Ebionites 145905 225684369 2008-07-14T21:58:57Z EALacey 13429 linking [[Robert E. Van Voorst]] {{Expert-verify|date=August 2007}} The '''Ebionites''' ([[Greek language|Greek]]: {{lang|grc|Ἐβιωναῖοι}} ''Ebionaioi'' from [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]]; {{lang|he|'''אביונים'''}}{{Fact|date=June 2008}}, {{lang|he-Latn|''Ebyonim''}}, "the Poor Ones") were an [[Early Christianity|early]] [[Jewish Christian]] sect that lived in and around [[Judea]] and [[Roman Palestine|Palestine]] from the 1st to the 4th century.<ref name="Klijn & Reinink 1973">{{cite book| author = A.F.J. Klijn & G.J. Reinink| title = Patristic Evidence for Jewish-Christian Sects| publisher = Brill | year = 1973 | id = ISBN 9004037632 }}</ref> To throw light on the [[Ebionites#Views and practices|views, practices]] and [[Ebionites#History|history]] of the Ebionites, modern scholars attempt to reconstruct information from the available sources. Much of what is known about the Ebionites derives from the [[Church Fathers]], who wrote [[polemics]] against the Ebionites, whom they deemed [[heresy|heretical]] [[Judaizers]].<ref name="Klijn & Reinink 1973"/><ref>See also [[s:Ebionites according to the Church Fathers|Church Fathers on the Ebionites (Wikisource)]]</ref> Some scholars agree with the substance of the traditional portrayal as an offshoot of mainstream Christianity attempting to reestablish [[Halakha|Jewish Law]].<ref name="Uhlhorn">G. Uhlhorn, "Ebionites", in: [[Philip Schaff]] (ed.), ''A Religious Encyclopaedia or Dictionary of Biblical, Historical, Doctrinal, and Practical Theology'', 3rd ed. (1894), p. 684–685 (vol. 2).</ref><ref name="RGG">[[Oscar Cullmann]], "Ebioniten", in: ''Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart'', 1958. p. 7435 (vol. 2).</ref> According to the Encyclopaedia Britannica, the Ebionite movement may have arisen about the time of the [[Siege of Jerusalem (70)|destruction of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem]] (AD 70).<ref>[http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9031860/Ebionite article ''Ebionite'']</ref> Others have argued that the Ebionites were more faithful to the authentic [[Ministry of Jesus#Teachings|teachings]] of Jesus and constituted the mainstream of the Jerusalem church before being gradually [[marginalization|marginalized]] by the [[Pauline Christianity|followers of Paul of Tarsus]].<ref name="Schoeps 1969">{{cite book| author = Hans-Joachim Schoeps| title = Jewish Christianity: Factional Disputes in the Early Church. Translation Douglas R. A. Hare| publisher = Fortress Press| year = 1969}}</ref><ref name="Maccoby 1987">{{cite book| author = [[Hyam Maccoby]]| title = The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity| pages = p. 172-183.| publisher = HarperCollins | year = 1987 | id = ISBN 0062505858}}</ref><ref name="Eisenman p. 5-6 1997">{{cite book| author = [[Robert Eisenman]]| title = James the Brother of Jesus: The Key to Unlocking the Secrets of Early Christianity and the Dead Sea Scrolls | pages = p. 5-6.| publisher = Viking | year = 1997 | id = ISBN 1842930265}}</ref><ref name="Tabor 2006">{{cite book| author = [[James Tabor]] | title = The Jesus Dynasty: A New Historical Investigation of Jesus, His Royal Family, and the Birth of Christianity| publisher = Simon & Schuster | year = 2006| id = ISBN 0743287231}}</ref><ref name="Tabor, authentic followers">Tabor (2006), p. 275, 278-283.</ref><ref>Howard Bream's review of H. J. Schoeps, ''Theologie und Geschichte des Judenchristentums'' (1949), in: ''The Journal of Religion'' (1952), p. 58: "In the development of Christianity itself, he [Schoeps] believes that they [the Ebionites] were in many respects closer to the teachings of Jesus than were the Gentiles. This is true particularly where the Ebionites differed from normative Judaism, as in rejecting animal sacrifice and in deleting certain passages from Scripture with the claim that they were interpolations."</ref> In contrast to mainstream Christianity, the Ebionites insisted on a universal necessity of following [[Torah|Jewish religious law and rites]],<ref>Kaufmann Kohler, [http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=22&letter=E "Ebionites"], in: Isidore Singer & Cyrus Alder (ed.), ''Jewish Encyclopedia'', 1901-1906.</ref> which they interpreted in light of Jesus' [[expounding of the Law]].<ref name="Viljoen 2006"/> They regarded Jesus as a mortal human messianic prophet but not as [[God the Son|divine]], revered [[James the Just|his brother James]] as the head of the [[Jerusalem Church]] and rejected [[Paul of Tarsus]] as an "[[apostate]] of the Law"{{Fact|date=March 2008}}. Their name suggests that they placed a special value on [[Poverty#Religious poverty|religious poverty]]. Some scholars distinguish the Ebionites from other Jewish Christian groups, e.g. the [[Nazarenes]],<ref name="Hegg 2007">{{cite paper | author = Tim Hegg | title = The Virgin Birth - An Inquiry into the Biblical Doctrine | publisher = TorahResource | year = 2007 | url = http://www.torahresource.com/EnglishArticles/VirginBirth.pdf | accessdate=2007-08-13}}</ref> while others believe the two names refer to the same sect and that noted disagreements among Jewish Christians do not correspond with these names.