Oriental studies
4349112
224259555
2008-07-08T01:14:33Z
65.24.61.249
/* From "Oriental Studies" to "Asian Studies" */
[[Image:BM; RM6 - ANE, Assyrian Sculpture 14 West Wall (M + N) ~ Assyrian Empire + -Lamassu, Gates at Balawat, Relief Panel's) & Full Projection.3.JPG|thumb|right|[[Ancient Assyria]]n antiquities in the [[British Museum]]. In the 19th century the placing of spectacular antiquities in the new museums brought unusual interest from the general public to Oriental Studies]]
'''Oriental studies''' is the academic field of study that embraces [[Near East]]ern and [[Far East]]ern societies and cultures, languages, peoples, history and archaeology; in recent years the term [[Asian studies]] has mostly replaced the older term. European study of the region had primarily religious origins, which has remained an important motivation until recent times. Learning from Arabic medicine and philosophy, and the Arabic translations from Greek, was an important factor in the Middle Ages. Linguistic knowledge preceded a wider study of cultures and history, and as Europe began to encroach upon the region, political and economic factors encouraged growth in academic study. From the late 18th century archaeology became a link from the discipline to a wide European public, as treasures brought back filled new European museums. The modern study was influenced both by [[Imperialist]] attitudes and interests, and also the sometimes naive fascination of the exotic East for Mediterranean and European writers and thinkers, captured in images by artists, that is embodied in a repeatedly-surfacing theme in the [[history of ideas]] in the West, called "[[Orientalism]]". In the last century, scholars from the region itself have participated on equal terms in the discipline, transforming it.
==History of Oriental studies==
===Pre-Islam===
The Western world's original distinction between the "West" and the "East" was crystallised in the [[Greco-Persian Wars]] of the fifth century BCE, when [[Athen]]ian historians made a distinction between their "[[Athenian democracy]]" and that of the [[Persian Empire|Persian]] monarchy. An institutional distinction between East and West did not exist as a defined polarity before the ''Oriens-'' and ''Occidens''-divided administration of the Emperor [[Diocletian]]'s [[Roman Empire]] at the end of the third century CE, and the division of the Empire into [[Latin]] and [[Greek language|Greek]]-speaking portions. The classical world had initimate knowledge of their [[Ancient Persia]]n neighbours (and usually enemies), but very [[Sino-Roman relations|imprecise]] knowledge of most of the world further East, including the "[[Seres]]" (Chinese). However there was substantial direct [[Roman trade with India]] (unlike with China) in the Imperial period.
===Middle Ages===
[[Image:HaytonRemittingHisReportToThePope.JPG|left|thumb|[[Hayton of Corycus]] remitting his report on the [[Mongol Empire|Mongols]], to [[Pope Clement V]], in 1307.]]
The [[Spread of Islam|rise of Islam]] and [[Muslim conquests]] in the seventh century established a sharp opposition, or even a sense of polarity, between medieval European [[Christendom]] and the [[Islamic Golden Age|medieval Islamic world]] (which stretched from the [[Middle East]] and [[Central Asia]] to [[North Africa]] and [[Al-Andalus|Andalusia]]). During the [[Middle Ages]], [[Muslim]]s were considered the "alien" enemies of Christendom. Popular medieval European knowledge of cultures farther to the East was poor, dependent on the wildly fictionalised travels of Sir [[John Mandeville]] and legends of [[Prester John]], although the equally famous, and much longer, account by [[Marco Polo]] was a good deal more accurate.
