Genomic imprinting
15235
223090115
2008-07-02T14:58:47Z
Chris Capoccia
286058
/* Functions of imprinted genes */
'''Genomic imprinting''' is a [[genetics|genetic]] phenomenon by which certain [[gene]]s are [[gene expression|expressed]] in a [[parent]]-of-origin-specific manner. It is an inheritance process independent of the classical [[Mendelian inheritance]]. Imprinted genes are either expressed only from the allele inherited from the mother (eg. ''[[H19 (gene)|H19]]'' or ''[[CDKN1C]]''), or in other instances from the allele inherited from the father (eg. ''IGF2''). Forms of genomic imprinting have been demonstrated in [[insect]]s, [[mammal]]s and flowering [[plant]]s.
==Overview==
In [[Ploidy#Diploid|diploid]] organisms [[somatic cell]]s possess two copies of the [[genome]]. Each [[autosomal]] gene is therefore represented by two copies, or alleles, with one copy inherited from each parent at [[fertilisation]]. For the vast majority of autosomal genes, expression occurs from both [[allele]]s simultaneously. In mammals however, a small proportion (<1%) of genes are imprinted, meaning that gene expression occurs from only one allele.<ref name="Wilkinson 2007">{{cite journal |last=Wilkinson |first=Lawrence S. |coauthors=William Davies and Anthony R. Isles |title=Genomic imprinting effects on brain development and function |journal=[[Nature Reviews Neuroscience]] |volume=8 |issue=11 |pages=832–843 |year=2007 |month=November |url=http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v8/n11/abs/nrn2235.html |pmid=17925812 |doi=10.1038/nrn2235 |accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref> The expressed allele is dependent upon its parental origin. For example, the gene encoding [[Insulin-like growth factor 2]] (IGF2/Igf2) is only expressed from the allele inherited from the father.<ref name="DeChiara 1991">{{cite journal |last=DeChiara |first=Thomas M. |coauthors=Elizabeth J. Robertson and Argiris Efstratiadis |title=Parental imprinting of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II gene |journal=[[Cell (journal)|Cell]] |volume=64 |issue=4 |pages=849–59 |year=1991 |month=February |pmid=1997210 |doi= |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0092-8674(91)90513-X |issn= |accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref>
The phrase "imprinting" was first used to described events in the insect ''Pseudococcus nipae''.<ref name="Schrader 1921">{{cite journal |last=Schrader |first=Franz |year=1921 |month=May |title=The chromosomes in ''Pseudococcus nipæ'' |journal=Biological Bullitin |volume=40 |issue=5 |pages=259–270 |id= |url=http://www.biolbull.org/cgi/content/abstract/40/5/259 |accessdate=2008-07-01 |quote= |doi=10.2307/1536736 }}</ref> In Pseudococcids or [[mealybugs]] (Homoptera, Coccoidea) both the male and female develop from a fertilised egg. In females, all chromosomes remain [[Euchromatin|euchromatic]] and functional. In embryos destined to become males, one [[haploid]] set of chromosomes becomes [[heterochromatin]]ised after the sixth cleavage division and remains so in most tissues; males are thus functionally haploid.<ref name="Brown and Nur 1964">{{cite journal |last=Brown |first=S. W. |coauthors=U. Nur |year=1964 |title=Heterochromatic chromosomes in the coccids |journal=[[Science (journal)|Science]] |volume=145 |pages=130–136 |pmid=14171547 |doi=10.1126/science.145.3628.130 |url=http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/145/3628/130}}</ref><ref name="Hughes-Schrader 1948">{{cite journal |last=Hughes-Schrader |first=S. |title=Cytology of coccids (Coccoïdea-Homoptera) |journal=Advances in Genetics |volume=35 |issue=2 |pages=127–203 |year=1948 |pmid=18103373 |doi= |url= |issn= |accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref><ref name="Nur 1990">{{cite journal |last=Nur |first=U. |title=Heterochromatization and euchromatization of whole genomes in scale insects (Coccoidea: Homoptera) |journal=Dev. Suppl. |volume= |issue= |pages=29–34 |year=1990 |pmid=2090427 |doi= |url= |issn= |accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref> In insects, imprinting describes the silencing of the paternal genome in males, and thus is involved in sex determination. In mammals, genomic imprinting describes the processes involved in introducing functional inequality between two parental alleles of a gene.<ref name="Feil and Berger 2007">{{cite journal |last=Feil |first=Robert Feil |coauthors=Frédéric Berger |title=Convergent evolution of genomic imprinting in plants and mammals |journal=Trends in Genetics |volume=23 |issue=4 |pages=192–9 |year=2007 |month=April |pmid=17316885 |doi=10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.004 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168-9525(07)00057-1|accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref>