<ref name="Harnack">[[Adolf von Harnack]], ''The History of Dogma'', [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/19612/19612-h/19612-h.htm#SEC_I_VI_I "Chapter VI. The Christianity of the Jewish Christians"].</ref> Still others contend that the term was not used to describe a single group at all, but rather denoted any group of Christians of that time who sought to adhere both to Jesus and the Jewish law.<ref>Lindsay Jones (ed.) ''Encyclopedia of Religion'', Detroit: Thomason-Gale, 2005, p. 2595-2596. ISBN 0-02-865997-X.</ref>{{Clarifyme|date=March 2008}}<!---Is this the article called 'Ebionites'? This should be indicated.---> [[Image:Bloch-SermonOnTheMount.jpg|thumb|300px|right|Jesus's [[expounding of the Law]] during the [[Sermon on the Mount]] may have been a central issue to Jewish Christians such as the Ebionites.<ref name="Viljoen 2006"/> ''Image: The Sermon on the Mount by Carl Heinrich Bloch, 1890'']] ==Name== The term ''Ebionites'' derives from the [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]] ''Evyonim'', meaning "the Poor Ones",<ref name="Uhlhorn"/> which has parallels in the [[Psalms]] and the self-given term of pious Jewish circles.<ref name="RGG"/><ref>PsSal 10, 6; 15, 1; 1 QpHab XII, 3.6.10</ref> The term "the poor" was at first a common designation for all Christians - a reference to their material as well their [[Poverty#Religious poverty|religious poverty]].<ref name="Uhlhorn"/><ref>[[Marcus Minucius Felix|Minucius Felix]], ''Octavius, 36'': "That we are called the poor is not our disgrace, but our glory."</ref><ref>The Greek equivalent ([[Greek language|Greek]]: {{lang|grc|πτωχοί}})'' ptōkhoi'' appears in the [[New Testament]] ([http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%2015:26;&version=50; Romans 15, 26]; [http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians%202:10;&version=50; Galatians 2,10]), possibly as an honorary title of the [[Jerusalem church]].</ref> Following [[schism]]s within the early Church, the graecized Hebrew term "Ebionite" was applied exclusively to [[Jewish Christians]] separated from the developing [[Pauline Christianity]], and later in the fourth century a specific group of Jewish Christians or to a Jewish Christian sect distinct from the [[Nazarenes]]. All the while, the designation "the Poor" in other languages was still used in its original, more general sense.<ref name="Uhlhorn"/><ref name="RGG"/><ref name = "TaborNazEbiJames">James Tabor, ''[http://www.religiousstudies.uncc.edu/JDTABOR/ebionites.html Nazarenes and Ebionites]''</ref><ref name="Eisenman p. 4,45 1997">Eisenman (1997), p. 4, 45.</ref> [[Origen]] says "for Ebion signifies “poor” among the Jews, and those Jews who have received Jesus as Christ are called by the name of Ebionites."<ref>Origen, Contra Celsum, II, 1.</ref><ref>http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf04.vi.ix.ii.i.html</ref> [[Tertullian]] inaccurately derived the name from a fictional [[heresiarch]] called Ebion.<ref name="Uhlhorn"/><ref name="RGG"/> The divergent application of "Ebionite" persists today, as some authors choose to label all Jewish Christians, even before the mentioned schism, as Ebionites,<ref name = "TaborNazEbiJames"/><ref name="Eisenman p. 4,45 1997"/> while others, though agreeing about the historical events, use it in a more restricted sense.<ref name="Maccoby 1987"/> Mainstream scholarship commonly uses the term in the restricted sense.<ref name="Uhlhorn"/><ref name="RGG"/> ==History== {{Jewish Christianity}} Without authenticated archaeological evidence, attempts to reconstruct their history have been based on textual references, mainly the writings of the Church Fathers. The earliest reference to a group that might fit the description of the Ebionites appears in [[Justin Martyr]]'s ''Dialogue with Trypho'' (c. 140). Justin distinguishes between [[Jewish Christians]] who observe the [[Law of Moses]] but does not require its observance upon others, and those who believe the Mosaic Law to be obligatory on all.<ref name="Justin">Justin Martyr, [http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/01282.htm ''Dialogue with Trypho'', 47].</ref> [[Irenaeus]] (c. 180) was the first to use the term "Ebionites" to describe a heretical judaizing sect, which he regarded as [[Legalism (theology)|stubbornly clinging to the Law]].