Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment
5710651
217125007
2008-06-04T18:36:01Z
SmackBot
433328
Date the maintenance tags or general fixes
[[Image:MSRE Diagram.JPG|right|300px|thumb|MSRE plant diagram]]
The '''Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment''' (MSRE) was an experimental [[molten-salt reactor]] at the [[Oak Ridge National Laboratory]] (ORNL); researching this technology through the 1960s. The MSRE was a 7.4 MW<sub>th</sub> test reactor simulating the neutronic "kernel" of an [[inherently safe]] [[epithermal]] [[thorium]] [[breeder reactor]]. It operated from three of the reactor fuels: [[plutonium-239]], [[uranium-235]] and [[uranium-233]]. The last, <sup>233</sup>UF<sub>4</sub> was the result of breeding from Thorium.
Since this was an engineering test, the large, expensive breeding blanket of Thorium salt was omitted in favor of neutron measurements.
In the MSRE, the heat from the red-hot 650 °C temperature was shed via a cooling system using air blowers on radiators. It is thought similar reactors could power high-efficiency heat engines such as gas turbines.
The MSRE was located at ORNL. Its piping, core vat and structural components were made from [[Hastelloy]]-N and its moderator was a [[pyrolytic graphite]] core. It went critical in 1965 and ran for four years. The fuel for the MSRE was LiF-BeF<sub>2</sub>-ZrF<sub>4</sub>-UF<sub>4</sub> (65-30-5-0.1), the graphite core moderated it, and its secondary coolant was [[FLiBe]] (2LiF-BeF<sub>2</sub>), it operated as hot as 650 °C and operated for the equivalent of about 1.5 years of full power operation.
The result promised to be a simple, reliable reactor. The molten salt reactor experiment was needed to prove the technology. The purpose of the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment was to demonstrate that some of the key features of the proposed molten-salt [[nuclear reactor|power reactor]]s could be embodied in a practical reactor that could be operated safely and reliably and be maintained without excessive difficulty. For simplicity, it was to be a fairly small, one-fluid (i.e. non-breeding) reactor operating at 10 [[Watt (unit)|MW]](t) or less, with heat rejection to the air via a secondary (fuel-free) salt.
==Plant description==
[[Image:MSRE Reactor.JPG|right|200px|thumb|MSRE reactor room, top down view]]
===Core===
[[Image:MSRE Core.JPG|right|200px|thumb|Graphite MSRE core]]
The [[Pyrolytic graphite]] core, grade CGB, also served as the [[neutron moderator|moderator]].
Before the MSRE development began, tests had shown that salt would not permeate graphite in which the pores were on the order of a micron. Graphite with the desired pore structure was available only in small, experimentally prepared pieces, however, and when a manufacturer set out to produce a new grade (CGB) to meet the MSRE requirements, difficulties were encountered.<ref> {{harvnb | Briggs | 1964 | pp= 373–309 }}.</ref><!-- sic: pp. 373–309]. -->
===Fuel/primary coolant===
The fuel was LiF-BeF<sub>2</sub>-ZrF<sub>4</sub>-UF<sub>4</sub> (64-30-5-1 mole %).
This reactor could breed more of its <sup>233</sup>U fuel from [[thorium]]. Thorium is about three times as abundant as uranium in the Earth's crust. Compared to conventional [[light-water reactor]]s, this breeding had the potential to eliminate the difficulty and expense of [[uranium enrichment]], as well as the need for [[fast breeder reactor]]s to make [[plutonium]] fuel from [[U-238|<sup>238</sup>U]].
Keeping all the breeding and fuel as fluoride salts made it theoretically possible to combine the [[reactor core]] and [[breeding blanket]] in one fluid, by sculpting the moderator rods. Further, it appeared that the fluid salt would permit on-site chemical separation of the fuel and wastes.
By [[1960 in science|1960]] a better understanding of fluoride salt based [[molten-salt reactor]]s had emerged due to earlier molten salt reactor research for the [[Aircraft Reactor Experiment]].
