Clostridium difficile 466440 226024648 2008-07-16T14:17:57Z Dulciana 1960685 /* Notable outbreaks */ consistent date format {{Taxobox | color = lightgrey | name = ''Clostridium difficile'' | image = Clostridium_difficile_01.png | image_width = 240px | image_caption = ''C. difficile'' colonies on a blood [[agar plate]]. | regnum = [[Bacterium|Bacteria]] | phylum = [[Firmicutes]] | classis = [[Clostridia]] | ordo = [[Clostridia]]les | familia = [[Clostridiaceae]] | genus = ''[[Clostridium]]'' | species = '''''C. difficile''''' | binomial = ''Clostridium difficile'' | binomial_authority = Hall & O'Toole, 1935 }} '''''Clostridium difficile''''' (pronounced {{IPA|/klɒsˈtrɪdiəm dɪˈfɪsɪli/}}, also known as CDF/cdf', or 'C. diff') is a species of [[bacteria]] of the genus ''[[Clostridium]]'' which are [[Gram-positive]], [[Anaerobic organism|anaerobic]], [[endospore|spore]]-forming rods (bacillus).<ref name=Sherris>{{cite book | author = Ryan KJ; Ray CG (editors) | title = Sherris Medical Microbiology | edition = 4th ed. | pages = pp. 322-4 | publisher = McGraw Hill | year = 2004 | id = ISBN 0-8385-8529-9 }}</ref> ''C. difficile'' is the most significant cause of [[pseudomembranous colitis]],<ref name=eMed1942>{{ cite web | url= http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic1942.htm#section~introduction | title=Pseudomembranous Colitis | work=eMedicine | date=2005-07-01 | publisher=WebMD | accessdate=2007-01-11}} </ref> a severe infection of the [[colon (anatomy)|colon]], often after normal [[gut flora]] is eradicated by the use of [[antibiotic]]s. Treatment is performed by stopping any antibiotics and commencing specific anticlostridial antibiotics, e.g. [[metronidazole]]. [[Image:Clostridium difficile EM.png|right|thumb|250px|Individual drumstick shaped ''C. diff'' bacilli seen through electronmicroscopy]] == Bacteriology == Clostridia are motile [[bacterium|bacteria]] that are ubiquitous in nature and are especially prevalent in [[soil]]. Under the microscope after [[Gram stain]]ing, they appear as long drumsticks with a bulge located at their terminal ends. ''Clostridium difficile'' cells are [[Gram positive]] and show optimum growth on [[blood agar]] at human body temperatures [[anaerobic|in the absence of oxygen]]. When stressed, the bacteria produce spores which tolerate extreme conditions that the active bacteria cannot tolerate. First described by Hall and O'Toole in [[1935]], "the difficult clostridium" was resistant to early attempts at isolation and grew very slowly in culture.<ref name=Hall_1935>{{cite journal | author = Hall I, O'Toole E | title = Intestinal flora in newborn infants with a description of a new pathogenic anaerobe, ''Bacillus difficilis'' | journal = Am J Dis Child | year = 1935 | volume = 49 | issue = | pages = 390 | url= }}</ref> ''C. difficile'' is a [[commensal bacterium]] of the human [[intestine]] in a minority of the population. Patients who have been staying long-term in a hospital or a nursing home have a higher likelihood of being [[Colony (biology)|colonized]] by this bacterium. In small numbers it does not result in disease of any significance. Antibiotics, especially those with a broad spectrum of activity, cause disruption of normal [[intestinal flora]], leading to an overgrowth of ''C. difficile''. This leads to [[pseudomembranous colitis]]. ''C. difficile'' is resistant to most [[antibiotic]]s. It flourishes under these conditions. It is transmitted from person to person by the [[fecal-oral route]]. Because the organism forms heat-resistant spores, it can remain in the [[hospital]] or [[nursing home]] environment for long periods of time. It can be cultured from almost any surface in the hospital. Once spores are ingested, they pass through the stomach unscathed because of their acid-resistance. They change to their active form in the colon and multiply. It has been observed that several [[disinfectant]]s commonly used in hospitals may fail to kill the bacteria, and may actually promote spore formation. However, disinfectants containing [[bleach]] are effective in killing the organisms<ref>{{cite news | url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4871840.stm | title=Cleaning agents 'make bug strong' | work=BBC News Online | date=2006-04-03 | accessdate=2007-01-11}}</ref>. [[Pseudomembranous colitis]] caused by ''C. difficile'' is treated with specific antibiotics, for example, [[vancomycin]], [[metronidazole]], bacitracin or fusidic acid. === Toxins === Pathogenic ''C. difficile'' strains produce various [[toxin]]s. The most well-characterized are [[enterotoxin]] (''toxin A'') and [[cytotoxin]] (''toxin B'').