Remote viewing 155045 226081342 2008-07-16T19:13:52Z JzG 760284 Not lauded by skeptics, mind... {{Paranormal}} '''Remote Viewing (RV)''' refers to the attempt to gather information about a distant or unseen target using paranormal means or [[extra-sensory perception]]. Typically a remote viewer is expected to give information about an object that is hidden from physical view and separated at some distance.<ref>{{citebook|title=Anomalistic psychology: a study of magical thinking|author=Leonard Zusne, Warren H. Jones||year=1989|publisher=Lawrence Erlbaum Associates|pages=167|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=b39Udl6qY30C&pg=PA167&dq=paranormal%22Remote+viewing%22+-Wikipedia&lr=&as_brr=3&sig=Psg_vVaJi1L3Y-u2vqa2qJqJ9bo|id=ISBN 0805805087}}</ref><ref>''Search for the Soul'' by Milbourne Christopher, Thomas Y. Crowell, 1979 </ref><ref>''Kiss the Earth Good-bye: Adventures and Discoveries in the Nonmaterial, Recounted by the Man who has Astounded Physicists and Parapsychologists Throughout the World'' by Ingo Swann, Hawthorne Books, 1975</ref> The term was introduced by [[parapsychologists]] [[Russell Targ]] and [[Harold Puthoff]] in 1974.<ref>http://parapsych.org/glossary_l_r.html#r Parapsychological Association website, Glossary of Key Words Frequently Used in Parapsychology, Retrieved [[January 8]] [[2006]]</ref> Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s, following the declassification of documents related to the [[Stargate Project]], a 20 million dollar research program sponsored by the U.S. Federal Government to determine any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was terminated in 1995, citing a lack of documented evidence that the program had any value to the intelligence community.<ref name="Time" /> One of the early experiments was lauded by proponents as having improved the methodology of remote viewing testing and as raising future experimental standards, but also criticized as leaking information to the participants by inadvertently leaving clues. <ref name="wiseman_may">{{cite journal | journal = [[Journal of Parapsychology]] | url = http://www.richardwiseman.com/resources/SAICreply.pdf | format = PDF | title = Experiment one of the SAIC remote viewing program: A critical re-evaluation. A reply to May. | author = Wiseman, R. & Milton, J. | pages = 3-14 | issue = 1 | volume = 63 | year = 1999 | accessdate = 2008-06-26 }}<br>* Obtained from [http://www.richardwiseman.com/research/papers.html listing of research papers on Wiseman's website]</ref> Some later experiments had negative results when these clues were eliminated. <ref name="randi_encyclopedia">[http://www.randi.org/encyclopedia/remote%20viewing.html Randi & Clarke], An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult and Supernatural "Remote viewing" definition "The data of Puthoff and Targ were reexamined by the other researchers, and it was found that their students were able to solve the locations without use of any psychic powers, using only the clues that had inadvertently been included in the Puthoff and Targ transcripts."</ref> Remote viewing, like other forms of extra-sensory perception, is generally considered as pseudoscience <ref name="heretical">{{cite book |url = http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/1994/PV1994_4003.pdf | title = Heretical science - Beyond the boundaries of pathological science | work = IN:Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, 29th, Monterey, CA, Aug 7-11, 1994, Technical Papers. Pt. 3 (A94-31838 10-44) | author = Bennett, Gary L. (NASA, Washington, DC) | publisher = American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics | location = Washington, DC | year = 1994 | pages = 1207-1212 | ISBN = AIAA-1994-4003 }}</ref> due to the need to overcome fundamental ideas about causality, time, and other principles currently held by the scientific community, and the lack of a positive theory that explains the outcomes.