[[Fluorine|Fluoride]] salts are strongly [[Ionic compound|ionic]], and when melted, are stable at high temperatures, low pressures, and high radiation fluxes. Low pressure stability requires less robust reactor vessels and increased reliability. The high reactivity of fluorine traps most fission reaction byproducts.
The fuel system was located in sealed cells, laid out for maintenance with long-handled tools through openings in the top shielding. A tank of LiF-BeF<sub>2</sub> salt was used to flush the fuel circulating system before and after maintenance. In a cell adjacent to the reactor was a simple facility for bubbling gas through the fuel or flush salt: H<sub>2</sub>-HF to remove oxide, F<sub>2</sub> to remove uranium as UF<sub>6</sub>. Haubenreich and Engel,<ref name="NATMSRE">{{cite journal| author= P.N. Haubenreich and J.R. Engel | title=Experience with the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment| journal= Nuclear Applications and Technology| year= 1970| pages=118–136| volume=8 |url=http://www.energyfromthorium.com/pdf/NAT_MSREexperience.pdf| format=PDF, reprint}}</ref> Robertson,<ref name="TM0728">{{cite science|author=R.C. Robertson|title= MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part I, Description of Reactor Design|id=ORNL-TM-0728|month=January|year=1965}}</ref> and Lindauer<ref name="TM2578">{{cite science|author=R.B. Lindauer|title=Processing of the MSRE Flush and Fuel Salts|id=ORNL-TM-2578|month=August|year=1969}}</ref> provide more detailed descriptions of the reactor and processing plant.
===Secondary coolant===
[[Image:FLiBe.JPG|right|thumb|200px|Molten FLiBe]]
The secondary salt was LiF-BeF<sub>2</sub> (66–34 mole %).
===Pump===
The bowl of the fuel pump was the surge space for the circulating loop, and here about 50 gal/min of fuel was sprayed into the gas space to allow [[xenon]] and [[krypton]] to escape from the salt. Removing xenon made the reactor safer and easier to restart. In most reactors, xenon is not eliminated from the fuel, and provides excess heat when the reactor is shut down. On restart, the [[xenon-135|<sup>135</sup>Xe]] in the fuel absorbs neutrons, poisoning the reactions, so that conventional reactors usually have to remain shut down until the xenon-135 decays.
Also in the pump bowl was a port through which salt samples could be taken or capsules of concentrated fuel-enriching salt (UF<sub>4</sub>-LiF or PuF<sub>3</sub>) could be introduced.
===Air-cooled heat exchangers===
[[Image:MSRE Heat Exchanger.JPG|right|200px|thumb|MSRE air-cooled heat exchanger glowing a dull red due to high temperature.]]
At the time, the high temperatures were seen almost as a disadvantage, because they hampered use of conventional [[steam turbine]]s. Now, such temperatures are seen as an opportunity to use high-efficiency [[gas turbine]]s. After two months of high-power operation, the reactor was down for 3 months because of the failure of one of the main cooling blowers.
===Neutronics and thermal-hydraulics===
The reactor experienced stable neutronic operation. If either temperatures increased, or bubbles formed, the volume of the fluid fuel salts would increase and thereby reduce the reactivity.
The MSRE development program did not include [[Nuclear reactor physics|reactor physics]] experiments or [[heat transfer]] measurements. There was enough latitude in the MSRE that deviations from predictions would not compromise safety or accomplishment of the objectives of the MSRE.
===Building grounds===
[[Image:ARE Building.JPG|right|thumb|150px|Aircraft Reactor Experiment building at ORNL, it was later retrofitted for the MSRE]]
Construction of the primary system components and alterations of the old [[Aircraft Reactor Experiment|ARE]] building (which had been partly remodeled for a proposed 60-MW(t) aircraft reactor) were started in 1962. Installation of the salt systems was completed in mid-1964. ORNL was responsible for quality assurance, planning, and management of construction.<ref name="Webster">{{cite science |author=B.H. Webster |title=Quality-Assurance Practices in Construction and Maintenance of the MSRE |id=ORNL-TM-2999 |month=April |year=1970}}</ref> The primary systems were installed by ORNL personnel; subcontractors modified the building and installed ancillary systems.