<ref name=Sherris /> These two toxins are both responsible for the [[diarrhea]] and [[inflammation]] seen in infected patients, although their relative contributions have been debated by researchers. Another toxin, ''binary toxin'', has also been described, but its role in disease is not yet fully understood.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Barth H, Aktories K, Popoff M, Stiles B |title=Binary bacterial toxins: biochemistry, biology, and applications of common Clostridium and Bacillus proteins |journal=Microbiol Mol Biol Rev |volume=68 |issue=3 |pages=373–402, table of contents |year=2004 |pmid=15353562 |doi=10.1128/MMBR.68.3.373-402.2004}}</ref> == Role in disease == With the introduction of [[broad-spectrum antibiotics]] in the latter half of the twentieth century, antibiotic-associated diarrhea became more common. [[Pseudomembranous colitis]] was first described as a complication of ''C. difficile'' [[infection]] in [[1978]],<ref name=Larson_1978>{{cite journal |author=Larson H, Price A, Honour P, Borriello S |title=''Clostridium difficile'' and the aetiology of pseudomembranous colitis |journal=Lancet |volume=1 |issue=8073 |pages=1063–6 |year=1978 |pmid=77366 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(78)90912-1}}</ref> when a toxin was isolated from patients suffering from pseudomembranous colitis and [[Koch's postulates]] were met. ''Clostridium difficile infection'' (CDI) can range in severity from asymptomatic to severe and life threatening, and many deaths have been reported, especially amongst the aged. People are most often infected in [[hospital]]s, [[nursing home]]s, or institutions, although ''C. difficile'' infection in the community, outpatient setting is increasing. ''Clostridium difficile'' associated diarrhea (aka CDAD) has been linked to use of broad-spectrum antibiotics such as [[cephalosporin]]s and [[clindamycin]], though the use of quinolones is now probably the most likely culprit; quinolones are frequently used in hospital settings. Frequency and severity of ''C. difficile'' colitis remains high and seems to be associated with increased death rates. Immunocompromised status and delayed diagnosis appear to result in elevated risk of death. Early intervention and aggressive management are key factors to recovery. The rate of ''Clostridium difficile'' acquisition is estimated to be 13% in patients with hospital stays of up to 2 weeks and 50% in those with hospital stays longer than 4 weeks. Increasing rates of community-acquired ''Clostridium difficile''-associated infection/disease (CDAD) have also been linked to the use of medication to suppress [[gastric acid]] production: [[H2-receptor antagonist]]s increased the risk twofold, and [[proton pump inhibitor]]s threefold, mainly in the elderly. It is presumed that increased gastric [[pH]], (alkalinity), leads to decreased destruction of spores.<ref name=Dial_2005>{{cite journal |author=Dial S, Delaney J, Barkun A, Suissa S |title=Use of gastric acid-suppressive agents and the risk of community-acquired ''Clostridium difficile''-associated disease |journal=[[Journal of the American Medical Association|JAMA]] |volume=294 |issue=23 |pages=2989–95 |year=2005 |pmid=16414946 |doi=10.1001/jama.294.23.2989}}</ref> == Diagnosis == In order to prevent complications, clinicians often begin treatment based on clinical presentation before results have come back. Knowledge of the local epidemiology of intestinal flora of a particular institution can guide therapy. ===Symptoms and signs=== In adults, a [[clinical prediction rule]] found the best [[medical sign|signs]] are<ref name="pmid8644759">{{cite journal |author=Katz DA, Lynch ME, Littenberg B |title=Clinical prediction rules to optimize cytotoxin testing for Clostridium difficile in hospitalized patients with diarrhea |journal=Am. J. Med. |volume=100 |issue=5 |pages=487–95 |year=1996 |pmid=8644759 |doi=10.1016/S0002-9343(95)00016-X }}</ref> : * significant diarrhea ("new onset of > 3 partially formed or watery stools per 24 hour period") * exposure of antibiotics * abdominal pain * foul stool odor The presence of any one of these findings has a [[sensitivity (tests)|sensitivity]] of 86% and a [[specificity (tests)|specificity]] of 45%.