Duns Scotus
87888
223126938
2008-07-02T18:13:37Z
Kernel Saunters
4080342
Removed category "People from the Scottish Borders"; Quick-adding category "People from Duns" (using [[WP:HOTCAT|HotCat]])
{{two other uses||SCOTUS|Supreme Court of the United States||John Scotus}}
{{Infobox_Philosopher |
<!-- Scroll down to edit this page -->
<!-- Philosopher Category -->
region = Western Philosophers |
era = Medieval Philosophy |
color = #B0C4DE |
<!-- Image and Caption -->
image_name = JohnDunsScotus.jpg |
image_caption = John Duns Scotus|
<!-- Information -->
name = John Duns Scotus |
birth = c. [[1266]] (Duns, Berwickshire, [[Scotland]]) |
death = [[8 November]], [[1308]] ([[Cologne]], [[Germany]]) |
school_tradition = [[Scholasticism]], Founder of [[Scotism]] |
main_interests = [[Metaphysics]], [[Theology]], [[Logic]], [[Epistemology]], [[Ethics]] |
influences = [[Aristotle]], [[Augustine of Hippo|St. Augustine]], [[Avicenna]], [[Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius|Boethius]], [[Anselm of Canterbury|Anselm]], [[Thomas Aquinas]], [[Henry of Ghent]] |
influenced = Popes [[Alexander VI]], [[Sixtus IV]], [[William of Ockham]], [[Martin Luther]], [[René Descartes]], [[Leibniz]], [[Heidegger]], [[Charles Peirce]] |
notable_ideas = Univocity of being, Haecceity as a principle of individuation, [[Immaculate conception]] of Virgin Mary |
}}
The [[Beatification|blessed]] '''John Duns Scotus''', [[Order of Friars Minor|O.F.M]] (c. [[1266]] – [[November 8]], [[1308]]) was one of the most important [[theology|theologians]] and [[philosopher | philosophers]] of the [[High Middle Ages]] (the others being [[Aquinas]], [[William_of_Ockham|Ockham]] and [[Bonaventura]]). He was nicknamed ''Doctor Subtilis'' for his penetrating and subtle manner of thought.
Scotus has had considerable influence on [[Roman Catholic]] thought. The doctrines for which he is best known are the "univocity of being", that existence is the most abstract concept we have, applicable to everything that exists, the [[formal distinction]], a way of distinguishing between different aspects of the same thing, and the idea of [[haecceity]], the property supposed to be in each individual thing that makes it an individual. Scotus also developed a complex argument for the [[Existence_of_God | existence of God]], and argued for the [[Immaculate conception]] of [[Mary]].
==Life==
Little is known of Scotus' life. He was probably born at [[Duns]], in the [[Scottish Borders|Borders]]. In 1291 he was ordained in [[Northampton, England|Northampton]], [[England]]. A note in Codex 66 of Merton College, Oxford, records that Scotus "flourished at [[Cambridge, England|Cambridge]], [[Oxford, England|Oxford]] and [[ Paris]]<ref>Frank & Wollter p.5</ref>. He began lecturing on Peter Lombard's [[Sentences]] at the prestigious [[University of Paris]] in the Autumn of 1302. Later in that academic year, however, he was expelled from the University of Paris for siding with then [[Pope Boniface VIII]] in his feud with [[Philip the Fair]] of France, over the taxation of church property.
Scotus was back in Paris before the end of 1304, probably returning in May. He continued lecturing there until, for reasons which are still mysterious, he was dispatched to the Franciscan ''studium'' at [[Cologne]], probably in October 1307. He died there in 1308; the date of his death is traditionally given as 8 November.
He is buried in the Church of the [[Minorites]] in Cologne. His sarcophagus bears the Latin inscription: ''Scotia me genuit. Anglia me suscepit. Gallia me docuit. Colonia me tenet.'' (trans. "[[Scotia]] brought me forth. England sustained me. France taught me. Cologne holds me.") He was [[beatification|beatified]] by [[Pope John Paul II]] on [[March 20]], [[1993]]. According to an old tradition, Scotus was buried alive following his lapse into a coma.
