Civil union 72009 224977229 2008-07-11T07:46:25Z Joshuajohanson 3773005 /* External links */ Added category for same-sex relationship {{Civil_union}} A '''civil union''' is a legally recognized union similar to [[marriage]]. Beginning with [[civil unions in Denmark|Denmark]] in 1989, civil unions under one name or another have been established by law in many [[developed countries]] in order to provide [[homosexuality|same-sex couples]] with [[right]]s, benefits, and [[Moral responsibility|responsibilities]] similar (in some countries, identical) to opposite-sex civil marriage. In some [[jurisdiction]]s, such as [[Civil unions in Quebec|Quebec]], [[Civil unions in New Zealand|New Zealand]], and [[Civil unions in Uruguay|Uruguay]], civil unions are also open to opposite-sex couples. Most civil-union countries recognize foreign unions if those are essentially equivalent to their own; for example, the [[United Kingdom]] lists equivalent unions in [[Civil Partnership Act Schedule 20]]. Many people are critical of civil unions because they say they represent separate status unequal to marriage ("marriage [[apartheid]]").<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.vtfreetomarry.org/notenough.php |title=Why Civil Unions Aren't Enough |accessdate=2007-07-31 |last=Corbin |first=Sherry |date=2004 |publisher=Vermont Freedom to Marry }}</ref><ref name='aut050107'>{{cite news | first=Joseph | last=Barratt | coauthors= | title=Civil unions ‘social apartheid’, says Waring | date=[[2007-05-01]] | publisher=Auckland (New Zealand) University of Technology School of Communication Studies | url =http://artsweb.aut.ac.nz/Journalism/tewahanui/news/070430_waring.shtml | work =Te Waha Nui online | pages = | accessdate = 2007-07-31 | language = }}</ref> Others are critical because they say civil unions allow [[same-sex marriage]] by using a different name. ==Terminology== The terms used to designate recognized same-sex unions are not standardized, and vary widely from country to country. Government-sanctioned relationships that may be similar or equivalent to civil unions include [[civil partnership]]s, [[registered partnership]]s, [[domestic partnership]]s, [[Domestic partnership in Tasmania|significant relationship]]s, [[Domestic partnerships in Hawaii|reciprocal beneficiary relationships]], [[common-law marriage]], [[Adult interdependent relationship in Alberta|adult interdependent relationships]], [[civil unions in Germany|life partnerships]], [[civil unions in Andorra|stable unions]], [[civil unions in France|civil solidarity pacts]], and so on. The exact level of rights, benefits, obligations, and responsibilities also varies, depending on the laws of a particular country. Some jurisdictions allow same-sex couples to adopt, while others forbid them to do so, or allow adoption only in specified circumstances. As used in the [[United States]], beginning with the state of [[Civil unions in Vermont|Vermont]] in 2000, the term ''civil union'' has connoted a status equivalent to marriage for same-sex couples; ''[[domestic partnership]]'', offered by some states, counties, cities, and employers since as early as 1985,<ref name='buddy062907'> {{cite web|url=http://www.buddybuddy.com/d-p-gov.html |title=Governments Offering Benefits |accessdate=2007-07-31 |date=[[2007-06-29]] |publisher=Partners Task Force for Gay & Lesbian Couples }}</ref> has generally connoted a lesser status with fewer benefits. However, the legislatures of the [[West Coast of the United States|West Coast]] states of [[Domestic partnership in California|California]], [[Domestic partnership in Oregon|Oregon]] and [[Domestic partnership in Washington|Washington]] have preferred the term ''domestic partnership'' for enactments similar or equivalent to civil union laws in [[East Coast of the United States|East Coast]] states. Civil unions are not seen as a replacement for marriage by some in the gay community. "Marriage in the United States is a civil union; but a civil union, as it has come to be called, is not marriage," said [[Evan Wolfson]] of [[Freedom to Marry]].<ref>[http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Interview_with_gay_marriage_movement_founder_Evan_Wolfson Interview with Evan Wolfson], David Shankbone, September 30, 2007</ref> "It is a proposed hypothetical legal mechanism, since it doesn’t exist in most places, to give some of the protections but also withhold something precious from gay people. There’s no good reason to do that." However, some supporters of traditional marriage view the matter differently; Randy Thomasson, Executive Director of the Campaign for California Families, calls civil unions “homosexual marriage by another name” and contends that civil unions provide same-sex couples “all the rights of marriage available under state law.”