Lawyer
17541
225814109
2008-07-15T15:05:50Z
170.140.183.4
/* Terminology */
{{otheruses}}
A '''lawyer''', according to ''[[Black's Law Dictionary]]'', is "a person learned in the law; as an [[Attorney at law|attorney]], counsel or solicitor; a person licensed to practice law."<ref>Henry Campbell Black, ''[[Black's Law Dictionary]]'', 5th ed. ([[Saint Paul, Minnesota|St. Paul]]: [[Thomson West|West Publishing Co.]], 1979), 799.</ref> [[Law]] is the system of rules of conduct established by the [[sovereign]] [[government]] of a society to correct wrongs, maintain stability, and deliver [[justice]]. Working as a lawyer involves the practical application of abstract legal theories and knowledge to solve specific individualized problems, or to advance the interests of those who retain (i.e., hire) lawyers to perform legal services.
The role of the lawyer varies significantly across legal jurisdictions, and therefore can be treated here in only the most general terms.<ref>Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr. & Angelo Dondi, ''Legal Ethics: A Comparative Study'' ([[Stanford, California|Stanford]]: [[Stanford University Press]], 2004), 20-23.</ref> More information is available in country-specific articles (see below).
==Terminology==
In practice, legal jurisdictions exercise their right to determine who is recognized as being a lawyer; as a result, the meaning of the term "lawyer" may vary from place to place.
* In [[Australia]], the word "lawyer" is used to refer to both [[barrister]]s and [[solicitor]]s (whether in private practice or practising as corporate in-house counsel) but not people who do not practice the law.
* In [[Canada]], the word "lawyer" only refers to individuals who have been [[called to the bar]] or have qualified as civil law notaries in the province of [[Quebec]]. Common law lawyers in Canada may also be known as "barristers and solicitors", but should not be referred to as "attorneys", since that term has a different meaning in Canadian usage. However, in Quebec, civil law advocates (or ''avocats'' in French) often call themselves "attorney" and sometimes "barrister and solicitor".
* In [[England]], "lawyer" is used loosely to refer to a broad variety of law-trained persons. It includes practitioners such as [[barrister]]s, [[solicitor]]s, [[legal executive]]s and [[licensed conveyancer]]s; and people who are involved with the law but do not practice it on behalf of individual clients, such as judges, court clerks, and drafters of legislation.
* In [[India]], the term "lawyer" is often colloquially used, but the official term is "[[Advocate#Advocates_in_India|advocate]]" as prescribed under the Advocates Act, 1961.<ref>[http://barcouncilofindia.nic.in/disk1/196125.pdf Advocates Act, 1961], s. 2.</ref>
* In [[Scotland]], the word "lawyer" refers to a more specific group of legally trained people. It specifically includes [[Advocate#Advocates_in_Scotland|advocates]] and [[Solicitor#Scotland|solicitors]]. In a generic sense, it may also include judges and law-trained support staff.
* In the [[United States]], the term generally refers to [[Attorney at law|attorneys]] who may [[Practice of law|practice law]].
* Other nations tend to have comparable terms for the analogous concept.
==Responsibilities==
In most countries, particularly [[Civil law (legal system)|civil law]] countries, there has been a tradition of giving many legal tasks to a variety of [[civil law notary|civil law notaries]], clerks, and scriveners.<ref>Richard L. Abel, "Lawyers in the Civil Law World," in ''Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World'', vol. 2, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 1-53 ([[Berkeley, California|Berkeley]]: [[University of California Press]], 1988), 4.</ref> These countries do not have "lawyers" in the American sense, insofar as that term refers to a single type of general-purpose legal services provider;<ref>Walter O. Reyrauch, ''The Personality of Lawyers'' (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964), 27.</ref> rather, their legal professions consist of a large number of law-trained persons, known as [[jurist]]s, of which only some are advocates who are licensed to practice in the courts.<ref>Jon T. Johnsen, "The Professionalization of Legal Counseling in Norway," in ''Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World'', vol. 2, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 54-123 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 91.</ref><ref>Kahei Rokumoto, "The Present State of Japanese Practicing Attorneys: On the Way to Full Professionalization?" in ''Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World'', vol. 2, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 160-199 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 164.</ref> It is difficult to formulate accurate generalizations that cover all the countries with multiple legal professions, because each country has traditionally had its own peculiar method of dividing up legal work among all its different types of legal professionals.<ref>Hazard, 21-33.</ref>
Notably, [[England]], the mother of the [[common law]] jurisdictions, emerged from the [[Dark Ages]] with similar complexity in its legal professions, but then evolved by the 19th century to a single dichotomy between [[barrister]]s and [[solicitor]]s. An equivalent dichotomy developed between advocates and procurators in some civil law countries, though these two types did not always monopolize the practice of law as much as barristers and solicitors, in that they always coexisted with civil law notaries.<ref>Benoit Bastard and Laura Cardia-Vonèche, "The Lawyers of Geneva: an Analysis of Change in the Legal Profession," trans. by Richard L. Abel, in ''Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World'', vol. 2, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 295-335 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 297.</ref><ref>Carlos Viladás Jene, "The Legal Profession in Spain: An Understudied but Booming Occupation," in ''Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World'', vol. 2, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 369-379 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 369.</ref><ref>Vittorio Olgiati and Valerio Pocar, "The Italian Legal Profession: An Institutional Dilemma," in ''Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World'', vol. 2, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 336-368 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 338.</ref>
Several countries that originally had two or more legal professions have since [[Fused profession|''fused'']] or ''united'' their professions into a single type of lawyer.<ref>Bastard, 299.</ref><ref>Harry W. Arthurs, Richard Weisman, and Frederick H. Zemans, "Canadian Lawyers: A Peculiar Professionalism," in ''Lawyers in Society: The Common Law World'', vol. 1, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 123-185 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 124.</ref><ref>David Weisbrot, "The Australian Legal Profession: From Provincial Family Firms to Multinationals," in ''Lawyers in Society: The Common Law World'', vol. 1, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 244-317 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 250.
</ref><ref>Georgina Murray, "New Zealand Lawyers: From Colonial GPs to the Servants of Capital," in ''Lawyers in Society: The Common Law World'', vol. 1, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 318-368 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 324.</ref> Most countries in this category are [[common law]] countries, though [[France]], a civil law country, merged together its jurists in 1990 and 1991 in response to Anglo-American competition.<ref>Anne Boigeol, "The Rise of Lawyers in France," in ''Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization: Latin America and Latin Europe,'' eds. Lawrence M. Friedman and Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo, 185-219 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003), 208.</ref>
In countries with fused professions, a lawyer is usually permitted to carry out all or nearly all the responsibilities listed below.
===Oral argument in the courts===
Arguing a client's case before a [[judge]] or [[jury]] in a court of law is the traditional province of the barrister in England. However, the boundary between barristers and solicitors has evolved. In England today, the barrister monopoly covers only appellate courts, and barristers must compete directly with solicitors in many trial courts.<ref>Richard L. Abel, ''The Legal Profession in England and Wales'' ([[London]]: [[Basil Blackwell]], 1989), 116.</ref> In countries like the United States that have fused legal professions, there are [[trial lawyer]]s who specialize in trying cases in court, but trial lawyers do not have a ''de jure'' monopoly like barristers.
