Maxwell's demon
96558
223461033
2008-07-04T04:41:54Z
Chetvorno
1030826
/* Applications */ Fixed broken link, tweaked wording
'''Maxwell's demon''' is an [[1871]] [[thought experiment]] by the [[Scotland|Scottish]] [[physicist]] [[James Clerk Maxwell]], meant to raise questions about the possibility of violating the [[second law of thermodynamics]].
==Maxwell's thought experiment==
The [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]] forbids (due to statistical improbability) that two bodies of equal [[temperature]], when brought into contact with each other and isolated from the rest of the Universe, will evolve to a state in which one of the two has a significantly higher temperature than the other. The second law is also expressed as the assertion that in an [[isolated system]], [[entropy]] never decreases.
Maxwell conceived a "thought experiment" as a challenge to the second law. He described the experiment as follows:<ref>Maxwell (1871), reprinted in Leff & Rex (1990) at p.4</ref>:
{{Quotation|... if we conceive of a being whose faculties are so sharpened that he can follow every molecule in its course, such a being, whose attributes are as essentially finite as our own, would be able to do what is impossible to us. For we have seen that molecules in a vessel full of air at uniform temperature are moving with velocities by no means uniform, though the mean velocity of any great number of them, arbitrarily selected, is almost exactly uniform. Now let us suppose that such a vessel is divided into two portions, A and B, by a division in which there is a small hole, and that a being, who can see the individual molecules, opens and closes this hole, so as to allow only the swifter molecules to pass from A to B, and only the slower molecules to pass from B to A. He will thus, without expenditure of work, raise the temperature of B and lower that of A, in contradiction to the second law of thermodynamics.}}
[[Image:Maxwell's demon.svg|right|310px|thumb|Schematic figure of Maxwell's demon]]
In other words, Maxwell imagines two containers, ''A'' and ''B''. The containers are filled with the same [[gas]] at equal temperatures and placed next to each other. Observing the [[molecule]]s on both sides, a little "demon" guards a trapdoor between the two containers. When a faster-than-average molecule from ''A'' flies towards the trapdoor, the demon opens it, and the molecule will fly from ''A'' to ''B''. The average [[speed]] of the molecules in ''B'' will have increased while in ''A'' they will have slowed down on average. Since average molecular speed corresponds to temperature, the temperature decreases in ''A'' and increases in ''B'', contrary to the second law of thermodynamics.
==Criticism and development==
Maxwell's thought experiment has troubled physicists since he first published it.
:''Is Maxwell correct?''
:''Could such a demon, as he describes it, actually violate the second law?''
Several physicists have presented calculations that show that the [[second law of thermodynamics]] will not actually be violated, if a more complete analysis is made of the whole system including the demon. The essence of the physical argument is to show by calculation that any demon must "generate" more entropy segregating the molecules than it could ever eliminate by the method described. That is, it would take more effort to gauge the speed of the molecules and allow them to selectively pass through the opening between A and B than the amount of energy saved by the difference of temperature caused by this.
One of the most famous responses to this question was suggested in [[1929]] by [[Leó Szilárd]] and later by [[Léon Brillouin]]. Szilárd pointed out that a real-life Maxwell's demon would need to have some means of measuring molecular speed, and that the act of acquiring information would require an expenditure of energy. The [[second law of thermodynamics|second law]] states that the total entropy of an isolated system must increase. Since the demon and the gas are interacting, we must consider the total entropy of the gas and the demon combined. The expenditure of energy by the demon will cause an increase in the entropy of the demon, which will be larger than the lowering of the entropy of the gas. For example, if the demon is checking molecular positions using a flashlight, the flashlight battery is a low-entropy device, a chemical reaction waiting to happen. As its energy is used up emitting photons (whose entropy must now be counted as well), the battery's chemical reaction will proceed and its entropy will increase, more than offsetting the decrease in the entropy of the gas.