<ref>[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6338458/ Bush stance on gay unions irks conservatives - Politics - MSNBC.com<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> ===Civil unions and kinship=== Legally, marriage is a means of establishing [[kinship]] outside of bloodline.<ref name="diff-mar-cu">{{cite web | url=http://lesbianlife.about.com/cs/wedding/a/unionvmarriage.htm | author=Belge, Kathy | title=The Difference Between Marriage and Civil Unions | publisher=[[About.com]]: Lesbian Life}}</ref> This concept of kinship is one that permeates society, and is encoded in [[Western World|Western]] [[common law]] as well as the laws of every nation, including 1,138 federal laws in the United States.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.gao.gov/archive/1997/og97016.pdf | author=Office of the General Counsel | publisher=United States General Accounting Office | date=[[1997-01-13]] | title=GAO/OGC-97-16 Defense of Marriage Act}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web|url=http://nclrights.org/publications/pubs/2004GAO.pdf |title=Defense of Marriage Act: Update to Prior Report |accessdate=2007-07-31 |date=[[2004-01-23]] |format=PDF |publisher=US General Accounting Office }}</ref> Kinship conveys not only rights and privileges, but duties and even restrictions. For example, judges cannot preside over certain of their kin according to Western common law.<ref>{{cite journal | title=The Disqualification of Judges | publication=[[Columbia Law Review]] | issue=Vol. 20, No. 5 | month=May | year=1920 | pages=pp. 594–598 | url=http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0010-1958(192005)20%3A5%3C594%3ATDOJ%3E2.0.CO%3B2-B}}</ref> Because civil unions are a new concept, they do not instruct business, the courts or other agencies how to apply the centuries of kinship-related doctrine, custom and law to these arrangements which is one of the primary differences cited between marriage and civil unions.<ref name="diff-mar-cu"/> ===Examples=== To illustrate the possible difference between civil unions and domestic partnerships, the state of [[New Jersey]] enacted a domestic partnership law in 2004, offering certain limited rights and benefits to same-sex and different-sex couples; however, after a [[Supreme Court of New Jersey|state Supreme Court]] [[Lewis v. Harris|ruling]] in 2006 that same-sex couples must be extended all the rights and benefits of marriage, the state legislature passed a new civil unions law, effective in 2007, which fulfills the court's ruling. In California, on the other hand, where domestic partnership has been available to same-sex couples since 2000, a wholesale revision of the law in 2005 has made it, like the New Jersey civil union law, equivalent to marriage in nearly every respect at the state level, though neither is recognized by the federal government. {{See also|Civil unions in New Jersey|Domestic partnership in California}} ==History== The first civil unions in the United States were offered by the state of [[civil unions in Vermont|Vermont]] in 2000. The [[United States government|federal government]] does not recognize these unions, and under the U.S. [[Defense of Marriage Act]] of 1996 (DOMA), other U.S. states are not obliged to recognize them. By the end of 2006, [[civil unions in Connecticut|Connecticut]] and [[same-sex marriage in New Jersey|New Jersey]] had also enacted civil union laws; [[civil unions in New Hampshire|New Hampshire]] followed in 2007. Furthermore, California's [[domestic partnership in California|domestic partnership law]] had been expanded to the point that it became practically a civil union law, as well. The same might be said from 2007 for [[domestic partnership in Maine]], [[domestic partnerships in District of Columbia]], [[domestic partnership in Washington]], and [[domestic partnership in Oregon]]. Since 2005, both [[civil unions in New Zealand|New Zealand]] and the [[civil partnerships in the United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] have offered civil unions similar to marriage nationwide, although