In some countries, litigants have the option of arguing ''[[pro se]]'', or on their own behalf. It is common for litigants to appear unrepresented before certain courts like [[small claims court]]s; indeed, many such courts do not allow lawyers to speak for their clients, in an effort to save money for all participants in a small case.<ref>See, e.g., Cal. Code. Civ. Proc. § 116.530 [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cacodes/ccp/116.510-116.570.html] (preventing attorneys from appearing in small claims court except as parties or witnesses).</ref> In other countries, like [[Venezuela]], no one may appear before a judge unless represented by a lawyer.<ref>Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo, "The Venezuelan Legal Profession: Lawyers in an Inegalitarian Society," in ''Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World'', vol. 2, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 380-399 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 387.</ref> The advantage of the latter regime is that lawyers are familiar with the court's customs and procedures, and make the legal system more efficient for all involved. Unrepresented parties often damage their own credibility or slow the court down as a result of their inexperience.<ref>Gordon Kent, "Lawyerless Litigants: Is Justice Being Served?" ''[[Edmonton Journal]]'', 27 January 2002, A1.</ref><ref>Alan Feuer, "Lawyering by Laymen: More Litigants Are Taking a Do-It-Yourself Tack," ''[[New York Times]]'', 22 January 2001, B1.</ref>
===Research and drafting of court papers===
Often, lawyers brief a court in writing on the issues in a case before the issues can be orally argued. They may have to perform extensive research into relevant facts and law while drafting legal papers and preparing for oral argument.
In England, a solicitor gets the facts of the case from the client and briefs a barrister in writing. The barrister then researches, drafts, and files the necessary court pleadings, and orally argues the case.<ref>See Abel, ''England and Wales'', 56 and 141.</ref>
In [[Spain]], the procurator merely signs and presents the papers to the court, but it is the advocate who drafts the papers and argues the case.<ref>Jene, 369.</ref>
In some countries, like [[Japan]], a [[scrivener]] or clerk may fill out court forms and draft simple papers for lay persons who cannot afford or do not need attorneys, and advise them on how to manage and argue their own cases.<ref>Rokumoto, 164.</ref>
===Advocacy (written and oral) in administrative hearings===
In most developed countries, the legislature has granted [[original jurisdiction]] over highly technical matters to [[executive branch]] administrative agencies which oversee such things. As a result, some lawyers have become specialists in [[administrative law]]. In a few countries, there is a special category of jurists with a monopoly over this form of advocacy; for example, France formerly had ''conseil juridiques'' (who were merged into the main legal profession in 1991).<ref>Anne Boigeol, "The French Bar: The Difficulties of Unifying a Divided Profession," in ''Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World'', vol. 2, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 258-294 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 263; and Boigeol, "The Rise of Lawyers," 206.</ref> In other countries, like the [[United States]], lawyers have been effectively barred by statute from certain types of administrative hearings in order to preserve their informality.<ref>Richard L. Abel, ''American Lawyers'' (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), 132. See, e.g., ''Hines v. Lowrey'', {{ussc|305|85|1938}} (upholding limitation on attorneys' fees in veterans' benefits cases to $10).</ref>
===Client intake and counseling (with regard to pending litigation)===
An important aspect of a lawyer's job is developing and managing relationships with clients (or the client's employees, if the lawyer works in-house for a government or corporation). The client-lawyer relationship often begins with an intake interview where the lawyer gets to know the client personally, discovers the facts of the client's case, clarifies what the client wants to accomplish, shapes the client's expectations as to what actually can be accomplished, begins to develop various claims or defenses, and explains his or her fees to the client.<ref>Paul J. Zwier & Anthony J. Bocchini, ''Fact Investigation: A Practical Guide to Interviewing, Counseling, and Case Theory Development'' (Louisville, CO: National Institute for Trial Advocacy, 2000), 13-44.</ref><ref>John H. Freeman, ''Client Management for Solicitors'' (London: Cavendish Publishing Ltd., 1997), 266-274.</ref>
In England, only solicitors were traditionally in direct contact with the client.<ref> Abel, ''England and Wales'', 1 and 141.</ref> The solicitor retained a barrister if one was necessary and acted as an intermediary between the barrister and the client. In most cases a barrister would be obliged, under what is known as the "cab rank rule", to accept instructions for a case in an area in which they held themselves out as practising, at a court at which they normally appeared and at their usual rates.<ref>R.E. Megarry, ''Lawyer and Litigant in England'' (London: Stevens and Sons, 1962), 32.</ref><ref>Maureen Paton, "Cab-rank exits," ''[[The Times]]'', 9 October 2001, 1. This brief article explains the uneasy tension between solicitors and barristers, and the loopholes that have developed. For example, a barrister need not accept a case if the fee is too low or the barrister is just too busy.</ref>
===Legal advice===
{{main|Legal advice}}
Legal advice is the application of abstract principles of law to the concrete facts of the client's case in order to advise the client about what they should do next. In many countries, only a properly licensed lawyer may provide legal advice to clients for good [[consideration]], even if no lawsuit is contemplated or is in progress.<ref>Arthurs, 125; Johnsen, 74; and Pérez-Perdomo, "Venezuelan Legal Profession," 387.</ref><ref>Erhard Blankenburg and Ulrike Schultz, "German Advocates: A Highly Regulated Profession," in ''Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World'', vol. 2, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 124-159 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 124.</ref><ref>Joaquim Falcão, "Lawyers in Brazil," in ''Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World'', vol. 2, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 400-442 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 401.</ref> Therefore, even conveyancers and corporate in-house counsel must first get a license to practice, though they may actually spend very little of their careers in court. Failure to obey such a rule is the crime of [[unauthorized practice of law]].