==Imprinted genes in mammals==
That imprinting might be a feature of mammalian development was suggested in breeding experiments in mice carrying reciprocal translocations.<ref name="Lyon and Glenister 1977">{{cite journal |last=Lyon |first=M. F. |coauthors=P.H. Glenister |title=Factors affecting the observed number of young resulting from adjacent-2 disjunction in mice carrying a translocation |journal=Genetics Research |volume=29 |issue=1 |pages=83–92 |year=1977 |month=February |pmid=559611 |doi= |url= |issn= |accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref> Nucleus transplantation experiments in [[mouse]] zygotes in the early 1980s confirmed that normal development requires the contribution of both the maternal and paternal genomes. The vast majority of mouse parthenogenones/gynogenones (with two maternal or egg genomes) and androgenones (with two paternal or sperm genomes) die at, or before, the blastocyst/implantation stage. In the rare instances that they develop to postimplantation stages, gynogenetic embryos show better embryonic development relative to placental development, while for androgenones, the reverse is true. Nevertheless, for the latter, only a few have been described.<ref name="Barton 1984">{{cite journal |last=Barton |first=S. C. |coauthors=''et al'' |year=1984 |title=Role of paternal and maternal genomes in mouse development |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=311 |issue=5984 |pages=374–376 |doi=10.1038/311374a0 |pmid=6482961 |url=http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v311/n5984/abs/311374a0.html}}</ref><ref name="Mann and Lovell-Badge 1984">{{cite journal |last=Mann |first=J. R. |coauthors=R.H. Lovell-Badge |title=Inviability of parthenogenones is determined by pronuclei, not egg cytoplasm |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=310 |issue=5972 |pages=66–7 |year=1984 |pmid=6738704 |doi= |url= |issn= |accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref><ref name="McGrath and Solter 1984">{{cite journal |last=McGrath |first=J. |coauthors=D. Solter |title=Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes |journal=[[Cell]] |volume=37 |issue=1 |pages=179–83 |year=1984 |month=May |pmid=6722870 |doi= |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0092-8674(84)90313-1 |issn= |accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref>
Parthenogenetic/gynogenetic embryos have twice the normal expression level of maternally derived genes, and lack expression of paternally expressed genes, while the reverse is true for androgenetic embryos. It is now known that there are at least 80 imprinted genes in humans and mice, many of which are involved in embryonic and placental growth and development.<ref name="Isles and Holland 2005">{{cite journal |last=Isles |first=A. R. |coauthors=A. J. Holland |title=Imprinted genes and mother-offspring interactions |journal=Early Human Development |volume=81 |issue=1 |pages=73–7 |year=2005 |month=January |pmid=15707717 |doi=10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2004.10.006 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378-3782(04)00164-1 |accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref><ref name="Morison 2005">{{cite journal |last=Morison |first=I.M. |coauthors=J. P. Ramsay and H. G. Spencer |title=A census of mammalian imprinting |journal=Trends in Genetics |volume=21 |issue=8 |pages=457–65 |year=2005 |month=August |pmid=15990197 |doi=10.1016/j.tig.2005.06.008 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168-9525(05)00166-6|accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref><ref name="Reik and Lewis 2005">{{cite journal |last=Reik |first=W. |coauthors=A. Lewis |title=Co-evolution of X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting in mammals |journal=[[Nature Reviews Genetics]] |volume=6 |issue=5 |pages=403–10 |year=2005 |month=May |pmid=15818385 |doi=10.1038/nrg1602|accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref><ref name="Wood and Oakey 2006">{{cite journal |last=Wood |first=A. J. |coauthors=R. J. Oakey |title=Genomic imprinting in mammals: emerging themes and established theories |journal=[[PLoS Genetics]] |volume=2 |issue=11 |pages=e147 |year=2006 |month=November |pmid=17121465 |pmc=1657038 |doi=10.1371/journal.pgen.0020147 |url=http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020147|accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref>
