Critic 161227 224526902 2008-07-09T07:07:58Z Daniel.luxemburg 7437894 {{Cleanup|date=May 2008}} {{Unreferenced|date=April 2007}} {{otheruses}} {{Distinguish|Critique}} {{TOCright}} The word '''critic''' comes from the [[Greek language|Greek]] ''{{lang|el|κριτικός}}, {{lang|el-Latn|kritikós}} - one who discerns'', which itself arises from the [[Ancient Greek]] word ''{{lang|grc|κριτής}}, {{lang|grc-Latn|krités}}'', meaning a person who offers reasoned [[judgment]] or analysis, [[value judgment]], interpretation, or [[observation]]. The term can be used to describe an adherent of a position disagreeing with or opposing the object of criticism. Modern critics include professionals or amateurs who regularly judge or interpret [[performance]]s or other works (such as those of [[artist]]s, [[scientist]]s, [[musician]]s, or [[actor]]s), and typically [[publish]] their observations, often in [[periodical]]s. Critics are numerous in certain fields, including [[art critic|art]], [[music critic|music]], [[film critic|film]], [[theatre]] or [[drama]], [[restaurant]], and [[scientific publication]] critics. ==Criticism== '''Criticism''' in terms of expectations means [[democratic]] [[judgment]] over the suitability of a subject for the intended purposes, as opposed to the [[authoritarian]] [[command]], which is meant as an [[absolute]] realization of the authority's will, thus not open for [[debate]]. Criticism is the activity of judgement or informed interpretation and, in many cases, can be synonymous with "analysis." In literary and academic contexts, the term most frequently refers to [[literary criticism]], [[art criticism]], or other such fields, and to scholars' attempts to understand the aesthetic object in depth. In these contexts the term "critic," used without qualification, most frequently refers to a scholar of literature or another art form. In other contexts, the term describes hostility or disagreement with the object of criticism. Sometimes context, and the contentiousness of the subject, are the only differentiating factors between these two approaches. In politics, for instance (as in the phrase "criticism of [[U.S. foreign policy]]"), ''criticism'' almost exclusively refers to disagreement—while in an academic, artistic, or literary context (as in "criticism of [[Romantic poetry]]") it usually refers to the activity of subtle interpretation or analysis. ===Constructive criticism=== '''Constructive criticism''' is a compassionate attitude towards the person qualified for criticism. Having higher experience, gifts, respect, knowledge in specific field and being able to verbally convince at the same time, this person is intending to uplift the other person materially, morally, emotionally or spiritually. For high probability in succeeding his compassionate criticism the critic has to be in some kind of healthy personal relationship with the other one, which is normally a parent to child, friend to friend, teacher to student, spouse to spouse or any kind of recognized authority in specific field. Hence the word constructive is used so that something is created or visible outcome generated rather than the opposite. Participatory [[learning]] in [[pedagogy]] is based on these principles of constructive criticism. Here the saying applies that example is better than precept. There can be tension between constructive and useful criticism; for instance, a critic might usefully help an individual artist to recognize what is poor or slapdash in their body of work—but the critic may have to appear harsh and judgmental in order to state this. But useful criticism is a practical part of constructive criticism. ===Destructive criticism=== '''Destructive criticism''' is intended to harm someone, derogate and destroy someone’s creation, prestige, reputation and self-esteem on whatever level it might be. This may be done intentionally or out of sheer ignorance and foolishness. Hence the word destructive is used. In practical life destructive criticism may be disguised as constructive to be more painful while harming. Valid examination of intention of critic is when asked to prove, to help or to be somewhat useful at all. Often destructive criticism comes from persons who are envious, cruel and those who judges in fields which are not their own. An alternative definition of the difference is "''Criticism by me is constructive. Criticism of me is destructive.''" More usefully, whether criticism is constructive or destructive depends heavily on the use the listener makes of it. "Whether the critic meant to be constructive or destructive in pointing out that "''2+2 does not equal 7''" is not nearly as important as whether the person addressed corrects his arithmetic. Many of the common definitions of "constructive" and "destructive" border on logical fallacies: here the given definition of "constructive" is very close to [[argument from authority]], and the definition of "destructive" makes it easy to fall into argument [[ad hominem]]. Criticism cannot be ignored or accepted based on whether it is constructive or destructive. ==Criticism in psychology== Criticism can also be a tool of antisocial behavior, such as a [[passive-aggressive]] attack. One of the symptoms of [[Narcissistic Personality Disorder]] is an inability to tolerate any forms of criticism. The critic is also considered to be the [[dialectic|psychic inverse]] of [[genius]].<ref>[http://www.thecrimson.harvard.edu/article.aspx?ref=519082 The Harvard Crimson], "To be a critic is to trade transcendence in for self-awareness and proficiency—which is not to say that geniuses don’t know what they’re doing...genius involves a sort of freefall, brave, bold and fluent, that most of us aren’t capable of."</ref> This insight was formulated early by [[Gotthold Ephraim Lessing|Lessing]] as "not every critic is a genius, but every genius is born a critic...genius has the proof of all rules within itself." Kant scholar Jane Kneller has read this to indicate that, as opposed to the externally oriented and culturally dependent critic, "genius demonstrates its autonomy not by ignoring all rules, but by deriving the rules from itself."<ref>{{cite book | editor = Paul Guyer | title=Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgement: Critical Essays| publisher= Rowman and Littlefield| year=2003 | id=ISBN 0742514196}}</ref> ==Footnotes== {{reflist}} ==See also== * [[Art historian]] * [[Connoisseur]] * [[Critical management studies]] * [[Critical theory]] * [[Critical theory (Frankfurt School)]] * [[Critical thinking]] * [[Critical vocabulary]] * [[Criticism of atheism]] * [[Criticism of religion]] * [[Critique]] * [[Cultural critic]] * [[Film criticism]] * [[Food critic]] * [[Literary criticism]] * [[Music journalism]] * [[Review]] * [[Social criticism]] * [[Textual criticism]] ==External links== {{wiktionarypar|critic|critical|critique}} * [http://www.citigraphics.net/jenner/djenner/archive/CritiqueAndCriticalThinking.pdf What "Critical" means in "Critical Thinking"]: Donald Jenner, BMCC/CUNY (pdf) [[Category:Humanities occupations]] [[Category:Entertainment occupations]] [[Category:Criticism]] [[ar:نقد]] [[bg:Критик]] [[cs:Kritik]] [[da:Kritik]] [[de:Kritiker]] [[es:Crítica]] [[eo:Kritikisto]] [[id:Kritik]] [[nl:Kritiek]] [[ja:評論家]] [[pl:Krytyka]] [[ru:Критик]] [[sq:Kritika]] [[simple:Critic]] [[sr:Критичар]] [[fi:Arvostelu]] [[sv:Kritiker]] [[tr:Eleştiri]] [[uk:Критик]] [[zh:評論家]]