Mountaintop removal mining 1685995 225877564 2008-07-15T20:41:21Z Rjwilmsi 203434 gen fixes + link/fix date fields in cite templates (explanation [[User:Rjwilmsi#My_correction_of_citation_templates|here]]) using [[Project:AutoWikiBrowser|AWB]] [[Image:MTR1.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Mountaintop removal site.]] '''Mountaintop removal mining''' ('''MTR'''), often referred to in the industry as mountaintop mining/valley fills (MTM/VF), is a form of [[surface mining]] that involves an extreme topographic change to the [[summit]] or summit ridge of a mountain. It is most closely associated with [[coal mining]] in the [[Appalachian Mountains]], located in the eastern [[United States]]. The process involves using explosives to remove up to 1,000 vertical feet of rock to get to the coal seams. The resulting debris is often scraped into the adjacent river valleys in what is called a ''valley fill''.<ref name="ensnews">[http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/feb2003/2003-02-03-06.asp Appeals Court Upholds Mountaintop Removal Mining]</ref><ref name="epaPeis">{{cite web | title=Mountaintop Mining/Valley Fills in Appalachia: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement | author=U.S. Environmental Protection Agency | url=http://www.epa.gov/region03/mtntop/index.htm | accessmonthday=August 20 | accessyear=2006 | date=2005-10-25 }}</ref><ref name=epa>[http://www.epa.gov/reg3esd1/nepa/mountaintop/mountaintop.htm Mountaintop Mining and Valley Fills in Appalachia (MTM/VF) - Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement]</ref> Because of the physically destructive nature of the practice, MTR is controversial, and is protested by environmentalists, local residents, and others. Controversy over the practice stems from both the extreme topographical and ecological changes that the mining site undergoes, as well as from the storage of waste material generated from the mining and processing of the coal; proponents of MTR point to its efficiency, its ability to provide jobs, and the resulting increase of flat land in areas where there is often little. == History == Increased demand for coal in the United States, sparked by the [[1973 oil crisis|1973]] and [[1979 energy crisis|1979 petroleum crises]], created incentives for a more economical form of coal mining than the traditional [[underground mining]] methods that involving hundreds of workers, triggering the first widespread use of MTR. The mining method's prevalence expanded further in the 1990s to retrieve relatively [[Coal#Types of coal|low-sulfur coal]], a cleaner burning form, which became desirable as a result of amendments to the [[Clean Air Act (1970)|U.S. Clean Air Act]] that tightened emissions limits on high-sulfur coal processing.<ref name="burns">{{cite paper | author = Burns, Shirley Stewart | title = Bringing Down the Mountains: the Impact of Mountaintop Removal Surface Coal Mining on Southern West Virginia Communities, 1970-2004 | version = Ph.D. dissertation | publisher = West Virginia University | date= 2005 | url = http://kitkat.wvu.edu:8080/files/4047/Stewart_Burns_Shirley_dissertation.pdf | format = [[PDF]] | accessdate = 2006-12-16 }}</ref> With an increasing call for [[U.S. Energy Independence|energy independence in the U.S.]], as well as a growing call for [[Coal#Liquefaction|Coal-To-Liquids]] and "[[clean coal]] technologies", MTR has continued to expand into the 2000s. == Occurrence == MTR in the United States is most often associated with the extraction of coal in the [[Appalachian Mountains]], where the [[EPA]] estimates that {{convert|2200|sqmi|km2|-2}} of Appalachian forests will be cleared for MTR sites by the year 2012.<ref name="usatoday">{{cite news | url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-04-18-mines_N.htm | title=Mining battle marked by peaks and valleys | name=Laura Parker | date=2007-04-18 | publisher=USA Today }}</ref> It occurs most commonly in [[West Virginia]] and Eastern [[Kentucky]], the top two coal producing states in [[Appalachia]], with each state using approximately 1000 metric tons of explosives per day for the purposes of surface mining.