===Structural alloy Hastelloy-N===
A low [[chromium]], [[nickel]]–[[molybdenum]] alloy, [[Hastelloy]]-N, was used in the MSRE and proved compatible with the fluoride salts. All metal parts contacting salt were made of Hastelloy-N.
The choice of Hastelloy-N for the MSRE was on the basis of the promising results of tests at aircraft nuclear propulsion conditions and the availability of much of the required [[metallurgical]] data. Development for the MSRE generated the further data required for [[ASME]] code approval. It also included preparation of standards for Hastelloy-N procurement and for component fabrication. Almost 200,000 lb (90 Mg) in a variety of shapes of material for the MSRE was produced commercially. Requests for bids on component fabrication went to several companies in the nuclear fabrication industry, but all declined to submit lump-sum bids because of lack of experience with the new [[alloy]]. Consequently all major components were fabricated in [[U.S. Atomic Energy Commission]]-owned shops at [[Oak Ridge, Tennessee|Oak Ridge]] and [[Paducah, Kentucky|Paducah]].<ref> {{harvnb | Briggs | 1964 | pp= 63–52 }}.</ref><!-- sic: pp. 63–52]. -->
At the time that design stresses were set for the MSRE, the data that was available indicated that the strength and creep rate of Hastelloy-N were hardly affected by [[irradiation]]. After the construction was well along, the stress-rupture life and fracture strain were found to be drastically reduced by [[thermal neutron]] irradiation. The MSRE stresses were reanalyzed, and it was concluded that the reactor would have adequate life to reach its goals. At the same time a program was launched to improve the resistance of Hastelloy-N to the embrittlement. (See reference <ref name="McCoy">{{cite journal |author=H.E. McCoy ''et al.'' |title=New Developments in Materials for Molten-Salt Reactors |journal=Nuclear Applications and Technology |volume=8 |pages=156 |year=1970}}</ref>.)
An out-of-[[pile]] [[corrosion]] test program was carried out for Hastelloy-N<ref> {{harvnb | Briggs | 1964 | pp= 334–343 }}.</ref> which indicated extremely low corrosion rates at MSRE conditions. Capsules exposed in the Materials Testing Reactor showed that salt fission power densities of more than 200 W/cm³ had no adverse effects on compatibility of fuel salt, Hastelloy-N, and graphite. [[Fluorine]] gas was found to be produced by [[radiolysis]] of frozen salts, but only at temperatures below about 100 °C.<ref> {{harvnb | Briggs | 1964 | pp= 252–257 }}.</ref>
Components that were developed especially for the MSRE included flanges for {{convert|5|in|mm|sing=on}} lines carrying molten salt, freeze valves (an air-cooled section where salt could be frozen and thawed), flexible control rods to operate in thimbles at 1200 °F (650 °C), and the fuel sampler-enricher.<ref> {{harvnb | Briggs | 1964 | pp= 167–190 }}.</ref> [[Centrifugal pump]]s were developed similar to those used successfully in the [[Aircraft Reactor Experiment|aircraft reactor program]], but with provisions for remote maintenance, and including a spray system for xenon removal. Remote maintenance considerations pervaded the MSRE design, and developments included devices for remotely cutting and brazing together 1½-inch pipe, removable heater-insulation units, and equipment for removing specimens of metal and graphite from the core.
===Development and construction timeline===
Most of the MSRE effort from 1960 through 1964 was devoted to design, development, and construction of the MSRE. Production and further testing of graphite and Hastelloy-N, both in-pile and out, were major development activities. Others included work on reactor chemistry, development of fabrication techniques for Hastelloy-N, development of reactor components, and remote-maintenance planning and preparations.<ref> {{harvnb | Briggs | 1964 }}.</ref>
==Operation==
The MSRE operated for 5 years. The salt was loaded in 1964 and nuclear operation ended in December, 1969,<ref name="NATMSRE" /><ref name="Rosenthal">{{cite science |author=M.W. Rosenthal, P.N. Haubenreich, H.E. McCoy, and L.E. McNeese |title=Current Progress in Molten-Salt Reactor Development |journal=Atomic Energy Review IX |pages=601–50 |year=1971}}</ref> and all of the objectives of the experiment were achieved during this period.
