Sustainable forest management 4473245 218345813 2008-06-10T06:15:46Z SilvonenBot 6351353 robot Adding: [[de:Nachhaltigkeit (Forstwirtschaft)]], [[fi:Kestävä metsähoito]] [r5545] '''Sustainable forest management''' ('''SFM''') is the management of [[forests]] according to the principles of [[sustainable development]]. Sustainable forest management uses very broad social, economic and environmental goals. A range of forestry institutions now practice various forms of sustainable forest management and a broad range of methods and tools are available that have been tested over time. The [[Forest Principles]] adopted at [[Earth Summit|The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED)]] in [[Rio de Janeiro]] in 1992 captured the general international understanding of sustainable forest management at that time. A number of sets of criteria and indicators have since been developed to evaluate the achievement of SFM at both the country and management unit level. These were all attempts to codify and provide for independent assessment of the degree to which the broader objectives of sustainable forest management are being achieved in practice. In 2007, the [[United Nations General Assembly]] adopted the [[United Nations Forum on Forests#Non-legally binding instrument on all types of forests|Non-Legally Binding Instrument on All Types of Forests]]. The instrument is the first of its kind, and reflects the strong international commitment to promote implementation of sustainable forest management through a new approach that brings all stakeholders together. ==Definition== A definition of the present day understanding of the term sustainable forest management was developed by the Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE), and has since been adopted by the [[Food and Agriculture Organization]] (FAO).<ref>[http://www.mcpfe.org Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe]</ref> It defines sustainable forest management as: <blockquote>the stewardship and use of forests and forest lands in a way, and at a rate, that maintains their biodiversity, productivity, regeneration capacity, vitality and their potential to fulfill, now and in the future, relevant ecological, economic and social functions, at local, national, and global levels, and that does not cause damage to other ecosystems.</blockquote> In simpler terms, the concept can be described as the attainment of balance - balance between society's increasing demands for forest products and benefits, and the preservation of forest health and diversity. This balance is critical to the survival of forests, and to the prosperity of forest-dependent communities. For forest managers, sustainably managing a particular forest tract means determining, in a tangible way, how to use it today to ensure similar benefits, health and productivity in the future. Forest managers must assess and integrate a wide array of sometimes conflicting factors - commercial and non-commercial values, environmental considerations, community needs, even global impact - to produce sound forest plans. In most cases, forest managers develop their forest plans in consultation with citizens, businesses, organizations and other interested parties in and around the forest tract being managed. Because forests and societies are in constant flux, the desired outcome of sustainable forest management is not a fixed one. What constitutes a sustainably managed forest will change over time as values held by the public change. ==Criteria and indicators== Criteria and indicators are policy instruments by which progress towards implementing sustainable forest management may be evaluated and reported on. Criteria define and characterize the essential elements, as well as a set of conditions or processes, by which sustainable forest management may be assessed. Periodically measured indicators reveal the direction of change with respect to each criterion. Criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management are widely used and many countries produce national reports that assess their progress toward sustainable forest management. There are nine international and regional criteria and indicators initiatives, which collectively involve more than 150 countries.<ref>[http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/004/AC135E/AC135E00.HTM Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: A Compendium]. Paper compiled by Froylán Castañeda, Christel Palmberg-Lerche and Petteri Vuorinen, May 2001. Forest Management Working Papers, Working Paper 5. Forest Resources Development Service, Forest Resources Division. FAO, Rome (unpublished)]</ref> Three of the more advanced initiatives are those of the Working Group on Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Sustainable Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests (also called the Montreal Process) <ref>[http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/mpci/ MPCI]</ref>, the Ministerial Conference for the Protection of Forests in Europe <ref>[http://www.mcpfe.org/resolutions/vienna/improved_indicators.pdf MCPFE indicators]</ref>, and the International Tropical Timber Organization <ref>[http://www.itto.or.jp/live/Live_Server/963/ps15e.pdf ITTO]</ref>. Countries who are members of the same initiative usually agree to produce reports at the same time and using the same indicators. Within countries, at the management unit level, efforts have also been directed at developing local level criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management. The [[Center for International Forestry Research]], the International Model Forest Network and researchers at the University of British Columbia have developed a number of tools and techniques to help forest-dependent communities develop their own local level criteria and indicators<ref>[http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/acm/pub/toolbox.html