== Reputation and influence ==
Scotus is considered one of the most important [[Franciscan]] theologians and was the founder of [[Scotism]], a special form of [[Scholasticism]]. He came out of the Old Franciscan School, to which [[Haymo of Faversham]] (d. 1244), [[Alexander of Hales]] (d. 1245), [[John of Rupella]] (d. 1245), [[William of Melitona]] (d. 1260), St. [[Bonaventure]] (d. 1274), [[Cardinal (Catholicism)|Cardinal]] [[Matthew of Aquasparta]] (d. 1289), [[John Peckham]], Archbishop of Canterbury (d. 1292), [[Richard of Middletown]] (d. about 1300), etc., belonged. He was known as "Doctor Subtilis" because of the subtle distinctions and nuances of his thinking. Later philosophers in the sixteenth century were less complimentary about his work, and accused him of [[Sophism|sophistry]]. This led to his name, "[[dunce]]" (which developed from the name "Dunse" given to his followers in the 1500s) to become synonymous for "somebody who is incapable of [[Scholarly method|scholarship]]", as is expressed for example in the (now defunct) use of the "[[dunce cap]]" to punish pupils who behave badly in class.
==Metaphysics==
=== Realism ===
Scotus is generally considered to be a [[Philosophical realism|realist]] (as opposed to a [[nominalist]]) in that he treated universals as real. He attacks a position close to that later defended by [[Ockham]], arguing that things have a common nature - for example the humanity common to both Socrates and Plato.
=== Univocity of Being ===
He followed [[Aristotle]] in asserting that the subject matter of metaphysics is "being qua being" (''ens inquantum ens''). Being in general (''ens in communi''), as an univocal notion, was for him the first object of the intellect. Metaphysics includes the study of the transcendentals, so called because they transcend the division of being into finite and infinite and the further division of finite being into the ten Aristotelian categories. Being itself is a transcendental, and so are the "attributes" of being — "one", "true", and "good" — which are coextensive with being, but which each add something to it.
The doctrine of the univocity of being implies the denial of any real distinction between [[essence]] and [[existence]]. Aquinas had argued that in all finite being (i.e. all except God), the essence of a thing is distinct from its existence. Scotus rejected the distinction. We can conceive of what it is to be something, without conceiving it as existing. Scotus denied this. We should not make any distinction between whether a thing exists (''si est'') and what it is (''quid est''), for we never know whether something exists, unless we have some concept of what we know to exist. <ref>''Opus Oxoniense'' I iii 1-2, quoted in Grenz p.55</ref>
=== Categories ===
The study of the Aristotelian categories belongs to metaphysics insofar as the categories, or the things falling under them, are studied as beings. (If they are studied as concepts, they belong instead to the logician.) There are exactly ten categories, according to orthodox Aristotelianism. The first and most important is the category of [[Substance theory|substance]]. Substances are beings in a primary sense, since they have an independent existence (''entia per se''). Beings in any of the other nine categories, called [[Accident (philosophy)|accidents]], exist in substances. The nine categories of accidents are quantity, quality, relation, action, passion, place, time, position, and state (or ''habitus'').
=== Individuation ===
Duns elaborates a distinct view on [[hylomorphism]], with three important strong theses that differentiate him. He held: 1) that there exists [[matter]] that has no form whatsoever, or prime matter, as the stuff underlying all change, against [[Aquinas]] (cf. his ''Quaestiones in Metaphysicam'' 7, q. 5; ''Lectura'' 2, d. 12, q. un.), 2) that not all created substances are composites of form and matter (cf. ''Lectura'' 2, d. 12, q. un., n. 55), that is, that purely spiritual substances do exist, and 3) that one and the same substance can have more than one substantial form — for instance, humans have at least two substantial forms, the soul and the form of the body (''forma corporeitas'') (cf. ''Ordinatio'' 4, d. 11, q. 3, n. 54). He argued for an original principle of [[individuation]] (cf. ''Ordinatio'' 2, d. 3, pars 1, qq. 1-6), the "[[haecceity]]" as the ultimate unity of a unique individual (''haecceitas'', an entity's 'thisness'), as opposed to the common [[Nature (philosophy)|nature]] (''natura communis''), feature existing in any number of individuals. For Scotus, the axiom stating that only the individual exists is a dominating principle of the understanding of reality. For the apprehension of individuals, an intuitive cognition is required, which gives us the present existence or the non-existence of an individual, as opposed to abstract cognition. Thus the human soul, in its separated state from the body, will be capable of knowing the spiritual intuitively.