Checkout and prenuclear tests included 1,000 hours of circulation of flush salt and fuel carrier salt. Nuclear testing of the MSRE began in June 1965, with the addition of enriched <sup>235</sup>U as UF<sub>4</sub>-LiF eutectic to the carrier salt to make the reactor critical. After zero-power experiments to measure rod worth and reactivity coefficients,<ref name="Prince"> {{cite science |author=B.E. Prince, S.J. Ball, J.R. Engel, P.N. Haubenreich, and T.W. Kerlin |title=Zero-Power Physics Experiments on the MSRE |id=ORNL-4233 |month=February |year=1968}}</ref> the reactor was shut down and final preparations made for power operation. Power ascension was delayed when vapors from oil that had leaked into the fuel pump were polymerized by the radioactive offgas and plugged gas filters and valves. Maximum power, which was limited to 7.4 MW(t) by the capability of the heat-rejection system, was reached in May 1966.
After two months of high-power operation, the reactor was down for three months because of the failure of one of the main cooling blowers. Some further delays were encountered because of offgas line plugging, but by the end of 1966 most of the startup problems were behind. During the next 15 months, the reactor was critical 80% of the time, with runs of 1, 3, and 6 months that were uninterrupted by a fuel drain. By March 1968, the original objectives of the MSRE had been accomplished, and nuclear operation with <sup>235</sup>U was concluded.
By this time, ample <sup>233</sup>U had become available, so the MSRE program was extended to include substitution of <sup>233</sup>U for the uranium in the fuel salt, and operation to observe the new nuclear characteristics. Using the on-site processing equipment the flush salt and fuel salt were fluorinated to recover the uranium in them as UF6.<ref name="TM2578" /> <sup>233</sup>UF<sub>4</sub>-LiF eutectic was then added to the carrier salt, and in October 1968, the MSRE became the world's first reactor to operate on <sup>233</sup>U.
The <sup>233</sup>U zero-power experiments and dynamics tests confirmed the predicted [[neutron]]ic characteristics. An unexpected consequence of processing the salt was that its physical properties were altered slightly so that more than the usual amount of gas was entrained from the fuel pump into the circulating loop. The circulating gas and the power fluctuations that accompanied it were eliminated by operating the fuel pump at slightly lower speed. Operation at high power for several months permitted accurate measurement of the capture-to-fission ratio, for <sup>233</sup>U in this reactor, completing the objectives of the <sup>233</sup>U operation.
In the concluding months of operation, xenon stripping, deposition of fission products, and [[tritium]] behavior were investigated. The feasibility of using [[plutonium]] in molten-salt reactors was emphasized by adding PuF<sub>3</sub> as makeup fuel during this period.
After the final shutdown in December 1969, the reactor was left in standby for nearly a year. A limited examination program was then carried out, including a moderator bar from the core, a control rod thimble, heat exchanger tubes, parts from the fuel pump bowl, and a freeze valve that had developed a leak during the final shutdown. The radioactive systems were then closed to await ultimate disposal.
==Results==
The broadest and perhaps most important conclusion from the MSRE experience was that a molten salt fueled reactor concept was viable. It ran for considerable periods of time, yielding valuable information, and maintenance was accomplished safely and without excessive delay.
The MSRE confirmed expectations and predictions.<ref name="Rosenthal" /> For example, it was demonstrated that: the fuel salt was immune to radiation damage, the graphite was not attacked by the fuel salt, and the corrosion of Hastelloy-N was negligible. Noble gases were stripped from the fuel salt by a spray system, reducing the <sup>135</sup>Xe poisoning by a factor of about 6. The bulk of the fission product elements remained stable in the salt. Additions of uranium and plutonium to the salt during operation were quick and uneventful, and recovery of uranium by fluorination was efficient. The neutronics, including critical loading, reactivity coefficients, dynamics, and long-term reactivity changes, agreed with prior calculations.
