Linear Pottery culture 4407586 219117611 2008-06-13T17:30:48Z Mapar007 5905677 {{redirect|LBK}} {{TOCright}} [[Image:LBK-Pottery.jpg|thumb|left|'''Linear pottery'''. "The vessels are oblated globes, cut off on the top and slightly flattened on the bottom suggestive of a gourd."&mdash;Frank Hibben<ref name=Hib121>Hibben, page 121.</ref> Note the imitation of painted bands by incising the edges of the band. Stroked Ware is shown in the upper left corner.]] The '''Linear Pottery culture''' is a major [[archaeological horizon]] of the European [[Neolithic]], flourishing ca. 5500&mdash;4500 BC. The heaviest concentrations are on the middle [[Danube]], the upper and middle [[Elbe]], and the upper and middle [[Rhine]]. The culture represents a major impulse if not the advent of agriculture into this part of the world. The pottery after which it was named consists of simple cups, bowls, vases and jugs, without handles, but in a later phase with [[Lug (knob)|lug]]s or pierced lugs, bases and necks.<ref name=Hib121/> They were obviously designed as kitchen dishes, or for the immediate or local transport of food and liquids. Important sites include [[Nitra]] in [[Slovakia]]; [[Bylany (archaeology)|Bylany]] in the [[Czech Republic]]; [[Langweiler]] and [[Zwenkau]] in [[Germany]]; [[Brunn am Gebirge]] in [[Austria]]; [[Elsloo]], [[Sittard]], [[Köln-Lindenthal]], [[Aldenhoven]], [[Flomborn]] and [[Rixheim]] on the Rhine; [[Lautereck]] and [[Hienheim]] on the upper Danube; [[Rössen]] and [[Sonderhausen]] on the middle Elbe. Two variants of the early Linear Pottery Culture are recognized: * The Early or Western Linear Pottery Culture developed on the middle [[Danube]], including western [[Hungary]], and was carried down the [[Rhine]], [[Elbe]], [[Oder]] and [[Vistula]]. * The [[Eastern Linear Pottery Culture]] flourished in eastern Hungary. Middle and late phases are also defined. In the middle phase, the Early Linear Pottery Culture intruded upon the [[Bug-Dniester culture]] and began to manufacture [[Musical Note Pottery]]. In the late phase, the [[Stroke-ornamented ware culture|Stroked Pottery Culture]] moved down the Vistula and Elbe. A number of cultures ultimately replaced the Linear Pottery culture over its range, but there is no one-to-one correspondence between its variants and the replacing cultures. The culture map instead is complex. Some of the successor cultures are the [[Hinkelstein]], [[Großgartach]], [[Rössen culture|Rössen]], [[Lengyel culture|Lengyel]], [[Cucuteni culture|Cucuteni]], and [[Boian-Maritza Culture|Boian-Maritza]]. ==Names== {| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 0em; margin-right: 2.5em; margin-top: 0.5em; font-size: 90%; background:whitesmoke; width:20em; max-width: 40%; border:1px" cellspacing="6" | style="text-align: left;" | "Because of the sharply observed present political boundaries, the terminology applied to the various cultures and groups has become needlessly complicated. Thus, in different countries the same culture complex may carry completely different names based on different eponymous sites, or may have the same basic name modified by regional or language variants. For example, Yugoslavian Starčevo is the general equivalent of Hungarian Körös and Rumanian Criş."&mdash;Robert Ehrich<ref>Ehrich page 404.</ref> |} The culture is known by a number of names, all heavily used: * German '''Linienbandkeramische Kultur''', in which the adjective is formed from the name of the pottery, '''Linearbandkeramik''' (abbr. '''LBK''') * '''[[:de:Bandkeramische Kultur|Bandkeramische Kultur]]''', based on '''Bandkeramik''', the more popular term in Germany today * '''Linear Band Pottery culture''' * '''Linear (Band) Ware culture''' * '''Linear Ceramics culture''' * [[Danubian culture|'''Danubian I''']] culture of [[V. Gordon Childe]] * '''Early Danubian culture''' * '''Incised Ware Group''' The term, Linear Band Ware, is a mnemonic of the pottery's decorative technique. The "Band Ware" or Bandkeramik part of it began as an innovation of the German archaeologist, [[Friedrich Klopfleisch]] (1831-1898).<ref>Klopfleisch (1882), ''Die Grabhügel von Leubingen, Sömmerda und Nienstädt'', in the ''Voraufgehend: allgemeine Einleitung'', section entitled ''Charakteristik und Zeitfolge der Keramik.'' Brief recognition of his authorship is given in English by Fagan, Brian Murray (1996), ''The Oxford Companion to Archaeology'', Oxford University Press, ISBN 0195076184 page 84.</ref> The earliest generally accepted name in English was the Danubian of [[V. Gordon Childe]]. Currently most names are attempts to translate Linearbandkeramik into good English. Since [[Starčevo culture|Starčevo-Körös]] pottery was earlier than the LBK and was located in a contiguous food-producing region, the early investigators looked for precedents there. Much of the Starčevo-Körös pottery features decorative patterns composed of convolute bands of paint: spirals, converging bands, vertical bands, and so on. The LBK appears to imitate and often improve these convolutions with incised lines; hence the term, linear, to distinguish painted band ware from incised band ware. The name depends on specialized meanings of "linear" and "band", whether in English or in German. These words without the qualifiers do not describe the decoration. There are few bands going around the pottery and the lines are mainly not straight. Patterns are repeated motifs: spirals, rectangles, triangles, chevrons. For the most part they are not placed within bands, but rather, the entire surface of the pot is the artist's field. In addition to the names listed above are local or period-specific names, which refer to some phase or style within the Linear Pottery Culture. Agreement does not always exist concerning whether a local style is to be included as linear. ==Extent== [[Image:DonauknieVisegrad.jpg|thumb|left|The Danube bend in Hungary]] [[Image:Elbe - flussabwärts kurz nach Ort Königstein.jpg|thumb|right|The Elbe]] [[Image:Oder Fluss.jpg|thumb|left|The Oder]] The LBK at maximum extent ranged from about the line of the [[Seine]]&mdash;[[Oise]] ([[Paris Basin]]) eastward to the line of the [[Vistula]] and upper [[Dniester]], and southward to the line of the upper [[Danube]] down to the big bend. An extension ran through the [[Bug River|Western Bug river]] valley, leaped to the valley of the Dniester, and swerved southward from the middle Dniester to the lower Danube in eastern [[Romania]], east of the [[Carpathian Mountains|Carpathians]]. [[Image:Johann Christian Brand 002.jpg|thumb|right|Danube lands near Vienna, by Johann Christian Brand, ca. 1760]] The LBK did not begin with this range and only reached it toward the end of its time. It began in regions of densest occupation on the middle Danube ([[Bohemia]], [[Moravia]], [[Hungary]]) and spread over about 1500 km along the rivers in 360 years. The rate of expansion was therefore about 4 km per year,<ref>Dolukhanov under External links, Models. The numbers are stated in the abstract. Note that figures such as this although true given the parameters depend on data that was selected by the investigator and are best regarded as approximations.