<ref name="Irenaeus">Irenaeus of Lyon, ''[[On the Detection and Overthrow of the So-Called Gnosis|Adversus Haereses]]'' [http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103126.htm I, 26]; [http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103321.htm II,21].</ref> [[Origen]] (c. 212) remarks that the name derives from the [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]] word "evyon," meaning "poor."<ref>Origen, [http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/04124.htm ''De Principiis'', IV, 22].</ref> [[Epiphanius of Salamis]] in the 4th century gives the most complete but also questionable account in his [[heresiology]] called ''[[Panarion]]'', denouncing eighty heretical sects, among them the Ebionites.<ref name="Epiphanius30">Epiphanius of Salamis, ''[[Panarion]]'', 30.</ref><ref name="Koch 1976">{{cite book| author = Glenn Alan Koch| title = A Critical Investigation of Epiphanius' Knowledge of the Ebionites: A Translation and Critical Discussion of 'Panarion' 30| publisher = University of Pennsylvania| year = 1976}}</ref> Epiphanius mostly gives general descriptions of their religious beliefs and includes quotations from their [[Ebionites#Writings|gospel]]s, which have not survived. The actual number of groups described as Ebionites is difficult to ascertain, as the contradictory [[patristic]] accounts in their attempt to distinguish various sects, sometimes confuse them with each other.<ref name="RGG"/> Other groups mentioned are the [[Carpocrates|Carpocratians]], the [[Cerinthus|Cerinthians]], the [[Elcesaites]], the [[Nazarene (sect)|Nazarene]]s, the [[Nazoraean]]s, and the [[Sampsaeans]], most of whom were Jewish Christian sects who held [[Fathers of Christian Gnosticism|gnostic]] or other views rejected by the Ebionites. Epiphanius, however, mentions that a group of Ebionites came to embrace some of these views despite keeping their name.<ref name="Wace 1911">{{cite book | author = Henry Wace & William Piercy | title = A Dictionary of Early Christian Biography | year = 1911 | url = http://www.ccel.org/ccel/wace/biodict.html?term=Ebionism%20and%20Ebionites| accessdate = 2007-08-01}}</ref> As the Ebionites are first mentioned as such in the 2nd century, their earlier history and their relation to the first [[Jerusalem church]] remains obscure and a matter of contention. Many scholars link the origin of the Ebionites with the [[First Jewish-Roman War]]. Prior to this, they are considered to be part of the Jerusalem church led by the [[St. Peter|Apostle Peter]] and later by Jesus' brother [[James the Just|James]]. Eusebius relates a tradition, probably based on [[Aristo of Pella]], that the early Christians left Jerusalem just prior to the war and fled to [[Pella, Jordan|Pella]] beyond the [[Jordan River]].<ref name="RGG">O. Cullmann, "Ebioniten", in: ''Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart'', p. 7435 (vol. 2).</ref><ref name="Uhlhorn">G. Uhlhorn, "Ebionites", in: ''A Religious Encyclopaedia or Dictionary of Biblical, Historical, Doctrinal, and Practical Theology'', 3rd ed. (edited by Philip Schaff), p. 684–685 (vol. 2).</ref> They were led by [[Simeon of Jerusalem]] (d. 107) and during the [[Second Jewish-Roman War]], they were persecuted by the Jewish followers of [[Bar Kochba]] for refusing to recognize his messianic claims.<ref name="Wace 1911">{{cite book | author = Wace, Henry & Piercy, William | title = A Dictionary of Early Christian Biography | year = 1911 | url = http://www.ccel.org/ccel/wace/biodict.html?term=Ebionism%20and%20Ebionites| accessdate = 2007-08-01}}</ref> According to these scholars, it was [[Transjordan|beyond the Jordan]], that the [[Nazarene (sect)|Nazarenes]]/Ebionites were first recognized as a distinct group when some Jewish Christians receded farther from mainstream Christianity, and approximated more and more closely to Rabbinical Judaism, resulting in a "degeneration" into an exclusively Jewish sect. Some from these groups later opened themselves to either [[Jewish Gnosticism|Jewish Gnostic]] (and possibly [[Essenes|Essene]]) or [[syncretism|syncretic]] influences, such as the book of [[Elchasaites|Elchasai]].<ref name="Kirby">{{cite paper | author = Peter Kirby| title = Book of Elchasai | url = http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/elchasai.html | accessdate = 2007-08-18}}</ref> The latter influence places some Ebionites in the context of the [[Gnosticism#Persian Gnosticism|gnostic movements widespread in Syria and the lands to the east]].<ref name="RGG"/><ref name="Harnack"/> After the end of the [[First Jewish-Roman War]], the importance of the [[Jerusalem church]] began to fade. [[Jewish Christianity]] became dispersed throughout the [[Jewish diaspora]] in the [[Levant]], where it was slowly eclipsed by gentile Christianity, which then spread throughout the [[Roman Empire]] without competition from "judaizing" Christian groups.