In other areas, the operation resulted in improved data or reduced uncertainties. The <sup>233</sup>U capture-to-[[fission]] ratio in a typical MSR [[neutron spectrum]] is an example of basic data that was improved. The effect of fissioning on the [[redox potential]] of the fuel salt was resolved. The deposition of some elements (“[[noble metals]]”) was expected, but the MSRE provided quantitative data on relative deposition on graphite, metal, and liquid-gas interfaces. [[Heat transfer coefficient]]s measured in the MSRE agreed with conventional design calculations and did not change over the life of the reactor. Limiting oxygen in the salt proved effective, and the tendency of fission products to be dispersed from contaminated equipment during maintenance was low.
Operation of the MSRE provided insights into the problem of [[tritium]] in a molten-salt reactor. It was observed that about 6–10% of the calculated 54 Ci/day (2.0 [[terabecquerel|TBq]]) production diffused out of the fuel system into the containment cell atmosphere and another 6–10% reached the air through the heat removal system.<ref name="Briggs">{{cite journal |author=R.B. Briggs |title=Tritium in Molten-Salt Reactors |journal=Reactor Technology |volume=14 |pages=335–42 |date=Winter 1971–72}}</ref> The fact that these fractions were not higher indicated that something partially negated the transfer of tritium through hot metals.
One unexpected finding was shallow, inter-granular cracking in all metal surfaces exposed to the fuel salt. This was first noted in the specimens that were removed from the core at intervals during the reactor operation. Post-operation examination of pieces of a control-rod thimble, heat-exchanger tubes, and pump bowl parts revealed the ubiquity of the cracking and emphasized its importance to the MSR concept.
This cracking was later resolved by adding small amounts of [[titanium]] to the Hastelloy-N.
==Decommissioning==
{{Expand-section|date=June 2008}}
After shutdown the salt was believed to be in long-term safe storage, but beginning in the mid-1980s, there was concern that radioactivity was migrating through the system. Sampling in 1994 revealed concentrations of uranium that created a potential for a nuclear criticality accident, as well as a potentially dangerous build-up of fluorine gas — the environment above the solidified salt is approximately one atmosphere of fluorine. The ensuing decontamination and decommissioning project was called "the most technically challenging" activity assigned to [[Bechtel Jacobs]] under its environmental management contract with the [[U.S. Department of Energy]]'s Oak Ridge Operations organization. In 2003, the MSRE cleanup project was estimated at about $130 million, with decommissioning expected to be completed in 2009.<ref>R. Cathey Daniels, [http://oakridger.com/stories/040803/new_16.html Elegant experiment puts wallop on cleanup], ''The Oak Ridger'', April 8, 2003.</ref>
A detailed description of potential decommissioning processes is [http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=5538&page=R1]; uranium is to be removed from the fuel as the hexafluoride by adding excess fluorine, and plutonium as the dioxide by adding sodium carbonate.
{{coord|35.92178|-84.30672 |format=dms |region:US-TN_type:landmark |display=title }}
==References==
{{reflist}}
*{{Citation
| last = Briggs | first = R. B.
| publication-date = November 1964 | year = 1964
| title = MSR Program Semiannual Progress Report for the period ending July 31, 1964
| periodical =
| series =
| publication-place =
| place =
| publisher = (ORNL-3708) (66.3 [[Megabyte|MB]] [[PDF]]), [[Oak Ridge National Laboratory]], [[United States Atomic Energy Commission|U.S. AEC]]
| url = http://www.energyfromthorium.com/pdf/ORNL-3708.pdf
| accessdate = 2008-05-21
}}
[[Category:Nuclear reactors]]
[[Category:Physics experiments]]
[[Category:Oak Ridge, Tennessee]]
[[es:Reactor de sal fundida (Molten salt reactor)]]