Imperialism
15316
226180576
2008-07-17T05:12:40Z
SJL
1262413
Quick-adding category "Concepts (nationalism studies)" (using [[WP:HOTCAT|HotCat]])
{{Cleanup-articletitle}}
{{FixHTML|beg}}
[[Image:Punch Rhodes Colossus.png|thumb|right|260px|[[Cecil Rhodes]]: [[Cape-Cairo railway]] project. Founded the [[De Beers Mining Company]] and owned the [[British South Africa Company]], which established [[Rhodesia]] for itself. He liked to "paint the map [[United Kingdom|British]] red", and declared: "all of these stars ... these vast worlds that remain out of reach. If I could, I would annex other planets".<ref> [[S. Gertrude Millin]], ''Rhodes'', London, 1933, p.138 </ref> ]]
{{FixHTML|end}}
:''For the computer game, see [[Imperialism (computer game)]].''
'''Imperialism''' has two meanings, one describing an action and the other describing an attitude. Most commonly it is understood in relation to [[Empire]] building, as the expansion of a nation's authority by [[Territory (country subdivision)|territorial]] conquest establishing [[economic]] and [[political]] powers in other territories or nations, and when such encompasses non-contiguous "colonies" or "protectorates" then the term also subsumes as well [[Colonialism]]. In that sense, most European seafaring powers were at one time or another Colonialistic and therefore Imperialistic, regardless of their exploitation or benevolence toward their colonial possessions and people.
{{TOCnestright}}
In its second meaning the term describes the imperialistic attitude of superiority, subordination and dominion over foreign people— a chauvinism and comportment relegating foreign people to a lesser social and or political status. To clarify the distinction, the French colonies in North America treated the native races with great diplomacy, whereas the British and British colonies early on began treating native Indians chauvinistically, as savages and lesser creatures or fit only to be [[genocide|exterminated]]. In contrast, the abhorrent record of the Spanish made the British behavior look almost tolerant and good, and the Japanese Empire's treatment of conquered people was at best brutal.
Imperialism is often [[autocratic]], e.g. in early 20th century [[Japan]],<ref
>http://www.global-labour.org/katayama1.htm Sen Katayama, ''The Labor Movement in Japan,'' Global Labour Institute</ref
> and sometimes [[monolithic]] <ref
>http://pubs.socialistreviewindex.org.uk/isj93/rees.htm John Rees, ''Imperialism: globalisation, the state and war,'' International Socialism Journal 93, Winter 2001</ref
> in character. While the term imperialism often refers to a contigous political or geographical domain such as the [[Ottoman Empire]]<ref
>http://i-cias.com/e.o/ottomans.htm ''Ottoman Empire,'' Encylcopaedia of the Orient</ref
> the [[Russian Empire]],<ref
>http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/empire/ ''The Empire that was Russia,'' Library of Congress</ref
> or the [[British Empire]],<ref
>http://www.britishempire.co.uk/ ''The British Empire''</ref
> etcetera, the term can equally be applied to domains of knowledge, beliefs, values and expertise, such as the empires of [[Christianity]] (see [[Christendom]])<ref
>http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=3350 John B Cobb, ''Christianity and Empire,''</ref
> or [[Islam]] (see [[Caliphate]]).<ref
>http://www.pbs.org/empires/islam/ ''Islam Empire of Faith''</ref
>
==Overview==
Imperialism is found in the ancient histories of [[Roman Empire]], [[Ancient Greece|Greece]], the [[Persian Empire]], the [[Ottoman Empire]] (''see [[Ottoman wars in Europe]]''), the [[Islamic Caliphate]], [[India]], [[Egypt]], the [[Aztec]] empire, and many other areas. Although the practice has existed for thousands of years, the term "[[Age of Imperialism]]" refers to the [[Scramble for Africa]], along with the [[Scramble for India]]. The term 'Imperialism' was coined in the sixteenth century,<ref>[http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50112914?single=1&query_type=word&queryword=imperialism&first=1&max_to_show=10 Oxford English Dictionary online] (subscription required</ref> reflecting the imperial policies of [[Portugal]], [[Kingdom of Spain|Spain]], Britain, France, and the Netherlands into [[Africa]], [[Asia]], and [[the Americas]].{{Fact|date=July 2007}}
Currently, there is an effort to broaden the definition of "imperialism" so it applies to any instance of a greater power acting or being perceived to act at the expense of a lesser power. Including 'perception' in the definition makes it circular, solipsistic, and subjective. Under this broader definition, 'imperialism' not only describes colonial, territorial policies;but also describes economic dominance and influence.