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/explosives/600401.pdf | title=U.S. Geological Survey report on consumption of explosives |format=PDF}}</ref> However, the technique is being used increasingly in central [[Tennessee]] and southwest [[Virginia]].<ref>{{ cite web | url=http://www.appvoices.org/index.php?/mtr/coal_consumption/ | title=Where Coal from Mountaintop Removal Is Used | publisher=Appalachian Voices | accessdate=September 18 | accessyear=2006 }}</ref> At current rates, MTR in the U.S. will mine over 1.4 million acres (5,700 km²) by 2010,<ref name="ilovemountains-faq">{{ cite web | url=http://www.ilovemountains.org/resources | title=Frequently Asked Questions about Mountaintop Removal | publisher=Appalachian Voices | accessdate=April 29 | accessyear=2007 }}</ref> an amount of land area that exceeds that of the state of Delaware. == Process == {| align=right | [[Image:TransAlta dragline.jpg|right|thumb|300px|[[Dragline]] at the [[Centralia coal mine]] in [[Washington]].]] |} As no existing vegetation survives MTR, the targeted land is [[deforestation|clear-cut]] and either sold for [[lumber]]<ref name="burns">{{cite paper | author = Burns, Shirley Stewart | title = Bringing Down the Mountains: the Impact of Mountaintop Removal Surface Coal Mining on Southern West Virginia Communities, 1970-2004 | version = Ph.D. dissertation | publisher = West Virginia University | date= 2005 | url = http://kitkat.wvu.edu:8080/files/4047/Stewart_Burns_Shirley_dissertation.pdf | format = [[PDF]] | accessdate = 2006-12-16 }}</ref> or burned<ref>{{The High cost of Cheap Coal,National Geographic March 2006, written byJohn G. Mitchell}} {{Fact|date=February 2008}}. Ideally, the [[topsoil]] is removed and set aside for later reclamation.<ref name="burns">{{cite paper | author = Burns, Shirley Stewart | title = Bringing Down the Mountains: the Impact of Mountaintop Removal Surface Coal Mining on Southern West Virginia Communities, 1970-2004 | version = Ph.D. dissertation | publisher = West Virginia University | date= 2005 | url = http://kitkat.wvu.edu:8080/files/4047/Stewart_Burns_Shirley_dissertation.pdf | format = [[PDF]] | accessdate = 2006-12-16 }}</ref> Miners then use explosives to blast away the [[overburden]], the rock and [[subsoil]] that lies above a coal seam, to expose the [[coal]]. In a March 2006 National Geographic article entitled 'The High Cost of Cheap Coal', John G Mitchell explained how the overburden is pushed into a nearby valley or hollow, creating a pile below called ''valley fill''{{Fact|date=February 2008}}. A [[dragline excavator]] removes the coal, where it is transported to a processing plant and washed. Millions of gallons of waste from coal processing, called ''sludge'' or [[Coal slurry impoundment|''slurry'']], are often stored nearby in open pools held back by earthen dams. Once coal removal is completed, the mining operators replace the topsoil (or a topsoil substitute) on the stripped site and seed it for [[revegetation]]. Because coal usually exists in multiple [[stratum|geologically stratified]] seams, miners can often repeat the blasting process to mine over a dozen seams on a single mountain, increasing the mine depth each time. This can result in vertical descension of hundreds of extra feet into the earth.<ref name="burns">{{cite paper | author = Burns, Shirley Stewart | title = Bringing Down the Mountains: the Impact of Mountaintop Removal Surface Coal Mining on Southern West Virginia Communities, 1970-2004 | version = Ph.D. dissertation | publisher = West Virginia University | date= 2005 | url = http://kitkat.wvu.edu:8080/files/4047/Stewart_Burns_Shirley_dissertation.pdf | format = [[PDF]] | accessdate = 2006-12-16 }}</ref> == Economics == Just over half of the electricity generated in the United States is produced by [[coal-fired power plant]]s. MTR accounted for less than 5% of U.S. coal production as of 2001.<ref name="ilovemountains-faq">{{ cite web | url=http://www.ilovemountains.org/resources | title=Frequently Asked Questions about Mountaintop Removal | publisher=Appalachian Voices | accessdate=April 29 | accessyear=2007 }}</ref> In some regions, however, the percentage is higher, for example MTR provided 30% of the coal mined in West Virginia in 2006.