<ref name="pmid8644759"/> In this study of hospitalized patients with a prevalence of positive cytotoxin assays of 14%, the [[positive predictive value]] was 20% and the [[negative predictive value]] was 95%. ===Cytotoxicity assay=== ''C. difficile'' toxin detection as cytopathic effect in cell culture, and neutralized with specific anti-sera is the practical gold standard for studies investigating new CDAD diagnostic techniques. Toxigenic culture, in which organisms are cultured on selective medium and tested for toxin production, remains the [[Gold standard (test)|gold standard]] and is the most sensitive and specific test, although it is slow and labour-intensive.<ref name=Murray_1993>{{cite book | author = Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller EA, Tenover F, Yolken RH (editors) |title = Manual of Clinical Microbiology | edition = 8th ed | publisher=ASM Press | location = Washington DC | date = 2003 | isbn = 1-55581-255-3}}</ref> ===Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbant assay (ELISA) for toxin=== Assessment of the A and B toxins by [[ELISA|enzyme-linked immunoabsorbant assay]] (ELISA) for toxin A or B (or both) has: * [[sensitivity (tests)|sensitivity]] 63-99% * [[specificity (tests)|specificity]] 93-100% At a prevalence of 15%, this leads to: * [[positive predictive value]] 73% * [[negative predictive value]] 96% <!-- 20% prev is both prior abys and sig diarrhea per pred rule above --> Experts recommend sending as many as three samples to rule-out disease if initial tests are negative. ''C. difficile'' toxin should clear from the stool of previously infected patients if treatment is effective. Unfortunately, many hospitals only test for the prevalent toxin A. Strains that express only the B toxin are now present in many hospitals and ordering both toxins should occur. Not testing for both may contribute to a delay in obtaining laboratory results, which is often the cause of prolonged illness and poor outcomes. ===Other stool tests=== Stool [[leukocyte]] measurements and stool [[lactoferrin]] levels have also been proposed as diagnostic tests, but may have limited diagnostic accuracy.<ref name=Vaishnavi_2000>{{cite journal |author=Vaishnavi C, Bhasin D, Kochhar R, Singh K |title=Clostridium difficile toxin and faecal lactoferrin assays in adult patients |journal=Microbes Infect |volume=2 |issue=15 |pages=1827–30 |year=2000 |pmid=11165926 |doi=10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01343-5}}</ref> ===Computed tomography=== In a recent study, a patient who received a diagnosis of CDC on the basis of [[computed tomography]] (CT scan) had an 88% probability of testing positive on stool assay.<ref name="pmid11222194">{{cite journal |author=Kirkpatrick ID, Greenberg HM |title=Evaluating the CT diagnosis of Clostridium difficile colitis: should CT guide therapy? |journal=AJR. American journal of roentgenology |volume=176 |issue=3 |pages=635–9 |year=2001 |pmid=11222194 |doi=|url=http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/176/3/635}}</ref> Wall thickening is the key CT finding in this disease. Once colon wall thickening is identified as being >4 mm, the best ancillary findings were: * pericolonic stranding * [[ascites]] * colon wall nodularity The presence of wall thickness plus any one of these ancillary findings yields: * [[sensitivity (tests)|sensitivity]] of 70% * [[specificity (tests)|specificity]] of 93% Using criteria of >=10 mm or a wall thickness of >4 mm and any of the more-specific findings does not add significantly to the diagnosis but gives equally satisfactory results. In this study with a prevalence of positive ''C. difficile'' toxin of 54%, the [[positive predictive value]] was 88%. Patients who have antibiotic-associated diarrhea who have CT findings diagnostic of CDC merit consideration for treatment on that basis. A weakness of this study was not using a [[Gold standard (test)|gold standard]] cytotoxicity assay. ==Treatment== Many persons will also be asymptomatic and colonized with ''Clostridium difficile''. Treatment in asymptomatic patients is controversial, also leading into the debate of [[clinical surveillance]] and how it intersects with public health policy. It is possible that mild cases do not need treatment.