Scholarly work was initially very largely linguistic in nature, with primarily a religious focus on understanding both [[Biblical Hebrew language|Biblical Hebrew]] and languages like [[Syriac]] with early Christian literature, but also from a wish to understand Greek and [[Arabic language|Arabic]] works on [[Islamic medicine|medicine]], [[Early Islamic philosophy|philosophy]] and [[Islamic science|science]]. This effort existed sporadically throughout the Middle Ages, and the "[[Renaissance of the 12th century]]" witnessed a particular [[Latin translations of the 12th century|growth in translations]] of Arabic texts into Latin, with figures like [[Constantine the African]], who translated 37 books, mostly medical texts, from Arabic to Latin, and [[Herman of Carinthia]], one of the translators of the [[Qur'an]]. The [[Lex Mahumet pseudoprophete|earliest translation]] of the Qur'an into [[Latin]] was completed in 1143, although little use was made of it until it was printed in 1543, after which it was translated into other European languages. [[Gerard of Cremona]] and others based themselves in [[Al-Andaluz]] to take advantage of the Arabic libraries and scholars there. Later, with the Christian [[Reconquista]] in full progress, such contacts became rarer in Spain.
There was [[Chronology of European exploration of Asia|vague but increasing]] knowledge of the complex civilizations extant in [[China]] and [[History of India|India]], from which luxury goods (notably [[cotton]] and [[silk]] textiles as well as [[ceramics (art)|ceramics]]) were imported. Although the [[Crusades]] produced relatively little in the way of scholarly interchange, the eruption of the [[Mongol Empire]] had strategic implications for both the [[Crusader kingdoms]] and Europe itself, and led to [[Franco-Mongol alliance|extended diplomatic contacts]]. From the [[Age of Exploration]], European interest in [[Cartography of Asia|mapping Asia]], and especially the sea-routes, became intense, though mostly pursued outside the universities. As European exploration and [[colonisation]] occurred, the distinction between illiterate peoples (i.e. in [[sub-Saharan Africa]] and the [[Americas]]) and the literate cultures of the East became entrenched.
===Renaissance to 1800===
[[Image:Ricci1.jpg|frame|Matteo Ricci (left) and [[Xu Guangqi]] (徐光啟) (right) in the Chinese edition of ''[[Euclid's Elements]]'' (幾何原本) published in 1607.]]
University Oriental studies became systematic during the Renaissance, with the linguistic and religious aspects initially continuing to dominate. There was also a political dimension, as translations for diplomatic purposes were needed, even before the West engaged actively with the East beyond the [[Ottoman Empire]]. A landmark was the publication in Spain in 1514 of the first [[Complutensian Polyglot Bible|Polyglot Bible]], containing the complete existing texts in Hebrew and [[Aramaic]], as well as Greek and Latin. At [[Cambridge University]] there has been a [[Regius Professor of Hebrew]] since 1540 (the fifth oldest regular chair there), and the [[Sir Thomas Adams's Professor of Arabic|chair in Arabic]] was founded in about 1643. Oxford followed for Hebrew in 1546 (both chairs were established by Henry VIII). Distinguished scholars included [[Edmund Castell]], who published his ''Lexicon Heptaglotton Hebraicum, Chaldaicum, Syriacum, Samaritanum, Aethiopicum, Arabicum, et Persicum'' in 1669, whilst some scholars like [[Edward Pococke]] had travelled to the East and wrote also on the modern history and society of Eastern peoples. The [[University of Salamanca]] had Professors of Oriental Languages from at least the 1570s. In France, [[Colbert]] initiated a training programme for "Les Jeunes de langues", young linguists with the diplomatic service, like [[François Pétis de la Croix]], who like his father and his son served as Arabic interpreter to the King. Study of the [[Far East]] was pioneered by missionaries, especially [[Matteo Ricci]] and others in the [[Jesuit China missions]], and missionary motives were to remain important, at least in linguistic studies.
During the eighteenth century Western scholars reached a reasonable basic level of understanding of the geography and most of the history of the region, though knowledge of the areas least accessible to Western travellers, like [[Japan]] and [[Tibet]], and their languages, remained limited. [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] thinkers characterised aspects of the pagan East as superior to the Christian West, in [[Montesquieu]]'s ''Lettres Persanes'' or [[Voltaire]]'s ironic promotion of [[Zoroastrianism]]; others, like [[Edward Gibbon]], praised the relative religious tolerance of the Islamic East as opposed to the intolerant Christian West, and many, including [[Diderot]] and [[Voltaire]], the high social status of scholarship in [[Mandarin (bureaucrat)|Mandarin]] China.