In other countries, jurists who hold law degrees are allowed to provide legal advice to individuals or to corporations, and it is irrelevant if they lack a license and cannot appear in court.<ref>Abel, ''England and Wales'', 185; Bastard, 318.</ref><ref>Kees Schuyt, "The Rise of Lawyers in the Dutch Welfare State," in ''Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World'', vol. 2, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 200-224 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 201.</ref> Some countries go further; in [[England and Wales]], there is ''no'' general prohibition on the giving of legal advice.<ref>Stephen J. McGarry, ''Multidisciplinary Practices and Partnerships: Lawyers, Consultants, and Clients'', § 1.06[1] (New York: Law Journal Press, 2002), 1-29.</ref> Sometimes civil law notaries are allowed to give legal advice, as in [[Belgium]].<ref>Luc Huyse, "Legal Experts in Belgium," in ''Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World'', vol. 2, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 225-257 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 227.</ref>
In many countries, non-jurist accountants may provide what is technically legal advice in tax and accounting matters.<ref>Murray, 325; and Rokumoto, 164.</ref>
===Protecting intellectual property===
In virtually all countries, [[patent]]s, [[trademark]]s, [[Industrial design rights|industrial designs]] and other forms of [[intellectual property]] must be formally registered with a government agency in order to receive maximum protection under the law. The division of such work among lawyers, licensed non-lawyer jurists/agents, and ordinary clerks or scriveners varies greatly from one country to the next.<ref>Rokumoto, 164.</ref><ref>Lee Rousso, "Japan's New Patent Attorney Law Breaches Barrier Between The 'Legal' And 'Quasi-Legal' Professions: Integrity Of Japanese Patent Practice At Risk?" <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">10 Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y 781, 783-790 (2001).</span></ref>
===Negotiating and drafting contracts===
In some countries, the negotiating and drafting of contracts is considered to be similar to the provision of legal advice, so that it is subject to the licensing requirement explained above.<ref>Arthurs, 125; and Pérez-Perdomo, "Venezuelan Legal Profession," 387.</ref> In others, jurists or notaries may negotiate or draft contracts.<ref>Huyse, 227.</ref>
Lawyers in some civil law countries traditionally deprecated "transactional law" or "business law" as beneath them. French law firms developed transactional departments only in the 1990s when they started to lose business to international firms based in the United States and the [[United Kingdom]] (where solicitors have always done transactional work).<ref>Boigeol, "The Rise of Lawyers," 206.</ref>
===Conveyancing===
Conveyancing is the drafting of the documents necessary for the transfer of [[real property]], such as [[deed]]s and [[mortgage]]s. In some jurisdictions, all [[real estate]] transactions must be carried out by a lawyer (or a solicitor where that distinction still exists).<ref>Abel, ''England and Wales'', 176; Murray, 325; and Pérez-Perdomo, "Venezuelan Legal Profession," 387.</ref> Such a monopoly is quite valuable from the lawyer's point of view; historically, conveyancing accounted for about half of English solicitors' income (though this has since changed),<ref>Abel, ''England and Wales'', 177.</ref> and a 1978 study showed that conveyancing "accounts for as much as 80 percent of solicitor-client contact in [[New South Wales]]."<ref>Weisbrot, 292.</ref> In most common law jurisdictions outside of the United States, this monopoly arose from an 1804 law<ref>s. 14 Stamp Act 1804</ref> that was introduced by [[William Pitt the Younger]] as a ''[[quid pro quo]]'' for the raising of fees on the certification of legal professionals such as barristers, solicitors, attorneys and notaries.<ref>Brian Abel-Smith and Robert Stevens, ''Lawyers and the Courts: A Sociological Study of the English Legal System, 1750-1965'' ([[Cambridge, Massachusetts|Cambridge]]: [[Harvard University]] Press, 1967), 23.</ref>
In others, the use of a lawyer is optional and banks, title companies, or [[realtor]]s may be used instead.<ref>Weisbrot, 251.</ref> In some civil law jurisdictions, real estate transactions are handled by civil law notaries.<ref>Arthurs, 125; Huyse, 227; and Schuyt, 201.</ref> In [[England and Wales]] a special class of legal professional, the [[Licensed Conveyancer]] is also allowed to carry out conveyancing services for reward.
===Carrying out the intent of the deceased===
In many countries, only lawyers have the legal authority to do drafting of [[Will (law)|wills]], [[Trust (property)|trusts]], and any other documents that ensure the efficient disposition of a person's property after death. In some civil law countries this responsibility is handled by civil law notaries.<ref>Huyse, 227.</ref>
In the United States, the estates of the deceased must be administered by a court through [[probate]]. American lawyers have a profitable monopoly on dispensing advice about probate law (which has been heavily criticized).<ref>Ralph Warner & Stephen Elias, ''Fed Up with the Legal System: What's Wrong & How to Fix It'' (Berkeley: Nolo Press, 1994), 11.</ref>
===Prosecution and defense of criminal suspects===
In many civil law countries, [[prosecutor]]s are trained and employed as part of the judiciary; they are law-trained jurists, but may not necessarily be lawyers in the sense that the word is used in the common law world.<ref>Hazard, 34-35; Huyse, 227; and Schuyt, 201.</ref> In common law countries, prosecutors are usually lawyers holding regular licenses who simply happen to work for the government office that files criminal charges against suspects. [[Criminal defense lawyer]]s specialize in the defense of those charged with any crimes.
==Education==
{{main|Legal education}}
The educational prerequisites to becoming a lawyer vary greatly from country to country. In some countries, law is taught by a [[faculty of law]], which is a department of a university's general undergraduate college.<ref>Lawrence M. Friedman and Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo, "Latin Legal Cultures in the Age of Globalization," in ''Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization: Latin America and Latin Europe'', eds. Lawrence M. Friedman and Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo, 1-19 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003), 6.</ref> Law students in those countries pursue a [[Master of Laws|Master]] or [[Bachelor of Laws]] degree. In some countries it is common or even required for students to earn another bachelor's degree at the same time. Nor is the LL.B the sole obstacle; it is often followed by a series of advanced examinations, apprenticeships, and additional coursework at special government institutes.<ref>Abel, ''England and Wales'', 45-59; Rokumoto, 165; and Schuyt, 204.</ref>
In other countries, particularly the United States, law is primarily taught at [[law school]]s. In the United States<ref>Wayne L. Anderson and Marilyn J. Headrick, ''The Legal Profession: Is it for you?'' (Cincinnati: Thomson Executive Press, 1996), 52-53.</ref> and countries following the American model, (such as [[Canada]]<ref>Anonymous, "Careers in the legal profession offer a variety of opportunities: While we may not think about it often, the legal system affects us every day," ''[[The Telegram]]'', 14 April 2004, D8.</ref> with the exception of the province of Quebec) law schools are graduate/professional schools where a bachelor's degree is a prerequisite for admission. Most law schools are part of universities but a few are independent institutions. Law schools in the United States (and some in Canada and elsewhere) award graduating students a J.D. ([[Juris Doctor]]/Doctor of Jurisprudence) (as opposed to the [[Bachelor of Laws]]) as the practitioner's law degree. However, like other professional doctorates (including the M.D.), the J.D. is not the exact equivalent of the Ph.D., since it does not require the submission of a full dissertation based on original research. Many schools also offer post-doctoral law degrees such as the LL.M (Legum Magister/Master of Laws), or the S.J.D. (Scientiae Juridicae Doctor/Doctor of the Science of Law) for students interested in advancing their knowledge and credentials in a specific area of law.