</ref> which can hardly be called an invasion or a wave by the standard of current events, but over archaeological time seems especially rapid. The LBK was concentrated somewhat inland from the coastal areas; i.e., it is not evidenced in [[Denmark]] or the northern coastal strips of [[Germany]] and [[Poland]], or the coast of the [[Black Sea]] in [[Romania]]. The northern coastal regions remained occupied by [[Mesolithic]] cultures exploiting the then fabulously rich [[Atlantic salmon]] runs. There are lighter concentrations of LBK in the [[low countries]], such as at [[Elsloo]], and at the mouths of the [[Oder]] and [[Vistula]]. Evidently, the Neolithics and Mesolithics were not excluding each other. ==Duration== A good many [[Radiocarbon dating|C-14]] dates have been acquired on the LBK, making possible statistical analyses, which have been performed on different sample groups. One such analysis by Stadler and Lennais<ref>External links, Dates below</ref> sets 68.2% [[confidence limit]]s at about 5430-5040 BC; that is, 68.2% of possible dates allowed by variation of the major factors that influence measurement, calculation and calibration fall within that range. The 95.4% [[confidence interval]] is 5600-4750 BC. Data continues to be acquired and therefore any one analysis should be taken as a rough guideline only. Overall it is probably safe to say that the Linear Pottery culture spanned several hundred years of continental European prehistory in the late 6th and early 5th millennia BC, with local variations. Data from Belgium indicates a late survival of LBK there, as late as 4100 BC.<ref>See the article ''The Interaction Between Early Farmers and Indigenous People in Central Belgium'' included under ''External links, People'' below.</ref> The Linear Pottery Culture is not the only food-producing player on the stage of prehistoric Europe. It has been necessary therefore to distinguish between it and the Neolithic, which was most easily done by dividing the Neolithic of Europe into chronological phases. These have varied a great deal. An approximation is as follows:<ref name=KRAP2007>KRAP (2007) under External Links, Places.</ref><ref>Hertelendi and others (1995) under External links, Places, especially page 242.</ref><ref name=Gimb1991>Gimbutas (1991) pages 35-45.</ref> * Early Neolithic. 6000-5500. The first appearance of food-producing cultures in the south of the future Linear Pottery Culture range: the [[Körös]] of southern [[Hungary]] and the [[Bug-Dniester culture]] in the [[Ukraine]]. * Middle Neolithic. 5500-5000. Early and Middle Linear Pottery Culture. * Late Neolithic. 5000-4500. Late Linear Pottery and legacy cultures. The last phase is no longer the end of the Neolithic. A Final Neolithic has been added to the transition between the Neolithic and the Bronze Age.<ref>For example, Baldia (2006) ''The Earliest Bandkeramik'' presents a 5-phase scheme carrying the last of the Neolithic down to 2200. His table can be found at [http://www.comp-archaeology.org/Chronolog-N-Cent-S-Germany.gif].</ref> All numbers depend to some extent on the geographic region. The pottery styles of the LBK allow some division of its window in time. Conceptual schemes have varied somewhat. One is as follows:<ref name=Gimb1991/> * Early. The Eastern and Western LBK cultures, originating on the middle Danube. * Middle. [[Musical Note pottery]]. The incised lines of the decoration are broken or terminated by punctures, or "strokes", giving the appearance of musical notes. The culture expanded to its maximum extent. Regional variants appeared. One variant is the late [[Bug-Dniester culture]]. * Late. [[Stroke-ornamented ware|Stroked pottery]]. Lines of punctures are substituted for the incised lines. ==Origins== The origin of the culture must be distinguished from the origin of the people who used it. ===Culture=== The earliest theory of Linear Pottery Culture origin is that it came from the [[Starčevo-Körös]] culture of [[Serbia]] and [[Hungary]].<ref name=Bald2006>Baldia (2006) ''The Earliest Bandkeramik.''.</ref> Supporting this view is the fact that the LBK appeared earliest ca. 5600-5400 BC on the middle [[Danube]] in the Starčevo range. Presumably, the expansion northwards of early [[Starčevo-Körös]] produced a local variant reaching the upper [[Tisza]] that may have well been created by contact with native [[epi-Paleolithic]] people. This small group began a new tradition of pottery, substituting engravings for the paintings of the Balkanic cultures. A site at [[Brunn am Gebirge]] just south of Vienna seems to document the transition to LBK. The site was densely settled in a long house pattern approximately 5550-5200. The lower layers feature Starčevo-type plain pottery, with large number of stone tools made of material from near [[Lake Balaton]], [[Hungary]]. Over the time frame, LBK pottery and animal husbandry increased, while the use of stone tools decreased. A second theory proposes an autochthonous development out of the local [[Mesolithic]] cultures.<ref>Price, pages 13-16, gives an overview of the theory's development.</ref> Although the [[Starčevo-Körös]] entered southern Hungary at about 6000 and the LBK spread very rapidly there appears to be a hiatus of up to 500 years<ref name=Bald2006/> in which a barrier seems to have been in effect.<ref name=KRAP2007/><ref>The article by Kertész covers the research on the area and the concepts of hiatus and barrier.</ref> Moreover, the cultivated species of the near and middle eastern Neolithic do not do well over the Linear Pottery Culture range. And finally, the [[Mesolithic]]s in the region prior to the LBK used some domestic species, such as [[Triticum]] and [[flax]]. The [[La Hoguette]] Culture on the northwest of the LBK range developed their own food production from native plants and animals. A third theory attributes the start of Linear Pottery to an influence from the Mesolithic cultures of the east European plain.<ref>Dolukhanov and others (2005) pages 1453-1457.