<ref>J. O. Britton and others, ''West Virginia'', Mining Engineering, May 2007, p.125.</ref> Historically in the U.S. the prevalent method of coal acquisition was [[underground mining]] which is very labor-intensive. In MTR, through the use of explosives and large machinery, more than two and a half times as much coal can be extracted per worker per hour than in traditional underground mines,<ref>{{ cite web | url=http://www.nma.org/pdf/c_most_requested.pdf | title=Most Requested Statistics - U.S. Coal Industry | publisher=National Mining Association | accessdate=December 1 | accessyear=2007 |format=PDF}}</ref> and thus greatly reducing the need for workers. The industry lost approximately 10,000 jobs from 1990 to 1997, as MTR and other more mechanized mining methods became more widely used.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.wvgazette.com/static/series/mining/mcferrin0521.html | title=An Odd Partnership: UMW, Coal Association arm in arm | author=McFerrin }}</ref> In addition, because MTR sites employ fewer miners per amount extracted, [[labor unions]] have less representation, and the [[United Mine Workers of America]] have charged that anti-union practices are often associated with MTR.{{Fact|date=December 2007}} They have also called for additional legal measures to protect communities from the degradation and destruction that results from nearby blasting.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.dailymail.com/mtrletters/umwa_07-24-03.pdf | title=Statement of United Mine Workers of America on Mountaintop Removal | date=2003-07-24 |format=PDF}}</ref> The coal industry asserts that surface mining techniques, such as mountaintop removal, are safer for miners than sending miners underground.<ref>{{cite news | last = Banerjee | first = Neela | title = Taking On a Coal Mining Practice as a Matter of Faith | publisher = The New York Times | date= 2006-10-28 | url = http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/28/us/28mountains.html | accessdate = 2006-10-28 }}</ref> Proponents argue that in certain geologic areas, MTR and similar forms of [[surface mining]] allow easier access to coal than traditional [[underground mining]], and that it is the most cost-effective method of extracting coal.{{Fact|date=November 2007}} However, the [[counties]] that host MTR are often the poorest in Appalachia. For instance, in [[McDowell County, West Virginia]], which produces the most coal in the state, over 37% of residents live below the [[poverty line]].<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.appvoices.org/index.php?/mtr/economics/ | title=What Are the Economic Consequences of Mountaintop Removal in Appalachia? }}</ref> In Kentucky, counties with coal mining have economies no better than adjoining counties where no mining occurs.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://windpub.com/dirtymoney.htm | title = Economic Impact of Mountaintop Removal on Coal Mining Communities }}</ref> == Legislation in the United States == In the United States, MTR is allowed by section 515(c)(1) of the [[SMCRA|Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act]] (SMCRA). Although most [[coal mining]] sites must be [[Land rehabilitation|reclaimed]] to the land's pre-mining contour and use, regulatory agencies can issue waivers to allow MTR.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.epa.gov/maia/html/issue-valley.html | author=U.S. Environmental Protection Agency | title=Mountaintop Removal/Valley Fill }}</ref> In such cases, SMCRA dictates that reclamation must create "a level plateau or a gently rolling contour with no highwalls remaining."<ref>{{ cite web | url=http://www.osmre.gov/smcra.htm#515(C)(1) | title=Public Law 95-87 ''Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977'' | date=1977-08-03 }}</ref> <!-- With so many court rulings against MTR, it's easy to get them confused. The four mentioned in this following paragraph are specific to Valley Fills. (see also comment 2 paragraphs down) --> Permits must be obtained to deposit valley fill into streams. On four occasions, federal courts have ruled that the [[US Army Corps of Engineers]] violated the [[Clean Water Act]] by issuing such permits.