in the UK they are termed [[civil partnerships]]. As of May 2007, only five nations ([[same-sex marriage in the Netherlands|the Netherlands]], [[same-sex marriage in Belgium|Belgium]], [[same-sex marriage in Canada|Canada]], [[same-sex marriage in Spain|Spain]], and [[same-sex marriage in South Africa|South Africa]]) offer full [[same-sex marriage]]. The U.S. states of [[same-sex marriage in Massachusetts|Massachusetts]] and [[same-sex marriage in California|California]] offer state-wide [[same-sex marriage]]. ==List of jurisdictions allowing same-sex unions== [[Image:Samesex marriage in USA.svg|right|300px|thumb|'''Laws Regarding Same-Sex Partnerships in the United States''' {{legend|#a9218e|Same-sex marriages}} {{legend|#00a651|Unions granting rights similar to marriage}} {{legend|#605ca8|Unions granting limited/enumerated rights}} {{legend|#00b7f1|Foreign same-sex marriages recognized}} {{legend|#ffff00|Statute bans same-sex marriage}} {{legend|#ff7f00|Constitution bans same-sex marriage}} {{legend|#ed1e24|Constitution bans same-sex marriage ''and'' other kinds of same-sex unions}}]] === North America === ==== United States ==== Jurisdictions in the U.S. that offer civil unions or domestic partnerships granting nearly all of the state-recognized rights of marriage to same-sex couples include *[[Recognition of gay unions in Vermont|Civil Unions in Vermont]] (2000), *[[Domestic partnership in California|Domestic Partnerships in California]] (2000), *[[Recognition of gay unions in Connecticut|Civil Unions in Connecticut]] (2005), *[[Recognition of gay unions in New Jersey|Civil Unions in New Jersey]] (2007), *[[Civil unions in New Hampshire|Civil Unions in New Hampshire]] (2008), and *[[Domestic partnership in Oregon|Domestic Partnerships in Oregon]] (2008),<ref>[http://www.365gay.com/Newscon07/05/050907oregon.htm 365gay: Oregon Governorr signs Gay Rights Bill]</ref> States in the U.S. with domestic partnerships or similar status granting some of the rights of marriage include *[[Reciprocal Beneficiary Relationships in Hawaii]] (1997), *[[Domestic partnership in the District of Columbia|Domestic Partnerships in the District of Columbia]] (1992/2002), *[[Domestic partnership in Maine|Domestic Partnerships in Maine]] (2004), *[[Recognition of gay unions in New Jersey|Domestic Partnerships in New Jersey]] (2004) (now available only for couples 62 and older), and *[[Domestic partnership in Washington|Domestic Partnerships in Washington]] (2007). [[Same-sex marriage in Massachusetts|Massachusetts]] and [[Same-sex marriage in California|California]] are the only states that offer same-sex marriage. The right to marry was extended to same-sex couples by state supreme court [[Goodridge v. Department of Public Health|ruling]] on [[18 November]] [[2003]] in Massachusetts and by a similar [[In re Marriage Cases|ruling]] on [[May 15]], [[2008]] in [[California]]. In addition, on [[August 31]], [[2007]] a court in [[Same-sex marriage in Iowa|Iowa]] ruled that same-sex couples could marry in that state, but the following day the ruling was suspended pending appeals, and only one same-sex couple married. <ref>[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,295416,00.html FOX News: First gay couple legally married in Iowa after judge rules state ban unconstitutional]</ref> Thus, until further court review, Iowa does not permit same-sex marriage. Due to the federal [[Defense of Marriage Act| Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)]], same-sex couples in marriages, civil unions, or domestic partnerships in the U.S. do not have the 1,138 rights that a married couple has under federal law.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://nclrights.org/publications/pubs/2004GAO.pdf |title=Defense of Marriage Act: Update to Prior Report |accessdate=2007-07-31 |date=[[2004-01-23]] |format=PDF |publisher=US General Accounting Office }}</ref>{{PDFlink|[http://nclrights.org/publications/pubs/2004GAO.pdf]|268&nbsp;[[Kibibyte|KiB]]<!