CIFOR Criteria and Indicators Toolbox Series]</ref><ref>[http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-54246-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html International Model Forest Network Criteria and Indicators]</ref><ref>[http://www.sfmindicators.org SFM Indicator Knowledge Base]</ref>. Criteria and Indicators also form the basis of the Canadian Standards Association certification standard for sustainable forest management. There appears to be growing international consensus on the key elements of sustainable forest management. Seven common thematic areas of sustainable forest management have emerged based on the criteria of the nine ongoing regional and international criteria and indicators initiatives. The seven thematic areas are: *Extent of forest resources *Biological diversity *Forest health and vitality *Productive functions and forest resources *Protective functions of forest resources *Socio-economic functions *Legal, policy and institutional framework. This consensus on common thematic areas (or criteria) effectively provides a common, implicit definition of sustainable forest management. The seven thematic areas were acknowledged by the international forest community at the fourth session of the [[United Nations Forum on Forests]] and the 16th session of the Committee on Forestry.<ref>[http://www.un.org/esa/forests/ United Nations Forum on Forests] (2004)</ref><ref>[http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/MEETING/007/Y9203e/y9203e09.htm#TopOfPage Committee on Forestry] (2003)</ref>. These thematic areas have since been enshrined in the [[United Nations Forum on Forests#Non-legally binding instrument on all types of forests|Non-Legally Binding Instrument on All Types of Forests]] as a reference framework for sustainable forest management to help achieve the purpose of the instrument. ==Ecosystem approach== The [[Ecosystem Approach]] has been prominent on the agenda of the [[Convention on Biological Diversity]] (CBD) since 1995 . The [[Convention on Biological Diversity|CBD]] definition of the Ecosystem Approach and a set of principles for its application were developed at an expert meeting in [[Malawi]] in [[1995]], known as the Malawi Principles.<ref>[http://www.fao.org/documents/show_cdr.asp?url_file=/DOCREP/006/Y4773E/y4773e0e.htm Malawi Principles]</ref> The definition, 12 principles and 5 points of "operational guidance" were adopted by the fifth Conference of Parties (COP5) in 2000. The [[Convention on Biological Diversity|CBD]] definition is as follows <blockquote>The ecosystem approach is a strategy for the integrated management of land, water and living resources that promotes conservation and sustainable use in an equitable way. Application of the ecosystem approach will help to reach a balance of the three objectives of the Convention. An ecosystem approach is based on the application of appropriate scientific methodologies focused on levels of biological organization, which encompasses the essential structures, processes, functions and interactions among organisms and their environment. It recognizes that humans, with their cultural diversity, are an integral component of many ecosystems.</blockquote> Sustainable forest management was recognized by parties to the [[Convention on Biological Diversity]] in 2004 (Decision VII/11 of COP7) to be a concrete means of applying the Ecosystem Approach to forest ecosystems. The two concepts, sustainable forest management and the ecosystem approach, aim at promoting conservation and management practices which are environmentally, socially and economically sustainable, and which generate and maintain benefits for both present and future generations. In Europe, the MCPFE and the Council for the Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy (PEBLDS) jointly recognized sustainable forest management to be consistent with the Ecosystem Approach in 2006.<ref>[http://www.mcpfe.org/ MCPFE]</ref><ref>[http://www.strategyguide.org/stracont.html Council]</ref><ref>[http://www.strategyguide.org/straabou.html Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy]</ref><ref>[http://www.strategyguide.org/200602/Documents/STRA-CO%202006%202%20_EA%20SFM%20JT%20STMT__E_final.pdf PEBLD Strategy]</ref> ==Independent certification == Growing environmental awareness and consumer demand for more socially responsible businesses helped third-party forest [[certification]] emerge in the 1990s as a credible tool for communicating the environmental and social performance of forest operations. There are many potential users of certification, including: forest managers, investors, environmental advocates, business consumers of wood and paper, and individuals. With [[Certified wood|forest certification]], an independent organization develops standards of good forest management, and independent auditors issue certificates to forest operations that comply with those standards. This certification verifies that forests are well-managed—as defined by a particular standard—and ensures that certain wood and paper products come from responsibly managed forests. This rise of certification led to the emergence of several different systems throughout the world. As a result, there is no single accepted forest management standard worldwide, and each system takes a somewhat different approach in defining standards for sustainable forest management. Third-party forest certification is an important tool for those seeking to ensure that the paper and wood products they purchase and use come from forests that are well-managed and legally harvested. Incorporating third-party certification into forest product procurement practices can be a centerpiece for comprehensive wood and paper policies that include factors such as the protection of sensitive forest values, thoughtful material selection and efficient use of products.