<ref name="usatoday">{{cite news | url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-04-18-mines_N.htm | title=Mining battle marked by peaks and valleys | name=Laura Parker | date=2007-04-18 | publisher=USA Today }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.sundaygazettemail.com/section/Series/Mining+the+Mountains/200205101 | title=Key players react cautiously to mountaintop removal decision | name=Ken Ward Jr. | date=2002-05-10 | publisher=The Charleston Gazette }}</ref> [[Massey Energy Company]] is currently appealing a 2007 ruling, but has been allowed to continue mining in the meantime because "most of the substantial harm has already occurred," according to the judge.<ref name="usatoday">{{cite news | url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-04-18-mines_N.htm | title=Mining battle marked by peaks and valleys | name=Laura Parker | date=2007-04-18 | publisher=USA Today }}</ref> The [[George W. Bush administration|Bush administration]] appealed one of these rulings in 2001 because the Act had not explicitly defined "fill material" that could legally be placed in a waterway. The EPA and [[Army Corps of Engineers]] changed a rule to include mining debris in the definition of fill material, and the ruling was overturned.<ref>{{ cite news | url=http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/feb2003/2003-02-03-06.asp | first=Cat | last=Lazaroff | title=Appeals Court Upholds Mountaintop Removal Mining | date=2003-02-03 | publisher=Environment News Service }}</ref><ref name="usatoday">{{cite news | url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-04-18-mines_N.htm | title=Mining battle marked by peaks and valleys | name=Laura Parker | date=2007-04-18 | publisher=USA Today }}</ref> However, if passed, the [[Clean Water Protection Act]] (''H.R.2169''), a bill in the [[United States House of Representatives|House of Representatives]], would revert this change by specifying that coal mining waste does not constitute fill material,<ref>{{cite web | url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.2169: | title=Clean Water Protection Act | date=2007-05-03 | publisher=Library of Congress | accessmonthday=May 9 | accessyear=2007 }}</ref> in effect disallowing valley fills. <!-- This court ruling refers explicitly to in-stream settling ponds (see comment 2 paragraphs up) --> A federal judge has also ruled that using settling ponds to remove mining waste from streams violates the Clean Water Act. He also declared that the Army Corps of Engineers has no authority to issue permits allowing discharge of pollutants into such in-stream settling ponds, which are often built just below valley fills.<ref>{{ cite news | url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19231612/ | title=Judge rules against mountaintop mining | date=2007-06-14 | publisher=MSNBC News }}</ref> Additionally, a September 2007 survey conducted by the [[Civil Society Institute]] found that 65% of Americans oppose the Bush Administration's proposal "to ease environmental regulations to permit wider use of 'mountain top removal' coal mining in the U.S." The study also found that 74% of Americans are opposed to the expansion of MTR coal mining in general, and that 90% of Americans agree that more mining should be permitted only after the United States government has assessed its impacts on safety and the environment.<ref name="enn">[http://www.enn.com/ecosystems/article/23024 Survey: 65 Percent of Americans Oppose Mountaintop Removal]</ref> On [[15 January]] [[2008]], the environmental advocacy group [[Center for Biological Diversity]] petitioned the [[United States Fish and Wildlife Service]] to end a policy that waives detailed federal Endangered Species Act reviews for new mining permits. The current policy states that MTR can never damage endangered species or their habitat as long as mining operators comply with federal surface mining law, despite the complexities of species and ecosystems. Since 1996, this policy has exempted many strip mines from being subject to permit-specific reviews of impact on individual endangered species.