=== Formal distinction ===
Like other realist philosophers of the period (such as Aquinas and [[Henry of Ghent]], Scotus recognised the need for an intermediate distinction that was not merely conceptual, but not fully real or mind-dependent either. Scotus argued for an [[Formal distinction | formal distinction]] (''distinctio formalis a parte rei''), which holds between entities which are inseparable and indistinct in reality, but whose definitions are not identical. For example, the personal properties of the [[Trinity]] are formally distinct from the Divine essence. Similarly, the distinction between the 'thisness' or ''haecceity'' of a thing is intermediate between a real and a conceptual distinction<ref>Honderich p. 209</ref>. There is also a formal distinction between the divine attributes and the powers of the soul.
==Theology==
=== Voluntarism ===
Scotus was an Augustinian theologian. He is usually associated with [[voluntarism]], the tendency to emphasize God's will and human freedom in all philosophical issues. The main difference between [[Aquinas]]' rational theology and that of Scotus' is that Scotus believes certain predicates may be applied univocally — with exactly the same meaning — to God and creatures, whereas Aquinas insisted that this is impossible, and that only analogical predication can be employed, in which a word as applied to God has a meaning different from, although related to, the meaning of that same word as applied to creatures. Duns struggled throughout his works in demonstrating his univocity theory against Aquinas' analogy doctrine.
=== Existence of God ===
The existence of God can be proven only ''a posteriori'', through its effects. The Causal Argument he gives for the existence of [[God]] is particularly interesting and precise. It says that an infinity of things that are essentially ordered is impossible, as the totality of caused things that are essentially caused is itself caused, and so it is caused by some cause which is not a part of the totality, for then it would be the cause of itself; for the whole totality of dependent things is dependent, and not on anything belonging to that totality. The argument is relevant for Scotus' conception of metaphysical inquiry into being by searching the ways into which beings relate to each other.
=== Immaculate Conception ===
Perhaps the most influential point of Duns Scotus' theology was his defense of the [[Immaculate Conception]] of [[Blessed Virgin Mary|Mary]]. At the time, there was a great deal of argument about the subject. The general opinion was that it was appropriate, but it could not be seen how to resolve the problem that only with [[Jesus|Christ's]] death would the stain of [[original sin]] be removed. The great philosophers and theologians of the West were divided on the subject (indeed, it appears that even [[Thomas Aquinas]] sided with those who denied the doctrine, though some [[Thomism|Thomists]] dispute this). The [[feast of the Immaculate Conception|feast day]] had existed in the East since the seventh century and had been introduced in several dioceses in the West as well, even though the philosophical basis was lacking. Citing [[Anselm of Canterbury]]'s principle, "''potuit, decuit, ergo fecit''" ([[God]] could do it, it was appropriate, therefore he did it), Duns Scotus devised the following argument: Mary was in need of redemption like all other human beings, but through the merits of Jesus' [[crucifixion]], given in advance, she was conceived without the stain of original sin. God could have brought it about (1) that she was never in original sin, (2) she was in sin only for an instant, (3) she was in sin for a period of time, being purged at the last instant. Whatever of these was more excellent should probably be attributed to Mary <ref>''Ordinatio'' III, d.3, q.1</ref>. This apparently careful statement provoked a storm of opposition at Paris, and suggested the line 'fired France for Mary without spot' in the famous poem "Duns Scotus's Oxford", by [[Gerard Manley Hopkins]].