<ref name="Brandon 1968">{{cite book| author = Brandon, S. G. F| title = The fall of Jerusalem and the Christian church: A study of the effects of the Jewish overthrow of A. D. 70 on Christianity| publisher = S.P. C.K | year = 1968 | id = ISBN 0281004501 }}</ref> Once the Jerusalem church, still headed by [[Desposyni|Jesus' relatives]], was eliminated during the [[Bar Kokhba revolt]] in 135, the Ebionites gradually lost influence and followers. According to one writer their decline was due to marginalization and "[[Persecution of Christians#Persecution of Christians by Christians|persecution]]" by both Jews and Christians.<ref name="Maccoby 1987">{{cite book| author = [[Hyam Maccoby]]| title = The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity| publisher = HarperCollins | year = 1987 | id = ISBN 0062505858}}</ref> Following the defeat of the rebellion and the expulsion of all Jews from Judea, Jerusalem became the Gentile city of [[Aelia Capitolina]]. Many of the Jewish Christians residing at Pella renounced their Jewish practices at this time and joined to the mainstream Christian church. Those who remained at Pella and continued in obedience to the Law were deemed heretics.<ref name="Gibbon 2003">{{cite book| author = [[Edward Gibbon]]| title = [[The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire|The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire]], ch. 15, p. 390–391.| publisher = Random House, NY| year = 2003 | id = ISBN 0375758119}} {{cite book| title = Chapter 15 | url = http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/g/gibbon/edward/g43d/chapter15.html | accessdate = 2007-08-02}}</ref> In 375, Epiphanius records the settlement of Ebionites on Cyprus, but by the mid-5th century, [[Theodoret|Theodoret of Cyrrhus]] reported that they were no longer present in the region.<ref name="Wace 1911"/> [[Image:Hijaz.png|thumb|120px|left|Map showing the region of Hejaz outlined in red]] Some scholars argue that the Ebionites survived much longer and identify them with a sect encountered by the historian [[Abd al-Jabbar]] around the year 1000.<ref name="Pines 1966">{{cite book| author = Shlomo Pines| title = The Jewish Christians Of The Early Centuries Of Christianity According To A New Source | publisher = Proceedings of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities II, No. 13| year = 1966 | id = ISBN 102-255-998}}</ref> Another possible reference to surviving Ebionite communities in northwestern [[Arabia]], specifically the cities of [[Tayma]] and Tilmas, around the 11th century, appears in ''[[Sefer]] Ha'masaot,'' the "Book of the Travels" of Rabbi [[Benjamin of Tudela]], a rabbi from Spain.<ref name="Adler 1907">{{cite book| author = Marcus N. Adler| title = The Itinerary of Benjamin of Tudela: Critical Text, Translation and Commentary, p. 70–72.| publisher = Phillip Feldheim| year = 1907}}</ref> 12th century Muslim historian [[Muhammad al-Shahrastani]] mentions Jews living in nearby [[Medina]] and [[Hejaz]] who accepted Jesus as a prophetic figure and followed traditional Judaism, rejecting mainstream [[Christian views of Jesus|Christian views]].<ref name=" Shahrastani 1842">{{cite book| author = [[Muhammad al-Shahrastani]]| title = [[Kitab al–Milal wa al-Nihal|The Book of Religious and Philosophical Sects]], [[William Cureton]] edition, page 167| publisher = Gorgias Press| year = 2002}}</ref> Some scholars argue that they contributed to the development of the [[Islamic view of Jesus]] due to exchanges of Ebionite remnants with the first Muslims.<ref name="Schoeps 1969">{{cite book| author = Hans-Joachim Schoeps| title = Jewish Christianity: Factional Disputes in the Early Church. Translation Douglas R. A. Hare| publisher = Fortress Press| year = 1969}}</ref><ref name="RGG"/> ==Legacy== In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, several small yet competing [[new religious movement]]s, such as the [[Ebionite Jewish Community]] and others, have emerged claiming to be revivalists of the views and practices of early Ebionites,<ref name="Self Help Guide 2006">{{cite paper|author = Self Help Guide| title = Jesus Christ| date = 2006 | url = http://selfhelp-guide.com/heros4u/jesus_christ.htm| accessdate = 2006-02-21}}</ref> although their idiosyncratic claims to authenticity cannot be verified. The [[counter-missionary]] group [[Jews for Judaism]] favorably mentions the historical Ebionites in their literature in order to argue that "[[Messianic Judaism]]", as promoted by missionary groups such as [[Jews for Jesus]], is [[Pauline Christianity]] misrepresenting itself as Judaism.<ref name="Kravitz 2001">{{cite book| author = Bentzion Kravitz| title = The Jewish Response to Missionaries: Counter-Missionary Handbook | publisher = [[Jews for Judaism]] International | year = 2001}}</ref> Some Messianic groups have expressed concern over leaders in Israel that deny Jesus' divinity and the possible collapse of the Messianic movement due to a resurgence of Ebionitism.