</ref> Pottery began with the [[Jomon Culture]] of [[Japan]] at about 11,000 BC. The habit of innovating pottery spread through [[Siberia]] to the east European plain by 7000 BC. The pottery was used in intensive food gathering. The rate at which it spread was no faster than the spread of the Neolithic in general. Accordingly Dolukhanov and others postulate that an impulse from the steppe to the southeast of the barrier stimulated the Mesolithics north of it to innovate their own pottery. This view only accounts for the pottery; presumably, the Mesolithics combined it de novo with local food production, which began to spread very rapidly throughout a range that was already producing some food. ===Population=== The initial LBK population theory hypothesized that the culture was spread by farmers moving up the Danube practicing slash-and-burn methods. The presence of the Mediterranean sea shell, [[Spondylus]] gaederopus, and the similarity of the pottery to gourds, which did not grow in the north, seemed to be evidence of the immigration.<ref>Clark & Piggott, pages 240-246.</ref> The lands into which they moved were believed untenanted or too sparsely populated by hunter-gatherers to be a significant factor. The barrier causing the hiatus mentioned above does not have an immediate geographical cause. The Körös Culture ended in the middle of the Hungarian plain and although the climate to the north is colder the gradient is not so sharp as to form a barrier there. It may have been one of language and ethnic loyalty. The [[Mesolithic]] population of Europe was by no means physically homogeneous. In it were pockets of physical types called "local European" or "Cro-magnon (B)" by Gimbutas,<ref>1991 page 43.</ref> meaning not the exact type of the ancestral [[Cro-Magnon]] man of the upper [[Palaeolithic]] who lived in the region previously but a similar remnant population surviving in less accessible pockets, having distinct physical characteristics and often associated with distinct cultures. North of the Körös was such a population. Zoffman<ref>Zoffman 2000, External links under People.</ref> in a recent statistical analysis of 120 sample series from remains in the entire [[Carpathian]] Basin covering several thousand years calls this proto-Linear-Pottery-Culture population a "Protonordic-Cro-Magnoid type." Its relationship to the [[Nordic race|nordics]] is another topic, but she uses the variables of [[anthropometry]], which she calls "taxonomic data", to compare the populations in the basin. She calculates the [[Penrose distance]]<ref>This term refers to the statistical distance between sample groups for the variables measured.</ref> between populations to determine whether they can be identified with or are remote from each other. The "Protonordic-Cro-Magnoids" turn out to be different from the "gracile Mediterraneans" of the Körös and from any of the surrounding populations: the central European, Bohemian and German, confirming that in fact they were a large pocket. The author admits that the result might be influenced by sampling error. Ostensibly the study shows that the Linear Pottery Culture was not transmitted via major population movements. Recent [[mtDNA]] studies on 24 LBK individuals at 16 locations in [[Germany]], [[Austria]] and [[Hungary]] by a team of scientists<ref>Haak (2005) and others cited under Dienekes (2005) in External links, People below.</ref> found that six individuals owned a rare suite of mutations labeled [[Haplogroup N1a (mtDNA)|N1a]], a percentage much greater than in the modern population. The investigators concluded, "Our finding lends weight to a proposed Paleolithic ancestry for modern Europeans." The study is not conclusive. The modern population might be the Neolithic and the owners of [[Haplogroup N1a (mtDNA)|N1a]] a palaeolithic remnant. However the conclusion seems to fit the anthropometric work of Zoffman: as there were no large-scale transfers of population, the culture could have been carried by small numbers of the population with the rare mutation. It disappears by the late LBK; that is to say, the whole population was genetically overwhelmed by immigrants. == Variants == [[Image:European Middle Neolithic.gif|thumb|center|500px|Map of European Neolithic at the apogee of Danubian expansion, c. 4500-4000 BC.]] ===Early or Western=== The early or earliest Western Linear Pottery Culture began conventionally at 5500 BC, possibly as early as 5700 BC, in western [[Hungary]], southern [[Germany]], [[Austria]] and the Czech Republic.<ref name=Bald2006/>. It is sometimes called the Central European Linear Pottery (CELP) to distinguish it from the ALP phase of the Eastern Linear Pottery Culture. The Hungarians tend to use DVK, Dunatúl Vonaldiszes Kerámia, translated "Transdanubian Linear Pottery." A number of local styles and phases of ware are defined.<ref>This article does not have space for all the names but they can for the most part be found in the sources.</ref> The end of the early phase can be dated to its arrival in the [[Netherlands]] at about 5200 BC. The population there was already food-producing to some extent. The early phase went on there but meanwhile the Music-Note Pottery (Notenkopfkeramik) phase of the Middle Linear Band Pottery Culture appeared in Austria at about 5200 and moved eastward into [[Romania]] and the [[Ukraine]]. The late phase, or [[Stroke-ornamented pottery|Stroked pottery]] Culture (Stichbandkeramik or SBK, 5000-4500) evolved in central Europe and went eastward. This article includes a brief introduction to some of the features of the Western Linear Pottery Culture below. {{Further|[[Stroke-ornamented pottery]] and [[Bug-Dniester culture]]}} ===Eastern=== The Eastern Linear Pottery Culture developed in eastern [[Hungary]] roughly contemporaneously with, perhaps a few hundred years after, the transdanubian.<ref name=Bald2006/> The great plain there (Hungarian Alföld) had been occupied by the [[Starčevo culture|Starčevo-Körös-Criş Culture]] of "gracile Mediterraneans" from the [[Balkans]] as early as 6100 BC.<ref>Baldia (2003) ''Starcevo-Koros-Cris'' under External links, Places.</ref> Hertelendi and others give a reevaluated date range of 5860-5330 for the Early Neolithic, 5950-5400 for the Körös.<ref>External links, Places. These numbers are their 1σ range. For the tolerances, see the article.</ref> The Körös Culture went as far north as the edge of the upper [[Tisza]] and stopped. North of it the Alföld plain and the [[Bükk]] Mountains were intensively occupied by Mesolithics thriving on the flint tool trade. At around 5330 the classical [[Alföld Culture]] of the LBK appeared to the north of the Körös Culture and flourished until about 4940.<ref name=Hert>Hertelendi and others, External links, Places.</ref> This time also is the Middle Neolithic. The Alföld Culture has been abbreviated ALV from its Hungarian name, Alföldi Vonaldíszes Kerámia, or ALP for Alföld Linear Pottery Culture, the earliest variant of the Eastern Linear Pottery Culture. In one view the AVK came "directly out of" the Körös.<ref name=KRAP2007/> The brief, short-ranged Szatmár Group on the northern edge of the Körös Culture seems transitional.