Pet cloning
1321047
223334450
2008-07-03T16:53:04Z
Geniac
1839933
Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/82.30.232.107|82.30.232.107]] ([[User talk:82.30.232.107|talk]]) to last version by Tarynvoget
'''Pet cloning''' is the [[commerce| commercial]] [[cloning]] of a [[pet]] [[animal]]. The first commercially cloned pet was a cat named [[Little Nicky (cat)| Little Nicky]], produced in 2004 by [[Genetic Savings & Clone]] for a north [[Texas]] woman for the fee of [[USD| US$]]50,000. On May 21, 2008 [http://www.bioarts.com BioArts International] announced a limited commercial dog cloning service through a program it calls [http://www.bestfriendsagain.com Best Friends Again]. This program came on the announcement of the successful cloning of a family dog Missy, which was widely publicized in the [[Missyplicity]] Project.
Science fiction depictions of cloning often create the impression that clones emerge full-grown from machines, are indistinguishable from their predecessors, and have even had their predecessors' minds "downloaded" into them. However, while an animal clone has the same genes as its genetic donor, behavior is influenced by [[nature versus nurture| environment and experience as well as by genetics]]. The behavior of an animal clone and its genetic donor will therefore be no more similar than the behavior of identical twins.
== Controversy ==
Some critics accuse pet cloning proponents of encouraging prospective pet cloning clients to falsely expect that their new pets will be indistinguishable from their old pets.
Commercial cloning has been decried by the [[Humane Society]] and some other [[animal welfare]] groups, which argue that it is unethical for people to obtain pets through commercial sources when so many [[Overpopulation (animals)#Pet overpopulation| homeless pets]] languish in [[animal shelter| shelters]] or live on the streets, and that the money spent on pet cloning would be better spent on the vaccination and care of those animals. Critics also argue that cloning attempts have high rates of failure, that animals involved in cloning research are likely to suffer, that clones may have serious health problems in later life, and that pet cloning is a [[slippery slope]] to [[human cloning]].
Defenders of pet cloning argue that pet cloning does not contribute to pet homelessness, the animals involved are treated humanely, it makes people happy, there is a [[free market| demand for it]], it will contribute to [[science| scientific]], veterinary, and medical knowledge, and it will help efforts to preserve endangered cousins of the cat and dog.
In [[2005]], [[California]] Assembly Member Lloyd Levine introduced a bill to ban the sale or transfer of pet clones in California. However, it was voted down.
==External Links==
*[http://www.bestfriendsagain.com Best Friends Again dog cloning service]
*[http://www.bioarts.com BioArts International - the company who cloned Missy and who offers commercial dog cloning service]
[[Category:Pets]]