<ref name="pmid17636768">Nelson R. Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD004610. PMID 17636768</ref> Patients should be treated as soon as possible when the diagnosis of ''Clostridium difficile'' colitis (CDC) is made to avoid frank [[sepsis]] or bowel perforation. === Pharmacotherapy === Three antibiotics are effective against ''C. difficile''. [[Metronidazole]] 500 mg orally three times daily is the drug of choice, because of lower price and comparable efficacy<ref name="pmid6138597">Teasley DG, Gerding DN, Olson MM, Peterson LR, Gebhard RL, Schwartz MJ, Lee JT Jr. Prospective randomised trial of metronidazole versus vancomycin for Clostridium-difficile-associated diarrhoea and colitis. Lancet. 1983 Nov 5;2(8358):1043-6. PMID 6138597</ref>. Oral [[vancomycin]] 125 mg four times daily is second-line therapy, but is avoided due to theoretical concerns of converting intestinal flora into vancomycin resistant organisms. However, it is used in the following cases: severe ''C. difficile'' diarrhea<ref name="pmid17599306">{{cite journal |author=Zar FA, Bakkanagari SR, Moorthi KM, Davis MB |title=A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity |journal=Clin. Infect. Dis. |volume=45 |issue=3 |pages=302–7 |year=2007 |pmid=17599306 |doi=10.1086/519265}}</ref> (the duration of diarrhea is reduced to 3 versus 4.6 days with metronidazole{{Fact|date=September 2007}}); no response to oral metronidazole; the organism is resistant to metronidazole; the patient is allergic to metronidazole; the patient is either pregnant or younger than 10 years of age. Vancomycin must be administered orally because IV administration does not achieve gut lumen minimum therapeutic concentration. The use of [[linezolid]] may be considered too, and newer drugs such as [[ramoplanin]] are in clinical development. It has been known that drugs traditionally used to stop diarrhea worsen the course of ''C. difficile''-related pseudomembranous colitis. [[Loperamide]], [[diphenoxylate]] and [[bismuth]] compounds are indeed contraindicated, because slowing of fecal transit time is thought to result in extended toxin-associated damage. [[Cholestyramine]], a powder drink occasionally used to lower cholesterol, is effective in binding both Toxin A and B, and slows bowel motility and helps prevent dehydration.<ref name=Stroehlein_2004>{{cite journal |author=Stroehlein J |title=Treatment of ''Clostridium difficile'' Infection |journal=Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol |volume=7 |issue=3 |pages=235–239 |year=2004 |pmid=15149585 |doi=10.1007/s11938-004-0044-y}}</ref> The dosage can be 4 grams daily, to up to four doses a day: caution should be exercised to prevent constipation, or drug interactions, most notably the binding of drugs by cholestyramine, preventing their absorption. Powdered banana flakes given twice daily is an alternative to cholestyramine and allow for stool bulking. Treatment with probiotics ("good" intestinal flora) has also been shown effective. Provision of ''[[Saccharomyces boulardii]]'' (Florastor) or ''[[Lactobacillus acidophilus]]'' twice daily times 30 days along with antibiotics has been clinically shown to shorten the duration of diarrhoea. A last-resort treatment in [[immunosuppression|immunosuppressed]] patients is [[intravenous immunoglobulin]] (IVIG).<ref name=Stroehlein_2004 /> ===Colectomy=== In those patients that develop systemic symptoms of CDC, colectomy may improve the outcome if performed before the need for [[vasopressors]]. ===Fecal bacteriotherapy=== [[Fecal bacteriotherapy]], a procedure related to probiotic research, has been suggested as a potential cure for the disease. It involves infusion of bacterial flora acquired from the feces of a healthy donor in an attempt to reverse bacterial imbalance responsible for the recurring nature of the infection. It has a success rate of nearly 95% according to some sources.