<ref name=KRAP2007/> Some place it with the Körös, some with the AVK. The latter's pottery is decorated with white painted bands with incised edges. Körös pottery was painted. As is presented above, however, there were no major population movements across the border. The Körös went on into a late phase in its accustomed place, 5770-5230.<ref name=Hert/> The late Körös is also called the Proto-Vinča, which was succeeded by the Vinča-Tordo, 5390-4960. There is no necessity to view the Körös and the AVK as closely connected. The AVK economy is somewhat different: it uses cattle and swine, both of which occur wild in the region, instead of the sheep of the Balkans and Mediterranean. The percentage of wild animal bones is greater. Barley, millet and lentils were added. Around 5100 or so towards the end of the Middle Neolithic the classical AVK descended into a complex of pronounced local groups called the Szakálhát-Esztár-Bükk,<ref name=Hert/><ref name=KRAP2007/> which flourished about 5260-4880: * The Szakálhát Group was located on the lower and middle Tisza and the Körös Rivers, taking the place of the previous Körös Culture. Its pottery went on with the painted white bands and incised edge. * The Esztár Group to the north featured pottery with bands painted in dark paint. * The Szilmeg Group was located in the foothills of the [[Bükk]] Mountains. * The Tiszadob Group was located in the Sajó Valley. * The [[Bükk Culture|Bükk]] Group was located in the mountains. These are all characterized by finely crafted and decorated ware. The entire group is considered by the majority of the sources listed in this article to have been in the LBK. Before the chronology and many of the sites were known the Bükk was thought to be a major variant; in fact, Gimbutas<ref>1991 pages 43-46</ref> at one point believed it to be identical with the Eastern Linear Pottery Culture. Since 1991 the predominance of the Alföld has come to light. The end of the Eastern Linear Pottery Culture and the LBK is less certain. The Szakálhát-Esztár-Bükk descended into another Late Neolithic legacy complex, the Tisza-Hérpály-Csöszhalom, which is either not LBK or is transitional from the LBK to the Tiszapolgar, a successor culture. {{details|Bükk Culture}} ==Economy== ===Land utilisation=== [[Image:Mineraly.sk - spras.jpg|thumb|right|Slovakian loess]] The LBK people settled on fluvial terraces and in the proximities of rivers. They were quick to identify regions of fertile [[loess]]. On it they raised a distinctive assemblage of crops and associated weeds in small plots, an economy that Gimbutas called a "garden type of civilization."<ref>Gimbutas (1991) page 38.</ref> The difference between a crop and a weed in LBK contexts is the frequency. Crop foods are: * Triticum dicoccum, [[emmer]] wheat * Triticum monococcum, [[einkorn wheat]] * Pisum sativum, [[pea]] * Lens culinaris, [[lentil]] Species that are found so rarely as to warrant classification as possible weeds are: * Hordeum, [[barley]] * Panicum miliaceum, broom corn [[millet]] * Secale cereale [[rye]] * Vicia ervilia, [[bitter vetch]] * [[Vicia faba]], broad bean <gallery> Image:Triticum dicoccum.jpg|Triticum dicoccum Image:Usdaeinkorn1 Triticum monococcum.jpg|Triticum monococcum Image:NCI snow peas.jpg|Pisum sativum Image:Illustration Lens culinaris0.jpg|Lens culinaris </gallery> [[Image:BreakingFlax.jpeg|thumb|right|Breaking flax in Russia]] [[Image:Grand-Reng JPG02.jpg|thumb|right|Poppies and linen]] [[Image:Cow Oostvaardersplassen.jpg|thumb|right|Cow]] [[Image:Vasilyev wet medow.JPG|thumb|right|Wet meadow, by Vasiliev]] The emmer and the einkorn were sometimes grown as maslin, or mixed crops. The lower-yield einkorn predominates over emmer, which has been attributed to its better resistance to heavy rain.<ref>The crop and weed information is indebted to Kreuz and others, cited under External links, Economy.</ref> [[Hemp]] and [[flax]] (Linum usitatissimum) gave the LBK people the raw material of rope and cloth, which they no doubt manufactured at home as a cottage industry. From [[Poppy|poppies]] (Papaver somniferum), introduced later from the Mediterranean, they must have manufactured palliative medicine. The LBK people were stock raisers as well, with [[cattle]] favored, though [[goat]]s and [[swine]] are also recorded. Like farmers today, they must have used the better grain for themselves and the lower grades for the animals. The ubiquitous dogs are present here too, but scantly. Substantial wild faunal remains are found. The LBK supplemented their diets by hunting [[Red Deer|elk]], [[deer]] and [[boar]] in the open forests of Europe as it was then. Although no significant population transfers were associated with the start of the LBK, population diffusion along the wetlands of the mature civilization (about 5200 BC) had leveled the high percentage of the rare gene sequence mentioned above by the late LBK. The population was much greater by then, a phenomenon termed the [[Neolithic Demographic Transition]] (NDT). According to Bocquet-Appel<ref>2002, External links, People.</ref> beginning from a stable population of "small connected groups exchanging migrants" among the "hunter-gatherers and horticulturalists" the LBK experienced an increase in birth rate caused by a "reduction in the length of the birth interval." The author hypothesizes a decrease in the weaning period made possible by division of labor. At the end of the LBK the NDT was over and the population growth disappeared due to an increase in the mortality rate, caused, the author speculates, by new pathogens passed along by increased social contact. The new population was sedentary up to the capacity of the land, and then the excess population moved to less inhabited land. An in-depth [[GIS]] study by Ebersbach and Schade of an 18 km² region in the wetlands region of Wetterau, [[Hesse]], traces the land use in detail and discovers the limiting factor.<ref>2003, under External links, Economy.</ref> In the study region 82% of the land is suitable for agriculture, 11% for grazing (even though wetland) and 7% steep slopes. The investigators found that the LBK occupied this land for about 400 years. They began with 14 settlements, 53 houses, 318 people using the wetlands for cattle pasture. Settlement gradually spread over the wetlands, reaching a maximum of 47 settlements, 122 houses, 732 people in the late period. At that time all the available grazing land was in use. Toward the end, the population suddenly dropped to initial levels, even though much of the arable land was still available. The investigators conclude that cattle were the main economic interest and available grazing land was the limiting factor in settlement. The Neolithic of the Middle East featured urban concentrations of people subsisting mainly on grain. Beef and dairy products on the other hand were the mainstay of LBK diet. When the grazing lands were all in use they moved elsewhere in search of them. As the relatively brief window of the LBK falls roughly in the center of the [[Atlantic (period)|Atlantic climate period]], a maximum of temperature and rainfall, a conclusion that the spread of wetlands at that time encouraged the growth and spreading of the LBK is to some degree justified. ===Tool kit=== The tool kit was appropriate to the economy. [[Flint]] and [[obsidian]] were the main materials used for points and cutting edges.