European dominance of the east through economic exploitation and political rule, (as distinct from the word colonialism, which usually implied establishment of settler colonies often with slavery as the labor system), the word was coined in the mid-nineteenth century.
==Lenin's theory of imperialism==
European intellectuals have contributed to formal theories of imperialism. In [[Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism]] (1916), V.I. [[Lenin]] said capitalism necessarily induced [[monopoly capitalism]] as imperialism to find new business and resources, representing the last and highest stage of capitalism.<ref>In [http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/index.htm ''Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism'']</ref> The necessary expansion of [[capitalism]] beyond the boundaries of [[nation-states]] — a foundation of [[Leninism]] — was shared by [[Rosa Luxemburg]] ([[The Accumulation of Capital|The Accumulation of Capital: A Contribution to an Economic Explanation of Imperialism]]<ref> See ''[http://www.marxists.org/archive/luxemburg/1913/accumulation-capital/index.htm The Accumulation of Capital]'', 1913. </ref>) and liberal philosopher [[Hannah Arendt]].<ref> See Hannah Arendt, ''op.cit.'' </ref> Since then, Marxist scholars extended Lenin's theory to be synonymous with [[capitalism|capitalist]] [[Free Trade|international trade]] and [[finance|banking]].<ref>[http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/ch07.htm Lenin, Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism]</ref>
Although [[Karl Marx]] did not publish a theory of imperialism, he identified [[colonialism]] (cf. [[Das Kapital]]) as an aspect of the prehistory of the [[capitalist mode of production]]. Lenin's definition: "the highest stage of capitalism" addressed the time when monopoly finance capital was dominant, forcing nations and private corporations to compete to control the world's natural resources and markets.
[[Marxism|Marxist]] imperialism theory, and the related [[dependency theory]], emphasise the [[economic]] relationships among countries (and within countries), rather than formal [[political]] and military relationships. Thus, imperialism is not necessarily direct formal control of one country by another, but the economic [[exploitation]] of one by another. This Marxism contrasts with the popular conception of imperialism, as directly-controlled [[colonialism|colonial]] and [[neocolonialism|neocolonial]] empires.
'''Per Lenin, Imperialism is Capitalism, with five simultaneous features:'''
(1) Concentration of production and capital led to the creation of national and multinational monopolies — not as in liberal economics, but as ''de facto'' power over their markets — while "free competition" remains the domain of local and niche markets:
''Free competition is the basic feature of capitalism, and of commodity production generally; monopoly is the exact opposite of free competition, but we have seen the latter being transformed into monopoly before our eyes, creating large-scale industry and forcing out small industry, replacing large-scale by still larger-scale industry, and carrying concentration of production and capital to the point where out of it has grown and is growing monopoly: cartels, syndicates and trusts, and merging with them, the capital of a dozen or so banks, which manipulate thousands of millions. At the same time the monopolies, which have grown out of free competition, do not eliminate the latter, but exist above it and alongside it, and thereby give rise to a number of very acute, intense antagonisms, frictions and conflicts. Monopoly is the transition from capitalism to a higher system.'' (Ch. VII)
[Following Marx's [[value theory]], Lenin saw monopoly capitalism limited by the law of falling profit, as the ratio of constant capital to variable capital increased. Per Marx, only living labour (variable capital) creates profit in the form of surplus-value. As the ratio of surplus value to the sum of constant and variable capital falls, so does the rate of profit on invested capital.]