<ref name="Messianic Leaders Deny Yeshua">{{cite paper| author = Moshe Koniuchowsky| title = "Messianic" Leaders Deny Yeshua in Record Numbers| date = 2007 | url = http://yourarmstoisrael.org/Editorials/?page=MESSIANIC_LEADERS_DENY&type=2| accessdate = 2007-07-21}}</ref><ref name="New Galations">{{cite paper|author = James Prasch| title = You Foolish Galatians, Who Bewitched You? A Crisis in Messianic Judaism?|date = 2007 | url = http://www.moriel.org/articles/sermons/new_galatians.htm| accessdate = 2007-07-21}}</ref> In a recent polemic, a Messianic leader asked whether Christians should imitate the Torah-observance of "neo-Ebionites".<ref name="Torah Observance">{{cite paper|author = John Parsons| title = Should Christians be Torah-observant?| date = 2007 | url = http://www.hebrew4christians.com/Articles/Torah_Observance/torah_observance.html| accessdate = 2007-07-21}}</ref> ==Views and practices== ===Judaic and Gnostic Ebionitism=== Most patristic sources portray the Ebionites as traditional yet [[asceticism|ascetic]] Jews, who zealously followed the [[Law of Moses]], revered [[Jerusalem]] as the holiest city,<ref name="Irenaeus"/> and restricted [[Kashrut#Maintenance of a separate culture|table fellowship]] only to Gentiles who [[Conversion to Judaism|converted to Judaism]].<ref name="Justin"/> They celebrated a commemorative meal annually,<ref name="Ramsey 1912">{{cite paper | author = W.M. Ramsey| title = The Tekmoreian Guest-Friends, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 32, p. 151-170.| date = 1912}}</ref> on or around [[Passover]], with [[unleavened bread]] and water only, in contrast to the daily Christian [[Eucharist]].<ref>{{cite paper| author = Exarch Anthony J. Aneed| title = Syrian Christians, A Brief History of the Catholic Church of St. George in Milwaukee, Wis. And a Sketch of the Eastern Church| date = 1919| url = http://www.melkite.org/HolyCommunion.html| accessdate = 2007-04-28}}</ref><ref name="Irenaeus5">Irenaeus of Lyon, ''Against Heresies'' [http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103501.htm V, 1].</ref><ref name="Epiphanius30"/> [[Epiphanius of Salamis]] is the only Church Father who describes some Ebionites as departing from traditional [[Jewish principles of faith]] and [[Orthopraxis#Judaism|practice]]; specifically by engaging in excessive [[Mikvah|ritual bathing]],<ref name="Epiphanius19">Epiphanius, ''Panarion'', 19:28–30.</ref> possessing an [[angelology]] which claimed that the Christ is a great archangel who was incarnated in Jesus and [[adoptionism|adopted as the son of God]],<ref>Epiphanius, ''Panarion'', 30, 14, 5.</ref><ref name="Epiphanius 30-16">Epiphanius, ''Panarion'', 30, 16, 4-5.</ref> opposing [[Korban|animal sacrifice]],<ref name="Epiphanius 30-16"/> [[Antinomianism|denying parts or most of the Law]],<ref>Epiphanius, ''Panarion'', 30, 18, 7–9.</ref> and practicing [[Vegetarianism and religion#Judaism|religious vegetarianism]]<ref>Epiphanius, ''Panarion'', 30.22.4</ref> The reliability of Epiphanius' account of the Ebionites is questioned by some scholars.<ref name="Klijn & Reinink 1973"/><ref name=" Van Voorst 1989">{{cite book| author = Robert E. van Voorst| authorlink = Robert E. Van Voorst| title = The Ascents of James: History and Theology of a Jewish-Christian Community| publisher = Society of Biblical Literature| year = 1989| id = ISBN 1555402941}}</ref> [[Shlomo Pines]], for example, argues that the [[heterodox]] views and practices he ascribes to some Ebionites originated in [[Fathers of Christian Gnosticism|Gnostic Christianity]] rather than [[Jewish Christianity]], and are characteristics of the [[Elcesaites|Elcesaite]] sect, which Epiphanius mistakenly attributed to the Ebionites.<ref name="Pines 1966"/> While mainstream [[biblical scholarship|biblical scholars]] do suppose some Essene influence on the nascent Jewish-Christian Church in some organizational, administrative and cultic respects, some scholars go beyond that assumption. Among them, some hold theories which have been discredited and others which remain controversial.<ref name="Vermes 1992">{{cite paper| author = [[Géza Vermes]]| title = Brother James' Heirs? the community at Qumran and its relations to the first Christians (Times Literary Supplement) | date = 1992}}</ref> Regarding the Ebionites specifically, a number of scholars have different theories on how the Ebionites may have developed from an Essene [[Jewish messianism|Jewish messianic]] sect. Hans-Joachim Schoeps argues that the conversion of some Essenes to Jewish Christianity after the [[Siege of Jerusalem (70)|Siege of Jerusalem in 70 CE]] may be the source of some Ebionites adopting Essene views and practices;<ref name="Schoeps 1969"/> while some conclude that the Essenes did not become Jewish Christians but still had an influence on the Ebionites.