No naturally occurring cases of [[parthenogenesis]] exist in mammals because of imprinted genes. Experimental manipulation of a paternal methylation imprint controlling the Igf2 gene has, however, recently allowed the creation of rare individual mice with two maternal sets of chromosomes - but this is not a true parthenogenone. [[Hybrid (biology)|Hybrid]] offspring of two species may exhibit unusual growth due to the novel combination of imprinted genes.<ref>{{cite news |title=Gene Tug-of-War Leads to Distinct Species |url=http://www.hhmi.org/news/tilghman.html |publisher=[[Howard Hughes Medical Institute]] |date=2000-04-30 |accessdate=2008-07-02}}</ref>
===Genetic mapping of imprinted genes===
At the same time as the generation of the gynogenetic and androgenetic embryos discussed above, mouse embryos were also being generated that contained only small regions that were derived from either a paternal or maternal source.<ref name="Cattanach and Kirk 1985">{{cite journal |last=Cattanach |first=B. M. |authorlink= |coauthors=M. Kirk |year=1985 |month=June |title=Differential activity of maternally and paternally derived chromosome regions in mice |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=315 |pages=496–498 |url=http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v315/n6019/abs/315496a0.html |accessdate=2008-07-01 |doi=10.1038/315496a0}}</ref><ref name="McLaughlin 1996">{{cite journal |last=McLaughlin |first=K. J. |coauthors=P. Szabó, H. Haegel and J. R. Mann |title=Mouse embryos with paternal duplication of an imprinted chromosome 7 region die at midgestation and lack placental spongiotrophoblast |journal=Development |volume=122 |issue=1 |pages=265–70 |year=1996 |month=January |pmid=8565838 |doi= |url=http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=8565838}}</ref> The generation of a series of such uniparental disomies, which together span the entire genome, allowed the creation of an imprinting map.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.har.mrc.ac.uk/research/genomic_imprinting/ |title=Mouse Imprinting Data and References |accessdate=2008-07-02 |last=Beechey |first=Colin |coauthors=B. M. Cattanach, Andrew Blake and Jo Peters |year=2008 |work= |publisher=MRC Harwell}}</ref> Those regions which when inherited from a single parent result in a discernible phenotype contain imprinted gene(s). Further research showed that within these regions there were often numerous imprinted genes.<ref name="Bartolomei and Tilghman 1997">{{cite journal |last=Bartolomei |first=M. S. |coauthors=S. M. Tilghman |year=1997 |title= Genomic imprinting in mammals |journal=[[Annual Review of Genetics]] |volume=31 |pages=493–525 |doi=10.1146/annurev.genet.31.1.493 |url=http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.genet.31.1.493 |format=subscription required}}</ref> Around 80% of imprinted genes are found in clusters such as these, called imprinted domains, suggesting a level of co-ordinated control.<ref name="Reik and Walter 2001">{{cite journal |last=Reik |first=W. |coauthors=J. Walter |title=Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome |journal=[[Nature Reviews Genetics]] |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=21–32 |year=2001 |month=January |pmid=11253064 |doi=10.1038/35047554|accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref>
===Imprinting mechanisms===
{{unreferencedsection|date=July 2008}}
Imprinting is a dynamic process. It must be possible to erase and re-establish the imprint through each generation. The nature of the imprint must therefore be [[epigenetic]] (modifications to the structure of the DNA rather than the sequence). In [[germline]] cells the imprint is erased, and then re-established according to the [[sex]] of the individual; i.e. in the developing sperm, a paternal imprint is established, whereas in developing oocytes, a maternal imprint is established. This process of erasure and [[reprogramming]] is necessary such that the current imprinting status is relevant to the sex of the individual. In both plants and mammals there are two major mechanisms that are involved in establishing the imprint; these are [[DNA methylation]] and [[histone]] modifications.