The methods and quality of legal education vary widely. Some countries require extensive clinical training in the form of apprenticeships or special clinical courses.<ref>Olgiati, 345.</ref> Others do not, like Venezuela.<ref>Pérez-Perdomo, "Venezuelan Legal Profession," 384.</ref> A few countries prefer to teach through assigned readings of judicial opinions (the [[casebook method]]) followed by intense in-class cross-examination by the professor (the [[Socratic method]]).<ref>Robert H. Miller, ''Law School Confidential: A Complete Guide to the Law School Experience, By Students, for Students'' (New York: St. Martin's Griffin, 2000), 25-27.</ref><ref>Anderson, 4-10.</ref> Many others have only lectures on highly abstract legal doctrines, which forces young lawyers to figure out how to actually think and write like a lawyer at their first apprenticeship (or job).<ref>Friedman and Pérez-Perdomo, 6; Blankenburg, 132; and Olgiati, 345.</ref><ref>Sergio Lopez-Ayllon and Hector Fix-Figaro, " 'Faraway, So Close!' The Rule of Law and Legal Change in Mexico: 1970-2000," in ''Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization: Latin America and Latin Europe'', eds. Lawrence M. Friedman and Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo, 285-351 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003), 324.</ref><ref>Herbert Hausmaninger, "Austrian Legal Education," <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">43 S. Tex. L. Rev. 387, 388 and 400 (2002).</span></ref> Depending upon the country, a typical class size could range from five students in a seminar to five hundred in a giant lecture room. In the United States, law schools maintain small class sizes, and as such, grant admissions on a more limited and competitive basis.<ref>Miller, 42-60.</ref>
<!-- DO NOT ALTER the following sentence as it accurately reflects the content of the sources cited.-->Some countries, particularly industrialized ones, have a traditional preference for full-time law programs,<ref>Abel, ''American Lawyers'', 57; Miller, 25; and Murray, 337.</ref> while in developing countries, students often work full- or part-time to pay the tuition and fees of their part-time law programs.<ref>Falcão, 410.</ref><ref>J.S. Gandhi, "Past and Present: A Sociological Portrait of the Indian Legal Profession," in ''Lawyers in Society: The Common Law World'', vol. 1, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 369-382 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 375.</ref>
Law schools in developing countries share several common problems, such as an overreliance on practicing judges and lawyers who treat teaching as a part-time hobby (and a concomitant scarcity of full-time law professors);<ref>Lopez-Ayllon, 324.</ref><ref>Eliane Botelho Junqueira, "Brazil: The Road of Conflict Bound for Total Justice," in ''Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization: Latin America and Latin Europe'', eds. Lawrence M. Friedman and Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo, 64-107 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003), 89.</ref> incompetent faculty with questionable credentials;<ref>Junqueira, 89.</ref> and textbooks that lag behind the current state of the law by two or three decades.<ref>Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo, "Venezuela, 1958-1999: The Legal System in an Impaired Democracy," in ''Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization: Latin America and Latin Europe'', eds. Lawrence M. Friedman and Rogelio Perez-Perdomo, 414-478 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003), 459. For example, a 1997 study found that not a single law school in Venezuela had bothered to integrate any part of the Convention on Children's Rights into its curriculum, even though Venezuela had signed the treaty in 1990 and subsequently modified its domestic laws to bring them into compliance. Rather than embark on curriculum reform, Venezuelan law schools now offer special postgraduate courses so that recent graduates can bring their legal knowledge up-to-date with current law.</ref><ref>Lopez-Ayllon, 324.</ref>
===Earning the right to practice law===
:''Main articles: [[Call to the bar]] and [[Admission to the bar]]''
Some jurisdictions grant a "[[diploma privilege]]" to certain institutions, so that merely earning a degree or credential from those institutions is the primary qualification for practicing law.<ref name="Abel_AmLaw_62">Abel, ''American Lawyers'', 62.</ref> [[Mexico]] allows ''anyone'' with a law degree to practice law.<ref>Lopez-Ayllon, 330.</ref> However, in a large number of countries, a law student must pass a [[bar examination]] (or a series of such examinations) before receiving a license to practice.<ref name="Abel_AmLaw_62"/><ref>Miller, 335-341.</ref><ref>Alan A. Paterson, "The Legal Profession in Scotland: An Endangered Species or a Problem Case for Market Theory?" in ''Lawyers in Society: The Common Law World'', vol. 1, eds. Richard L. Abel and Philip S.C. Lewis, 76-122 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 89.</ref> In a handful of [[U.S. state]]s, one may become an attorney by simply passing the bar examination, without having to attend law school first (though very few people actually become lawyers that way).<ref>G. Jeffrey MacDonald, "The self-made lawyer: Not every attorney goes to law school," ''[[The Christian Science Monitor]]'', 3 June 2003, 13.</ref>
Some countries require a formal apprenticeship with an experienced practitioner, while others do not. For example, a few jurisdictions still allow an apprenticeship in place of any kind of formal legal education (though the number of persons who actually become lawyers that way is increasingly rare).<ref>Weisbrot, 266.</ref>
==Career structure==
[[Image:Abraham Lincoln head on shoulders photo portrait.jpg|thumb|right|200px|[[President of the United States|U.S. President]] [[Abraham Lincoln]] is a famous example of a lawyer-turned-politician.]]
The career structure of lawyers varies widely from one country to the next.
===Common law/civil law===
In most common law countries, especially those with fused professions, lawyers have many options over the course of their careers. Besides private practice, they can always aspire to becoming a [[prosecutor]], government counsel, corporate in-house counsel, [[administrative law judge]], [[judge]], [[arbitrator]], [[law professor]], or [[politician]].<ref>Abel, ''American Lawyers'', 167-175; Abel, ''England and Wales'', 214; Arthurs, 131; Gandhi, 374; and Weisbrot, 277.</ref> There are also many non-legal jobs which legal training is good preparation for, such as [[corporate executive]], government administrator, [[investment banker]], [[entrepreneur]], or [[journalist]].<ref>Anderson, 124-131.</ref> In developing countries like India, a large majority of law students never actually practice, but simply use their law degree as a foundation for careers in other fields.<ref>Gandhi, 374.</ref>
In most civil law countries, lawyers generally structure their legal education around their chosen specialty; the boundaries between different types of lawyers are carefully defined and hard to cross. After one earns a law degree, career mobility may be severely constrained. For example, unlike their American counterparts,<ref>Although it is common for former American judges to return to private practice, it is highly controversial for them to suggest that they still retain any judicial powers (for example, by wearing judicial robes in advertisements). Brad McElhinny, "Workman criticized for using robe in ad: Group files State Bar complaint about the way former justice seeks clients," ''[[Charleston Daily Mail]]'', 3 February 2005, 1A.</ref> it is difficult for German judges to leave the bench and become advocates in private practice.<ref>Blankenburg, 133.</ref> Another interesting example is France, where for much of the 20th century, all magistrates were graduates of an elite professional school for judges. Although the French magistracy has begun experimenting with the Anglo-American model of appointing judges from accomplished advocates, the few advocates who have actually joined the bench this way are looked down upon by their colleagues who have taken the traditional route to magistracy.<ref>Boigeol, "The Rise of Lawyers," 202.</ref>
In a few civil law countries, such as [[Sweden]],<ref>Bernard Michael Ortwein II, "The Swedish Legal System: An Introduction," <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">13 Ind. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 405, 440-445 (2003).</span></ref> the legal profession is ''not'' rigorously bifurcated and everyone within it can easily change roles and arenas.