-- application/pdf, 275244 bytes -->}} ====Canada==== [[Image:World homosexuality laws.svg|thumb|right|300px|World homosexuality laws]] In [[Same-sex marriage in Canada|Canada]]: *[[Domestic partnership in Nova Scotia|Domestic partnerships in Nova Scotia]] (2001), *[[Civil unions in Quebec]] (2002), *[[Common-law relationships in Manitoba]] (2002), and *[[Adult interdependent relationship in Alberta|Adult interdependent relationships in Alberta]] (2003) were extended to same-sex couples before the enactment (2005) nationwide of [[same-sex marriage in Canada]]. Between June 2003 and June 2005, courts in eight provinces and one territory of Canada extended marriage to include same-sex couples. === Latin America === ====Argentina==== *[[Argentina|Argentine]] capital of [[Buenos Aires]] (2003), *[[Rio Negro Province]] (2003) *City of [[Villa Carlos Paz]] (2007). ====Brazil==== *some parts of [[Brazil]] (2004), *the state of [[Rio Grande Do Sul]] ====Mexico==== *[[Mexico City]] (2006) and *the state of [[Coahuila]] (2007). ====Uruguay==== *[[Civil unions in Uruguay]], nationwide (2008) The Argentinian province of [[Río Negro Province|Rio Negro]] and the city of [[Buenos Aires]] have domestic partnerships. In 2007, [[Colombia]] came close to passing a law granting legal recognition to same-sex couples, but the bill failed on final passage in one house of the national legislature. [[Image:Same sex marriage map Europe detailed.svg|300px|thumb|right|Status of same-sex unions in Europe. {{legend|#980098|Same sex marriage recognised}} {{legend|#0000FF|Civil unions recognised}} {{legend|#009800|Unregistered cohabitation recognised}} {{legend|#FFFF00|Issue under political consideration}} {{legend|#FF9800|Unrecognised or unknown}} {{legend|#FF0000|Same sex marriage banned}}]] ===Europe=== In Europe, *[[Denmark]] (1989), *[[Norway]] (1993), *[[Sweden]] (1995), *[[Iceland]] (1996), *[[France]] (1999), *[[Finland]] (2002), *[[Portugal]] (2001), *[[Germany]] (2001), *[[Luxembourg]] (2004), *[[Andorra]] (2005), *[[United Kingdom]] (2005), *the [[Czech Republic]] (2006), *[[Slovenia]] (2006), and *[[Switzerland]] (2007), *[[Republic of Ireland]] (2009). <ref>[http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/Publication%20of%20Scheme%20of%20Civil%20Partnership%20Bill Irish Dept. of Justice: Civil Union Bill 2008] </ref> *[[Hungary]] (1996/2009). <ref>[http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid50505.asp Advocate:Hungary to allow Civil Unions for Gay Couples] </ref> In 2001, the [[Netherlands]] passed a law allowing same-sex couples to marry, in addition to its 1998 "registered partnership" law (civil union) for both same-sex and opposite-sex couples. [[Belgium]] did likewise in 2003. [[Spain]] legalized [[same-sex marriage]] in 2005. [[Norway]] did it in [[2008]] On [[31 October]] 2007, during a parliamentary debate in [[Dáil Éireann]] on an opposition Bill to introduce civil unions, the government of the [[Republic of Ireland]] announced that it will be introducing its own legislation to create civil unions in March 2008.<ref>[http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/breaking/2007/1031/breaking45.htm The Irish Times]. 31 October 2007.</ref>. This was delayed but was released in June 2008.<ref>[http://www.rte.ie/news/2008/0624/marriage.html RTE.ie 24 June 2008]]</ref> ===Africa=== In Africa: [[Same-sex marriage in South Africa|South Africa]] legalized same-sex marriage in 2006; civil unions are also available to same-sex couples. ===Asia=== In the [[Middle East]]: *[[Israel]] (1994 as common-law marriage; 2006 as recognition of foreign marriage). ===Oceania=== [[Image:Same sex marriage Australia map.svg|right|thumb|Status of same-sex unions in Australia. {{legend|#980098|Same-sex marriage or civil union}} {{legend|#0000FF|Domestic partnership registry}} {{legend|#009800|Domestic partnership agreement}} {{legend|#FFFF00|Domestic partnership being debated}} {{legend|#FF9800|Defined statewide as "De facto"}} {{legend|#FF0000|State same-sex marriage ban}}]] ==== New Zealand ==== *[[New Zealand]] nationwide (2005) ==== Australia ==== {{main|Recognition of same-sex relationships in Australia|LGBT rights in Australia|Domestic partnership in Tasmania}} *[[Tasmania]] (Significant Relationships from 2004), *The [[Australian Capital Territory]] (Civil partnerships from 2008), *[[Victoria (Australia)|Victoria]] (Registered partnerships from 2008) [[Registered partnership]] recognition in local governments: * [[City of Sydney]], [[New South Wales]] - Registered partnerships since 2004 * [[City of Melbourne]], [[Victoria (Australia)|Victoria]] - Registered partnerships since 2007 * [[City of Yarra]], [[Victoria (Australia)|Victoria]] - Registered partnerships since 2007 The Australian federal/commonwealth government has banned the recognition of all same-sex marriages at the national level. [[Tasmania]] has recognised de facto couples in unregistered co-habitation since 2002, as now do all other states and territories. Tasmania's ''Significant Relationships'' (a form of [[registered partnership]] may be utilised by carers, siblings and both opposite and same sex couples).