===Regulation===
{{unreferencedsection|date=July 2008}}
The grouping of imprinted genes within clusters allows them to share common regulatory elements, such as non-coding [[RNA]]s and differentially methylated regions (DMRs). When these regulatory elements control the imprinting of one or more genes, they are known as imprinting control regions (ICR). The expression of non-coding RNAs, such as ''Air'' on mouse chromosome 17 and ''KCNQ1OT1'' on human chromosome 11p15.5, have been shown to be essential for the imprinting of genes in their corresponding regions.
Differentially methylated regions are generally segments of DNA rich in [[cytosine]] and [[guanine]] nucleotides, with the cytosine nucleotides methylated on one copy but not on the other. Contrary to expectation, methylation does not necessarily mean silencing; instead, the effect of methylation depends upon the default state of the region.
===Functions of imprinted genes===
The control of expression of specific genes by genomic imprinting is unique to placental mammals ([[eutherians]] and [[marsupials]]) and flowering plants. Imprinting of whole chromosomes has been reported in mealybugs.<ref name="Schrader 1921" /><ref name="Brown and Nur 1964" /><ref name="Hughes-Schrader 1948" /><ref name="Nur 1990" /> and a [[fungus gnat]] (''Sciara'').<ref name="Metz 1938">{{cite journal |last=Metz |first=C. W. |year=1938 |title=Chromosome behavior, inheritance and sex determination in Sciara |journal=[[American Naturalist]] |volume=72 |pages=485–520 |doi=10.1086/280803}}</ref> It has also been established that [[X-chromosome]] inactivation occurs in an imprinted manner in the extra-embryonic tissues of mice, where it is always the paternal X-chromosome which is silenced.<ref name="Reik and Walter 2001" /><ref name="Alleman and Doctor 2000">{{cite journal |last=Alleman |first=Mary |coauthors=John Doctor |title=Genomic imprinting in plants: observations and evolutionary implications |journal=Plant Molecular Biology |volume=43 |issue=2-3 |pages=147–61 |year=2000 |month=June |pmid=10999401 |doi=10.1023/A:1006419025155 |url=http://www.kluweronline.com/art.pdf?issn=0167-4412&volume=43&page=147}}</ref>
The majority of imprinted genes in mammals have been found to have roles in the control of embryonic growth and development, including development of the placenta.<ref name="Isles and Holland 2005" /><ref name="Tycko and Morison 2002">{{cite journal |last=Tycko |first=B. |coauthors=I. M. Morison |title=Physiological functions of imprinted genes |journal=Journal of Cellular Physiology |volume=192 |issue=3 |pages=245–58 |year=2002 |month=September |pmid=12124770 |doi=10.1002/jcp.10129|accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref> Other imprinted genes are involved in post-natal development, with roles affecting suckling and metabolism.<ref name="Tycko and Morison 2002" /><ref name="Constancia 2004">{{cite journal |last=Constância |first=Miguel |coauthors=Benjamin Pickard, Gavin Kelsey, and Wolf Reik |title=Imprinting mechanisms |journal=Genome Research |volume=8 |issue=9 |pages=881–900 |year=1998 |month=September |pmid=9750189 |doi= |url=http://www.genome.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=9750189}}</ref>
===Theories on the origins of imprinting===
Imprinting appears to be able to increase the [[Fitness (biology)|evolutionary fitness of genes]] in two ways, so either or both could be responsible for its origins.