Szilárd's insight was expanded upon in [[1982]] by [[Charles H. Bennett (computer scientist)|Charles H. Bennett]]. In 1960, [[Rolf Landauer]] realized that certain measurements need not increase thermodynamic entropy as long as they were [[Reversible process (thermodynamics)|thermodynamically reversible]]. Due to the connection between thermodynamic entropy and [[information entropy]], this also meant that the recorded measurement must not be erased. In other words, to determine what side of the gate a molecule must be on, the demon must store information about the state of the molecule. [[Charles H. Bennett (computer scientist)|Bennett]] showed that, however well prepared, eventually the demon will run out of information storage space and must begin to erase the information it has previously gathered. Erasing information is a thermodynamically irreversible process that increases the entropy of a system.<!-- BAD LINK <ref>http://www.ulearntoday.com/magazine/physics_article1.jsp?FILE=maxwelldemon</ref>-->
Note that if the whole universe consisted of the demon and the container, and energy were needed to operate the gate, the only source of energy is letting heat flow from B to A. Now, the quantum of B to A heat flow is a single particle going from B to A. This restores entropy, because on average the single particles going from B to A are more energetic than the ones going from A to B.
The above argument can take another form if the door is modeled as a potential energy barrier. In order to raise the potential, work must be done, and that potential energy cliff should be higher than the kinetic energy of the particle going from A to B. Thus, the quantum of heat flow going from B to A should be more energetic than the incoming particle.
Put simply, no matter how it is done, both the act of the demon watching molecules and the act of opening and closing the trapdoor is by definition ''[[work (physics)|work]]'' and requires the expenditure of energy. These explanations, however, are inadequate as the concept of the demon is not stated and may work as described below.{{Clarifyme|date=March 2008}}
Furthermore, [[John Earman]] and John Norton have argued that Szilard and Landauer's explanations of Maxwell's Demon begin by assuming that the [[second law of thermodynamics]] cannot be violated, thus rendering their proofs that Maxwell's Demon cannot violate the Second Law vacuous.
==Applications==
Real-life versions of Maxwellian demons occur, but all such "real demons" have their entropy-lowering effects duly balanced by increase of entropy elsewhere.
Single-atom traps used by particle physicists allow an experimenter to control the state of individual quanta in a way similar to Maxwell's demon.
Molecular-sized mechanisms are no longer found only in biology; they are also the subject of the emerging field of [[nanotechnology]].
A large-scale, commercially-available pneumatic device, called a [[Vortex tube|Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube]] separates hot and cold air. It sorts molecules by exploiting the conservation of angular momentum: hotter molecules are spun to the outside of the tube while cooler molecules spin in a tighter whirl within the tube. Gas from the two different temperature whirls may be vented on opposite ends of the tube. Although this creates a temperature difference, the energy to do so is supplied by the pressure driving the gas through the tube.
If hypothetical [[mirror matter]] exists, [http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608114 demons can be envisaged] which can act like perpetuum mobiles of the second kind: extract heat energy from only one reservoir, use it to do work and be isolated from the rest of ordinary world. Yet the Second Law is not violated because the demons pay their entropy cost in the hidden (mirror) sector of the world by emitting mirror photons.
In 1962 lectures, to illustrate thermodynamics, physicist [[Richard Feynmann]] analyzed a putative Maxwell's demon device, a tiny [[paddlewheel]] attached to a [[ratchet]], showing why it cannot extract energy from molecular motion of a fluid at equilibrium.<ref name="Feynmann" >{{cite book
| last = Feynmann
| first = Richard P.
| authorlink =
| coauthors =
| title = The Feynmann Lectures on Physics, Vol. 1
| publisher = Addison-Wesley
| date = 1963
| location = Massachusetts, USA
| pages = Chapter 46
| url =
| doi =
| id =
| isbn =0201021161 }}</ref> This [[brownian ratchet]] is a popular teaching tool.
==Experimental work based on Maxwell's Demon==
In the [[1 February]], [[2007]] issue of [[Nature (journal)|Nature]], [[David Leigh(scientist)|David Leigh]], a professor at the [[University of Edinburgh]], announced the creation of a nano-device based on this thought experiment. This device is able to drive a chemical system out of [[Chemical equilibrium|equilibrium]], but it must be powered by an external source ([[light]] in this case) and therefore does not violate thermodynamics.
Previously, other researchers created a ring-shaped molecule which could be placed on an axle connecting two sites (called A and B). Particles from either site would bump into the ring and move it from end to end. If a large collection of these devices were placed in a system, half of the devices had the ring at site A and half at B at any given moment in time.