<ref>http://www.actwin.com/eatonohio/gay/tasmaniahoa.html</ref> ==Denmark== {{main|Civil unions in Denmark}} Civil unions were introduced in [[Denmark]] by law on [[June 7]], [[1989]], the world's first such law. It has the name of a [[registered partnership]] (Danish: "registreret partnerskab"), but has almost all the same qualities as marriage. It provides all the same legal and fiscal rights and obligations that come with a heterosexual marriage, with four exceptions: * registered partners cannot adopt, with the exception that one party can adopt the biological children of the other * registered partners cannot have joint custody of a child, except by adoption * laws making explicit reference to the sexes of a married couple don't apply to registered partnerships * regulations by international treaties do not apply unless all signatories agree. Registered partnership is by civil ceremony only. The [[Church of Denmark]] has yet to decide how to handle the issue, but the general attitude of the church seems positive but hesitant. Some priests perform blessings of gay couples, and this is accepted by the church, which states that the church blesses people, not institutions. Divorce for registered partners follows the same rules as ordinary divorces. Only citizens of Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway and Iceland can enter into a registered partnership in Denmark. This list is adjusted whenever a new country legalizes same-sex unions. This rule excludes foreigners from gaining a registered partnership status that would not be legally recognised in their home country or state. As of [[January 1]], [[2002]], there were more than 2,000 registered partnerships in Denmark, of which 220 had children. ==France== {{main|Pacte civil de solidarité}} The [[France|French]] law providing benefits to same-sex couples also applies to opposite-sex couples who choose this form of partnership over marriage. Known as the "Pacte civil de solidarité" (PACS), it is more easily dissolved than the divorce process applying to marriage. Tax benefits accrue immediately (only from 2007 on *Ref), while immigration benefits accrue only after the contract has been in effect for one year. The partners are required to have a common address, making it difficult for foreigners to use this law as a means to a residence permit, and difficult for French citizens to gain the right to live with a foreign partner - especially since the contract does not automatically give immigration rights, as does marriage. *Ref. Circulaire n°2007-03 CIV du 5 février 2007 ==New Zealand== {{main|Civil union in New Zealand}} On [[9 December]] [[2004]] the [[New Zealand]] [[New Zealand Parliament|Parliament]] passed the Civil Union Bill, establishing civil unions for same-sex and opposite-sex couples. The debate over Civil Unions was highly divisive in New Zealand, inspiring great public emotion both for and against the passing. A companion bill, the Relationships (Statutory References) Bill was passed shortly thereafter to remove discriminatory provisions on the basis of relationship status from a range of statutes and regulations. As a result of these bills, all couples in New Zealand, whether married, in a civil union, or in a de facto partnership, now generally enjoy the same rights and undertake the same obligations. These rights extend to immigration, next-of-kin status, social welfare, matrimonial property and other areas. The Civil Union Act came into effect on [[26 April]] [[2005]] with the first unions able to occur from Friday [[29 April]] [[2005]]. ==Portugal== {{main|Civil unions in Portugal}} '''[[Civil union]]s in [[Portugal]]''' were introduced for opposite-sex couples in [[1 July]] [[1999]] and extended to same-sex couples by the act of [[15 March]] [[2001]]. The current legislation extends to same-sex couples the same rights as [[heterosexual]] couples living in a [[common-law marriage|de facto union]] for more than two years. The law covers housing arrangements, [[civil servant]]s and work benefits, the option to choose a fiscal regime as married partners, and [[Welfare (financial aid)|welfare]] benefits. The difference in the civil union law between