<ref name="Gardner" /><ref name="hyman_si">"What seems clear is that the scientific community is not going to abandon its fundamental ideas about causality, time, and other principles on the basis of a handful of experiments whose findings have yet to be shown to be replicable and lawful." - Ray Hyman, [http://www.csicop.org/si/9603/claims.html ''The Evidence for Psychic Functioning: Claims vs. Reality''] ''[[Skeptical Inquirer]]'', March/April 1996 </ref><ref name="wiseman_one">{{cite journal | journal = [[Journal of Parapsychology]] | url = http://www.richardwiseman.com/resources/SAICcrit.pdf | format = PDF | title = Experiment One of the SAIC Remote Viewing Program: A critical reevaluation | author = Wiseman, R. & Milton, J. | pages = 297–308 | issue = 4 | volume = 62 | year = 1999 | accessdate = 2008-06-26 }}<br>* Obtained from [http://www.richardwiseman.com/research/papers.html listing of research papers on Wiseman's website]</ref> ==History== From World War II until the 1970s the US government occasionally funded ESP research. When the US intelligence community learned that the USSR and China were conducting ESP research, it became receptive to the idea of having its own competing psi research program. (Schnabel 1997) ===Early Stanford Research Institute experiments=== In 1972 [[Stanford Research Institute]] (SRI) laser physicist [[Hal Puthoff]] tested remote viewer [[Ingo Swann]], and the experiment led to a visit from two employees of the CIA's Directorate of Science and Technology. The result was a $50,000 CIA-sponsored project. (Schnabel 1997, Puthoff 1996, Kress 1977/1999, Smith 2005) As research continued, the SRI team published papers in ''Nature'' (Targ & Puthoff, 1974), in ''Proceedings of the IEEE'' (Puthoff & Targ, 1976), and in the proceedings of a symposium on consciousness for the American Association for the Advancement of Science (Puthoff, ''et al'', 1981). The initial CIA-funded project was later renewed and expanded. A number of CIA officials including John McMahon, then the head of the Office of Technical Service and later the Agency's deputy director, became strong supporters of the program. By the mid 1970s, facing the post-Watergate revelations of its "skeletons," and after internal criticism of the program, the CIA dropped sponsorship of the SRI research effort. Sponsorship was picked up by the Air Force, led by analyst Dale E. Graff of the Foreign Technology Division. In 1979, the Army's Intelligence and Security Command, which had been providing some taskings to the SRI investigators, was ordered to develop its own program by the Army's chief intelligence officer, Gen. Ed Thompson. CIA operations officers, working from McMahon's office and other offices, also continued to provide taskings to SRI's subjects. (Schnabel 1997, Smith 2005, Atwater 2001) The program had three parts (Mumford, ''et al'', 1995). First was the evaluation of psi research performed by the U.S.S.R. and China, which appears to have been better-funded and better-supported than the government research in the U.S. (Schnabel 1997) In the second part of the program, SRI managed its own stable of "natural" psychics both for research purposes and to make them available for tasking by a variety of US intelligence agencies. The most famous results from these years were [[Pat Price (remote viewer)|Pat Price]]'s description of a big crane at a Soviet nuclear research facility (Kress 1977/199, Targ 1996), a description of a new class of Soviet strategic submarine by a team of three viewers including [[Joseph McMoneagle]],(Smith 2005, McMoneagle 2002) and Rosemary Smith's <ref> ''Reading the Enemy's Mind: Inside Star Gate, America's Psychic Espionage Program'' by Paul H. Smith, Tom Doherty, 2005, p.100 </ref> location of a downed Soviet bomber in Africa (which former President Carter later referred to in speeches). By the early 1980s numerous offices throughout the intelligence community were providing taskings to SRI's psychics. (Schnabel 1997, Smith 2005) The third branch of the program was a research project intended to find out if ESP – now called "remote viewing" – could be made accurate and reliable. The intelligence community offices that tasked the group seemed to believe that the phenomenon was real. But in the view of these taskers, a remote viewer could be "on" one day and "off" the next, a fact that made it hard for the technique to be officially accepted. Through SRI, individuals were