The end of the century saw the beginnings in the great increase in study of the [[archaeology]] of the period, which was to be an ever-more important aspect of the field through the next century. [[Egyptology]] led the way, and as with many other ancient cultures, provided the linguists with new material for decypherment and study.
===Nineteenth century===
[[Image:Kolkata Asiatic Society2.jpg|thumb|250px|right|The old building of the [[Asiatic Society]] in [[Calcutta]], founded by [[William Jones (philologist)|William Jones]] in 1784.]]
With a great increase in knowledge of Asia among Western specialists, increasing political and economic involvement in the region, and in particular the realisation of the existence of [[Indo-European languages|close relations between Indian and European languages]], by [[William Jones (philologist)|William Jones]], there emerged more complex intellectual connections between the early history of Eastern and Western cultures. Some of these developments occurred in the context of Franco–British rivalry for control of India. Liberal economists, such as [[James Mill]], denigrated Eastern civilizations as static and corrupt. [[Karl Marx]] characterised the [[Asiatic mode of production]] as unchanging, because of the economic narrowness of village economies and the State's role in production. [[Oriental despotism]] was generally regarded in Europe as a major factor in the relative failure ro [[progress]] of Eastern societies. The study of Islam was central to the field since the majority of people living in the geographical area termed 'the Orient' were Muslims. Interest in understanding Islam was partly fuelled by economic considerations of growing trade in the Mediterranean region and the changing cultural and intellectual climate of the time. <ref>Zachary Lockman, ''Contending Visions of the Middle East'', Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004:44</ref>
In the course of the century Western archaeology spread across the Middle East and Asia, with spectacular results. The new national museums provided a setting for the finds, most of which were in this period bought back to Europe, and put Orientalists in the public spotlight as never before.
The first, serious European studies of [[Buddhism]] and [[Hinduism]] were by scholars [[Eugene Burnouf]] and [[Max Müller]]. In that time, the academic [[List_of_Islamic_studies_scholars#Orientalists.2FNon-Muslims|study of Islam]] also developed, and, by the mid-nineteenth century, Oriental Studies was a well-established academic discipline in most European counties, especially those with imperial interests in the region. Yet, while scholastic study expanded, so did [[Racism|racist]] attitudes and stereotypes of "inscrutable", "wily" Orientals. Scholarship often was intertwined with prejudicial racist and religious presumptions, <ref>J Go, "'Racism' and Colonialism: Meanings of Difference and Ruling Practice in America's Pacific Empire" in ''Qualitative Sociology' '''27'''.1 (March 2004).</ref> to which the new [[biology|biological sciences]] tended to contribute until the middle of the following century.
===Twentieth century===
The participation in academic studies by scholars from the newly-independent nations of the region itself inevitably changed the nature of studies considerably, with the emergence of [[post-colonial studies]] and [[Subaltern Studies]]. The influence of [[Orientalism]] (in the sense used by Edward Said in his [[Orientalism (book)|book of the same name]]) in scholarship on the Middle East was seen to have re-emerged and risen in prevalence again after the end of the Cold War. It is contended that this was partly a response to "a lacuna" in identity politics in international relations generally, and within the 'West' particularly, which was brought about by the absence of Soviet communism as a global adversary.<ref>Jochen Hippler and Andrea Lueg (eds.), 'The Next Threat: Western Perceptions of Islam' (Pluto Press/The Transnational Institute, London, 1995), p. 1.</ref> The post-Cold War era has been marked by discussions of Islamist terrorism framing views on the extent to which the culture of the Middle East region and Islam, its predominant religion, poses a threat to that of the West. The essence of this debate reflects a presupposition for which Orientalism has been criticised - that the 'Orient' is defined by Islam. Such considerations as these were seen to have occurred in the wider context of the way in which many Western scholars responded to international politics in the post-Cold War world; and they were arguably heightened following the terrorist attacks of September 11th 2001.<ref>Zachary Lockman, 'Contending Visions of the Middle East: the History and Politics of Orientalism' (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004), pp. 223/233.</ref>
Symbolic of this type of response to the end of the [[Cold War]] was the popularisation of the '[[clash of civilisations]]' thesis. This particular idea of a fundamental conflict between East and West was first advanced by [[Bernard Lewis]] in an article entitled "The Roots of Muslim Rage", written in 1990. Again, this was seen as a way of accounting for new forms and lines of division in post-Cold War international society. The 'clash of civilisations' approach involved another characteristic of Orientalist thought; namely, the tendency to see the region as being one, homogenous 'civilisation', rather than as comprising various different and diverse cultures and strands. It was an idea that was taken on more famously by [[Samuel Huntington]] in his 1993 article in [[Foreign Affairs]], called "The Clash of Civilisations?".<ref>Zachary Lockman, 'Contending Visions of the Middle East: the History and Politics of Orientalism' (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004), p. 233.</ref>
=="Orientalism" and Oriental studies==
[[Image:WomenofAlgiers.JPG|thumb|right|300px|''[[The Women of Algiers]]'', 1834, by [[Eugène Delacroix]] is one of the earliest paintings from Western painters in the "[[Eastern world]]".]]