<ref name=Schwan_1983>{{cite journal | author = Schwan A, Sjölin S, Trottestam U, Aronsson B | title = Relapsing clostridium difficile enterocolitis cured by rectal infusion of homologous faeces | journal = Lancet | volume = 2 | issue = 8354 | pages = 845 | year = 1983 | pmid = 6137662 | doi = 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)90753-5}}</ref><ref name=Schwan_1994>{{cite journal | author = Paterson D, Iredell J, Whitby M | title = Putting back the bugs: bacterial treatment relieves chronic diarrhoea | journal = Med J Aust | volume = 160 | issue = 4 | pages = 232–3 | year = 1994 | pmid = 8309401}}</ref><ref name=Borody_2000>{{cite journal | author = Borody T | title = "Flora Power"-- fecal bacteria cure chronic C. difficile diarrhea | journal = Am J Gastroenterol | volume = 95 | issue = 11 | pages = 3028–9 | year = 2000 | url = http://www.cdd.com.au/pdf/paper32.pdf | pmid = 11095314}}</ref> === Recurrence === The evolution of protocols for patients with recurrent ''C. difficile'' diarrhea also present a challenge: there is no known proper length of time or universally accepted alternative drugs with which one should be treated. However, re-treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin at the previous dose for 10 to 14 days is generally successful. The addition of [[rifampin]] to vancomycin also has been effective. Prophylaxis with competing, nonpathogenic organisms such as ''[[Lactobacillus]]'' spp. or ''[[Saccharomyces boulardii]]'' has been found to be helpful in preventing relapse in small numbers of patients (see, for example, [[Florastor]], or [[Lactinex]]). It is thought that these organisms, also known as probiotics, help to restore the natural flora in the gut and make patients more resistant to colonization by ''C. difficile''.{{Fact|date=March 2008}} ==Prevention== The most effective method for preventing CDAD is proper antimicrobial prescribing. In the hospital setting, where CDAD is most common, nearly all patients who develop CDAD are exposed to antimicrobials. Although proper antimicrobial prescribing sounds easy to do, approximately 50% of antimicrobial use is considered inappropriate. This is consistent whether in the hospital, clinic, community, or academic setting. Several studies have demonstrated a decrease in CDAD by limiting antibiotics most strongly associated with CDAD or by limiting unnecessary antimicrobial prescribing in general, both in outbreak and non-outbreak settings. The testing of all hospital inpatients over the age of 65 with diarrhea for CDiff became a compulsory NHS practice in January 2008, when it became evident that many outbreaks were being disguised as [[Noroflu]] in the UK, by hospital Risk Managers, who can be sacked by the Department of Health if CDiff infection rates are too high, but cannot be sacked over Noroflu outbreaks {see Department of Health website: insert link]. Patients most at risk are those with a prescription medicine history of broad-range antibiotics such as penicillins, and proton pump inhibitor drugs like omeprazole. Infection control measures, such as wearing gloves when caring for patients with CDAD, have been proven to be effective at preventing CDAD. This works by limiting the spread of ''C. difficile'' in the hospital setting. Additionally, washing with soap and water will eliminate the spores from contaminated hands, but alcohol-based hand rubs are ineffective.<ref>http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/563232</ref> Treatment with various oral supplements containing live bacteria has been studied in efforts to prevent ''Clostridium difficile''-associated infection/disease. A [[randomized controlled trial]] using a probiotic drink containing ''Lactobacillus casei'', ''L bulgaricus'', and ''Streptococcus thermophilus'' was reported to have some efficacy. This study was sponsored by the company that produces the drink studied <ref name="pmid17604300">{{cite journal |author=Hickson M, D'Souza AL, Muthu N, ''et al'' |title=Use of probiotic Lactobacillus preparation to prevent diarrhoea associated with antibiotics: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial |journal=BMJ |volume=335 |issue=7610 |pages=80 |year=2007 |pmid=17604300 |doi=10.1136/bmj.39231.599815.55}}</ref>. Although intriguing, several other studies have been unable to demonstrate any benefit of oral supplements of similar bacteria at preventing CDAD.