===Specialization===
In many countries, lawyers are general practitioners who will take almost any kind of case that walks in the door.<ref>Olgiati, 353.</ref> In others, there has been a tendency since the start of the 20th century for lawyers to specialize early in their careers.<ref>Abel, ''American Lawyers'', 122.</ref><ref>Michael H. Trotter, ''Profit and the Practice of Law: What's Happened to the Legal Profession'' (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1997), 50.</ref> In countries where specialization is prevalent, many lawyers specialize in representing one side in one particular area of the law; thus, it is common in the United States to hear of plaintiffs' personal injury attorneys.<ref>Herbert M. Kritzer, "The fracturing legal profession: the case of
plaintiffs' personal injury lawyers," <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">8 Int'l J. Legal Prof. 225, 228-231 (2001).</span></ref>
===Organization===
{{main|Law firm}}
Lawyers in private practice generally work in specialized [[business]]es known as [[law firm]]s,<ref>Anderson, 111-117.</ref> with the exception of English barristers. The vast majority of law firms worldwide are [[small business]]es that range in size from 1 to 10 lawyers.<ref>Hazard, 39.</ref> The United States, with its large number of firms with more than 50 lawyers, is an exception.<ref>Junqueira, 92. According to this source, as of 2003, there were 901 law firms with more than 50 lawyers in the United States.</ref> The United Kingdom and Australia are also exceptions, as the UK, Australia and the U.S. are now home to several firms with more than 1,000 lawyers after a wave of mergers in the late 1990s.
Notably, [[barrister]]s in [[England and Wales]] and some states in [[Australia]] do ''not'' work in "law firms". Those who offer their services to the general public — as opposed to those working "in house" — are required to be self-employed.<ref>Gary Slapper and David Kelly, ''The English Legal System'', 7th ed. (London: Cavendish Publishing Ltd., 2004), 550.</ref> Most work in groupings known as "sets" or "chambers", where some administrative and marketing costs are shared. An important effect of this different organizational structure is that there is no conflict of interest where barristers in the same chambers work for opposing sides in a case, and in some specialised chambers this is commonplace.
==Professional associations and regulation==
===Mandatory licensing and membership in professional organizations===
In some jurisdictions, either the judiciary<ref>Weisbrot, 264.</ref> or the Ministry of Justice<ref>Johnsen, 86.</ref> directly supervises the admission, licensing, and regulation of lawyers.
Other jurisdictions, by statute, tradition, or court order, have granted such powers to a professional association which all lawyers must belong to.<ref>Boigeol, “The French Bar,” 271; and Junqueira, 89.</ref> In the U.S., such associations are known as mandatory, integrated, or unified [[bar association]]s. In the Commonwealth of Nations, similar organizations are known as [[Inns of Court]], [[bar council]]s or [[law society|law societies]].<ref>Abel, ''England and Wales'', 127 and 243-249; Arthurs, 135; and Weisbrot, 279.</ref> In civil law countries, comparable organizations are known as Orders of Advocates,<ref>Bastard, 295; and Falcão, 401.</ref> Chambers of Advocates,<ref>Blankenburg, 139.</ref> Colleges of Advocates,<ref>Jene, 370.</ref> Faculties of Advocates,<ref>Paterson, 79.</ref> or similar names. Generally, a nonmember caught practicing law may be liable for the crime of [[unauthorized practice of law]].<ref>Arthurs, 143.</ref>
In common law countries with divided legal professions, barristers traditionally belong to the bar council (or an Inn of Court) and solicitors belong to the law society. In the English-speaking world, the largest mandatory professional association of lawyers is the [[State Bar of California]], with 200,000 members.
Some countries admit and regulate lawyers at the national level, so that a lawyer, once licensed, can argue cases in any court in the land. This is common in small countries like [[New Zealand]], Japan, and Belgium.<ref>Murray, 339; Rokumoto, 163; and Schuyt, 207.</ref> Others, especially those with federal governments, tend to regulate lawyers at the state or provincial level; this is the case in the United States,<ref>Abel, ''American Lawyers'', 116.</ref> Canada,<ref>Arthurs, 139.</ref> Australia,<ref>Weisbrot, 244.</ref> and Switzerland,<ref>Bastard, 299.</ref> to name a few. Brazil is the most well-known federal government that regulates lawyers at the national level.<ref>Falcão, 404.</ref>
Some countries, like Italy, regulate lawyers at the regional level,<ref>Olgiati, 343.</ref> and a few, like Belgium, even regulate them at the local level (that is, they are licensed and regulated by the local equivalent of bar associations but can advocate in courts nationwide).<ref>Huyse, 239.</ref> In Germany, lawyers are admitted to regional bars and may appear for clients before all courts nationwide with the exception of the [[Federal Court of Justice of Germany]] (''Bundesgerichthof'' or BGH); oddly, securing admission to the BGH's bar limits a lawyer's practice solely to the supreme federal courts and the [[Federal Constitutional Court of Germany]].<ref>Howard D. Fisher, ''The German Legal System and Legal Language'', 3rd ed. (London: Routledge Cavendish, 2002), 208-209.</ref>
Generally, geographic limitations can be troublesome for a lawyer who discovers that his client's cause requires him to litigate in a court beyond the normal geographic scope of his license. Although most courts have special ''[[pro hac vice]]'' rules for such occasions, the lawyer will still have to deal with a different set of [[professional responsibility]] rules, as well as the possibility of other differences in substantive and procedural law.
Some countries grant licenses to non-resident lawyers, who may then appear regularly on behalf of foreign clients. Others require all lawyers to live in the jurisdiction or to even hold national citizenship as a prerequisite for receiving a license to practice. But the trend in industrialized countries since the 1970s has been to abolish citizenship and residency restrictions. For example, the [[Supreme Court of Canada]] struck down a citizenship requirement on equality rights grounds in 1989,<ref>''[[Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia]]'', [1989] 1 S.C.R. 143.</ref> and similarly, American citizenship and residency requirements were struck down as unconstitutional by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] in 1973 and 1985, respectively.<ref>Abel, ''American Lawyers'', 68.</ref> The [[European Court of Justice]] made similar decisions in 1974 and 1977 striking down citizenship restrictions in Belgium and France.<ref>Mary C. Daly, "Ethical and Liability Issues in International Legal Practice," in ''Comparative Law Yearbook of International Business'', vol. 17, eds. Dennis Campbell and Susan Cotter, 223-268 (London: Kluwer Law International, 1995), 233.</ref>
===Who regulates lawyers===
A key difference among countries is whether lawyers should be regulated solely by an independent judiciary and its subordinate institutions (a self-regulating legal profession), or whether lawyers should be subject to supervision by the [[Ministry of Justice]] in the [[executive branch]].