<ref>A brief discussion of tools is to be found in Gimbutas (1991) page 39, and a fuller presentation with pictures of the tool kit in Lodewijckx & Bakels (2005) under External links, People.</ref> There is no sign of metal. For example, they harvested with sickles manufactured by inserting flint blades into the inside of a curved piece of wood. One diagnostic tool, the "[[shoe-last celt]]", was made of a ground stone chisel blade tied to a handle. You pulled the blade over a piece of wood by the handle, removing flakes, similar to a plane. Augurs were made of flint points tied to a stick that could be rotated. Scrapers and knives are found in abundance. The use of flint pieces, or [[microliths]], descended from the [[Mesolithic]], while the ground stone is characteristic of the [[Neolithic]]. These materials are evidence both of specialization of labor and commerce. The flint used came from southern Poland; the obsidian, from the Bükk and Tatra mountains. Settlements in those regions specialized in mining and manufacture. The products were exported to all the other LBK regions, which must have had something to trade. This commerce is a strong argument for an ethnic unity between the scattered pockets of the culture. <gallery> Image:Kurtkowiec i czerwone.jpg|West Tatra mountains. Note the wet meadows and the stone. Image:Slovakia-West Tatras-Rohace 6.JPG|Western Tatras, Slovakia Image:Flint.jpg|Flint Image:Flintstone.jpg|Flint </gallery> ===Settlement patterns=== The unit of residence was the [[long house]], a rectangular structure, 5.5 to 7 m wide, of variable length; for example, a house at Bylany was 45 m. Outer walls were wattle-and-daub, sometimes alternating with split logs, with slanted thatched roofs, supported by rows of poles, three across.<ref name=Gimb39>The numbers are from Gimbutas (1991) pages 39-41. However, they are approximately the same as the numbers given by other researchers and can therefore be taken as true measurements within a tolerance.</ref> The exterior wall of the home was solid and massive, oak posts being preferred. Clay for the daub was dug from pits near the house, which were then used for storage. Extra posts at one end may indicate a partial second story. Some LBK houses were occupied for as long as 30 years.<ref name=Marc/> At least part of the house may have been used for animals, as a fenced enclosure adjoined one end. Ditches went along part of the outer walls, especially at the enclosed end. Their purpose is not known, but they probably are not defensive works, as they were not much of a defense. More likely, the ditches collected waste water and rain water. A large house with many people and animals would have had to have a drainage system. One can conceive of a smelly end, where the animals and latrines were located, and a domestic end. Easy access to fresh water also would have been mandatory, which is another reason why settlements were in bottom lands near water. A number of wells from the times have been discovered, with a log-cabin type lining constructed one layer at a time as the previous layers sank into the well.<ref>Baldia (2000) ''The Oldest Dated Well'' under External links, People, describes an LBK well.</ref> Internally the house had one or two partitions creating up to three areas. Interpretations of the use of these areas varies; perhaps sleeping, common and animals.<ref name=Marc>Marciniak, Chapter 1.</ref> Trash was regularly removed and placed in external pits. The waste-producing work, such as hide preparation and flint-working, was done outside the house. The main door was located at the opposite end from the sleeping quarters. Long houses were gathered into villages of 5-8 about 20 m apart, placed on 300-1250 acres. Nearby villages formed settlement cells, some as dense as 20 per 25 km², others as sparse as 1 per 32 km².<ref name=Gimb39/> This structuring of settlements does not support a view that the LBK population had no social structure, or was anarchic. On the other hand the structure remains obscure and interpretational. One long house may have supported one extended family; however, the short lifespan would have precluded more than two generations. The houses required too much labor to be the residences of single families; consequently, communal houses are postulated.<ref name=Marc/> Though the known facts are tantalizing, the correct social interpretation of the layout of a long house and the arrangement of villages will have to wait for clearer evidence. At least some villages were fortified for some time with a palisade and outer ditch.<ref>Krause (1998) under External links, places.</ref> An earlier view saw the Linear Pottery Culture as living a "peaceful, unfortified lifestyle."<ref>Gimbutas (1991) page 143.</ref> Since then settlements with palisades and weapon-traumatized bones have been discovered, such as at Herxheim,<ref>Orschiedt (2006) under External links, Places.</ref> which, whether the site of a massacre or of a martial ritual, demonstrates "...systematic violence between groups." Most of the known settlements, however, left no trace of violence. Pottery has been found in long houses as well as in graves. Analysis of the home pottery reveals that each house had its own tradition. The occurrence of pottery primarily in female graves indicates that the women of the long house probably made the pottery; in fact lineages have been defined. Gimbutas goes so far as to assert: "The indirect results indicate an [[endogamous]], [[matrilocal]] residence."<ref>1991 page 331.</ref> ==Religion== As is true of all prehistoric cultures, the details of actual [[belief system]]s maintained by the Linear Pottery culture population are poorly understood relative to beliefs and religions of historical periods. The extent to which prehistoric beliefs formed a systematic [[religion|religious]] canon is also the subject of some debate. Nevertheless, comparative, detailed, scientific study of [[cultural artifact]]s and [[iconography]] has led to the proposal of models. The [[mother goddess]] model is the major one that applies to the [[Neolithic]] of the middle and near east, the civilization of the [[Aegean civilization|Aegean]] and [[Europe]]. The iconography was inherited from the [[Palaeolithic]]. The [[Gravettian]] Culture introduced it into the range of the future LBK from western Asia and south Russia.