{{Fact|date=September 2007}} Of note, patients on the antibiotics most strongly associated with CDAD were excluded from this study. On [[January 29]], [[2008]], scientists revealed that they have found a vaccination to prevent ''Clostridium difficile''. They stated it will be released in about three years' time. == Notable outbreaks == On June 4, 2003, two outbreaks of a highly virulent strain of this bacterium were reported in [[Montreal, Quebec]] and [[Calgary, Alberta]], in [[Canada]]. Sources put the death count as low as 36 and as high as 89, with approximately 1,400 cases in 2003 and within the first few months of 2004. ''C. difficile'' infections continued to be a problem in the Quebec health care system in late 2004. As of [[March 2005]], it had spread into the [[Toronto, Ontario]] area, hospitalizing 10 people. One died while the others were being discharged. A similar outbreak took place at [[Stoke Mandeville Hospital]] in the [[United Kingdom]] between 2003 and 2005. The local [[epidemiology]] of ''C. difficile'' may offer clues on how its spread may relate to the amount of time a patient spends in hospital and/or a rehabilitation center. It also samples institutions' ability to detect increased rates, and their capacity to respond with more aggressive hand washing campaigns, quarantine methods, and availability of yoghurt to patients at risk for infection. It has been suggested that both the Canadian and English outbreaks were related to the seemingly more virulent '''Strain NAP1/027''' of bacterium. This novel strain, also known as '''Quebec strain''', has also been implicated in an epidemic at two Dutch hospitals ([[Harderwijk]] and [[Amersfoort]], both 2005). A theory for explaining the increased virulence of 027 is that it is a hyperproducer of both toxin A and B, and that certain antibiotics may actually stimulate the bacteria to hyperproduce. On [[December 2]], [[2005]], The [[New England Journal of Medicine]], in an article spearheaded by Drs. Vivian Loo, Louise Poirier, and Mark Miller, reported the emergence of a new, highly toxic strain of ''C. difficile'', resistant to [[fluoroquinolone]] antibiotics, such as [[Cipro]] (ciprofloxacin) and [[Levaquin]] (levofloxacin), said to be causing geographically dispersed outbreaks in North America.<ref name=Loo_2005>{{cite journal |author=Loo V, Poirier L, Miller M, Oughton M, Libman M, Michaud S, Bourgault A, Nguyen T, Frenette C, Kelly M, Vibien A, Brassard P, Fenn S, Dewar K, Hudson T, Horn R, René P, Monczak Y, Dascal A |title=A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality |journal=N Engl J Med |volume=353 |issue=23 |pages=2442–9 |year=2005 |pmid=16322602 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa051639}}</ref> The [[Centers for Disease Control]] in [[Atlanta]] has also warned of the emergence of an epidemic strain with increased virulence, antibiotic resistance, or both.<ref name=McDonald_2005>{{cite journal |author=McDonald L |title=''Clostridium difficile'': responding to a new threat from an old enemy |journal=Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol |volume=26 |issue=8 |pages=672–5 |year=2005 |url= http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/infDis/Cdiff_ICHE08_05.pdf | pmid=16156321 |doi=10.1086/502600}}</ref> As one analyzes the pool of patients with the spores, many who are asymptomatic will pass the organism to individuals who are immunocompromised and hence, susceptible to increasing rates of diarrhea and poor outcome. It seems notable that the clusters described above represent a challenge to epidemiologists trying to understand how the illness spreads via the convergence of [[information technology]] with [[clinical surveillance]]. On [[October 1]], [[2006]], ''C.diff'' was said to have killed at least 49 people at hospitals in [[Leicester]], [[England]] over eight months, according to a [[National Health Service]] investigation. Another 29 similar cases were investigated by [[coroner]]s.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/leicestershire/5396800.stm Trust confirms 49 superbug deaths] - [[BBC News]]</ref> A UK Department of Health memo leaked shortly afterwards revealed significant concern in government about the bacterium, described as being "endemic throughout the health service"<ref>{{cite web| url= http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2541472,00.html| title=Leaked memo reveals that targets to beat MRSA will not be met| author=Nigel Hawkes| date=2007-01-11| work=The Times| accessdate = 2007-01-11}}</ref> On [[October 27]], [[2006]], 9 deaths were attributed to the bacterium in Quebec, Canada.