This argument appears in [[Pope Pius IX]]'s declaration of the [[dogma]] of the Immaculate Conception. [[Pope John XXIII]] recommended the reading of Duns Scotus' theology to modern theology students.
==Logic==
The authenticity of Scotus' [[Logic | logical works]] has been questioned. Some of the logical and metaphysical works originally attributed to him are now known to be by other authors. There were already concerns about this within two centuries of his death, when the sixteenth-century logician [[Jacobus Naveros]] noted inconsistencies between these texts and his commentary on the ''Sentences'', leading him to doubt whether he had written any logical works at all <ref>Ashworth 1987</ref>. The Questions on the Prior Analytics (''In Librum Priorum Analyticorum Aristotelis Quaestiones'') were also discovered to be mistakenly attributed <ref>R.P.E. Longpre</ref>.
Modern editors have identified only four works as authentic: the commentaries on Porphyry's [[Isagoge]], on Aristotle's [[Categories (Aristotle) | Categories]], [[On Interpretation]] (in two different versions), and on [[Sophistical Refutations]], probably written in that order. These are called the <i>parva logicalia</i>. These are dated at around 1295, when Scotus would have been in his late twenties, working in Oxford.
==See also==
*[[Scotism]]
*[[Oxford Franciscan school]]
*[[History of science in the Middle Ages]]
== Bibliography ==
Editions:
*''Lectura'' (Early Oxford Lectures)
*''Opus Parisiense'' or ''Reportata parisiensia'' (Paris Lectures)
*''Opus Oxoniense'' (Oxford Lectures)
*''Tractatus de Primo Principio'' (Treatise on the First Principle) [http://bice.philo.unibo.it/~buzzetti/corso2002-03/dpp-lat.html Latin Version] [http://www.ewtn.com/library/THEOLOGY/GODASFIR.HTM English Translation]
*''Questions on the Metaphysics of Aristotle'' [http://individual.utoronto.ca/pking/resources/scotus/In_Meta.txt Latin text]
*''Quaestiones Quodlibetales''
*''De Rerum Principio'' (Of the Beginning of Things) An inauthentic work once attributed to Scotus.
*''Cuestiones Cuodlibetales. In Obras del Doctor Sutil, Juan Duns Escoto''. Ed. Felix Alluntis. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos, 1963.
* ''Opera Omnia''. ("The Wadding edition") Lyon, 1639; reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1968.
* ''Opera Omnia''. ("The Vatican edition") Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, 1950-.
* ''Opera Philosophica''. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute: , 1997-2006:
* Vol. I: Quaestiones super Porphyrius Isagoge et Aristoteles Categoriae
* Vol. II: Quaestiones super Peri hermeneias et Sophistici Elenchis (along with)Theoremata
* Vol. III-IV: Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis
* Vol. V: Quaestiones super Secundum et Tertium de Anima.
English translations:
* John Duns Scotus, ''A Treatise on God as First Principle''. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press 1982. A Latin text and English translation of the De Primo Principio. Second edition, revised, with a commentary by Allan Wolter, (First edition 1966).
* John Duns Scotus, ''Contingency and Freedom. Lectura I 39'', transl., comment. and intro. by A. Vos Jaczn, H. Veldhuis, A.H. Looman-Graaskamp, E. Dekker and N.W. den Bok. The New Synthese Historical Library 4. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer, 1994.
* John Duns Scotus, ''A treatise on Potency and Act''. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute 2000.
* Questions on the Metaphysics of Aristotle Book IX. Introduction and Commentary. Latin text and English translation by Allan B. Wolter, St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute 2000.
* Questions on the Metaphysics of Aristotle by John Duns Scotus. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute, 1997-1998.
*A. Vos, H. Veldhuis, E. Dekker, N.W. den Bok and A.J. Beck (ed.). ''Duns Scotus on Divine Love: Texts and Commentary on Goodness and Freedom, God and Humans'', Aldershot: Ashgate 2003.