same-sex and opposite-sex couples is that only opposite-sex couples can adopt children together. The "[[registered partnership|registration]]" can be made by an application of joint tax assessment. Also in [[15 March]] [[2001]], a new multi-person law ("common economy") was also approved that protects two or more persons that live in common economy with most of the rights of the de facto union, except welfare benefits. Since December 2006, same sex couples (and opposite sex couples) living in a civil union are also recognized in the same way as married couples for citizenship applications and when a public servant wants to extend healthcare protection to the partner. The Penal Code is also in the process of being changed to recognize same-sex couples in the Domestic violence law. ==Switzerland== {{main|Civil unions in Switzerland}} The [[Canton of Geneva]] has had a law on cantonal level, "Registered Partnership" or "PACS" ([[Pacte civil de solidarité]]), since 2001. It grants [[cohabitation|unmarried couples]], whether same-sex or opposite-sex, many rights, responsibilities and protections that [[married couples]] have. However, it does not allow benefits in taxation, social security, or health insurance premiums (unlike the federal law). On [[September 22]], [[2002]], voters in the [[Switzerland|Swiss]] canton of [[Canton of Zürich|Zürich]] voted to extend a number of marriage rights to same-sex partners, including tax, inheritance, and social security benefits.<ref>[http://www.planetout.com/news/article.html?2002/09/23/4 News & Politics<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> Partners must both live in the canton and formally commit themselves six months in advance to running a household and supporting and aiding one another. {{wikinews|The Swiss vote yes to same-sex relationships and "Schengen/Dublin"}} On [[June 5]], [[2005]] voters extended this right to the whole of Switzerland, through a federal referendum. This was the first time that the civil union laws were affirmed in a nationwide referendum in any country. ==Mexico== {{main|Civil unions in Mexico}} On [[November 9]], [[2006]], the Legislative Assembly of Mexico City approved a law that allows same sex and homosexual civil Unions which are not fully equivalent to marriage but provides them with certain rights. The motion was approved by 43 votes in favor and 16 against and 6 abstentions. Many conservative groups in Mexico criticized the law that will be in effect after the Chief of Government of Mexico city sanctions it. In 2002 a similar law was proposed but dismissed by the conservative [[Partido Acción Nacional]] due to alleged "bureaucratic errors". Mexico City is by far the most liberal region of a country in which the majority professes the catholic faith. This law is the first to recognize rights for same-sex couples and was welcomed by the gay community in general. On [[January 11]], [[2007]], the northern state of [[Coahuila]] approved a similar measure with 20 votes from the [[Partido Revolucionario Institucional]] (PRI) and the Partido del Trabajo (PT) and 13 votes against from the [[Partido Acción Nacional (Mexico)|PAN]] and the [[Partido de la Revo´lución Democrática|PRD]].<ref>[http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/notas/399701.html Aprueban en Coahuila unión entre personas del mismo sexo - El Universal - Los Estados<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> On [[January 31]], [[2007]] the first civil union between two persons of the same sex took place in [[Saltillo]], [[Coahuila]]. Two women, Karina Almaguer and Karla Lopez, became the first couple ever in [[Coahuila]] and in [[Mexico]] to formalize their union under such law<ref>[http://www.coahuila.gob.mx/hub.php/noticia/index.htm?preid=1232 Gobierno del Estado de Coahuila :: Noticia<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>. ==United Kingdom== {{main|Civil partnerships in the United Kingdom}} In 2003, the [[United Kingdom|British]] government announced plans to introduce civil partnerships which would allow same-sex couples the rights and responsibilities resulting from civil marriage. The [[Civil Partnership Act 2004|Civil Partnership Bill]] was introduced into the [[House of Lords]] on [[March 30]], [[2004]]. After considering amendments made by the [[British House of Commons|House of Commons]], it was passed by the House of Lords, its final legislative hurdle, on [[November 17]], [[2004]], and received [[Royal Assent]] on [[November 18]]. The Act came into force on [[5 December]] [[2005]], and same-sex, but not opposite-sex, couples were able to form the civil partnerships from [[19 December]] [[2005]] in [[Northern Ireland]], [[20 December]] [[2005]] in [[Scotland]] and [[21 December]] [[2005]] in [[England]] and [[Wales]].