<ref name="wvgaz">[http://wvgazette.com/section/News/Business/2008011512 Mining impact on species review sought]</ref> On May 25, 2008 [[North Carolina]] State Representative [[Pricey Harrison]] introduced a bill to ban the use of mountaintop removal coal from coal fired power plants within North Carolina. This proposed legislation would be the first of its kind in the United States.<ref>{{ cite news | url=http://www.newsobserver.com/business/nc/story/1087504.html | title=Bill aims to outlaw coal mined by removing mountaintops | date=2008-05-28 | publisher=The News & Observer | accessmonthday=June 15 | accessyear=2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/5/28/17123/6269 | title=Removing mountaintop removal: North Carolina bill would ban burning of coal from mountaintop-removal mining | publisher=Grist | date=2008-05-29 | accessmonthday=June 15 | accessyear=2008 }}</ref> == Criticism == Critics contend that MTR is a destructive and unsustainable practice that benefits a small number of corporations at the expense of [[Local community|local communities]] and the [[Natural environment|environment]]. Though the main issue has been over the physical alteration of the landscape, opponents to the practice have also criticized MTR for the damage done to the environment by massive transport trucks, and the environmental damage done by the burning of coal for power. Advocates of MTR claim that once the areas are reclaimed as mandated by law, the area provides flat land suitable for many uses in a region where flat land is at a premium. They also maintain that the new growth on reclaimed mountaintop mined areas is better suited to support populations of game animals.<ref>J.S. Gardner and P Sainato, ''Mountaintop mining and sustainable development in Appalachia'', Mining Engineering, March 2007, p.48-55.</ref> [[Image:Mountaintop Removal.jpg|thumb|right|[[Mountaintop removal]] coal mining at Kayford Mountain, [[West Virginia]].]] Blasting at MTR sites also expels [[coal dust]] and fly-rock into the air, which can disturb or settle onto private property nearby. This dust contains sulfur compounds, which corrodes structures and is a health hazard.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2006/08/03/tzerman/ | title=Blast Rites | author=Jessica Tzerman | date=2006-08-03 | publisher=Grist | accessdate=2006-09-04 }}</ref> In 2007, a feature documentary titled "Mountain Top Removal" was completed by Haw River Films. The film features Mountain Justice Summer activists, coal field residents, and coal industry officials. Included in the film are US President George W. Bush and [[West Virginia Governor]] [[Joe Manchin]], among others. On April 18 2008 the film received the Reel Current award selected and presented by Al Gore at the Nashville Film Festival. A book titled [[Coal River (book)|Coal River]] by Michael Shnayerson, released in January 2008, accuses the industry of circumventing public hearings by dividing large MTR projects into smaller sections. Under the practice, mining officials can utilize a legal loophole and obtain permits (Nationwide Permit 21) that undergo a more relaxed review than those required for large projects.<ref name="ens08">[http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jan2002/2002-01-15-01.asp Wetland Safeguards Eroded by New Nationwide Permits]></ref> Since Nationwide Permit 21 is intended for small projects that "cause minimal adverse environmental effects," citizens typically only discover the large-scale mining after mountaintop removal has already begun. The Clean Water Act prohibits this practice, but the Army Corps of Engineers has continued to allow it.<ref name=sdut>[http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080203/news_1v03coal.html 'Coal River' cries a river over the devastation from mining]</ref> The Corps has said that its allowance of the procedure "strengthens protections for mining related permits." === Biodiversity === An [[United States Environmental Protection Agency|EPA]] [[environmental impact statement]] finds that streams near valley fills from mountaintop removal contain high levels of minerals in the water and decreased aquatic [[biodiversity]].