<ref name="Stendahl 1991">{{cite book| author = Kriste Stendahl | title = The Scrolls and the New Testament | publisher = Herder & Herder | year = 1991 | id = ISBN 0824511360}}</ref> ===Jesus=== The majority of Church Fathers agree that the Ebionites rejected many of the central [[Christian views of Jesus]] such as the [[pre-existence]], [[divinity of Jesus|divinity]], [[virgin birth]], [[atonement|atoning]] [[death of Jesus|death]], and [[vision hypothesis|physical resurrection of Jesus]].<ref name="Klijn & Reinink 1973"/> The Ebionites are described as emphasizing the [[unitarianism|oneness of God]] and the humanity of Jesus as the biological son of both [[Mary (mother of Jesus)|Mary]] and [[Saint Joseph|Joseph]], who by virtue of his [[Tzadik|righteousness]], was [[Chosen people|chosen]] by God to be the [[messiah|messianic]] "[[Prophet#Prophets in the Tanakh .28Hebrew Bible.29|prophet]] like [[Moses]]" (foretold in ''[[Deuteronomy]]'' 18:14–22) when he was [[Anointing|anointed]] with the [[Shekhinah|holy spirit]] at his baptism.<ref name="Maccoby 1987"/><ref name="Tabor 1998">{{cite paper| author = [[James Tabor|Tabor, James D.]]| title = Ancient Judaism: Nazarenes and Ebionites| date = 1998 | url = http://www.religiousstudies.uncc.edu/JDTABOR/ebionites.html| accessdate = 2006-09-31}}</ref> Of the books of the [[New Testament]], the Ebionites are said to have accepted only a Hebrew version of the ''[[Gospel of Matthew]]'', referred to as the ''[[Gospel of the Hebrews]]'', as additional [[scripture]] to the [[Hebrew Bible]]. This version of ''Matthew'', [[Irenaeus]] reports, omitted the first two chapters (on the [[nativity of Jesus]]), and started with the [[baptism of Jesus]] by [[John the Baptist|John]].<ref name="Irenaeus"/> The Ebionites believed that all Jews and [[Gentiles]] must observe the [[613 mitzvot|commandments]] in the Law of Moses,<ref name="Justin"/> in order to become [[Tzadik|righteous]] and seek [[Devekut|communion with God]],<ref>Hippolytus</ref> but these commandments must be understood in the light of Jesus' [[expounding of the Law]],<ref name="Tabor 1998"/> revealed during his [[Sermon on the Mount|sermon on the mount]].<ref name="Viljoen 2006">{{cite paper| author = Francois P. Viljoen | title = Jesus' Teaching on the Torah in the Sermon on the Mount | publisher = Neotestamenica 40.1, pp. 135-155 | date = 2006}}{{cite paper| title = Jesus' Teaching on the Torah in the Sermon on the Mount | url = http://www.geocities.com/neotestamentica/archive/401/401gviljoen-sample.pdf | accessdate=2007-03-13}}</ref> The Ebionites may have held a form of "[[inaugurated eschatology]]" positing that the [[ministry of Jesus]] had ushered in the [[Messianic Age]] so that the kingdom of God might be understood as present in an incipient fashion, while at the same time awaiting consummation in the [[world to come|future age]].<ref name="Maccoby 1987"/><ref name="Tabor 1998"/> ===James vs. Paul=== James, the brother of the Lord, presided over the Jerusalem church after the other apostles dispersed.<ref name ="Oxford:Jerusalem">Cross, F. L., ed. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005, article ''Jerusalem''</ref> Paul, the ''Apostle to the Gentiles'', established many churches<ref>Cross, F. L., ed. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005, article ''Paul, St''</ref> and founded a Christian theology, see [[Pauline Christianity]]. At the [[Council of Jerusalem]] (''c'' 49),<ref name ="Oxford:Jerusalem"/> Paul persuaded the other apostles to abrogate certain Mosaic observances<ref>Cross, F. L., ed. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005, article ''Acts of the Apostles''</ref> insofar as they were allegedly applicable to non-Jewish Christians. For the parallel in Judaism, see [[Noachide law]]. Some scholars<ref name="Eisenman 1997 James as sucessor">Eisenman (1997), p. 155-184.</ref><ref name="Tabor 2006 James over Peter">Tabor (2006), p. 222-223, 231.</ref> argue that the Ebionites regarded [[James the Just|James, brother of Jesus]], the first [[patriarch of Jerusalem|bishop of Jerusalem]],<ref name="JamesOverseer">James is traditionally considered the leader of the Jerusalem church. As such he appears in [[Acts of the Apostles|Acts]] (15 and 21), [[Eusebius of Caesarea]] ([http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250102.htm ''Church History'' II, 1, 2]), [[Clement of Alexandria]] (quoted by Eusebius in ''Church History'' I, 1, 3–4), [[Hegesippus (chronicler)|Hegesippus]] (quoted by Eusebius in ''Church History'' II, 23, 4) and the [[Gospel of Thomas]] (saying 12).</ref> the rightful leader of the Church rather than [[Saint Peter|Peter]]. James Tabor argues that the Ebionites claimed a unique dynastic [[apostolic succession]] for the [[Desposyni|relatives of Jesus]].<ref name="Tabor 2006 Dynastic succession of James, Simon">Tabor (2006), p. 4, 74, 222, 226.