<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4493094.stm BBC NEWS | UK | 'Gay weddings' become law in UK<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> Separate provisions were included in the first Finance Act 2005 to allow regulations to be made to amend tax laws to give the same tax advantages and disadvantages to couples in civil partnerships as apply to married couples. In order to counter claims that this is instituting same-sex marriage, government spokespersons emphasised that civil partnership is quite separate from marriage. Aside from the manner in which couples register and the non-use of the word "marriage", civil partnerships and civil marriages give exactly the same legal rights and operate under the same constrictions and it is not legal to be in both a civil partnership and a marriage at the same time. Nevertheless, some of those in favour of legal same-sex marriage object that civil partnerships fall short of granting equality. They see legal marriage and civil partnerships as artificially segregated institutions, and draw parallels with the [[racial segregation]] of the [[United States]]' past. Both same-sex marriages and civil unions of other nations will be automatically considered civil partnerships under UK law providing the came within Section 20 of the Act. This means, in some cases, non-Britons from nations with civil unions will have greater rights in the UK than in their native countries. For example, a Vermont civil union would have legal standing in the UK, however in cases where one partner was American and the other British, the Vermont civil union would not provide the Briton with right of abode in Vermont (or any other US state or territory), whereas it would provide the American with right of abode in the UK. ==United States== {{main|Same-sex marriage in the United States|Civil union in the United States|Domestic partnership in the United States}} Below, listed by state, is information regarding civil unions in the United States. ===Vermont=== {{main|Civil unions in Vermont}} The controversial civil unions law<ref>[http://www.sec.state.vt.us/otherprg/civilunions/civilunionlaw.html Vermont Secretary of State - Civil Unions Law<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> passed in the [[Vermont General Assembly]] in 2000 was passed as a response to the [[Vermont Supreme Court]] ruling in ''[[Baker v. Vermont]]'' requiring that the state grant same-sex couples the same rights and privileges accorded to married couples under the law. There were still many people who were strongly opposed to the idea of same-sex marriage, so the legislature enacted civil unions as a compromise between groups seeking identical rights for [[homosexual]] couples, and groups objecting to [[Same-sex marriage in the United States|same-sex marriage]]. One of the most instrumental champions of the bill in the Vermont House was a three-term legislator from Washington, Marion Milne. Like many other proponents of the law, her conservative home district retaliated by not re-electing her in the 2000 elections. A Vermont civil union is nearly identical to a legal marriage, as far as the rights and responsibilities for which state law, not federal law, is responsible are concerned.<ref>[http://www.sec.state.vt.us/otherprg/civilunions/civilunions.html Vermont Secretary of State - Civil Unions<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> It grants partners [[next-of-kin]] rights and other protections that heterosexual married couples also receive. However, despite the [[Full Faith and Credit clause|"full faith and credit" clause]] of the [[United States Constitution]], civil unions are generally not recognized outside of the state of Vermont in the absence of specific legislation. Opponents of the law have supported the [[Defense of Marriage Act]] and the proposed [[Federal Marriage Amendment]] in order to prevent obligatory recognition of same-sex couple in other jurisdictions. This means that many of the advantages of marriage, which fall in the federal jurisdiction (Over 1,100 federal laws, as joint federal