studied for years in a search for physical (e.g., brain-wave) correlates that might reveal when they were "on- or off-target". At SRI, Ingo Swann and Hal Puthoff also developed a remote-viewing training program meant to enable any individual with a suitable background to produce useful data. As part of this project, a number of military officers and civilians were trained and formed a military remote viewing unit, based at Fort Meade, Maryland. (Schnabel 1997, Smith 2005, McMoneagle 2002) ===Decline and termination=== A struggle between unbelievers and believers in the sponsor organizations provided much of the program's actual drama. Each side seems to have been utterly convinced that the other's views were wrong. (Schnabel 1997, Smith 2005) In the early 1990s the Military Intelligence Board, chaired by DIA chief Soyster, appointed an Army Colonel, William Johnson, to manage the remote viewing unit and evaluate its objective usefulness. According to an account by former SRI-trained remote-viewer, Paul Smith (2005), Johnson spent several months running the remote viewing unit against military and DEA targets, and ended up a believer, not only in remote viewing's validity as a phenomenon but in its usefulness as an intelligence tool. After the Democrats lost control of the Senate in late 1994, funding declined and the program went into decline. The project was transferred out of DIA to the [[CIA]] in 1995, with the promise that it would be evaluated there, but most participants in the program believed that it would be terminated. (Schnabel 1997, Smith 2005, Mumford, ''et al'' 1995) ===AIR evaluation of remote viewing=== In 1995, the CIA hired the American Institutes for Research, a perennial intelligence-industry contractor, to perform a retrospective evaluation of the results generated by the remote-viewing program, the [[Stargate Project]]. Most of the program's results were not seen by the evaluators, with the report focusing on the most recent experiments, and only from government-sponsored research.<ref>May, E.C., “The American Institutes for Research Review of the Department of Defense's STAR GATE Program: A Commentary”, The Journal of Parapsychology. 60, pp 3-23, March 1996</ref> One of the reviewers was [[Ray Hyman]], a long-time critic of psi research, and another was [[Jessica Utts]] who, as a supporter of psi, was chosen to put forward the pro-psi argument. Utts maintained that there had been a [[statistically significant]] positive effect,<ref>[http://anson.ucdavis.edu/~utts/air2.html An assessment of the evidence for psychic functioning] Julia Utts</ref> with some subjects scoring 5%-15% above chance.<ref name=psiland/> Hyman argued that Utts' conclusion that ESP had been proven to exist, "is premature, to say the least."<ref name=HymanAbstract>{{cite web |last=Hyman |first=Ray |authorlink= |title=Evaluation of a Program on Anomalous Mental Phenomena |work=Journal of Society for Scientific Exploration Volume 10: Number 1: Article 2 |publisher=Society for Scientific Exploration |date= |url=http://www.scientificexploration.org/jse/abstracts/v10n1a2.php |accessdate=2008-06-24}}</ref> Hyman said the findings had yet to be replicated independently, and that more investigation would be necessary to "legitimately claim the existence of paranormal functioning."<ref name=HymanAbstract /> Based upon the study, which recommended a higher level of critical research and tighter controls, the CIA terminated the 20 million dollar project in 1995.<ref name="Time"> ''Time'' magazine, [[11 December]] [[1995]], p.45, ''[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,983829,00.html The Vision Thing]'' by Douglas Waller, Washington</ref> ''Time'' magazine stated in 1995 three full-time psychics were still working on a $500,000-a-year budget out of Fort Meade, Maryland, which would soon be shut down.<ref name="Time" /> According to the official AIR report there was insufficient evidence of the utility of the intelligence data produced. David Goslin, of the American Institute for Research said, "There's no documented evidence it had any value to the intelligence community."