</ref> They opposed the [[Apostle Paul]], who established that gentile Christians did not have to be [[Circumcision controversy in early Christianity|circumcised]] or otherwise follow the [[Law of Moses]], and named him an [[apostasy|apostate]].<ref name="Irenaeus"/> Epiphanius relates that some Ebionites alleged that Paul was a Greek who [[Conversion to Judaism|converted to Judaism]] in order to marry the daughter of a [[Kohen Gadol|high priest of Israel]] but apostasized when she rejected him.<ref>Epiphanius of Salamis, ''Panarion'', 16, 9.</ref> ==Writings== Few writings of the Ebionites have survived, and these are in uncertain form. The [[Clementine literature|''Recognitions of Clement'' and the ''Clementine Homilies'']], two 3rd century Christian works, are regarded by general scholarly consensus as largely or entirely [[Jewish Christians|Jewish Christian]] in origin and reflect Jewish Christian beliefs. The exact relationship between the Ebionites and these writings is debated, but Epiphanius's description of some Ebionites in ''[[Panarion]]'' 30 bears a striking similarity to the ideas in the ''Recognitions'' and ''Homilies''. Scholar Glenn Alan Koch speculates that Epiphanius likely relied upon a version of the ''Homilies'' as a source document.<ref name="Koch 1976"/> The [[Catholic Encyclopedia]] classifies the Ebionite writings into four groups:<ref name="Arendzen 1909">[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05242c.htm "Ebionites"], ''[[Catholic Encyclopedia]]'', vol. V (1909).</ref> *The ''[[Gospel of the Ebionites]]'': According to [[Irenaeus]], the Ebionites used only the ''[[Gospel of Matthew]]''. [[Eusebius of Caesarea]]<ref name="Eusebius IV">Eusebius of Caesarea, [http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250104.htm ''Church History'', IV, 21, 8.]</ref> mentions a ''[[Gospel of the Hebrews]]'', often identified as the slightly modified Aramaic original of Matthew, written with Hebrew letters. Such a work was known to [[Hegesippus (chronicler)|Hegesippus]],<ref name="Eusebius IV"/> [[Origen]]<ref>[[Jerome]], ''[[De Viris Illustribus (Jerome)|De viris illustribus]]'', [http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2708.htm 2]</ref> and to [[Clement of Alexandria]].<ref>Clement of Alexandria, [http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/02102.htm ''Stromata'' II, 9, 45]</ref> [[Epiphanius of Salamis]] attributes this gospel to [[Nazarenes]], and claims that Ebionites only possessed an incomplete, falsified, and truncated copy.<ref>Epiphanius, ''[[Panarion]]'' 29, 9.</ref> The question remains whether Epiphanius was able to accurately distinguish between Nazarenes and Ebionites. *[[New Testament apocrypha|Apocrypha of the New Testament]]: The ''Circuits of Peter'' and ''Acts of the Apostles'', including the work usually titled the ''Ascents of James''. The first-named books are substantially contained in the Homilies of Clement under the title of Clement's ''Compendium of Peter's itinerary sermons'', and also in the ''Recognitions'' attributed to Clement. They form an early Christian didactic fiction to express Jewish Christian views, i.e. the primacy of [[James the Just]], their connection with the [[Holy See|episcopal see of Rome]], and their antagonism to [[Simon Magus]], as well as [[gnosticism|gnostic]] doctrines. Scholar [[Robert E. Van Voorst]] opines of the ''Ascents of James'' (R 1.33–71), "There is, in fact, no section of the Clementine literature about whose origin in Jewish Christianity one may be more certain".<ref name=" Van Voorst 1989"/> Despite this assertion, he expresses reservations that the material is genuinely Ebionite in origin. *The Works of [[Symmachus the Ebionite]]: Symmachus produced a translation of the [[Hebrew Bible]] into [[Koine Greek]], which was used by Jerome and is still extant in fragments, and ''[[Hypomnemata]]'' written to counter the canonical Gospel of Matthew. The latter work, which is totally lost<ref name="Eusebius VI">Eusebius of Caesarea, [http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250106.htm ''Church History'', VI, 17.]</ref><ref>[[Jerome]], ''[[De Viris Illustribus (Jerome)|De viris illustribus]]'', [http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2708.htm 54].</ref> is probably identical with ''De distinctione præceptorum'' mentioned by Ebed Jesu (Assemani, ''Bibl. Or.'', III, 1). * The ''[[Elcesaites|Book of Elchesai]]'' claimed to have been written about 100 CE and brought to Rome in c. 217 CE by Alcibiades of Apamea. Ebionites deemed those who accepted its gnostic doctrines [[apostate]]s.<ref>[[Hippolytus of Rome|Hippolytus]], ''[[Refutation of all Heresies|Philosophumena]]'', IX, 14-17.</ref><ref>Epiphanius, ''Panarion'', 19, 1; 53, 1.</ref> Some also speculate that the core of the ''[[Gospel of Barnabas]]'', beneath a polemical medieval [[Islam|Muslim]] overlay, may have been based upon an Ebionite or gnostic document.