{{main|Orientalism}}
The term ''Orientalism'' has come to acquire negative connotations in some quarters and is interpreted to refer to the study of the East by Westerners shaped by the attitudes of the era of European [[imperialism]] in the 18th and 19th centuries. When used in this sense, it often implies prejudiced, outsider-caricatured interpretations of Eastern cultures and peoples. This viewpoint was most famously articulated and propagated by [[Edward Said]] in ''[[Orientalism (book)|Orientalism]]'' (1978), a critical history of this scholarly tradition. In contrast, the term has also been used by some modern scholars to refer to writers of the Imperialist era who had pro-Eastern attitudes, as opposed to those who saw nothing of value in non-Western cultures.<ref>For example Thomas R. Trautmann in ''Aryans and British India'', 1997, ISBN 0-520-20546-4</ref>
==From "Oriental Studies" to "Asian Studies"==
Like the term ''[[Orient]]'', ''Orientalism'' derives from the Latin word ''oriens'' (rising) and, equally likely, from the Greek word ('he'oros', the direction of the rising sun). "Orient" is the opposite of ''[[Occident]]''. In terms of The [[Old World]], [[Europe]] was considered The [[Occident]] (The West), and its farthest-known extreme [[The Orient]] (The East). Dating from the Roman Empire until the Middle Ages, what is now, in the West, considered 'the [[Middle East]]' was then considered 'the Orient'. However, use of the various terms and senses derived from "Orient" has greatly declined in the twentieth century, not least as trans-Pacific links between Asia and America have grown; nowadays, Asia usually arrives at the USA from the West.
In most [[North America]]n universities, Oriental Studies has now been replaced by [[Asian Studies]] localised to specific regions, such as, [[Middle East]]ern or Near Eastern Studies, [[South Asia]]n studies, and [[East Asia]]n Studies. This reflects the fact that the Orient is not a single, monolithic region but rather a broad area encompassing multiple [[civilisation]]s. The generic concept of Oriental Studies, to its opponents, has lost any use it may have once had and is perceived as obstructing changes in departmental structures to reflect actual patterns of modern scholarship. In many universities, like Chicago, the faculties and institutions have divided; the Biblical languages may be linked with theological institutes, and the study of ancient civilisations in the region may come under a different faculty to studies of modern periods.
In 2007 the Faculty of Oriental Studies at [[Cambridge University]] was renamed the Faculty of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, but Oxford still has its [[Oriental Institute, Oxford|Faculty for Oriental Studies]], as do [[Oriental Institute, Chicago|Chicago]], [[Pontifical Oriental Institute|Rome]], [[School of Oriental and African Studies|London]] (covering African studies also), and [[Oriental Institute|other universities]].