(2) [[finance capitalism|Finance capital]] replaces industrial capital (the dominant capital), (reiterating [[Rudolf Hilferding]]'s point in ''Finance Capital''), as industrial capitalists rely more upon bank-generated finance capital.
(3) Finance capital exportation replaces the exportation of goods (though they continue in production);
(4) The economic division of the world, by multi-national enterprises via international cartels; and
(5) The political division of the world by the great powers, wherein exporting finance capital to their colonies allows their exploitation for resources and continued investment. This [[superprofit|superexploitation]] of poor countries allows the capitalist industrial nations to keep some of their own workers content with slightly higher living standards. ''(cf. [[labor aristocracy]]; [[globalization]])''
Claiming to be Leninist, the [[U.S.S.R.]] proclaimed itself foremost [[Anti-imperialism|enemy of imperialism]], supporting armed, national independence or communist movements in the [[Third World]]<ref>[http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-12696.html Soviet Union - Central and South America]</ref><ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6171927.stm Profile: Mengistu Haile Mariam], [[BBC]]</ref> while simultaneously dominating [[Eastern Bloc|Eastern Europe]] and [[Soviet Central Asia|Central Asia]]. Marxists and Maoists to the left of Trotsky, such as [[Tony Cliff]], claim the Soviet Union was imperialist. Maoists claim it occurred after [[Kruschev|Khrushchev's]] ascension in 1956; Cliff says it occurred under Stalin in the 1940s (''see [[Soviet occupations]]'').<ref>[http://www.thehistorychannel.co.uk/site/encyclopedia/article_show/imperialism/m0096887.html Soviet imperialism]</ref> [[Harry Magdoff|Harry Magdoff's]] ''Age of Imperialism'' (1954) discusses Marxism and imperialism.
Lenin's theory of imperialism has been critiqued by many scholars. One problem with Lenin's theory concerns the measured volumes of trade and capital flow among European capitalist societies and between European capitalist societies and poor Third World societies. European capitalist systems since the nineteenth century have always done the vast bulk of their trading among themselves, with a relative sliver of trade and capital flow going out to non-developed societies in comparison with trade and capital flow within the great European systems.
Lenin's theory also contradicts Marx's doctrine of the reserved army of the unemployed (i.e. the lumpen proletariat), which holds that capitalism, for systemic reasons, cannot generate enough capital to employ all those who want to work. Lenin failed to see the contradiction, between the claim that capitalism builds up so much capital that it must send the excess overseas to "exploit" less developed societies, and the claim that capitalism cannot generate enough capital to sustain full employment.
The aforementioned contradiction can be seen as a distortion of Marxist-Leninist Theory. It is true that Marx uncovered systematic failures inherent to capitalism such as the inability of capitalism to provide work for all people. For instance, many modern Nations have an unemployment rate significantly greater than zero. However, Marx attributed such a failure to the dynamics of capitalist production. Capitalists, in general, own the means of production (e.g. factories) and make profit. What is important here is how the profit is re-invested into the capitalist system. Rather than pay their workers higher wages or hire a larger work force, capitalists spend a significant portion of their profits on technological development. For example, the modern assembly line relies heavily on machinery. These machines take away the jobs of human workers. At the same time, capitalists are able to churn out more products using such machinery. Capital, then, can be increased (at least for a short time). In terms of imperialism, Lenin's theory does not contradict Marx's analysis of capitalism. Both men believed in and witnessed the formation of monopolies. Both men also stressed the insatiable appetite of capitalism to search for new markets that can increase profit. Since the bottom line for monopolies is to increase profit, Lenin was right insofar as imperialism is caused by the search for new markets.
