Distinguish
2452527
211617267
2008-05-11T07:36:54Z
TreasuryTag
3041333
general rejuvenation using [[Project:AutoWikiBrowser|AWB]]
{{selfref|For Wikipedia's templates used to disambiguate terms or names, see [[Wikipedia:Template messages/General]].}}
{{unreferenced|date=December 2007}}
In [[law]], to '''distinguish''' a [[Legal case|case]] means to differentiate the [[facts]] of the case before the [[court]] from the facts of a case of [[precedent]] where there is an apparent [[similarity]]. By successfully distinguishing a case, the holding or legal reasoning of the earlier case will either not apply or will be limited.
Whether a case is successfully distinguished often looks to whether the distinguished facts are material to the matter.
Both cases ''[[Balfour v. Balfour]]'' (1919) and ''[[Merrit v. Merrit]]'' (1971), involve a wife making a claim against her husband for [[breach of contract]]. The judge in Balfour decided that a claim could not be made because there was no intention to create legal regulations, there was no legally binding contract. However in Merrit v. Merrit, the judge decided that the facts of this case was sufficiently different in that, whilst the parties were husband and wife, the agreement was made after they had separated, in writing, thus distinguishing the case from Balfour.
== Spotted cow ==
An analogy taught in [[law school]] is that of a case involving black and white spotted [[cow]]s. A [[lawyer]] in a subsequent case involving brown spotted cows might distinguish the facts on the [[color]] of the spots.
==See also==
* [[Precedent]]
* [[Case law]]
* [[Opinion]]
[[Category:Law]]
{{law-stub}}