<ref name="Time" /> ===PEAR's Remote Perception program=== Following Utts' emphasis on replication and Hyman's challenge on interlaboratory consistency in the American Institutes for Research report, the [[Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Lab]] conducted several hundred trials to see if they could replicate the SAIC and [[Science Applications International Corporation|SRI]] experiments. They created an analytical judgment methodology to replace the human judging process that was criticized in past experiments. They felt the results of the experiments were consistent with the SRI experiments.<ref>{{cite journal | url = http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/pdfs/jse_papers/9PRP%20i0892-3310-010-01-0109.pdf | journal = [[Journal of Scientific Exploration]] | publisher = [[Society for Scientific Exploration]] | volume = 10 | issue = 1 | pages = 109–110 | year = 1996 | title = Precognitive Remote Perception: Replication of Remote Viewing | coauthors = R. D. NELSON, B. J. DUNNE, Y. H. DOBYNS, R. G. JAHN | accessdate = 2008-06-02 }}</ref> ===Distant viewing and Stephan Schwartz=== Parallel with the work at SRI, Stephan A. Schwartz, who had just left government as Special Assistant to the US Chief of Naval Operations, developed almost the same protocol which he called Distant Viewing.<ref>[http://www.iskenderiye.com/story/stephan-a-schwartz/ Stephan A. Schwartz<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> To study this, he began a research laboratory known as Mobius. A central question in the seminal IEEE paper (Puthoff & Targ, 1976) was whether RV was electromagnetic in nature, or something else. Schwartz had begun to consider how this might be studied in 1973, after reading the work of Soviet Academician Leonid Vasiliev, the tutor for Russian psychic [[Nina Kulagina]].<ref>http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:srDADU4mSi8J:www.uri-geller.com/potm27.htm+leonid+vasiliev+pk&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us </ref> This work had eliminated all of the EM spectrum except for very low frequency ranges, known as [[Extremely low frequency|ELF]]. Testing in the ELF range required a submarine, because the only shield for ELF is hundreds of feet of seawater. In 1976 Schwartz was offered the use of a small submersible, capable of the depth required, by University of Southern California Institute for Marine and Coastal Studies. In 1977, as the experiment was about to go to sea, he invited SRI to assist in the study. The Project, known as Deep Quest, was carried out with logistical support from the USC Institute. It took place off of [[Santa Catalina Island, California|Santa Catalina Island]]. Two remote viewings, one by Hella Hammid,<ref>http://www.biomindsuperpowers.com/Pages/rvandlayers.html Ingo Swann describes Hella Hammid's RV abilities and the RV process</ref> and one by [[Ingo Swann]], described where target individuals were hiding in California. Both sessions were conducted while the submarine was at depth, and both were considered successful by the researchers. The targets were, respectively, a tree and a shopping mall. Swann commented his site "could be City Hall."<ref> ''The Mind Race: Understanding and Using Psychic Abilities'' by Russell Trag and Keith Harary, Villard Books, 1984, pages 40 & 50</ref> The experiment also tested a protocol Schwartz had devised involving five multiple viewers.<ref>"Both the research and applications fail to statically support a reality that multiple viewers increase the amount or the degree of accuracy about a specific target." ''The Ultimate Time Machine'' by Joseph McMoneagle, Hampton Roads Publishing Co.,Inc.,1998, p.30</ref> Four were given charts of the Pacific ocean and were asked to locate an unknown wreck on the seafloor. They chose as their location a 10 mile square area near Santa Catalina.<ref> ''Psychic Powers: Mysteries of the Unknown'' edited by Henry Anatole Greenwald, Consultants: Stephan A. Schwartz, Marcello Truzzi, and James G. Matlock, archivist of the ASPR library, Time-Life Books, 1987, p.124 </ref> The sunken vessel was determined by the Bureau of Land Management Marine Sites Board to be previously unknown. A documentary was shot as the events took place of the entire project was made.