A widely accepted hypothesis for the occurrence of genomic imprinting is the "parental conflict hypothesis."<ref name="Moore and Haig 1991">{{cite journal |last=Moore |first=T. |coauthors=D. Haig |title=Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war |journal=Trends in Genetics |volume=7 |issue=2 |pages=45–9 |year=1991 |month=February |pmid=2035190 |doi= |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0168-9525(91)90230-N |issn= |accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref> This hypothesis states that the inequality between parental genomes due to imprinting is a result of the [[sexual conflict|differing interests of each parent]] in terms of the [[Fitness (biology)|evolutionary fitness of their genes]]. The [[father]] is more 'interested' in the growth of his offspring, at the expense of the [[mother]]. The mother's interest is to conserve resources for her own survival while providing sufficient nourishment to current and subsequent litters. Accordingly, paternally expressed genes tend to be growth promoting whereas maternally expressed genes tend to be growth limiting.<ref name="Moore and Haig 1991" />
Another hypothesis behind the origins of genomic imprinting is that this phenomenon evolved to silence foreign DNA elements, such as genes of viral origin. There appears to be an over-representation of [[Transposon|retrotransposed]] genes, that is to say genes that are inserted into the genome by [[virus]]es, among imprinted genes. It has also been postulated that if the retrotransposed gene is inserted close to another imprinted gene, it may just acquire this imprint.<ref name="Chai 2001">{{cite journal |last=Chai |first=Jing-Hua |coauthors=Devin P. Locke, Tohru Ohta, John M. Greally and Robert D. Nicholls |title=Retrotransposed genes such as Frat3 in the mouse Chromosome 7C Prader-Willi syndrome region acquire the imprinted status of their insertion site |journal=Mammalian Genome |volume=12 |issue=11 |pages=813–821 |year=2001 |month=November |pmid=11845283 |doi=10.1007/s00335-001-2083-1 |url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/y44fdr27emt247h3/?p=f9083d2da2254dae8f2f9387d9e9ba7b|accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref>
===Problems associated with imprinting===
Imprinting may cause problems in [[cloning]], with clones having DNA that is not [[methylation|methylated]] in the correct position. It is possible that this is due to a lack of time for reprogramming to be completely achieved. When a [[cell nucleus|nucleus]] is added to an egg during [[somatic cell nuclear transfer]], the egg starts dividing in minutes, as compared to the days or months it takes for reprogramming during [[embryo]]nic development. If time is the responsible factor, it may be possible to delay cell division in clones, giving time for proper reprogramming to occur.
An allele of the "callipyge" (from the [[Greek language|Greek]] for "beautiful buttocks"), or CLPG, gene in [[sheep]] produces large buttocks consisting of muscle with very little fat. The large-buttocked phenotype only occurs when the allele is present on the copy of chromosome 18 inherited from a sheep's father and is ''not'' on the copy of chromosome 18 inherited from that sheep's mother.<ref name ="sheep">{{cite news |last=Winstead |first=Edward R. |url=http://www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articles/05_01/Callipyge_sheep_imprinting.shtml |publisher=Genome News Network |title=The Legacy of Solid Gold |date=2001-05-07}}</ref>
==Examples==
===Prader-Willi and Angelman Syndrome===
Several [[genetic disorder|genetic diseases]] that map to 15q11 (band 11 of the long arm of chromosome 15) in humans are due to abnormal imprinting. This region is differently imprinted in maternal and paternal chromosomes, and both imprintings are needed for normal development. In a normal individual, the maternal allele is methylated, while the paternal allele is unmethylated. It is possible for an individual to fail to inherit a properly imprinted 15q11 from one parent, as a result either of deletion of the 15q11 region from that parent's chromosome 15 or, less frequently, of [[uniparental disomy]] (in which both copies have been taken from the other parent's genes).