<ref>{{cite web| url= http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2006/10/27/2145519.html| title=C. difficile blamed for 9 death in hospital near Montreal| date=11th January 200| work=cNews| accessdate = 2007-01-11}}</ref> On November 18, 2006, the bacterium was reported to have been responsible for 12 deaths in Quebec, Canada. This 12th reported death was only two days after the St. Hyacinthe's Honoré Mercier announced that the outbreak was under control. Thirty-one patients were diagnosed with Clostridium difficile and four (as of Sat. Nov 18th) were still under observation. Cleaning crews took measures in an attempt to clear the outbreak.<ref>[http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2006/11/18/difficile-outbreak.html 12th person dies of C. difficile at Quebec hospital] - [[CBC News]]</ref> On [[February 27]], [[2007]], a new outbreak was identified at Trillium Health Centre in Mississauga Ontario, where 14 people were diagnosed with the bacteria. The bacteria was the same strain as the one in Quebec. Officials have not been able to determine if C. difficile was responsible for deaths of four patients over the prior two months.<ref>[http://toronto.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20070228/cdifficile_mississauga_outbreak_070228/20070228/?hub=TorontoHome CTV Toronto - C. difficile outbreak linked to fatal strain - CTV News, Shows and Sports - Canadian Television<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> Between February and June 2007, three patients at Loughlinstown Hospital in Dublin, Ireland were found by the coroner to have died as a result of ''C.diff'' infection. In an inquest, the Coroner's Court found that the hospital had no designated infection control team or consultant microbiologist on staff. <ref>Irish Independent, [http://www.independent.ie/national-news/superbug-in-hospitals-linked-to-four-deaths-1139062.html Superbug in hospitals linked to four deaths], 10 October, 2007</ref> In October 2007, [[Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust]] was heavily criticized by the [[Healthcare Commission]] regarding its handling of a major outbreak of ''C. difficile'' in its hospitals in [[Kent]] from April 2004 to September 2006. In its report, the Commission estimated that about 90 patients "definitely or probably" died as a result of the infection. <ref>Healthcare Commission press release: [http://www.healthcarecommission.org.uk/newsandevents/pressreleases.cfm/cit_id/5875/FAArea1/customWidgets.content_view_1/usecache/false Healthcare watchdog finds significant failings in infection control at Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust], 11 October 2007</ref><ref>Daily Telegraph, [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/11/ncdiff611.xml Health Secretary intervenes in superbug row], 11 October 2007</ref> In November 2007, the 027 strain has spread into several hospitals in southern Finland, with ten deaths out of 115 infected patients reported on 2007-12-14. <ref>[http://www.hs.fi/kotimaa/artikkeli/%C3%84rh%C3%A4kk%C3%A4+suolistobakteeri+on+tappanut+jo+kymmenen+potilasta/1135232592793 Ärhäkkä suolistobakteeri on tappanut jo kymmenen potilasta - HS.fi - Kotimaa<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> Clostridium difficile was mentioned on 6,480 death certificates in 2006 in UK. <ref>[http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=146311&in_page_id=34 Hospitals struck by new killer bug]An article by Manchester free newspaper 'Metro', May 7, 2008</ref> In June 2007 a tv program was shown highlighting the dangers and unsafe working practices carried out by outside agencies employing cleaners, a reporter went undercover and was employed with no CRB check s or refs. The hospital featured was in Wales. The hospital trust was seen to be very complacent when presented with the tv evidence. == Sequencing the genome of the Quebec strain == On [[December 14]], [[2005]], researchers at [[McGill University]] in [[Montreal]], [[Quebec]], led by Dr. Ken Dewar and Dr. Andre Dascal and in collaboration with province-organized [[NPO]] Genome Quebec's research facility, announced they had sequenced the [[genome]] of the highly virulent Quebec strain of ''C. difficile''. This was accomplished by using ultra high-throughput sequencing technology. The tests involved doing 400,000 DNA parallel sequencing reactions which took the bacterium's genome apart and reassembled it so it could be studied.