(Schwartz, 1977, 2007){{Fact|date=September 2007}} But the riches which Schwartz and his investors have sought in their many undersea expeditions have never been found.<ref> ''The Blue Sense: Psychic Detectives and Crime'' by Arthur Lyons and Marcello Truzzi, Ph.D., The Mysterious Press, 1991, pp 76 & 77</ref> The ship Schwartz's team found on the Bahamas Banks was carrying molasses, not the treasure that was their goal.<ref> ''Parapsychology: The Controversial Science'' by Richard S. Broughton, Ph.D., Ballantine books, 1991, p.338</ref> Schwartz also claims he was involved in the discovery and the first modern mapping of the Eastern Harbor of Alexandria and the discovery of numerous shipwrecks as well as Mark Anthony's palace in Alexandria, the Ptolemaic Palace Complex of Cleopatra, and the remains of the Lighthouse of Pharos. Much of this was discounted by two on-site Egyptian scholars whom Schwartz had listed as research associates, Dr. Shehetta Adam, head of Egypt's Department of Antiquities and Dr. Mostafa El Abbadi.<ref>''The Blue Sense: Psychic Detectives and Crime'' by Arthur Lyons and Marcello Truzzi, Ph.D., The Mysterious Press, 1991, p.77</ref> ==Scientific analysis== {{Infobox Pseudoscience |topics=[[Physics]], [[Biology]], [[Psychology]] |claims=Certain people have the [[paranormal]] ability to use their minds to see hidden, distant locations using the psychic powers of [[extra-sensory perception]]. |origyear=1974 |origprop= [[Russell Targ]] and [[Harold Puthoff]] |currentprop=[[Ingo Swann]], [[Russell Targ]], [[Joseph McMoneagle]], and [[Courtney Brown (researcher)|Courtney Brown]] }} According to psychologist [[David Marks (psychologist)|David Marks]] in experiments conducted in the 1970s at the [[Stanford Research Institute]], the notes given to the judges contained clues as to which order they were carried out, such as referring to yesterday's two targets, or they had the date of the session written at the top of the page. Dr. Marks concluded that these clues were the reason for the experiment's high hit rates.<ref>Marks, D.F. & Kammann, R. (1978). "Information transmission in remote viewing experiments", Nature, 274:680-81.</ref><ref>[http://www.nap.edu/books/POD276/html/647.html "A comprehensive review of major empirical studies in parapsychology involving random event generators or remote viewing"] by Alcock, J.</ref> Marks has also suggested that the participants of remote viewing experiments are influenced by [[subjective validation]], a process through which correspondences are perceived between stimuli that are in fact associated purely randomly.<ref>Marks, D.F. (2000). The Psychology of the Psychic. Amherst, New York:Prometheus Books.</ref> Details and transcripts of the SRI remote viewing experiments themselves were found to be edited and even unattainable. <ref>"The Psychology of the Psychic" by David Marks and Richard Kamman, Prometheus Books. Amherst, New York, 2000, 2nd edition. <br>* note: 1st edition, 1980, does not contain all of this information<br>* Book review of 2nd edition: {{cite journal | journal = [[Skeptical Inquirer]] | title = Even better the second time 'round. . - book review | url = http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2843/is_1_26/ai_80924586 | date = Jan-Feb, 2002 | author = James Alcock | accessdate = 2008-06-26 }}</ref><ref>''Flim Flam'' by James Randi, Prometheus books, New York, 1987, 9th printing</ref> Others have said that the information from remote viewing sessions can be vague and include a lot of erroneous data.<ref name="psiland"/> A [[1995]] report for the American Institute for Research contains a section of anonymous reports describing how remote viewing was tentatively used in a number of operational situations. The three reports conclude that the data was too vague to be of any use, and in the report that offers the most positive results the writer notes that the viewers "had some knowledge of the target organizations and their operations but not the background of the particular tasking at hand."