Fee tail
256695
226039389
2008-07-16T15:39:51Z
CheshireKatz
201100
{{Nofootnotes|article|date=February 2008}}
{{dablink|
This article discusses the legal term '''fee tail''', also known as '''entail'''. It does not discuss stories in literature that use these terms.
}}
{{PropertyLaw}}
'''Fee tail''' or '''entail''' is an obsolete term of art in [[common law]]. It describes an [[estate (law)|estate]] of [[inheritance]] in [[real property]] which cannot be sold, devised by will, or otherwise alienated by the owner, but which passes [[by operation of law]] to the owner's [[Inheritance|heirs]] upon his death. The term fee tail is derived from the Middle Latin ''feodum talliatum'', which means "cut-short fee."
Traditionally, a fee tail was created by words of grant in the [[deed]]: "to A and the heirs of his body." The crucial difference between the words of conveyance and the words that created a [[fee simple]], "to A and his heirs," is that the heirs "in tail" must be the children begotten by the landowner. It was also possible to have "fee tail male," which only sons could inherit, and "fee tail female," which only daughters could inherit; and "fee tail special," which had a further condition of inheritance, usually restricting succession to certain "heirs of the body" and excluding others. Land subject to these conditions was said to be ''entailed'' or ''in tail''. The restrictions themselves were ''entailments''.
Fee tail was formerly used during [[feudal]] times by [[landed nobility]] in order to create [[family]] settlements and to make certain that the land stayed in the family. From the foregoing, attempting to [[mortgage]] land in fee tail would be risky and uncertain, since at the death of the owner the land passed by operation of law to children who had no obligation to the mortgage lender and whose interest was prior in right over the mortgage. Similarly, the largest estate an owner in fee tail could convey to someone else was a [[life estate]], since the grantee's interest again terminates automatically when the original owner died. If all went as planned, it was impossible for the family to lose the land, which was the idea.
Things do not always go as planned, however. Owners of land in tail occasionally had "failure of issue" --- that is, they had no children surviving them at the time of their own deaths. In this situation, theoretically the entailed land went back up and through the family tree to descendants of former owners who were entitled to inherit, or to the last owner in fee simple. This situation produced complicated [[litigation]].
Fee tail was a device tuned to the needs of family settlements in the [[thirteenth century]], but it was never popular with the monarchy, the merchants, or many entailed holders themselves who wished to sell their land. In more [[mercantile]] eras, fee tail became rare. As early as the [[fifteenth century]], lawyers devised an elaborate action called "[[Common Recovery]]," which used collaborative lawsuits and [[legal fiction]]s to remove the conditions of fee tail from land and enable its free conveyance in fee simple.
==England==
The Statute of Westminster II, passed in [[1285]], created and stereotyped this form of estate. The new law was also formally called the statute ''[[De Donis Conditionalibus]]'' (Concerning Conditional Gifts). Fee tail was abolished by [[statute]] in [[England]] (as a legal [[estate (law)|estate]]) in [[1925]].
An entail can still exist in England and Wales as an equitable interest, behind a strict settlement, but the legal estate is vested in the current 'tenant for life' or other person immediately entitled to the income, but on the basis that any capital money arising must be paid to the settlement trustees. A tenant in tail in possession can bar his entail by a simple disentailing deed, which does not now have to be enrolled. A tenant in tail in reversion (i.e. a [[future interest]] where the property is subject to prior life interest) needs the consent of the life tenant and any 'special protectors' to vest a [[reversion]]ary fee simple in himself. Otherwise he can only create a base fee; a base fee only confers a right to the property on its owner, when its creator would have become entitled to it; if its creator dies before he would have received it, the owner of the base fee gets nothing. In most states within the United States, an attempt to create a fee tail results in a [[fee simple]]; even in those four states that still allow fee tail, the estate holder may convert his fee tail to a fee simple during his lifetime by executing a deed.
==Scotland==
[[Scotland]] disentailed all land following the passage of the [[Abolition of Feudal Tenure etc. (Scotland) Act 2000]], disapplying the [[Scots law]] concept of [[tailzie]]. Today, the doctrines of [[legitime|legitim]] and [[jus relictae]] restrict owners from willing property out of their family when they die with children or have a surviving partner.
==United States==
Fee tail has been abolished in all but three states in the [[United States]]: [[Massachusetts]], [[Maine]], and [[Rhode Island]]. [[New York]], for example, abolished it in 1782. Many other states within the U.S. never recognized the fee tail estate at all, as most of the land in the [[United States|United States of America]] was deemed [[allodial]].
In [[Louisiana]], the doctrines of [[legitime]] and [[jus relictae]] restrict owners from willing property out of their family when they die with children or have a surviving partner.
== See also ==
* [[Fee simple]]
* [[Majorat]]
* [[Ordynat]]
* [[Rule in Wild's Case]]
* [[tailzie]] (Scots law)
== Sources and References ==
*''The Fee Tail and the Common Recovery in Medieval England 1176–1502'', by: Joseph Biancalana, University of Cincinnati
*{{cite book
| last = Bell
| first = William
| title = Dictionary and Digest, Law of Scotland, with Short Explanations of the most Ordinary English Law Terms
| edition = Revised and Corrected with Numerous Additions by George Ross
| pages = 328
| year = 1861
| publisher = Bell & Bradfute
| location = Edinburgh
}}
*{{cite book
| last = Shumaker
| first = Walter A.
| coauthors = George Foster Longsdorf
| title = The Cyclopedic Law Dictionary
| edition = Second Edition by James C. Cahill
| pages = 353
| year = 1922
| publisher = Callaghan and Company
| location = Chicago
}}
==Further reading==
(Series: Cambridge Studies in English Legal History) [http://www.cambridge.org/uk/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521806461 Publisher's link]
[[Category:Real property law]]
[[Category:Legal history]]
[[Category:Scots law legal phrases]]
[[de:Familienfideikommiss]]
[[sv:Fideikommiss]]