<ref name="Toland 1718">[[John Toland (Irish Philosopher)|John Toland]], ''Nazarenus, or Jewish, Gentile and Mahometan Christianity'', 1718.</ref> The existence and origin of this source continues to be debated by scholars.<ref name=" Blackhirst 2000">{{cite paper| author = Blackhirst, R.| title = Barnabas and the Gospels: Was There an Early Gospel of Barnabas?, Journal of Higher Criticism, 7/1, p. 1–22.| date = 2000| url = http://depts.drew.edu/jhc/Blackhirst_Barnabas.html| accessdate = 2007-03-11}}</ref> ==Religious perspectives== The mainstream Christian view of the Ebionites is based on the polemical views of the Church Fathers who portrayed them as [[heretics]] for rejecting many of the central [[Christian views of Jesus]], and allegedly having an improper fixation on the [[Law of Moses]] at the expense of the [[divine grace|grace of God]].<ref name="Arendzen 1909">{{cite book| author = Arendzen, J.P. | title = Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume V.: Ebionites | publisher = Robert Appleton Company | year = 1904}}</ref> In this view, the Ebionites may have been the descendants of a [[Jewish Christian]] sect within the early [[Jerusalem church]] which broke away from its [[Pauline Christianity|mainstream theology]].<ref name="Daniélou 1964">{{cite book| author = [[Jean Daniélou]]| title = The theology of Jewish Christianity: The Development of Christian doctrine before the Council of Nicea | publisher = H. Regnery Co | year = 1964 | id = ASIN B0007FOFQI}}</ref> Some Christian [[apologetics|apologists]] have criticized the [[quest for the historical Jesus]] as having resulted in a "revival of the Ebionite heresy".<ref name="Bromling 1995">{{cite paper| author = Brad Bromling | title = Jesus: Truly God and Truly Human | Publisher = Apologetics Press | year = 1995 | url = http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/263| accessdate = 2007-08-05}}</ref> Some scholars with mainstream Christian beliefs are acknowledging the recent emphasis on the Jewishness of Jesus and his earliest followers, and commenting on how they reconciled the Jewish Jesus with the Christ of faith.<ref name="Loader, William">{{cite paper | author = William Loader| title = Jesus the Jew | url = http://wwwstaff.murdoch.edu.au/~loader/JJew.html | accessdate = 2007-08-05}}</ref> The mainstream Jewish view of the Ebionites is that they were [[Heresy in Orthodox Judaism|Jewish heretics]] due to their refusal to see Jesus as a [[false prophet]] and failed [[Jewish Messiah claimants|Jewish Messiah claimant]] but also for wanting to include their gospel into the [[Biblical canon|canon]] of the [[Hebrew Bible]].<ref name="Maccoby 1987"/> Some Muslims who charge Christians with having [[Tahrif|corrupted the Bible]], believe that the Ebionites (as opposed to Christians they encountered) were faithful to the original teachings of Jesus with shared views about Jesus' humanity, though the [[Islamic view of Jesus]] conflicts with the Ebionites' views regarding the virgin birth and the crucifixion.<ref name="al-Ashanti 2005">{{cite book | author = Abdulhaq al-Ashanti & Abdur-Rahmaan Bowes | title = Before Nicea: The Early Followers of Prophet Jesus | publisher = Jamia Media | year = 2005 | id = ISBN 0955109906}}</ref> ==References == {{reflist|2}} ==Literature== *{{cite book| author = [[Robert Eisenman|Eisenman, Robert]]| title = [[James the Brother of Jesus: The Key to Unlocking the Secrets of Early Christianity and the Dead Sea Scrolls]] | publisher = Viking | year = 1997 | id = ISBN 1842930265}} *{{cite book| author = [[James Tabor|Tabor, James D.]] | title = The Jesus Dynasty: A New Historical Investigation of Jesus, His Royal Family, and the Birth of Christianity| publisher = Simon & Schuster | year = 2006| id = ISBN 0743287231}} *G. Uhlhorn, "Ebionites", in: Philip Schaff (ed.), ''A Religious Encyclopaedia or Dictionary of Biblical, Historical, Doctrinal, and Practical Theology'', 3rd ed. (1894), p. 684–685 (vol. 2). *{{cite book| author = [[Barrie Wilson|Wilson, Barrie]]| title = How Jesus Became Chrisitan - The early Chritians and the transformation of a Jewish teacher into the Son of God | publisher = Orion | year = 2008 | id = ISBN 978 0 297 85200 1}} ==Primary sources== *[[s:Ebionites according to the Church Fathers|Ebionites according to the Church Fathers]] [[Category:Ancient Christian denominations]] [[Category:Jewish history]] [[Category:Judeo-Christian topics]] [[Category:Patristics]] [[Category:Jews and Judaism-related controversies]] [[Category:Christianity-related controversies]] [[ca:Ebionites]] [[da:Ebjonitisme]] [[de:Ebioniten]] [[es:Ebionismo]] [[fr:Ébionisme]] [[ia:Ebionitismo]] [[it:Ebioniti]] [[he:אביונים]] [[lt:Ebionizmas]] [[nl:Ebionieten]] [[pl:Ebionici]] [[pt:Ebionismo]] [[ru:Эбиониты]] [[fi:Ebionitismi]] [[zh:伊便尼派]]