<ref name="psiland">"An Evaluation of Remote Viewing: Research and Applications" by Mumford, Rose and Goslin</ref> According to [[James Randi]], controlled tests by several other researchers, eliminating several sources of cuing and extraneous evidence present in the original tests, produced negative results. Students were also able to solve Puthoff and Targ's locations from the clues that had inadvertently been included in the transcripts.<ref>[http://www.randi.org/encyclopedia/remote%20viewing.html Remote viewing] at the Randi Educational Foundation</ref> Professor [[Richard Wiseman]], a psychologist at the University of Hertfordshire and a fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI) has said that he agrees remote viewing has been proven using the normal standards of science, but that the bar of evidence needs to be much higher for outlandish claims that will revolutionise the world, and thus he remains unconvinced:<ref name="dailymail"> {{cite web | url = http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=510762&in_page_id=1770 | title = Could there be proof to the theory that we're ALL psychic? | author = Penman, Danny | coauthors = | year = [[January 28]] [[2008]] | accessdate = 2008-01-29 | format = html | work = Daily Mail UK | pages =28-29 | quote = }}</ref> {{Quote|1="I agree that by the standards of any other area of science that remote viewing is proven, but begs the question: do we need higher standards of evidence when we study the paranormal? I think we do. (...) if I said that a UFO had just landed, you'd probably want a lot more evidence. Because remote viewing is such an outlandish claim that will revolutionise the world, we need overwhelming evidence before we draw any conclusions. Right now we don't have that evidence." Richard Wiseman ''Daily Mail'', [[January 28]] [[2008]], pp 28-29 <ref name="dailymail" />}} Wiseman also pointed at several problems with one of the early experiments at SAIC, like information leakage. However, he indicated the importance of its process-oriented approach and of its refining of remote viewing methodology, which meant that researchers replicating their work could avoid these problems. <ref name="wiseman_one" /> Wiseman later insisted there were multiple opportunities for participants on that experiment to be influenced by inadverted cues and that these cues can inluence the results when they appear. <ref name="wiseman_may" /> Psychologist [[Ray Hyman]] says that, even if the results were reproduced under specified conditions, they would still not be a conclusive demonstration of the existance of physic functioning. He blames this on the reliance on a negative outcome -- the claims on ESP are based on the results of experiments not being explained by normal means. He says that the experiments lack a positive theory that guides as to what to control on them and what to ignore, and that "Parapsychologists have not come close to (having a positive theory) as yet". <ref name="hyman_positive">"Because even if Utts and her colleagues are correct and we were to find that we could reproduce the findings under specified conditions, this would still be a far cry from concluding that psychic functioning has been demonstrated. This is because the current claim is based entirely upon a negative outcome -- the sole basis for arguing for ESP is that extra-chance results can be obtained that apparently cannot be explained by normal means. But an infinite variety of normal possibilities exist and it is not clear than one can control for all of them in a single experiment. You need a positive theory to guide you as to what needs to be controlled, and what can be ignored. Parapsychologists have not come close to this as yet." - Ray Hyman, ''The Evidence for Psychic Functioning: Claims vs. Reality'' ''[[Skeptical Inquirer]]'', March/April 1996 [http://www.csicop.org/si/9603/claims.html]</ref> Ray Himan also says that the amount and quality of the experiments on RV are way too low to convince the scientific community to "abandon its fundamental ideas about causality, time, and other principles", due to its findings still not having been replicated successfully under careful scrutiny. <ref name="hyman_si" /> Science writer [[Martin Gardner]], and others, describe the topic of remote viewing as [[pseudoscience]]. <ref name="heretical" /> Gardner