In most civil law countries, the government has traditionally exercised tight control over the legal profession in order to ensure a steady supply of loyal judges and bureaucrats. That is, lawyers were expected first and foremost to serve the state, and the availability of counsel for private litigants was an afterthought.<ref>Abel, ''Civil Law World'', 10; Johnsen, 70; Olgiati, 339; and Rokumoto, 161.</ref> Even in civil law countries like Norway which have partially self-regulating professions, the Ministry of Justice is the sole issuer of licenses, and makes its own independent re-evaluation of a lawyer's fitness to practice after a lawyer has been expelled from the Advocates' Association.<ref>Johnsen, 86.</ref> Brazil is an unusual exception in that its national Order of Advocates has become a fully self-regulating institution (with direct control over licensing) and has successfully resisted government attempts to place it under the control of the Ministry of Labor.<ref>Falcão, 423.</ref><ref>Maria da Gloria Bonelli, "Lawyers' Associations and the Brazilian State, 1843-1997," <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">28 Law & Soc. Inquiry 1045, 1065</span> (2003).</ref>
Of all the civil law countries, Communist countries historically went the farthest towards total state control, with all Communist lawyers forced to practice in collectives by the mid-1950s.<ref>Kandis Scott, "Decollectivization and Democracy: Current Law Practice in Romania," <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">36 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 817, 820.</span> (2004).</ref><ref>Timothy J. Tyler, "Judging the Past: Germany's Post-Unification Lawyers' Admissions Review Law," <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">29 Tex. Int'l L.J. 457, 472 (1994).</span></ref> China is a prime example: technically, the [[People's Republic of China]] did not have lawyers, and instead had only poorly-trained, state-employed "legal workers," prior to the enactment of a comprehensive reform package in 1996 by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress.<ref>Michael J. Moser, "Globalization and Legal Services in China: Current Status and Future Directions," in ''The Internationalization of the Practice of Law'', eds. Jens I. Drolhammer and Michael Pfeifer, 127-136 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), 128-129. </ref>
In contrast, common law lawyers have traditionally regulated themselves through institutions where the influence of non-lawyers, if any, was weak and indirect (despite nominal state control).<ref>Abel, ''American Lawyers'', 142-143; Abel, ''England and Wales'', 29; and Arthurs, 148.</ref> Such institutions have been traditionally dominated by private practitioners who opposed strong state control of the profession on the grounds that it would endanger the ability of lawyers to zealously and competently advocate their clients' causes in the [[adversarial system]] of justice.<ref>Arthurs, 138; and Weisbrot, 281.</ref>
However, the concept of the self-regulating profession has been criticized as a sham which serves to legitimize the professional monopoly while protecting the profession from public scrutiny.<ref>Abel, ''American Lawyers'', 246-247.</ref> Disciplinary mechanisms have been astonishingly ineffective, and penalties have been light or nonexistent.<ref>Abel, ''American Lawyers'', 147; Abel, ''England and Wales'', 135 and 250; Arthurs, 146; Paterson, 104; and Weisbrot, 284.</ref><ref>Richard L. Abel, ''English Lawyers Between Market and State: The Politics of Professionalism'' (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), 374-375.</ref><ref>William T. Gallagher, "Ideologies of Professionalism and the Politics of Self-Regulation in the California State Bar," <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">22 Pepp. L. Rev. 485, 490-491</span> (1995).</ref>
===Voluntary associations of lawyers===
Lawyers are always free to form voluntary associations of their own, apart from any licensing or mandatory membership that may be required by the laws of their jurisdiction. Like their mandatory counterparts, such organizations may exist at all geographic levels.<ref>Abel, ''England and Wales'', 132-133.</ref><ref>Lopez-Ayllon, 330.</ref> In American English, such associations are known as voluntary bar associations.<ref>Arthurs, 141.</ref> The largest voluntary professional association of lawyers in the English-speaking world is the [[American Bar Association]].
In some countries, like France and Italy, lawyers have also formed [[trade union]]s.<ref>Boigeol, “The French Bar,” 274; and Olgiati, 344.</ref>
==Cultural perception of lawyers==
Hostility towards the legal profession is a widespread phenomenon. The legal profession was abolished in [[Prussia]] in 1780 and in France in 1789, though both countries eventually realized that their judicial systems could not function efficiently without lawyers.<ref>Blankenburg, 126; and Boigeol, “The French Bar,” 272.</ref> Complaints about too many lawyers were common in both England and the United States in the 1840s<ref>Abel, ''England and Wales'', 37.</ref><ref>Gerald W. Gawalt, "Sources of Anti-Lawyer Sentiment in Massachusetts, 1740-1840," in ''Essays in Nineteenth-Century American Legal History'', ed. Wythe Holt, 624-648 ([[Westport, Connecticut|Westport, CT]]: Greenwood Press, 1976), 624-625. According to this source, the strong anti-lawyer sentiment of the period was rather ironic, since lawyers were actually so scarce in the American colonies that a 1715 Massachusetts law forbade litigants from retaining two lawyers because of the risk of depriving one's opponent of counsel.</ref> Germany in the 1910s,<ref>Blankenburg, 127.</ref> and in Australia,<ref>Weisbrot, 246.</ref> Canada,<ref>Arthurs, 128.</ref> the United States,<ref>Marc Galanter, "Predators and Parasites: Lawyer-Bashing and Civil Justice, " <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">28 Ga. L. Rev. 633, 644-648 (1994).</span></ref><ref>Stephen D. Easton, "Fewer Lawyers? Try Getting Your Day in Court," ''Wall Street Journal'', 27 November 1984, 1. This article rebuts the common complaint of too many lawyers in the U.S. by pointing out that it is virtually impossible for a plaintiff to prevail in the vast majority of countries with less lawyers, like [[Japan]], because there are simply not enough lawyers or judges to go around. Even wrongful death cases with clear evidence of fault can drag on for decades in Japan. Thus, any reduction in the number of lawyers would result in reduced enforcement of individual rights.</ref><ref name="Spence">[[Gerry Spence]], ''With Justice For None: Destroying An American Myth'' ([[New York]]: Times Books, 1989), 27-40</ref> and [[Scotland]]<ref>Paterson, 76.</ref> in the 1980s.
Public distrust of lawyers reached record heights in the United States after the [[Watergate scandal]].<ref>Jerold Auerbach, ''Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modern America'' (New York: Oxford University Press, 1976), 301.</ref><ref name="Spence"/> In the aftermath of Watergate, legal self-help books became popular among those who wished to solve their legal problems without having to deal with lawyers.<ref>For examples of legal self-help books written by lawyers which concede that the profession has a bad image, see [[Mark McCormack|Mark H. McCormack]], ''The Terrible Truth About Lawyers'' (New York: Beech Tree Books, 1987), 11; Kenneth Menendez, ''Taming the Lawyers'' ([[Santa Monica, California|Santa Monica, CA]], Merritt Publishing, 1996), 2; and Stuart Kahan and Robert M. Cavallo, ''Do I Really Need A Lawyer?'' ([[Radnor, Pennsylvania|Radnor, PA]]: Chilton Book Company, 1979), 2.</ref> [[Lawyer joke]]s (already a perennial favorite) also soared in popularity in [[English language|English]]-speaking [[North America]] as a result of Watergate.<ref>Gayle White, "So, a lawyer, a skunk and a catfish walk into a bar...: No shortage of jokes," ''[[National Post]]'', 27 May 2006, FW8.</ref> In 1989, American legal self-help publisher [[Nolo Press]] published a 171-page compilation of negative anecdotes about lawyers from throughout human history.<ref>Andrew Roth & Jonathan Roth, ''Devil's Advocates: The Unnatural History of Lawyers'' (Berkeley: Nolo Press, 1989), ix.</ref>
A 2004 comparative study examined the various legal professions around the world and noted a "remarkable consistency" in complaints about lawyers that transcends both time and locale.<ref>Hazard, 60.</ref> The authors then generalized the most common complaints about lawyers as follows:
{{cquote|
* abuse of litigation in various ways, including using dilatory tactics and false evidence and making frivolous arguments to the courts;
* preparation of false documentation, such as false deeds, contracts, or wills;
* deceiving clients and other persons and misappropriating property;
* procrastination in dealings with clients; and
* charging excessive fees.<ref>Hazard, 60.</ref>}}
==Compensation==
{{main|Attorney's fee}}
Lawyers are paid for their work in a variety of ways. In private practice, they may work for an hourly fee according to a billable hour structure,<ref>Anderson, 111-112.</ref> a [[contingency fee]]<ref>Herbert M. Kritzer, ''Risks, Reputations, and Rewards: Contingency Fee Legal Practice in the United States'' (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004), 258-259. According to this source, contingency fees (or ''de facto'' equivalents) are allowed, as of 2004, in Canada, England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, New Zealand, Australia, the Dominican Republic, Greece, France, Brazil, Japan, and, of course, the United States.</ref> (usually in cases involving [[personal injury]]), or a lump sum payment if the matter is straightforward. Normally, most lawyers negotiate a written fee agreement up front and may require a non-refundable [[advance payment|retainer]] in advance. In many countries there are fee-shifting arrangements by which the loser must pay the winner's fees and costs; the United States is the major exception,<ref>See ''Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.'', {{ussc|386|714|1967}} (reviewing history of the American Rule).</ref> although in turn, its legislators have carved out many exceptions to the so-called "American Rule" of no fee shifting.
