd.co.uk/jha.html Journal for the History of Astronomy]
[[Category:Ancient astronomy]]
[[Category:Archaeoastronomy|*]]
[[Category:Archaeological sub-disciplines]]
[[Category:History of astronomy]]
[[Category:History of astrology]]
[[Category:Earth mysteries]]
[[Category:Ancient mysteries]]
[[bn:পুরাজ্যোতির্বিজ্ঞান]]
[[ca:Arqueoastronomia]]
[[de:Archäoastronomie]]
[[el:Αρχαιοαστρονομία]]
[[es:Arqueoastronomía]]
[[fr:Archéoastronomie]]
[[hr:Arheoastronomija]]
[[it:Archeoastronomia]]
[[nl:Archeoastronomie]]
[[no:Arkeoastronomi]]
[[pl:Archeoastronomia]]
[[pt:Arqueoastronomia]]
[[ru:Археоастрономия]]
[[sk:Archeoastronómia]]
[[sr:Етноастрономија]]
[[sv:Arkeoastronomi]]
[[zh:考古天文学]]