Leigh made a minor change to the axle so that if a light is shone on the device, the center of the axle will thicken, thus restricting the motion of the ring. It only keeps the ring from moving, however, if it is at site A. Over time, therefore, the rings will be bumped from site B to site A and get stuck there, creating an imbalance in the system. In his experiments, Leigh was able to take a pot of "billions of these devices" from 50:50 equilibrium to a 70:30 imbalance within a few minutes.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.nature.com/news/2007/070129/full/070129-10.html | title=A demon of a device | publisher=Nature.com | first=Kathrine | last=Sanderson | date=2007-01-31 | accessdate=2007-02-01}}</ref>
==Adams and the demon as historical metaphor==
Historian [[Henry Brooks Adams]] in his manuscript ''[[The Rule of Phase Applied to History]]'' attempted to use Maxwell's demon as a historical [[metaphor]], though he misunderstood and misapplied the original principle.<ref>Cater (1947), ''pp''640-647, see also the paper by Daub (1970) reprinted in Leff & Rex (1990), ''pp''37-51.</ref> Adams interpreted [[history]] as a process moving towards "equilibrium", but he saw [[militarism|militaristic]] nations (he felt [[Germany]] pre-eminent in this class) as tending to reverse this process, a Maxwell's Demon of history. Adams made many attempts to respond to the criticism of his formulation from his scientific colleagues, but the work remained incomplete at Adams' death in [[1918]]. It was only published posthumously. <ref>Adams (1919), p.267</ref>
==Maxwell's demon in popular culture==
In literature, Maxwell’s Demon appears in [[Thomas Pynchon]]'s novels, ''[[The Crying of Lot 49]]'' and ''[[Gravity's Rainbow]]''. and in [[George Gamow]]'s ''[[Mr. Tompkins]]''. Also, it is mentioned in the Novel ''[[Homo Faber (novel)|Homo Faber]]'' by [[Switzerland|Swiss]] author [[Max Frisch]], as well as in one of the short stories of ''[[The Cyberiad]]'' by [[Stanisław Lem]]: "The Sixth Sally, or How Trurl and Klaupacius Created a Demon of the Second Kind to Defeat the Pirate Pugg". In Greg Egan's hard science fiction novel ''Permutation City'', Maxwell's Demon is the name of a program used by the character Maria to keep track of individual "molecules" in the cellular automaton known as the Autoverse. Finally, Maxwell's Demon appears, and fills his typical role, in the climax of the book ''[[Master of the Five Magics]]'' by [[Lyndon Hardy]]. Maxwell's Demon was also mentioned in Christopher Stasheff's books from the series A Wizard in Rhyme, wherein he let Maxwell's Demon (Max for short) help out the main character.
In the way of short stories, an homage to Maxwell has been written by [[Isaac Asimov]] and [[Larry Niven]]. Additionally, [[Larry Niven]]'s Warlock in [[The Magic Goes Away]] uses such a demon to cool his home in a vignette titled "Unfinished Story" as published in "Playgrounds of the Mind". The Demon also contributes to the thesis of [[Ken Kesey]]'s collection of stories, ''[[The Demon Box]]''. In the story "A Feast of Demons" by William Morrison (pseudonym for [[Joseph Samachson]]), a scientist creates Maxwell's Demons to change the temperature of items, the purity of ores, and eventually even reverse or accelerate the aging process in people--only to have the Demons escape and wreak havoc on civilization.
In music and film, Maxwell Demon was the name of [[Brian Eno]]'s first band, which was the inspiration for the name of a fictional character in the movie ''[[Velvet Goldmine]],'' and ''Maxwell's Demon'' is the name of a 1968 film by the American experimental filmmaker [[Hollis Frampton]]. Maxwell's Demon is mentioned in the song 'A Metaphysical Drama', by Vintersorg and also is the name of a [http://www.frictionlessrecords.com/green Brooklyn-based indie rock band], as well as that of a [http://www.myspace.com/maxwellsdaemon London alt-pop band]. See also the lyrics to "Isaac's Law" by The [[Loud Family]].
==See also==
*[[Laplace's demon]]
*[[Evaporation]]
*[[Thermionic emission]]
*[[Photoelectric effect]]
*[[Joule-Thomson effect]]
*[[Hall effect]]
*[[Mass spectrometry]]
*[[Dispersion]]
*[[Catalysis]]
*[[Quantum tunnelling]]
*[[Gibbs paradox]]
==Notes==
<references />
==References==
* {{cite book | author=Cater, H.D (ed.)| title=Henry Adams and his Friends | publisher=Boston | year=1947 |}}
* {{cite journal | author=Daub, E.E. | year=1967 | title=Atomism and Thermodynamics | journal=Isis | volume=58 | pages=293–303 | doi=10.1086/350264}}
* {{cite book | author=Leff, H.S. & Rex, A.F. (eds) | title=Maxwell's Demon: Entropy, Information, Computing | location=Bristol | publisher=Adam-Hilger | year=1990| id=ISBN 0-7503-0057-4 }}
== Further reading ==
* [http://splasho.com/blog/maxwell-thermodynamics-meets-the-demon/ Maxwell: Thermodynamics meets the demon]. A non-peer reviewed article.
