Sothic cycle 985583 214890611 2008-05-25T19:41:30Z 78.137.134.236 The '''Sothic cycle''' or '''Canicular period''' is a period of 1461 [[ancient Egypt]]ian years (of 365 days each) or 1460 [[Julian calendar|Julian]] years (averaging 365.25 days each). During a Sothic cycle, the 365-day year loses enough time that the start of the year once again coincides with the [[heliacal rising]] of the star [[Sirius]] (the [[Latin]] name for a star called [[Sothis]] in [[Greek language|Greek]], deified by the Egyptians as [[Sopdet]]; a single year between heliacal risings of Sothis is a '''Sothic year'''). This rising occurred within a month or so of the beginning of the [[Nile]] flood, and was a matter of primary importance to this [[agricultural]] society. It is believed that Ancient Egyptians followed both a 365-day civil calendar and a lunar religious calendar. ==Mechanics and discovery== The ancient Egyptian civil year was 365 days long, and apparently did not have any [[intercalary]] days added to keep it in alignment with the Sothic year, a kind of [[sidereal year]]. Normally, a sidereal year is considered to be 365.25636 days long, but that only applies to stars on the [[ecliptic]], or the apparent path of the [[Sun]]. Because Sirius is not on the ecliptic, the wobbling of the celestial equator and hence of the horizon at the latitude of Egypt causes the Sothic year to be slightly smaller. Indeed, it is almost exactly 365.25 days long, the average number of days in a Julian year. This cycle was first noticed by [[Eduard Meyer]] in 1904, who then carefully combed known Egyptian inscriptions and written materials to find any mention of the calendar dates when Sirius rose. He found six of them, on which the dates of much of the conventional chronology are based. A heliacal rise of Sirius was recorded by [[Censorinus]] as having happened on the Egyptian new year's day, between AD 139 and 142<ref name=Kitchen>Kitchen, K. A. ''The Chronology of Ancient Egypt.'' p.205. World Archaeology, Vol. 23, No. 2 (October 1991).</ref> This correlates the Egyptian calendar to the Julian calendar. Thus he was able to compare the day on which Sothis rose in the Egyptian calendar to the day on which Sothis ought to have risen in the Julian calendar, count the number of intercalary days needed, and determine how many years were between the beginning of a cycle and the observation. One also needs to know the place of observation, since the latitude of the observation changes the day when the heliacal rising of Sirius occurs, and mislocating an observation can potentially change the resulting chronology by several decades.<ref name=Kitchen/> Meyer concluded from an ivory tablet from the reign of [[Djer]] that the Egyptian civil calendar was created in [[5th millennium BC|4241 BC]],<ref>[http://www.specialtyinterests.net/sothic_star.html Sothic Dating Examined by Damien F. Mackey]</ref> a date that appears in a number of old books. But research and discoveries have since shown that the [[first dynasty of Egypt]] did not begin before c.[[4th millennium BC|3100 BC]], and the claim that 4241 BC is the "earliest fixed date" has since been discredited. Most scholars either move the observation upon which he based this forward by one cycle of Sothis to 2781, or reject the assumption that the document in question indicates a rise of Sothis at all.<ref name=Grimal>Grimal, Nicolas. ''A History of Ancient Egypt.'' p.52. Librairie Arthéme Fayard, 1988.</ref> ==Chronological interpretation== Three specific observations of the heliacal rise of Sirius are extremely important for Egyptian chronology. The first is the aforementioned ivory tablet from the reign of [[Djer]] which supposedly indicates the beginning of a Sothic cycle, the rising of Sothis on the same day as the new year. If this does indicate the beginning of a Sothic cycle, it must date to about 2773 BC.<ref>Grimal, Nicolas. ''A History of Ancient Egypt.'' p.51. Librairie Arthéme Fayard, 1988.</ref> However, this date is too late for Djer's reign, so many scholars believe that it indicates a correlation between the rising of Sothis and the lunar calendar, instead of the solar calendar, which would render the tablet essentially devoid of chronological value.<ref name=Grimal/> The second observation is clearly a reference to a heliacal rising, and is believed to date to the seventh year of [[Senusret III]]. This observation was almost certainly made at [[Itj-Tawy]], the Twelfth Dynasty capital, which would date the Twelfth Dynasty from 1963 to 1786 BC.<ref name=Kitchen/> The third observation was in the reign of [[Amenhotep I]], and, assuming it was made in Thebes, dates his reign between 1525 and 1504 BC. If made in Memphis, Heliopolis, or some other Delta site instead, as a minority of scholars still argue, the entire chronology of the Eighteenth dynasty needs to be expanded by some 20 years.<ref>Grimal, Nicolas. ''A History of Ancient Egypt.'' p.202. Librairie Arthéme Fayard, 1988.</ref> ==Problems and criticisms== Determining the date of a heliacal rise of Sothis has been shown to be difficult, especially considering the need to know the exact latitude of the observation.<ref name=Kitchen/> Another problem is that due to the fact that the Egyptian calendar loses one day every four years, a heliacal rise will take place on the same day for four years in a row, and any observation of that rise can date to any of those four years, making the observation not extremely precise.<ref name=Kitchen/> A number of criticisms have been leveled against the reliability of dating by the Sothic cycle. Some are serious enough to warrant consideration (for example, was the civil calendar unchanged through the thousands of years of Egyptian history?), while others are not (for example, there is no explicit mention of the Sothic cycle in ancient Egyptian writing). Some have recently claimed that the [[Theran eruption]] marks the beginning of the XVIII dynasty in [[Egypt]], and because [[dendrochronology|dendrochronologists]] believe it took place in 1626 BC, that the Sothic cycle is off by 50–80 years. The claim that the Thera eruption is in fact the subject matter of the Tempest Stele of [[Ahmose I]] is disputed, and most [[Egyptologist]]s reject this problem outright. Egypt maintained diplomatic ties with other foreign powers, which allows for comparative chronologies to be made, and it is virtually impossible to move the entire chronology of the Hittites, Mitanni, Assyria, and Babylon earlier by over half a century. Peter James' book <i>Centuries of Darkness</i> (London, 1991: [http://www.centuries.co.uk/index.htm]) is a good introduction to attacks on Sothic dating from the perspective of the revisionists. ==References== {{reflist}} {{Chronology}} [[Category:Ancient Egyptian calendar]] [[Category:Chronology]] [[Category:Egyptology]] [[de:Sothis-Zyklus]] [[fr:Lever héliaque de Sirius]] [[nl:Sothisperiode]] [[ja:ソティス周期]] [[pl:Datowanie sotisowe]] [[sh:Sotički ciklus]]