Currently, Marxists view [[globalization]] as imperialism's latest incarnation. {{Fact|date=April 2007}}
==See also==
* [[John A. Hobson]]
* [[Vladimir Lenin]]
* [[Colonialism]]
* [[Neocolonialism]]
* [[New Imperialism]]
* [[Theories of New Imperialism]]
* [[Ultra-imperialism]]
* [[Cultural imperialism]]
* [[Islamic imperialism]]
* [[Scientific imperialism]]
* [[Empire]]
* [[List of empires]]
* [[The Imperial Presidency]]
* [[Feudalism]]
* [[Oil imperialism]]
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
==Further reading==
* Robert Bickers/Christian Henriot (Hg.): ''New frontiers : imperialism's new communities in East Asia, 1842-1953'', Manchester [u.a.] : Manchester University Press 2000, ISBN 0-7190-5604-7
* ''[[Empire (book)|Empire]],'' by Michael Hardt and Toni Negri, [[Harvard University Press]], 2000. ISBN 0-674-00671-2
* Guy Ankerl: ''Coexisting Contemporary Civilizations: Arabo-Muslim, Bharatai, Chinese, and Western.'', Geneva, INU PRESS,
2000, ISBN2-88155-004-5.
==External links==
*[http://www.marxists.org/archive/hobson/1902/imperialism/index.htm J.A Hobson, Imperialism a Study] 1902.
* [http://www.mises.org/story/2383 The Paradox of Imperialism] by [[Hans-Hermann Hoppe]]. November 2006.
* [http://www.polyarchy.org/documents/imperialism.html Imperialism] Quotations
* [http://www.panarchy.org/schumpeter/imperialism.html State, Imperialism and Capitalism] by Joseph Schumpeter
* [http://www.panarchy.org/taylor/imperialism.1952.html Economic Imperialism] by A.J.P.Taylor
* [http://www.bartelby.org/65/im/imperial.html Imperialism Entry in the Columbia Encyclopedia (Bartleby)]
*[http://journal.ilovephilosophy.com/Article/The-Nation-State--Core-and-Periphery--A-Brief-sketch-of-Imperialism-in-the-20th-century-/1770 The Nation-State, Core and Periphery: A Brief sketch of Imperialism in the 20th century.]
[[Category:Imperialism|*]]
[[Category:Political philosophy]]
[[Category:Philosophical concepts]]
[[Category:Marxist theory]]
[[Category:History of colonialism]]
[[Category:Political systems]]
[[Category:Concepts (nationalism studies)]]
[[ar:إمبريالية]]
[[an:Imperialismo]]
[[ast:Imperialismu]]
[[bs:Imperijalizam]]
[[bg:Империализъм]]
[[ca:Imperialisme]]
[[cs:Imperialismus]]
[[cy:Imperialaeth]]
[[da:Imperialisme]]
[[de:Imperialismus]]
[[el:Ιμπεριαλισμός]]
[[es:Imperialismo]]
[[eo:Imperiismo]]
[[eu:Inperialismo]]
[[fa:امپریالیسم]]
[[fr:Impérialisme]]
[[gl:Imperialismo]]
[[ko:제국주의]]
[[hr:Imperijalizam]]
[[id:Imperialisme]]
[[is:Heimsvaldastefna]]
[[it:Imperialismo]]
[[he:אימפריאליזם]]
[[ka:იმპერიალიზმი]]
[[lt:Imperializmas]]
[[hu:Imperializmus]]
[[mk:Империјализам]]
[[ms:Imperialisme]]
[[nl:Imperialisme]]
[[ja:帝国主義]]
[[no:Imperialisme]]
[[nn:Imperialisme]]
[[nrm:Împérialisme]]
[[pl:Imperializm]]
[[pt:Imperialismo]]
[[ro:Imperialism]]
[[ru:Империализм]]
[[scn:Mpirialismu]]
[[simple:Imperialism]]
[[sk:Imperializmus]]
[[sl:Imperializem]]
[[sr:Империјализам]]
[[sh:Imperijalizam]]
[[fi:Imperialismi]]
[[sv:Imperialism]]
[[ta:பேரரசுவாதம்]]
[[th:ลัทธิจักรวรรดินิยม]]
[[tr:Emperyalizm]]
[[uk:Імперіалізм]]
[[zh:帝国主义]]