income tax returns, visas and work permits for the foreign partner of a U.S. citizen, etc), are not extended to the partners of a Vermont civil union. As far as voluntary recognition of the civil union in other jurisdictions is concerned, [[New York City]]'s Domestic Partnership Law, passed in 2002, recognizes civil unions formalized in other jurisdictions. [[Germany]]'s international civil law (EGBGB) also accords to Vermont civil unions the same benefits and responsibilities that apply in Vermont, as long as they do not exceed the standard accorded by German law to a German civil union. ===Connecticut=== {{main|Civil unions in Connecticut}} In 2005, the [[Connecticut General Assembly]] passed a bill to adopt civil unions in Connecticut. Connecticut's civil unions are identical to marriage and provide all of the same rights and responsibilities except for the title. Connecticut was the first state in the US to voluntarily pass a same-sex civil unions law through the legislature without any immediate court intervention.{{Fact|date=January 2008}} ===New Jersey=== {{main|Civil unions in New Jersey|Same-sex marriage in New Jersey}} On [[October 25]] [[2006]] The [[Supreme Court of New Jersey]] gave [[New Jersey Legislature|New Jersey lawmakers]] 180 days to rewrite the state's marriage laws, either including same-sex couples or creating a new system of [[civil unions]] for them.<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/10/25/jersey.samesex.ap/]{{Dead link|date=March 2008}}</ref> On [[December 14]], the Legislature passed a bill establishing [[Same-sex marriage in New Jersey|civil unions in New Jersey]], which was signed into law by [[Governor of New Jersey|Governor]] [[Jon Corzine]] on [[December 21]], [[2006]]. The first civil unions took place on [[February 19]], [[2007]].<ref>[http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=local&id=4872275 7online.com: New York City and Tri-State News from WABC-TV 12/21/06<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>http://www.northjersey.com/page.php?qstr=eXJpcnk3ZjczN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXk2MDcmZmdiZWw3Zjd2cWVlRUV5eTcwODA0OTImeXJpcnk3ZjcxN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXky</ref> ===New Hampshire=== {{Main|Civil unions in New Hampshire}} On [[April 26]], [[2007]], the [[New Hampshire General Court]] (state legislature) passed a civil union bill, and Governor [[John Lynch]] signed the bill into law on [[May 31]], [[2007]].<ref>[http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070531/BREAK/70531001/1030 Concord Monitor - Lynch signs bill legalizing civil unions<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> At the time, New Hampshire was "...the first state to embrace same-sex unions without a court order or the threat of one.".<ref name=Wang>Wang, Beverley. ([[26 April]], [[2007]]) [http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070426/REPOSITORY/70426002/1030 State Senate approves civil unions for same-sex couples] ''Concord Monitor''. Accessed 26 April 2007.</ref> The New Hampshire civil union legislation became effective on [[January 1]], [[2008]].<ref>[http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070426/REPOSITORY/70426002/1030 Concord Monitor - State Senate approves civil unions for same-sex couples<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> ==See also== *[[Same-sex marriage]] *[[Registered partnership]] *[[Domestic partnership]] *[[Same-sex union]] *[[Common-law marriage]] ==References== {{reflist}} ==External links== *[http://www.sec.state.vt.us/otherprg/civilunions/civilunions.html The Vermont Guide to Civil Unions, Vermont Secretary of State] *[http://www.chiefminister.act.gov.au/media.asp?media=927&id=927&section=24&title=Jon%20Stanhope,%20MLA Civil Union Fact Sheet, Australian Capital Territory web site] {{LGBT-footer|rights=yes|culture=yes|history=yes}} [[Category:LGBT civil rights]] [[Category:Same-sex marriage]] [[Category:Vermont culture]] [[Category:Same-sex relationship]] {{Link FA|it}} [[af:Burgerlike verbintenis]] [[bg:Граждански съюз]] [[cs:Registrované partnerství]] [[da:Registreret partnerskab]] [[de:Eingetragene Partnerschaft]] [[es:Unión civil]] [[fr:Union civile]] [[it:Unione civile]] [[nl:Geregistreerd partnerschap]] [[no:Registrert partnerskap]] [[pl:Rejestrowany związek partnerski]] [[pt:União de Facto]] [[ru:ПАКС]] [[fi:Rekisteröity parisuhde]] [[sv:Registrerat partnerskap]] [[zh:民事結合]]