says that founding researcher [[Harold Puthoff]] was an active [[Scientologist]] prior to his work at [[Stanford University]], and that this influenced his research at SRI. In 1970, the [[Church of Scientology]] published a notarized letter that had been written by Puthoff while he was conducting research on remote viewing at Stanford. The letter read, in part: "Although critics viewing the system [Scientology] from the outside may form the impression that Scientology is just another of many quasi-educational quasi-religious 'schemes,' it is in fact a highly sophistical and highly technological system more characteristic of modern corporate planning and applied technology."<ref name="Gardner">Gardner, Martin, ''Did Adam and Eve Have Navels?: Debunking Pseudoscience'' ISBN 0393322386</ref> Among some of the ideas that Puthoff supported regarding remote viewing was the claim that two followers of [[Madame Blavatsky]], founder of [[theosophy]], were able to remote-view the inner structure of atoms.<ref name="Gardner" /> ==Selected RV study participants== * [[Ingo Swann]], one of the founders of remote viewing * [[Pat Price (remote viewer)|Pat Price]], one of the early remote viewers * [[Russell Targ]], cofounder of the Stanford Research Institute's investigation into psychic abilities in the 1970s and 1980s * [[Joseph McMoneagle]], one of the early remote viewers.<ref> ''Mind Trek: Exploring Consciousness, Time, and Space Through Remote Viewing'' by Joseph McMoneagle, Hampton Roads, Publishing Co., Inc., 1997</ref> See: [[Stargate Project]] * [[Courtney Brown (researcher)|Courtney Brown]], founder of the Farsight Institute *[[David Marks (psychologist)|David Marks]], the critic of remote viewing, after finding sensory cues and editing in the original transcripts generated by Russell Targ and Hal Puthoff at Stanford Research Institute in the 1970s ==Notes== *David Marks, Ph.D., "The Psychology of the Psychic (2nd edn.)" Prometheus Books, 2000. ISBN 1-57392-798-8 *Courtney Brown, Ph.D., ''Remote Viewing : The Science and Theory of Nonphysical Perception''. Farsight Press, 2005. ISBN 0-9766762-1-4 *David Morehouse, ''Psychic Warrior'', St. Martin's, 1996, ISBN 0-312-96413-7 *Jim Schnabel, ''Remote Viewers: The Secret History of America's Psychic Spies'', Dell, 1997 , ISBN 0-440-22306-7 *Paul H. Smith, ''Reading the Enemy's Mind: Inside Star Gate -- America's Psychic Espionage Program'', Forge, 2005, ISBN 0-312-87515-0 * [[Jon Ronson|Ronson, Jon]], ''The Men who Stare at Goats,'' Picador, 2004, ISBN 0-330-37547-4, written to accompany the TV series ''The Crazy Rulers of the World'' [http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6708686897899858973]The military budget cuts after Vietnam and how it all began. *Paolini, Christopher ''Eragon'' & ''Eldest'' Knopf publishing, 1989 ISBN 0-432-2191-5 *Buchanan, Lyn, ''The Seventh Sense: The Secrets Of Remote Viewing As Told By A "Psychic Spy" For The U.S. Military'', ISBN 0-7434-6268-8 *F. Holmes Atwater, ''Captain of My Ship, Master of My Soul: Living with Guidance'', Hampton Roads 2001, ISBN 1-57174-247-6 *McMoneagle, Joseph, ''The Stargate Chronicles: Memoirs of a Psychic Spy'', Hampton Roads 2002, ISBN 1-57174-225-5 ==References== {{reflist|2}} ==External links== *[http://www.forteantimes.com/articles/186_monroe1.shtml Fortean Times visits the Monroe Institute, a remote viewing laboratory] *[http://www.csicop.org/sb/9606/remote_viewing.html Scientific Remote Viewing] *[http://skepdic.com/remotevw.html the Skeptics Dictionary entry on Remote Viewing] *[http://www.skeptiko.com/index.php?id=14 Interview with remote viewer and researcher, Stephan A. Schwartz] *Freedom of Information Act - Study of Remote Viewing for U.K. Ministry of Defence 2001-2002[http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/FreedomOfInformation/DisclosureLog/SearchDisclosureLog/RemoteViewing.htm] {{Parapsychology}} [[Category:New Age]] [[Category:Psychic powers]] [[Category:Parapsychology]] [[Category:Remote viewing| ]] [[Category:Pseudoscience]] [[ar:الرؤية عن بعد]] [[de:Fernwahrnehmung]] [[et:Kaugtunnetus]] [[fr:Vision à distance]] [[hr:Kontrolirana jasnovidnost]] [[ja:透視]] [[pt:Visão Remota]] [[sv:Fjärrsyn]]