Various explanations for the change to "Asian studies" are offered; a growing number of professional scholars and students of Asian Studies are themselves Asian or from groups of Asian origin (like [[Asian American]]s). This change of labelling may be correlated in some cases to the fact that sensitivity to the term "Oriental" has been heightened in a more [[politically correct]] atmosphere, although it began earlier: Bernard Lewis' own department at [[Princeton University]] was renamed a decade ''before'' Said wrote his book, a detail that Said gets wrong.<ref>[http://etc.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/mfs/05/Companion/near_eastern_studies.html Princeton University, Near Eastern Studies department]</ref> By some, the term "Oriental" has come to be thought offensive to non-Westerners. [[Area studies]] that incorporate not only philological pursuits but [[identity politics]] may also account for the hestitation to use the term "Oriental".
Supporters of "Oriental Studies" counter that the term "[[Asia#Etymology|Asian]]" is just as encompassing as "Oriental," and may well have originally had the same meaning, were it derived from an [[Akkadian language|Akkadian]] word for "East" (a more common derivation is from one or both of two Anatolian proper names.). Replacing one word with another is to confuse historically objectional ''opinions'' about the East with the concept of "the East" itself. The terms Oriental/Eastern and Occidental/Western are both inclusive concepts that usefully identify large-scale cultural differences. Such general concepts do not preclude or deny more specific ones.
==See also==
* [[Europeans in Medieval China]]
* [[Medieval Roman Catholic Missions in China]]
*[[Arabist]]
*[[Area studies]]
*[[Assyriology]]
*[[Egyptology]]
*[[Indology]] (study of India)
*[[Islamism]]
*[[Iranistics]]
*[[Japonism]]
*[[List of Islamic studies scholars]]
**at section 5. "Orientalists/Non-Muslims" appears an annotated list of over 150 western & eastern non-Muslim scholars, often with titles of their writings on Islam.
*[[Middle Eastern studies]]
*[[Oriental Institute]]
*[[Philology]]
*[[Silk Road]]
*[[Sinology]] (study of China)
*[[School of Oriental and African Studies|SOAS]]
*[[Turkology]]
==References==
{{reflist}}
==External links==
===Institutions===
*[http://www.asiatica.org/ Asiatica Association]
*[http://www.soas.ac.uk SOAS: The School of Oriental and African Studies] at the [[University of London]]
*[http://www.orinst.ox.ac.uk/ Faculty of Oriental Studies] at the [[University of Oxford]]
*[http://oi.uchicago.edu/OI/default.html Oriental Institute] of the [[University of Chicago]]
*[http://www.bu.edu/acor/ American Center for Oriental Research]
*[http://www.umich.edu/~aos/ American Oriental Society]
*[http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/orientalclub/ Oriental Club of Philadelphia]
===Resources===
*[http://www.indiran.co.uk/ Ancient Indian & Iran Trust, London UK]
===Articles===
*[http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/cgi-local/DHI/dhi.cgi?id=dv1-48 ''Dictionary of the History of Ideas'':] China in Western Thought and Culture
*[http://depts.washington.edu/uwch/silkroad/texts/hhshu/hou_han_shu.html#sec22 John E. Hill, translation in his e-edition of ''Hou Hanshu'']
* [http://www.geocities.com/martinkramerorg/SaidSplash.htm Edward Said's Splash] The impact of Edward Said's book on Middle Eastern studies, by [[Martin Kramer]].
* [http://campcatatonia.org/article/1555/frontier-orientalism Frontier Orientalism] — an article by Austrian anthropologist [[Andre Gingrich]]
*[http://citizentrack.blogspot.com/2007/04/edward-said-andthe-production-of.html Edward Said and the Production of Knowledge]
*[http://citizentrack.blogspot.com/2007/05/orientalism-as-tool-of-colonialism.html Orientalism as a tool of Colonialism]
*{{CathEncy|wstitle=Oriental Study and Research}}
==Further reading==
* Crawley, William. "Sir William Jones: A vision of Orientalism", ''Asian Affairs'', Vol. 27, Issue 2. (Jun. 1996), pp. 163–176.
* Fleming, K.E. "Orientalism, the Balkans, and Balkan Historiography", ''The American Historical Review'', Vol. 105, No. 4. (Oct., 2000), pp. 1218–1233.