==References==
*Bos, E.P., (ed.). ''John Duns Scotus (1265-1308) Renewal of Philosophy.'' Acts of the Third Symposium organized by the Dutch Society for Medieval Philosophy Medium Aevum. Elementa, 72. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1998.
* Frank, W. and Wollter, A. ''Duns Scotus, Metaphysician'', Purdue University Press, 1995.
* Gracia, J.E. & Noone, T., ''A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages'', Blackwell 2003.
* Grenz, Stanley J., ''The Named God And The Question Of Being: A Trinitarian Theo-ontology'', Blackwell 2005.
* "The Death of Blessed Scotus", according to Canon Joseph Bonello and Eman Bonnici.
* Honderich, T., (ed.) ''The Oxford Companion to Philosophy'', article "Duns Scotus", Oxford 1995.
*Ingham, M.B., & Mechthild Dreyer, ''The Philosophical Vision of John Duns Scotus: An Introduction.'' Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press 2004.
*Kretzmann,N., A. Kenny, & J. Pinborg, ''Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy'' Cambridge: 1982.
* Vos., A. ''The Philosophy of John Duns Scotus''. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.
* Williams, Thomas, (ed.), ''The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus.'' Cambridge University Press 2003.
==Notes==
{{Reflist}}
==External links==
*[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/duns-scotus/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: ''John Duns Scotus'']
*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/s/scotus.htm Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: ''John Dun Scotus'']
*[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05194a.htm Catholic Encyclopedia article on John Duns Scotus]
*[http://www.dunsscotus.com Site about Duns Scotus of the Research Group John Duns Scotus (Utrecht, NL)]
*[http://www.nd.edu/~wwillia5/dunsscotus/index.html Thomas Williams' pages on Scotus]
*[http://www.formalontology.it/duns-scotus.htm The Realist Ontology of John Duns Scotus] with an annotated bibliography
*[http://www2.nd.edu/Departments//Maritain/etext/scotism.htm Article by Parthenius Minges on Scotists and Scotism at the Jacques Maritain Center]
*[http://www.duns.bordernet.co.uk/history/dunsscotus.html Local history site of Blessed John Duns Scotus' birthplace, Duns, Berwickshire, Scotland]
{{Medieval_Philosophy}}
{{Link FA|de}}
[[Category:13th century philosophers]]
[[Category:14th century philosophers]]
[[Category:Roman Catholic theologians]]
[[Category:Logicians]]
[[Category:Roman Catholic philosophers]]
[[Category:Scholastic philosophers]]
[[Category:Scottish philosophers]]
[[Category:Scottish scholars and academics]]
[[Category:Scottish theologians]]
[[Category:Philosophers of language|Duns Scotus]]
[[Category:Beatified people]]
[[Category:Franciscans]]
[[Category:13th century Latin writers]]
[[Category:14th century Latin writers]]
[[Category:Berwickshire]]
[[Category:1266 births|Duns Scotus]]
[[Category:1308 deaths|Duns Scotus]]
[[Category:People from Duns]]
[[bn:জন ডান্স স্কোটাস]]
[[bs:Ivan Duns Škot]]
[[ca:Joan Duns Escot]]
[[cs:John Duns Scotus]]
[[da:Johannes Duns Scotus]]
[[de:Johannes Duns Scotus]]
[[es:Juan Duns Scoto]]
[[eu:John Duns Scotus]]
[[fr:John Duns Scot]]
[[hr:Ivan Duns Škot]]
[[id:John Duns Scotus]]
[[it:Duns Scoto]]
[[he:ג'ון דנס סקוטוס]]
[[hu:John Duns Scotus]]
[[la:Duns Scotus]]
[[nl:Johannes Duns Scotus]]
[[ja:ヨハネス・ドゥンス・スコトゥス]]
[[no:John Duns Scotus]]
[[pl:Jan Duns Szkot]]
[[pt:Duns Scot]]
[[ro:Duns Scotus]]
[[ru:Иоанн Дунс Скот]]
[[sk:John Duns Scotus]]
[[sh:Duns Scot]]
[[fi:Duns Scotus]]
[[sv:Johannes Duns Scotus]]