Lawyers working directly on the payroll of governments, nonprofits, and corporations usually earn a regular annual salary.<ref>Anderson, 120-121.</ref> In many countries, with the notable exception of Germany,<ref>Matthias Kilian and Francis Regan, "Legal expenses insurance and legal aid — two sides of the same coin? The experience from Germany and Sweden," <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">11 Int'l J. Legal Prof. 233, 239 (2004).</span> According to this article, ''pro bono'' arrangements are illegal in Germany.</ref> lawyers can also volunteer their labor in the service of worthy causes through an arrangement called ''[[pro bono]]'' (for the common good).<ref>Abel, ''American Lawyers'', 129-130.</ref> Traditionally such work was performed on behalf of the poor, but in some countries it has now expanded to many other causes such as the [[environment (biophysical)|environment]].
In some countries, there are [[legal aid]] lawyers who specialize in providing legal services to the indigent.<ref>Abel, ''American Lawyers'', 133.</ref><ref>Arthurs, 161; Murray, 342; Pérez-Perdomo, 392; Schuyt, 211; and Weisbrot, 288.</ref> France and Spain even have formal fee structures by which lawyers are compensated by the government for legal aid cases on a per-case basis.<ref>Boigeol, “The French Bar,” 280; and Jene, 376.</ref> A similar system, though not as extensive or generous, operates in Australia, Canada, as well as South Africa.{{Fact|date=December 2007}}
In other countries, legal aid specialists are practically nonexistent. This may be because non-lawyers are allowed to provide such services; in both [[Italy]] and [[Belgium]], trade unions and political parties provide what can be characterized as legal aid services.<ref>Olgiati, 354, and Huyse, 240.</ref> Some legal aid in Belgium is also provided by young lawyer apprentices subsidized by local bar associations (known as the ''pro deo'' system), as well as consumer protection nonprofit organizations and Public Assistance Agencies subsidized by local governments.<ref>Huyse, 240-241.</ref> In Germany, mandatory fee structures have enabled widespread implementation of affordable legal expense insurance.<ref>Blankenburg, 143.</ref>
==History==
[[Image:Quentin Massys 007.jpg|200px|thumb|16th century painting of a [[civil law notary]], by Flemish painter [[Quentin Massys]]. A civil law notary is roughly analogous to a common law [[solicitor]], except that, unlike solicitors, civil law notaries do not practice litigation to any degree.]]
===Ancient Greece===
The earliest people who could be described as "lawyers" were probably the [[orators]] of ancient [[Athens]] (see [[History of Athens]]). However, Athenian orators faced serious structural obstacles. First, there was a rule that individuals were supposed to plead their own cases, which was soon bypassed by the increasing tendency of individuals to ask a "friend" for assistance.<ref>Robert J. Bonner, ''Lawyers and Litigants in Ancient Athens: The Genesis of the Legal Profession'' (New York: Benjamin Blom, 1927), 202.</ref> However, around the middle of the fourth century, the Athenians disposed of the perfunctory request for a friend.<ref>Bonner, 204.</ref> Second, a more serious obstacle, which the Athenian orators never completely overcame, was the rule that no one could take a fee to plead the cause of another. This law was widely disregarded in practice, but was never abolished, which meant that orators could ''never'' present themselves as legal professionals or experts.<ref>Bonner, 206.</ref> They had to uphold the [[legal fiction]] that they were merely an ordinary citizen generously helping out a friend for free, and thus they could never organize into a real profession — with professional associations and titles and all the other pomp and circumstance — like their modern counterparts.<ref>Bonner, 208-209.</ref> Therefore, if one narrows the definition to those men who could practice the legal profession openly and legally, then the first lawyers would have to be the orators of [[ancient Rome]].
===Early Ancient Rome===
A law enacted in 204 BC barred Roman advocates from taking fees, but the law was widely ignored.<ref>John A. Crook, ''Law and Life of Ancient Rome'' (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1967), 90.</ref> The ban on fees was abolished by [[Claudius|Emperor Claudius]], who legalized advocacy as a profession and allowed the Roman advocates to become the first lawyers who could practice openly — but he also imposed a fee ceiling of 10,000 [[sestertius|sesterces]].<ref>Crook, 90. Crook cites [[Tacitus]], ''Annals'' VI, 5 and 7 for this point. For more information about the complex political affair that forced Emperor Claudius to decide this issue, see ''The Annals of Tacitus'', Book VI ([[Franklin Township, Erie County, Pennsylvania|Franklin Center, PA]]: The Franklin Library, 1982), 208.</ref> This was apparently not much money; the [[Satires of Juvenal]] complain that there was no money in working as an advocate.<ref>Crook, 91.</ref>
Like their Greek contemporaries, early Roman advocates were trained in [[rhetoric]], not law, and the judges before whom they argued were also not law-trained.<ref>Crook, 87.</ref> But very early on, unlike Athens, Rome developed a class of specialists who were learned in the law, known as jurisconsults (''iuris consulti'').<ref>Crook, 88.</ref> Jurisconsults were wealthy amateurs who dabbled in law as an intellectual hobby; they did not make their primary living from it.<ref>Crook, 88.</ref> They gave legal opinions (''responsa'') on legal issues to all comers (a practice known as ''publice respondere'').<ref>Crook, 89.</ref> Roman judges and governors would routinely consult with an advisory panel of jurisconsults before rendering a decision, and advocates and ordinary people also went to jurisconsults for legal opinions.<ref>Crook, 88.</ref> Thus, the Romans were the first to have a class of people who spent their days thinking about legal problems, and this is why their law became so "precise, detailed, and technical."<ref>Crook, 88.</ref>
===Late Ancient Rome===