* Halliday, Fred. "'Orientalism' and Its Critics", ''British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies'', Vol. 20, No. 2. (1993), pp. 145–163.
* Irwin, Robert. ''For lust of knowing: The Orientalists and their enemies''. London: Penguin/Allen Lane, 2006 (hardcover, ISBN 0-7139-9415-0). As ''Dangerous Knowledge: Orientalism and Its Discontents''. New York: Overlook Press, 2006 (hardcover, ISBN 1-58567-835-X).
** [http://www.spectator.co.uk/books_pfv.php?id=3226 Reviewed] by Philip Hensher in [http://www.spectator.co.uk/ ''The Spectator''], January 28, 2006.
** [http://arts.telegraph.co.uk/core/Content/displayPrintable.jhtml;jsessionid=0RCNC1ARM0BWJQFIQMFSFGGAVCBQ0IV0?xml=/arts/2006/02/05/boirw05.xml&site=6 Reviewed] by Allan Massie in the [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/ ''Telegraph''], February 4, 2006.
** [http://www.newstatesman.com/Bookshop/200602130032 Reviewed] by Terry Eagleton in the [http://www.newstatesman.com/ ''New Statesman''], February 13, 2006.
** [http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/books/reviews/article347902.ece Reviewed] by Bill Saunders in [http://www.independent.co.uk/ ''The Independent''], February 26, 2006.
** [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2006/02/26/boirw19.xml Reviewed] by Noel Malcolm in [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/ ''The Telegraph''], February 26, 2006.
** [http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n11/jasa01_.html Reviewed] by Maya Jasanoff in the [http://www.lrb.co.uk/ ''London Review of Books''], June 8, 2006.
** [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/01/books/01grim.html?ex=1163394000&en=b2e925d36504c43c&ei=5070 Reviewed] by William Grimes in the [http://www.nytimes.com/ ''New York Times''], November 1, 2006.
** [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/09/AR2006110901770.html Reviewed] by Michael Dirda in [http://www.washingtonpost.com/ ''The Washington Post''], November 12, 2006.
** [http://bostonreview.net/BR32.1/rosen.html Reviewed] by Lawrence Rosen in the [http://bostonreview.net/ ''Boston Review''], January/February 2007.
* Klein, Christina. ''Cold War Orientalism: Asia in the Middlebrow Imagination, 1945–1961''. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003 (hardcover, ISBN 0-520-22469-8; paperback, ISBN 0-520-23230-5).
* Knight, Nathaniel. "Grigor'ev in Orenburg, 1851–1862: Russian Orientalism in the Service of Empire?", ''[[Slavic Review]]'', Vol. 59, No. 1. (Spring, 2000), pp. 74–100.
* Kontje, Todd. ''German Orientalisms''. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2004 (ISBN 0-472-11392-5).
* Little, Douglas. ''American Orientalism: The United States and the Middle East Since 1945''. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2001 (hardcover, ISBN 0-8078-2737-1); 2002 (paperback, ISBN 0-8078-5539-1); London: I.B. Tauris, 2002 (new ed., hardcover, ISBN 1-86064-889-4).
* Murti, Kamakshi P. ''India: The Seductive and Seduced "Other" of German Orientalism''. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2001 (hardcover, ISBN 0-313-30857-8).
* ''Noble dreams, wicked pleasures: Orientalism in America, 1870–1930'' by Holly Edwards (Editor). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000 (hardcover, ISBN 0-691-05003-1; paperback, ISBN 0-691-05004-X).
[[Category:Asian studies]]
[[Category:Area studies]]
[[Category:Interdisciplinary fields]]
[[cs:Orientalistika]]
[[de:Orientalistik]]
[[et:Orientalistika]]
[[eo:Orientalistiko]]
[[fa:شرقشناسی]]
[[ka:აღმოსავლეთმცოდნეობა]]
[[nl:Oriëntalistiek]]
[[pl:Orientalistyka]]
[[simple:Oriental studies]]
[[sk:Orientalistika]]
[[sv:Orientalistik]]