<ref name=Loo_2005 /><ref>[http://www.iapm.ca/newsmanager/anmviewer.asp?a=144&z=14 Scientists map C. difficile strain] - Institute of Public Affairs, Montreal</ref> It is expected this will allow quicker detection of the disease and better treatment. == Pronunciation== A practice has developed of pronouncing its specific name ''difficile'' as [dɪfɪsiːl] as if it was French, although it was intended as Latin ([[neuter]] [[singular]] [[nominative]] case). ==References== <!-- --------------------------------------------------------------- See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes for a discussion of different citation methods and how to generate footnotes using the <ref> & </ref> tags and the {{Reflist}} template -------------------------------------------------------------------- --> {{Reflist|2}} === Further reading === * {{cite journal |author=Dallal R, Harbrecht B, Boujoukas A, Sirio C, Farkas L, Lee K, Simmons R |title=Fulminant ''Clostridium difficile'': an underappreciated and increasing cause of death and complications |journal=Ann Surg |volume=235 |issue=3 |pages=363–72 |year=2002 |url=http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=11882758 |pmid=11882758 |doi=10.1097/00000658-200203000-00008}} * {{cite book | author = Martin S, Jung R | title = Gastrointestinal infections and enterotoxigenic poisonings. In: Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach (DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, Matzke GR, Wells BG, Posey LM, editors). | pages = pp. 2042-2043 | edition = 6th ed. | publisher = McGraw-Hill | year = 2005 | id = ISBN }} * {{cite journal |author=McDonald L, Killgore G, Thompson A, Owens R, Kazakova S, Sambol S, Johnson S, Gerding D |title=An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of ''Clostridium difficile'' |journal=N Engl J Med |volume=353 |issue=23 |pages=2433–41 |year=2005 |pmid=16322603 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa051590}} * {{cite book | author = Yamada T; Alpers DH (editors) | title = Textbook of Gastroenterology | edition = 4th ed. | pages = pp. 1870-1875 | publisher = Lippincott Williams & Wilkins | year = 2003 | id = ISBN 0-7817-2861-4 }} * {{cite journal |author=van den Hof S, van der Kooi T, van den Berg R, Kuijper E, Notermans D |title=''Clostridium difficile'' PCR ribotype 027 outbreaks in the Netherlands: recent surveillance data indicate that outbreaks are not easily controlled but interhospital transmission is limited |journal=Euro Surveill |volume=11 |issue=1 |pages=E060126.2 |year=2006 |url=http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ew/2006/060126.asp#2 | pmid=16801713}} * {{cite journal |author=Sunenshine R, McDonald L | title = ''Clostridium difficile-associated disease: New challenges from an established pathogen''| journal=Cleveland Clinic J. Med. |volume=73 |pages=187 |year=2006}} == See also == * [[Contamination control]] * [[Nosocomial infection]] ==External links== * [http://www.cdiff-support.co.uk/about.htm Information] from the ''UK Clostridium difficile'' Support Group (UK) * [http://www.cdiffsupport.com/learn/ Information] from the Original ''Clostridium difficile'' Support Group (UK) * [http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=6971098 "From hand to mouth"] Article from [[The Economist]] discussing ''C. difficile'' (requires subscription) * [http://pathema.tigr.org/tigr-scripts/Clostridium/PathemaHomePage.cgi Pathema-''Clostridium'' Resource] * [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5447a1.htm US CDC Report on Severe ''Clostridium difficile''--Associated Disease in Populations Previously at Low Risk--Four States, 2005] * [http://www.teflex.org Universal Antimicrobial Coating - kills C. Diff in 28 seconds or less] Wins Story (The risks of C Diff infection and hospital neglect)http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Gn1i9imSE-0 [[Category:Conditions diagnosed by stool test]] [[Category:Gram positive bacteria]] [[Category:Medically important anaerobes]] [[Category:Gut flora]] [[ca:Clostridium difficile]] [[de:Clostridium difficile]] [[es:Clostridium difficile]] [[fr:Clostridium difficile]] [[id:Clostridium difficile]] [[it:Clostridium difficile]] [[lb:Clostridium difficile]] [[hu:Clostridium difficile]] [[nl:Clostridium difficile]] [[pl:Clostridium difficile]] [[fi:Clostridium difficile]] [[sv:Clostridium difficile]] [[uk:Clostridium difficile]]