* If neither copy of 15q11 has ''paternal imprinting'', the result is [[Prader-Willi syndrome]] (characterised by [[hypotonia]], [[obesity]], and [[hypogonadism]]).
* If neither copy has ''maternal imprinting'', the result is [[Angelman syndrome]] (characterised by [[epilepsy]], [[tremors]], and a perpetually [[smiling]] [[facial expression]]).
===NOEY2===
[[NOEY2]] is a paternally expressed imprinted gene located on chromosome 1 in humans. Loss of NOEY2 expression is linked to an increased risk of ovarian and breast cancers; in 41% of breast and ovarian cancers the protein transcribed by NOEY2 is not expressed, suggesting that it functions as a [[tumor suppressor gene]]<ref name ="NOEY2">{{cite journal |last=Yu |first=Yinhua |coauthors=Fengji Xu, Hongqi Peng, Xianjun Fang, Shulei Zhaodagger, Yang Li, Bruce Cuevas, Wen-Lin KuoDagger, Joe W. GrayDagger, Michael Siciliano, Gordon B. Mills and Robert C. Bast Jr. |title=NOEY2 (ARHI), an imprinted putative tumor suppressor gene in ovarian and breast carcinomas |journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. |volume=96 |issue=1 |pages=214–9 |year=1999 |month=January |pmid=9874798 |pmc=15119 |doi= |url=http://www.pnas.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=9874798}}</ref> Therefore, if a person inherits both chromosomes from the mother, the gene will not be expressed and the individual is put at a greater risk for breast and ovarian cancer.
==Imprinted genes in plants==
Decades after imprinting was demonstrated in the mouse, a similar phenomena was observed in [[flowering plant]]s (angiosperms). During fertilisation of the embryo in flowers, a second separate fertilisation event gives rise to the [[endosperm]], an extraembryonic structure that nourishes the [[seed]] similar to the mammalian [[placenta]]. Unlike the embryo, the endosperm often contains two copies of the maternal genome and fusion with a male [[gamete]] results in a [[Polyploidy|triploid]] genome. This uneven ratio of maternal to paternal genomes appears to be critical for seed development. Some genes are found to be expressed from both maternal genomes while others are expressed exclusively from the lone paternal copy.<ref name="Nowack 2007">{{cite journal |last=Nowack |first=Moritz K. |coauthors=Reza Shirzadi, Nico Dissmeyer, Andreas Dolf, Elmar Endl, Paul E. Grini and Arp Schnittger |title=Bypassing genomic imprinting allows seed development |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=447 |issue=7142 |pages=312–5 |year=2007 |month=May |pmid=17468744 |doi=10.1038/nature05770|accessdate=2008-07-01}}</ref>
==See also==
* [[Metabolic imprinting]]
* [[Bookmarking]]
* [[Epigenetics]]
==References==
<references/>
==External links==
*[http://igc.otago.ac.nz/ Imprinted Gene and Parent-of-origin Effect Database]
*[http://www.mgu.har.mrc.ac.uk/research/imprinting/ MRC Harwell Imprinting Resource]
*[http://geneimprint.com/ geneimprint.com]
*[http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyPages/I/Imprinting.html J. Kimball's Imprinted Genes Site]
* {{MeshName|Genomic+imprinting}}
[[Category:Molecular genetics]]
[[Category:Gene expression]]
[[Category:Epigenetics]]
[[de:Imprinting]]
[[es:Impronta genética]]
[[he:החתמה גנומית]]
[[ja:ゲノムインプリンティング]]
[[pl:Imprinting (genetyka)]]
[[pt:Imprinting genômico]]
[[ru:Генный импритинг]]
[[sk:Imprinting]]
[[sr:Утискивање]]
[[fi:Leimautuminen]]
[[zh:基因銘印]]