<ref>James Chapter 1 page 13.</ref> From there it diffused throughout Europe in the [[Upper Palaeolithic]], which was inhabited by [[Cro-magnon]] man and was responsible for many works of art, such as the [[Venus of Willendorf]].<ref>James pages 20-22.</ref> With the transition to the Neolithic, "... the female principle continued to predominate the cultures that had grown up around the mysterious processes of birth and generation."<ref>James, page 22.</ref> The LBK therefore did not bring anything new spiritually to Europe, nor was the cult in any way localized to Europe. It is reflected in the vase paintings, figurines, graves and grave goods and surviving customs and myths of Europe. In the north the goddess could manifest herself as the mistress of animals, grain, distaff and loom, household and life and death.<ref>The reader may find a thorough recapitulation in Davidson (1998), whose chapter titles the above list repeats; however, the topic has received attention from many noted scholars and writers.</ref> The works of the noted late archaeologist [[Marija Gimbutas]] present a major study of the iconography and surviving beliefs of the European Neolithic, including the Linear Pottery Culture. She was able to trace the unity of reproductive themes in cultural objects previously unsuspected of such themes. For example, the burial pits of the Linear Pottery culture, which were lined with stone, clay or plaster, may have been intended to represent eggs. The deceased returns to the egg, so to speak, there to await rebirth.<ref>The works of Gimbutas listed in the Bibliography are sufficient to give the reader an overall view of her study. However, those interested in an immediately available comprehensive view from a Gimbutas supporter may access Marler (2005) under External links, Models.</ref> The presence of such pits contemporaneously with the burial of women and children under the floors of houses suggests a multiplicity of religious convictions, as does the use of both cremation and inhumation. Some of the figurines are not of females but are [[androgynous]]. Perhaps the beliefs of Europeans of any culture always were complex.<ref>An outstanding advocacy of complexity can be found in Hayden (1998) cited under External links, Models. Hayden discovers some of the limitations of Gimbutas' thought. His view was answered in detail in Marler (1999), External links, Models. The reader should be aware that all of Gimbutas' career was surrounded by controversy, perhaps fueled by sexist allegations and counter-allegations. Nevertheless Marler and Hayden are professionals with something valuable to contribute, as are Renfrew and other protagonists of Gimbutas' ongoing debates.</ref> ==Funerary customs== The early Neolithic in Europe featured burials of women and children under the floors of personal residences. Remains of adult males are missing. It is probably safe to say that Neolithic culture featured sex discrimination in funerary customs, and that women and children were important in ideology concerning the home.<ref>This section is heavily indebted to Gimbutas (1991) pages 331-332.</ref> Burials beneath the floors of homes continued until about 4000 BC. However, in the Balkans and central Europe the cemetery also came into use at about 5000 BC. LBK cemeteries contained from 20 to 200 graves arranged in groups that appear to have been based on kinship. Males and females of any age were included. Both [[cremation]] and [[inhumation]] were practiced. The inhumed were placed in flexed position in pits lined with stones, plaster or clay. Cemeteries were close to, but distinct from, residential areas. The presence of grave goods indicates both a sex and a dominance discrimination. Male graves included stone celts, flint implements and money or jewelry of spondylus shells. Female graves contained many of the same artifacts as male graves, but also most of the pottery and containers of ochre. The goods have been interpreted as gifts to the departed or personal possessions. Only about 30% of the graves have goods. This circumstance probably rightly has been interpreted as some sort of distinction in [[dominance (biology)|dominance]], but the exact nature is not known. If the goods were gifts, then some were more honored than others; if they were possessions, then some were wealthier than others. ==Notes== <div style="height: 250px; overflow: auto; padding: 3px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA; reflist4" > {{reflist|2}} </div> ==Bibliography== <div class="references-small"> * [[Robert Braidwood|Braidwood, Robert]], ''Prehistoric men'', William Morrow and Company, many editions * {{ cite book | author=Childe, Vere Gordon | authorlink=V. Gordon Childe | title=Man Makes Himself | publisher=the New American Library (a Mentor Book) | location=New York | year=1951 }} * {{ cite journal | last=Christensen | first=Jonas | title=Warfare in the European Neolithic | journal=Acta Archaeologica | volume=75 | issue=142,144, 136 | date=2004 }} * {{ Citation | last=Clark | first=Grahame | author-link=Grahame Clark | last2=Piggott | first2=Stuart | author2-link=Stuart Piggott | title=Prehistoric Societies | publisher=Alfred A. Knopf | year=1967 | location=New York }} * {{ cite book | first=Hilda Ellis | last=Davidson | title=Roles of the Northern Goddess | date=1998 | publisher=Routledge | id=ISBN 0415136105 }} * {{ cite book | author=Ehrich, Robert W., Editor | title=Chronologies in Old World Archaeology | publisher=The University of Chicago Press | year=1965 | location=Chicago and London }} * {{ cite book | author=Gimbutas, Marija | authorlink=Marija Gimbutas | title=The Goddesses and Gods of Old Europe 6500-3500 BC: Myths and Cult Images: New and Updated Edition | publisher=University of California Press | year=1982 | location=Berkeley, Los Angeles | id=ISBN 0520046552 | pages=page 27 }} * {{ cite book | author=Gimbutas, Marija | authorlink=Marija Gimbutas | title=The Civilization of the Goddess: The World of Old Europe | publisher=HarperCollins Publishers (HarperSanFrancisco) | location=San Francisco | year=1991 | id=ISBN 0-06-250368-5 (hardcover) or ISBN 0-06-250337-5 (paperback) }} * {{ cite book | author=Hawkes, Jacquetta | authorlink=Jacquetta Hawkes | title=Prehistory | publisher=the New American Library (a Mentor Book) | year= 1965 | location=New York }} * {{ cite book | author=Hibben, Frank | title=Prehistoric Man in Europe | publisher=University of Oklahoma Press | year=1958 | location=Norman, Oklahoma }} * {{ cite book | first=E.O. | last=James | title=The Cult of the Mother-Goddess | publisher=Barnes&Noble | location=New York | date=1994 | id=ISBN 