During the [[Roman Republic]] and the early [[Roman Empire]], jurisconsults and advocates were unregulated, since the former were amateurs and the latter were technically illegal.<ref>Crook, 90.</ref> Any citizen could call himself an advocate or a legal expert, though whether people believed him would depend upon his personal reputation. This changed once Claudius legalized the legal profession. By the start of the [[Byzantine Empire]], the legal profession had become well-established, heavily regulated, and highly stratified.<ref>A. H. M. Jones, ''The Later Roman Empire, 284-602: A Social, Economic, and Administrative Survey'', vol. 1 ([[Norman, Oklahoma|Norman, OK]]: University of Oklahoma Press, 1964), 507.</ref> The centralization and bureaucratization of the profession was apparently gradual at first, but accelerated during the reign of Emperor [[Hadrian]].<ref>Fritz Schulz, ''History of Roman Legal Science'' ([[Oxford]]: [[Oxford University Press]], 1946), 113.</ref> At the same time, the jurisconsults went into decline during the imperial period.<ref>Schulz, 113.</ref>
In the words of Fritz Schulz, "by the fourth century things had changed in the eastern Empire: advocates now were really lawyers."<ref>Schulz, 268.</ref> For example, by the fourth century, advocates had to be enrolled on the bar of a court to argue before it, they could only be attached to one court at a time, and there were restrictions (which came and went depending upon who was emperor) on how many advocates could be enrolled at a particular court.<ref>Jones, 508-510.</ref> By the 380s, advocates were studying law in addition to rhetoric (thus reducing the need for a separate class of jurisconsults); in 460, [[Leo I the Thracian|Emperor Leo]] imposed a requirement that new advocates seeking admission had to produce testimonials from their teachers; and by the sixth century, a regular course of legal study lasting about four years was required for admission.<ref>Jones, 512-513.</ref> Claudius's fee ceiling lasted all the way into the Byzantine period, though by then it was measured at 100 [[Solidus (coin)|solidi]].<ref>Jones, 511.</ref> Of course, it was widely evaded, either through demands for maintenance and expenses or a ''sub rosa'' [[barter (economics)|barter]] transaction.<ref>Jones, 511.</ref> The latter was cause for disbarment.<ref>Jones, 511.</ref>
The notaries (''tabelliones'') appeared in the late Roman Empire. Like their modern-day descendants, the civil law notaries, they were responsible for drafting wills, conveyances, and contracts.<ref>Jones, 515.</ref> They were ubiquitous and most villages had one.<ref>Jones, 515.</ref> In Roman times, notaries were widely considered to be inferior to advocates and jurisconsults.<ref>Jones, 515.</ref> Roman notaries were not law-trained; they were barely literate hacks who wrapped the simplest transactions in mountains of legal jargon, since they were paid by the line.<ref>Jones, 516.</ref>
===Middle Ages===
After the fall of the western Empire and the onset of the Dark Ages, the legal profession of Western Europe collapsed. As James Brundage has explained: "[by 1140], no one in Western Europe could properly be described as a professional lawyer or a professional canonist in anything like the modern sense of the term 'professional.' "<ref>James A. Brundage, "The Rise of the Professional Jurist in the Thirteenth Century," <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">20 Syracuse J. Int'l L. & Com. 185</span> (1994).</ref> However, from 1150 onward, a small but increasing number of men became experts in [[canon law]] but only in furtherance of other occupational goals, such as serving the [[Roman Catholic Church]] as priests.<ref>Brundage, 185-186.</ref> From 1190 to 1230, however, there was a crucial shift in which some men began to practice canon law as a lifelong profession in itself.<ref>Brundage, 186-187.</ref>
The legal profession's return was marked by the renewed efforts of church and state to regulate it. In 1231 two French councils mandated that lawyers had to swear an oath of admission before practicing before the bishop's courts in their regions, and a similar oath was promulgated by the papal legate in London in 1237.<ref>Brundage, 188.</ref> During the same decade, Frederick II, the emperor of the Kingdom of Sicily, imposed a similar oath in his civil courts.<ref>Brundage, 188-189.</ref> By 1250 the nucleus of a new legal profession had clearly formed.<ref>Brundage, 190.</ref> The new trend towards professionalization culminated in a controversial proposal at the [[Second Council of Lyon]] in 1275 that ''all'' ecclesiastical courts should require an oath of admission.<ref>Brundage, 189.</ref> Although not adopted by the council, it was highly influential in many such courts throughout Europe.<ref>Brundage, 189.</ref> The civil courts in England also joined the trend towards professionalization; in 1275 a statute was enacted that prescribed punishment for professional lawyers guilty of deceit, and in 1280 the mayor's court of the city of London promulgated regulations concerning admission procedures, including the administering of an oath.<ref>John Hamilton Baker, ''An Introduction to British Legal History'', 3rd ed. (London: Butterworths, 1990), 179.</ref>
==References==
{{Reflist|3}}
==See also==
{{MultiCol}}
* [[Wikt:ambulance chaser|Ambulance chaser]] (derogatory)
* [[Attorney at law]]
* [[Advocate]]
* [[Barrister]]
* [[Solicitor]]
* [[Court dress]]
* [[Corporate lawyer]]
* [[Esquire]]
* [[Fiduciary]]
* [[St. Ivo of Kermartin]] (patron saint of lawyers)
{{ColBreak}}
* [[Law broker]]
* [[Law firm]]
* [[Lawyer joke]]
* [[Legalese]]
* [[List of jurists]]
* [[List of lawyers]]
* [[Legal Executive]] - considered a lawyer in [[England and Wales]]
* [[Licensed Conveyancer]] - considered a lawyer in [[England and Wales]] and [[Australia]]
{{ColBreak}}
* [[Notary public]] - a legal professional in [[England and Wales]]
* [[Scrivener]]
* [[Practice of law]]
* [[Prosecutor]]
* [[Public defender]]
* [[Rules lawyer]] (derogatory)
* [[Shyster]] (derogatory)
{{EndMultiCol}}
{{Law}}
==External links==
{{wikiquote}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Lawyer}}
[[Category:Occupations]]
[[Category:Lawyers]]
[[Category:Legal occupations]]
[[Category:Legal ethics]]
[[Category:Solicitors]]
<!-- interwiki -->
[[af:Regsgeleerde]]
[[ar:محامي]]
[[bg:Адвокат]]
[[ca:Advocat]]
[[cs:Advokát]]
[[da:Jurist]]
[[de:Rechtsanwalt]]
[[et:Advokaat]]
[[el:Δικηγόρος]]
[[es:Abogado]]
[[eo:Advokato]]
[[fr:Avocat (métier)]]
[[gl:Avogado]]
[[ko:변호사]]
[[hr:Odvjetnik]]
[[id:Pengacara]]
[[it:Avvocato]]
[[he:עורך דין]]
[[la:Causidicus]]
[[nl:Advocaat (beroep)]]
[[nds-nl:Avvekaot (beroep)]]
[[ne:अधिवक्ता]]
[[ja:弁護士]]
[[no:Advokat]]
[[nn:Advokat]]
[[pl:Adwokat]]
[[pt:Advogado]]
[[ro:Avocat]]
[[ru:Адвокат]]
[[simple:Lawyer]]
[[sr:Адвокат]]
[[fi:Asianajaja]]
[[sv:Advokat]]
[[th:ทนายความ]]
[[tr:Avukat]]
[[ur:قانوندان]]
[[yi:אדוואקאט]]
[[zh:律師]]