* {{cite book | author=Adams, H. | title=The Degradation of the Democractic Dogma | location=New York | publisher=Kessinger | year=1919 | id=ISBN 1-4179-1598-6}}
* Bennet, C.H. (1987) "Demons, Engines and the Second Law", ''[[Scientific American]]'', November, ''pp''108-116
* {{cite journal | author=Earman, J. and Norton, J. | year=1998 | title=Exorcist XIV: The Wrath of Maxwell's Demon. Part I. From Maxwell to Szilard | journal=Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies In History and Philosophy of Modern Physics | volume=29 | pages=435–471 | doi=10.1016/S1355-2198(98)00023-9}}
* {{cite journal | author=Earman, J. and Norton, J. | year=1999 | title=Exorcist XIV: The Wrath of Maxwell's Demon. Part II. From Szilard to Landauer and Beyond | journal=Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies In History and Philosophy of Modern Physics | volume=30 | pages=1–40 | doi=10.1016/S1355-2198(98)00026-4}}
* {{cite book | author=Feynmann, R.P. ''et al.'' | title=Feynman Lectures on Computation | publisher=Addison-Wesley | year=1996 | id=ISBN 0-14-028451-6 }}, ''pp''148-150
* {{cite book | author=Jordy, W.H. | title=Henry Adams: Scientific Historian | publisher=New Haven | year=1952 | id=ISBN 0-685-26683-4 }}
* {{cite book | author=Leff, H.S. & Rex, A.F. (eds)| title=Maxwell's Demon 2: Entropy, Classical and Quantum Information, Computing | publisher=Institute of Physics | year=2003| id=ISBN 0-7503-0759-5 }}, [http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~susan/bib/nf/l/hrvyslff.htm#10345 Contents] - an anthology and comprehensive bibliography of academic papers pertaining to Maxwell's demon and related topics. [http://vlatko.madetomeasure.biz/Papers/maxwell2.pdf Chapter 1] provides a historical overview of the demon's origin and solutions to the paradox.
* {{cite book | author=Maxwell, J.C.| title=Theory of Heat| publisher= | year=1871 | id=}}, reprinted (2001) New York: Dover, ISBN 0-486-41735-2
* {{cite journal | author=Norton, J. | year=2005 | title=Eaters of the lotus: Landauer's principle and the return of Maxwell's demon | journal=Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies In History and Philosophy of Modern Physics | volume=36 | pages=375–411 | doi=10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.12.002}}
* Reaney, Patricia. [http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=116&art_id=qw1170340561317B216 "Scientists build nanomachine"], ''Reuters'', February 1, 2007
* Weiss, Peter. [http://web.archive.org/web/20070621222301/http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20001007/bob9.asp "Breaking the Law - Can quantum mechanics + thermodynamics = perpetual motion?"], ''Science News'', October 7, 2008
<!--[[Category:Thermodynamics]]-->
[[Category:Philosophy of thermal and statistical physics]]
[[Category:Thought experiments]]
[[Category:Fundamental physics concepts]]
[[Category:Nanotechnology]]
[[bg:Демон на Максуел]]
[[da:Maxwells dæmon]]
[[de:Maxwellscher Dämon]]
[[es:Demonio de Maxwell]]
[[fr:Démon de Maxwell]]
[[gl:Demo de Maxwell]]
[[he:השד של מקסוול]]
[[hu:Maxwell-démon]]
[[it:Diavoletto di Maxwell]]
[[ja:マクスウェルの悪魔]]
[[ko:맥스웰의 도깨비]]
[[nl:Maxwells demon]]
[[no:Maxwells demon]]
[[pl:Demon Maxwella]]
[[pt:Demônio de Maxwell]]
[[ro:Demonul lui Maxwell]]
[[ru:Демон Максвелла]]
[[sv:Maxwells demon]]
[[tr:Maxwell'in Cini]]
[[vi:Con quỷ Maxwell]]
[[zh:麦克斯韦妖]]