<ref name="epaPeis" /> The statement also estimates that {{convert|724|mi|km|0}} of Appalachian streams were buried by valley fills between 1985 to 2001.<ref name="epaPeis" /> Although U.S. mountaintop removal sites by law must be reclaimed after mining is complete, reclamation has traditionally focused on stabilizing rock formations and controlling for erosion, and not on the [[Secondary forest|reforestation]] of the affected area.<ref>{{cite web | title=Appalachian Regional Reforestation Initiative Forest Reclamation Advisory | url=http://arri.osmre.gov/PDFs/Pubs/FRA_No.1.pdf | publisher=Office of Surface Mining and Reclamation | accessmonthday=July 11 | accessyear=2007|format=PDF}}</ref> Fast-growing, [[Introduced species|non-native]] [[grass]]es, planted to quickly provide vegetation on a site, compete with tree seedlings, and trees have difficulty establishing root systems in compacted backfill.<ref name="epaPeis" /> Consequently, [[biodiversity]] suffers in a region of the United States with numerous [[endemic species]].<ref>{{cite web | title=Biology: Plants, Animals, & Habitats - We live in a hot spot of biodiversity | url=http://www.fnai.org/ARROW/almanac/biology/biology_index.cfm | publisher=Apalachicola Region Resources on the Web | accessmonthday=September 18 | accessyear=2006 }}</ref> [[Erosion]] also increases, which can intensify [[flooding]]. In the Eastern United States, the Appalachian Regional Reforestation Initiative works to promote the use of trees in mining reclamation.<ref>{{cite web | title=Appalachian Regional Reforestation Initiative | url=http://arri.osmre.gov/ | accessmonthday=September 5 | accessyear=2006 }}</ref> === Sludge ponds === As with other methods of coal mining, processing of the coal mined generates waste [[slurry]] (also called ''coal sludge''), which is usually stored in large sludge ponds impounded by an on-site dam. Many [[coal slurry impoundment]]s in West Virginia exceed 500 million gallons in volume, and can be larger than 7 billion gallons.<ref>{{cite web | title=Tearing Up Appalachia | author=Brian Vanneman | publisher=Sierra Club | year=2004 | url=http://sierraclub.org/planet/200405/appalachia.asp | accessmonthday=September 4 | accessyear=2006 }}</ref> Such impoundments can be hundreds of feet high and sometimes have close proximity to schools or private residences.<ref>{{cite web | title=Marsh Fork Elementary, Massey Energy's Shumate Coal Sludge Impoundment and Goals Coal Prep Plant | url=http://www.sludgesafety.org/what_me_worry/marsh_fork/index.html | accessmonthday=July 31 | accessyear=2006 }}</ref> The most controversial sludge dam at present sits {{convert|400|yd|m|-2}} above Marsh Fork Elementary School. On [[May 31]], [[2005]], 16 people were arrested at [[Joe Manchin|Governor Manchin's]] office for protesting the Governor's refusal to fund the relocation of the school. The leaking{{Fact|date=November 2007}} sludge pond is permitted to hold 2.8 billion gallons of coal sludge, and is 21 times larger than the pond which killed 125 people in the [[Buffalo Creek Flood]] in 1972.<ref> {{cite web | title=West Virginia Division of Culture and History -- Buffalo Creek | url=http://www.wvculture.org/history/buffcreek/buff1.html }}</ref> Kentucky's [[Martin County Sludge Spill]] occurred after midnight on [[October 11]], [[2000]], when a coal sludge impoundment broke through into an underground mine below, propelling 306 million gallons of sludge down two tributaries of the [[Tug Fork River]]. The spill polluted hundreds of miles of waterways, contaminated the water supply for over 27,000 residents, and killed all aquatic life in Coldwater Fork and Wolf Creek. == See also == * [[Clean Water Protection Act]] * [[I Love Mountains]] * [[Julia Bonds]] * [[Massey Energy]] * [[Mountain Party]] * [[Surface Mining]] == References == {{reflist|2}} == External links == * [http://www.osmre.gov/mtindex.htm US Government Office of Surface Mining] - index to government documents and records related to surface mining * [http://blueridgecountry.com/FavoriteArticles/MtTopRemoval/index.html Report on current efforts to combat mountaintop removal, Jan-Feb 2007] * [http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2006/07/unnatural_wonders.html ''Mother Jones'' story on tourism in MTR-devastated landscapes] * [http://www.blackdiamondsmovie.com/ Black Diamonds: Mountaintop Removal and the Fight for Coalfield Justice] (2006 feature-length video documentary) * [http://www.epa.gov/region3/mtntop/index.htm Mountaintop Mining & Valley Fills in Appalachia: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Final PEIS)] * [http://windpub.com/dirtymoney.htm Economic Impact of Mountaintop Removal on Coal-mining Communities] -- an article by Kristin Johannsen * [http://www.osmre.gov/mtindex.htm Mountaintop Removal Mining Index] * [http://www.marshall.edu/cber/ Marshall University's Center for Business and Economic Research] has conducted studies of Mountaintop Removal and Financing of Environmental Reclamation * [http://ran.org/what_we_do/global_finance/spotlight/coal_is_over/mountaintop_removal/ Rainforest Action Network's No New Coal Campaign] - a website dedicated to demonstrating the roles played by leading U.S. banks on funding MTR coal mining and new coal power plant construction. * [http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/tending/]Tending the Commons: Folklife and Landscape in Southern West Virginia -- an online multimedia exhibit on historical and cultural landscapes affected by mountaintop removal mining in southern West Virginia's Big Coal River Valley. ===Organisations=== * [http://crmw.net/ Coal River Mountain Watch] Southern West Virginia group opposing mountaintop removal mining. * [http://www.ohvec.org/ Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition (OVEC)] A grassroots organization fighting Mountaintop Removal in West Virginia through community organizing and leadership development, coalition building, media outreach and education. * [http://mountainjusticesummer.org/ Mountain Justice Summer Campaign] * [http://www.stopmountaintopremoval.org Stop Mountaintop Removal!] * [http://www.appalachian-center.org Appalachian Center for the Economy and the Environment] Nonprofit environmental law and policy center leading the court battles against mountaintop removal mining. * [http://www.appvoices.org Appalachian Voices] A grassroots organization working with coalfield residents and legislators to end Mountaintop Removal. Lots of facts and resources for learning more about Mountaintop Removal * [http://www.ilovemountains.org I Love Mountains] An "End Mountaintop Removal" Resource and Action Center * [http://www.sierraclub.org/mtr/ Sierra Club] A national grassroots organization working to end mountaintop removal mining through litigation, organizing and legislation ===Media=== *[http://www.brightcove.tv/title.jsp?title=1514307400 ]Honorable Al Gore speaking on Mountaintop Removal at the Nashville Film Festival April 18 2008 *[http://www.onearth.org/article/appalachian-apocalypse OnEarth Magazine » Appalachian Apocalypse] *[http://us.macmillan.com/coalriver ''Coal River''] Book by ''Vanity Fair'' writer Michael Shnayerson * [http://www.windpub.com/books/missing.htm ''Missing Mountains: We Went to the Mountaintop But it Wasn't There''] - 35 Kentucky writers explore mountaintop removal mining. * [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1100902/ ''Mountain Top Removal''] - award-winning documentary * [http://www.erikreece.com ''Lost Mountain: Radical Strip-Mining and the Devastation of Appalachia''] - award-winning account of strip-mining by [[Erik Reece]] * [http://www.mountainroadshow.com/ Mountaintop Removal Road Show] - Dave Cooper travels the country presenting a slide show about the impacts of mountaintop removal on coalfield residents, communities, and the environment. * [http://www.llrx.com/extras/mountaintopremoval.htm Commentary: Mountaintop Removal Sites - "Strip Mining on Steroids"] Beth Wellington, published [[November 12]], [[2006]] by LLRX.com. A look "into the complex history of this controversial mining operation, with background that highlights corporate and public interest positions, as well as relevant legislative history." {{Mining techniques}} [[Category:Coal mining]] [[Category:Surface mining]] [[Category:Resource extraction]] [[Category:Environmental issues with mining]] [[fr:Mountaintop removal]]