1-56619-600-0 }} * {{cite journal | last=Kertész | first=Róbert | title=Mesolithic Hunter-Gatherers in the Northwestern Part of the Great Hungarian Plain | journal=Praehistoria | volume=3 | date=2002 | url=http://vfek.vfmk.hu/00000030/00000030.pdf }} * {{ cite encyclopedia | author= Mallory, J.P. | authorlink=J. P. Mallory | title=Linear Band Ware Culture | encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture | publisher=Fitzroy Dearborn | date=1997 }} * {{cite book | last=Marciniak | first=Arkadiusz | title=Placing Animals in the Neolithic: Social Zooarchaeology of Prehistoric Farming Communities | publisher=Routledge Cavendish | date=2005 | isbn= 1844720926}} * {{ cite book | author=Renfrew, Colin | authorlink=Colin Renfrew | title=Archaeology and Language : The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=1990 | id=ISBN 0-521-38675-6 }} * {{ cite book | author=Stäuble, Harald | title=Häuser und absolute Datierung der Ältesten Bandkeramik | publisher=Habelt | year=2005}} </div> ==See also== <div class="references-small"> {{col-begin}} {{col-break|width=50%}} * [[Danubian Plain]] * [[Demic diffusion]] * [[Great Hungarian Plain]] * [[Haplogroup N1a (mtDNA)]] * [[Hungary before the Magyars]] {{col-break|width=50%}} * [[Hunter-gatherer]] * [[Little Hungarian Plain]] * [[Mesolithic]] * [[Neolithic]]: [[Neolithic Europe|Europe]], [[Neolithic founder crops|founder crops]], [[Neolithic long house|long house]], [[Neolithic Revolution|Revolution]] * [[Pre-Indo-European]] {{col-end}} </div> ==External links== Below are some relevant links to sites publishing current research or recapitulating recent thinking concerning the Neolithic of Europe. Many of the sites referenced contain links to other sites not mentioned here. ===Overall=== <div class="references-small"> * {{cite web | author=Baldia, Maximilian O. | title=The Earliest Bandkeramik | publisher=The Comparative Archaeology Web | date=2006 | url=http://www.comp-archaeology.org/Bandkeramik.htm | format=html }} * {{cite web | author=Baldia, Maximilian O. | title=The Later Bandkeramik | publisher=The Comparative Archaeology Web | date=2003 | url=http://www.comp-archaeology.org/BandkeramikLater.htm | format=html }} * {{cite web | author=Baldia, Maximilian O. | title=Stichbandkeramik or Stroke-Ornamented Pottery | publisher=The Comparative Archaeology Web | date=2006 | url=http://www.comp-archaeology.org/STK.htm | format=html }} * {{ cite journal | first=Pavel, and others | last=Dolukhanov | title=The Chronology of Neolithic Dispersal in Central and Eastern Europe | url=http://www.ffzg.hr/arheo/ska/tekstovi/neolithic_dispersal.pdf | journal=Journal of Archaeological Science | issue=32 | date=2005 | pages=pages 1441–1458 }} * {{Citation | first =T. Douglas | last =Price | editor-last =Price | editor-first =T. Douglas | contribution =Europe's First Farmers: an Introduction | contribution-url =http://assets.cambridge.org/052166/2036/sample/0521662036ws.pdf | title =Europe's First Farmers | year =2000 | place =Cambridge | publisher =Cambridge University Press | id =Hardcover ISBN 0521662036, Softcover ISBN 0521665728 }} * {{cite web | coauthors =Department of Archaeology Faculty of Arts | title =10th Neolithic Seminar | work =Neolithic Seminars | publisher =Ljubljana University, Slovenia | date =2003 | url =http://arheologija.ff.uni-lj.si/seminars/a10.html | format =html }} </div> ===Models=== <div class="references-small"> * {{cite web | last=Dolukhanov | first=Pavel | coauthors=Shukurov, Anvar | title=Modelling the Neolithic Dispersal in Northern Eurasia | work=Documenta Praehistorica XXXI | publisher=Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana | date=2003 | url=http://arheologija.ff.uni-lj.si/documenta/pdf31/31dolukhanov.pdf | format=pdf }} * {{cite journal | last =Hayden | first =Brian | title =An Archaeological Evaluation of the Gimbutas Paradigm | journal =The Virtual Pomegranate | issue =6 | date =1998 }} * {{cite journal | last =Marler | first =Joan | title =A Response to Brian Hayden's article | journal =The Virtual Pomegranate | issue =10 | date =1999 }} * {{cite web | last =Marler | first =Joan | title =The Iconography and Social Structure of Old Europe: The Archaeomythological Research of Marija Gimbutas | work =Societies of Peace | publisher =2nd World Congress on Matriarchal Studies | date =2005 | url =http://www.second-congress-matriarchal-studies.com/marler.html | format =html }} * {{cite web | last=Richards | first= Martin | title=The Neolithic Transition in Europe: archaeological models and genetic evidence | work=Documenta Praehistorica XXX | publisher=Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana | date=2003 | url=http://arheologija.ff.uni-lj.si/documenta/pdf30/30richards.pdf | format=pdf }} </div> ===Dates=== <div class="references-small"> * {{cite web | author=Baldia, Maximilian O. | title=The Central and North European Neolithic/Copper Age Chronology | publisher=The Comparative Archaeology Web | date=2006 | url=http://www.comp-archaeology.org/Central_European_Neolithic_Chronology.htm | format=html }} * {{cite journal | last=Stadler | first=P. | coauthors=Lenneis, E. | title =Zur Absolutchronologie der Linearbandkeramik aufgrund von 14C-Daten | journal =Archäologie Österreichs | volume =6 | issue =2 | pages =pages 4–13 | date =1996 | url =http://www.nhm-wien.ac.at/NHM/Prehist/Stadler/LVAS/QAM/14C/ | format ={{dead link|date=June 2008}} &ndash; <sup>[http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=author%3A+intitle%3AZur+Absolutchronologie+der+Linearbandkeramik+aufgrund+von+14C-Daten&as_publication=Arch%C3%A4ologie+%C3%96sterreichs&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&btnG=Search Scholar search]</sup> }} Select ''Zur Absolutchronologie der Linearbandkeramik'' and under that ''Abb.01'' for the [[calibration curve]] and ''Abb.02'' for the sample frequency per year. The latter is also given at [http://www.nhm-wien.ac.at/NHM/Prehist/Stadler/LVAS/QAM/14C/Images/Neol_Abb02.gif]. </div> ===People=== <div class="references-small"> * {{cite journal | last=Bentley | first=R. Alexander | coauthors=Knipper, Corina | title=Transhumance at the early Neolithic settlement at Vaihingen (Germany) | journal=Antiquity | volume=79 | issue=306 | date=December, 2005 | url=http://antiquity.ac.uk/ProjGall/bentley/index.html }} * {{ cite journal | last=Bocquet-Appel | first=Jean-Pierre | title=Paleoanthropological Traces of a Neolithic Demographic Transition | journal=Current Anthropology | volume=43 | issue=4 | date=August-October 2002 | url=http://www.ivry.cnrs.fr/deh/bocquet/curant02.pdf }} * {{cite web | last=Bogucki | first=Peter | title=The Neolithic Mosaic on the North European Plain | date=2004 | url=http://www.princeton.edu/~bogucki/mosaic.html |format=html | publisher=Princeton University }} The article includes an extensive bibliography. * {{cite web | last =Dienekes | title =mtDNA of early central European farmers | work =Dienekes' Anthropology Blog | date =2005 | url =http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2005/11/mtdna-of-early-central-european.html | format =html }} Dienekes summarizes and reviews {{cite journal | last =Haak | first =Wolfgang | coauthors =and others | title =Ancient DNA from the First European Farmers in 7500-Year-Old Neolithic Sites | journal =Science | volume =310 | issue =5750 | pages =pages 1016–1018 | date =[[11 November]] [[2005]] | url =http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/310/5750/1016 | pmid =16284177 | doi =10.1126/science.1118725 }} No charge for abstract. The article is also reviewed by {{ cite web | last=Kling | first=Jim | title=The Origins of Modern Europeans | work=Chemistry Org | publisher=American Chemical Society | date=2005 | format=html | url=http://www.chemistry.org/portal/a/c/s/1/feature_pro.html?id=c373e907e6595f838f6a17245d830100 }} * {{ cite web | last=Hawks | first=John | title=Early European mtDNA: only mysterious if you want it to be | work=john hawks weblog | date=2005 | url=http://www.johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/genetics/mtdna_migrations/neolithic_ancient_dna_2005.w }} Hawks reviews and comments on three articles. * {{cite web | last =Lodewijckx | first =Marc | coauthors =Bakels, Corrie | title =The Interaction Between Early Farmers and Indigenous People in Central Belgium | work =Western European Archaeology | publisher =Katholieke Universiteit Leuven | date =2005 | url =http://www.arts.kuleuven.be/wea/Farmers/index.htm | format =html }} * {{ cite journal | title=Anthropological sketch of the Prehistoric Population of the Carpathian Basin | first=Zsuzsanna K. | last=Zoffmann | journal=Acta Biologica Szegediensis | volume=44 | issue=1-4 | pages=pages 75–79 | date=2000 | url=http://www.sci.u-szeged.hu/ABS/Acta%20HP/44-75.pdf }} </div> ===Places=== <div class="references-small"> * {{cite web | author=Baldia, Maximilian O. | title=Starčevo -Körös-Criş (Starcevo-Koros-Cris) | publisher=The Comparative Archaeology Web | date=2003 | url=http://www.comp-archaeology.org/Starcevo-Koros-Cris.htm | format=html }} * {{cite journal | last=Czerniak | first=Lech | coauthors=Raczkowski, Wlodzimierz; Sosnowski, Wojciech | title=New prospects for the study of Early Neolithic longhouses in the Polish Lowlands | journal=Antiquity | volume=77 | issue=297 | date=September 2003 | url=http://antiquity.ac.uk/ProjGall/czerniak/czerniak.html }} * {{ cite web | last=Domoróczki | first=László, editor | title=Heves county | date=2006 | publisher=cultural heritage activities and institutes network (CHAIN) | url=http://www.chain.to/index.php?did=4&sort=b&subject=view_article&id=176 | format=html }} * {{ cite journal | last=Hertelendi | first= Ede and others | title=Re-Evaluation of the Neolithic in Eastern Hungary Based on Calibrated Radiocarbon Dates | journal=Radiocarbon | volume=37 | issue=2 | date=1995 | url=http://radiocarbon.library.arizona.edu/radiocarbon/GetFileServlet?file=file:///data1/pdf/Radiocarbon/Volume37/Number2/azu_radiocarbon_v37_n2_239_244_v.pdf&type=application/pdf }} * {{ cite web | last=Kooijmans | first=Leendert P. | title=The Neolithic at the Lower Rhine | publisher=Leiden University | date=1976 | url=https://www.openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/1887/2789/1/171_009.pdf | format=pdf }} * {{ cite web | author=Körös Regional Archaeological Project | title=The Archaeological Background | publisher=Florida State University | date=2007 | url=http://www.anthro.fsu.edu/research/koros/overview/arch_background/arch_background.html | format=html }} * {{cite web | last=Krause | first=Rüdiger | coauthors=Schalk, Emily (translator) | title=An enclosed Bandkeramik village and cemetery from the 6th millennium BC near Vaihingen/Enz | work=Archaeological Excavation in Baden-Wurttemberg | publisher=Wolfgang M. Werner | date=1998 | url=http://home.bawue.de/~wmwerner/grabung/vaih99_e.html | format=html }} * {{cite web | last=Orschiedt | first=Joerg | coauthors=Haidle, Miriam Noel | title=The LBK Enclosure at Herxheim: Theatre of War or Ritual Centre? References from Osteoarchaeological Investigation | publisher=University of Tübingen | date=2006 | url=http://www.urgeschichte.uni-tuebingen.de/fileadmin/downloads/Haidle/HerxheimConflictArch2006.pdf | format=pdf }} * {{cite web | last=Lodewijckx | first=Marc | coauthors=Waegeman, Tony; Barten, Merle | title=Cimetière rubané à Millen? (Belgique, prov. du Limbourg) | publisher=Notae Praehistoricae | date=1989 | url=http://www.naturalsciences.be/mars/groups/fnrs-contact-group/notae-praehistoricae/pdf/Np09/np09_37-40.pdf | format=pdf }} </div> </div> ===Economy=== <div class="references-small"> * {{cite web | author=Baldia, Maximilian O. | title=The Oldest Dated Well | publisher=The Comparative Archaeology Web | date=2000 | url=http://www.comp-archaeology.org/Oldest_well.htm | format=html }} * {{cite web | last=Ebersbach | first=Renate | coauthors=Schade, Christoph | title=Modelling the Intensity of Linear Pottery Land Use – An Example from the Mörlener Bucht in the Wetterau Basin, Hesse, Germany | publisher=University of Basel | date=2003 | url=http://pages.unibas.ch/arch/archbiol/pdf/Ebersbach2004.pdf | format=pdf }} * {{ cite journal | last=Kreuz | first=Angela | coauthors=Marinova, Elena; Schäfer, Eva; Wiethold, Julian | title=A comparison of early Neolithic crop and weed assemblages from the Linearbandkeramik and the Bulgarian Neolithic cultures: differences and similarities | journal=Vegetation History and Archaeobotany | volume=14 | date=2005 | url=http://www.urgeschichte.uni-tuebingen.de/fileadmin/downloads/weitere_Mitarbeiter/Marinova/Kreuz_etal_VHA14_2005klein.pdf }} </div> {{Holocene epoch}} [[Category:Archaeological cultures]] [[Category:Stone Age Europe]] [[Category:Archaeology of Ukraine]] [[Category:Archaeology of Poland]] [[Category:Archaeology of Germany]] [[Category:Archaeology of the Czech Republic]] [[Category:Archaeology of Belgium]] [[Category:Archaeology of France]] [[Category:Archaeology of Switzerland]] [[Category:Archaeology of Austria]] [[Category:Archaeology of Slovakia]] [[Category:Archaeology of Hungary]] [[Category:Archaeology of Romania]] [[Category:Archaeology of Moldova]] [[cs:Kultura s lineární keramikou]] [[de:Bandkeramische Kultur]] [[el:Γραμμική ταινιωτή κεραμική]] [[es:Cultura de la cerámica de bandas]] [[fr:Civilisation rubanée]] [[nl:Bandkeramische cultuur]] [[pl:Kultura ceramiki wstęgowej rytej]] [[ru:Культура линейно-ленточной керамики]] [[sk:Kultúra s lineárnou keramikou]] [[fi:Nauhakeraaminen kulttuuri]] [[sv:Bandkeramiska kulturen]] [[uk:Культура лінійно-стрічкової кераміки]]