<ref>[http://www.metafore.org/?s=147 Forest Certification Resource Center]</ref> There are more than 50 certification standards worldwide. Some common certification standards are: *Canada's National Sustainable Forest Management Standard (CSA)<ref>[http://www.csa-international.org/product_areas/forest_products_marking/default.asp?language=english Canadian Standards Association]</ref> *[[Forest Stewardship Council]] (FSC) *[[Sustainable Forestry Initiative]] (SFI)<ref>[http://www.aboutsfi.org Sustainable Forestry Initiative]</ref> *[[Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification schemes]] (PEFC) The area of forest certified worldwide is growing rapidly. As of December 2006, there were over 2,440,000 square kilometres of forest certified under the CSA, FSC or SFI standards, with over 1,237,000 square kilometres certified in [[Canada]] alone.<ref>[http://www.certificationcanada.org/english/status_intentions/status.php Canadian Sustainable Forestry Certification Coalition]</ref><ref>[http://www.csa-international.org/product_areas/forest_products_marking/default.asp?language=english CSA]</ref> While certification is intended as a tool to enhance forest management practices throughout the world, to date most certified forestry operations are located in [[Europe]] and [[North America]]. A significant barrier for many forest managers in [[developing countries]] is that they lack the capacity to undergo a certification audit and maintain operations to a certification standard. ==See also== {{Portal|Sustainable development|Sustainable development.svg}} *[[Analog forestry]] *[[Forest management]] *[[Forestry]] ==References== <references/> == Initiatives== ;United Nations *[http://www.un.org/esa/forests/ United Nations Forum on Forests] (UNFF) *[http://www.fern.org/campaign_area_extension.html?clid=4&id=3365 Civil society position on UNFF] at [[FERN]] ;Governmental *[http://www.ccfm.org/current/ccitf_e.php Canadian Council of Forest Ministers' Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management] *[http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/004/AC135E/AC135E00.HTM Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: A Compendium]. Paper compiled by Froylán Castañeda, Christel Palmberg-Lerche and Petteri Vuorinen, May 2001. Forest Management Working Papers, Working Paper 5. Forest Resources Development Service, Forest Resources Division. FAO, Rome (unpublished). *[http://www.mcpfe.org/ Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe] (MCPFE) *[http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/mpci/ The Montreal Process] - Working Group on Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Sustainable Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests *[http://www.sfmindicators.org The Sustainable Forest Management Indicator Database] a free new database of indicators of SFM from around the world; sponsored by the Government of British Columbia, Canada *[http://canadaforests.nrcan.gc.ca/articletopic/56 Sustainable Forestry: A Reality in Canada] A brief description of Sustainable Forest Management Practices in Canada *[http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y8694E/Y8694E00.HTM Report]: International Conference on the Contribution of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: The Way Forward (CICI-2003). Volume 1. 3 - 7 February 2003, Guatemala City, Guatemala. *[http://www.fao.org/docrep/MEETING/008/J2123E/J2123E00.htm#TopOfPage Report]: FAO/ITTO Expert Consultation on Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. 2 - 4 March 2004, Cebu City, Philippines ;NGO *[http://www.fern.org Forest and the European Union Resources Network (FERN)] *[http://www.csa-international.org/product_areas/forest_products_marking/default.asp?language=english Canadian Standards Association Forest Products Marking Program] *[http://www.earthrestoration.org Rainforest Rescue International (RRI)] *[http://www.forestryhorizons.eu Forestry Horizons] An independent forestry policy think-tank aiming to make forestry more valuable. *[http://www.eyeontherainforest.org/bluemahoe.php Tropic Ventures Rainforest Enrichment and Sustainable Forestry Project] is registered under the Auxiliary Forest Program of Puerto Rico, and is a demonstration project for students and foresters interested in the sustainable management and preservation of tropical rainforest land. *[http://www.iied.org/NR Forestry research at the International Institute for Environment and Development] ;Business * [http://www.wbcsd.org/includes/getTarget.asp?type=p&id=Nzk&doOpen=1&ClickMenu=LeftMenu The WBCSD's Sustainable Forest Industry Project] ;Education *[http://www.forestry.ubc.ca/frm Department of Forest Resources Management, UBC Forestry] *[http://sustain.forestry.ubc.ca Sustainable Forest Management Research Group, UBC Forestry] == National reports == ''Reports are in English unless otherwise noted'' *[http://www.mpci.org/rep-pub/2003/2003argentina.pdf Argentina (Spanish)] *[http://www.daff.gov.au/content/output.cfm?&CONTTYPE=outputs&OBJECTID=1F434DF7-3882-42C6-9BD9F1ED1336D03E Australia] *[http://www.ccfm.org/current/ccitf_e.php Canada] *[http://www.mpci.org/rep-pub/2003/2003chile.pdf Chile (Spanish)] *[http://www.mpci.org/rep-pub/2003/2003china.pdf China (Chinese)] *[http://www.mcpfe.org/system/files/u1/publications/pdf/forests_2003.pdf Europe (including Russian Federation)] *[http://www.forestryhorizons.eu/resources.htm Climate change impact in Europe] Forest management and silvicultural responses to predicted climate change impacts on valuable broadleaved species. *[http://www.mmm.fi/en/index/frontpage/forests/forest_policy/criteria_indicators.html Finland] *[http://www.ifn.fr/spip/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=85&lang=en France] *Japan [http://www.mpci.org/rep-pub/2003/2003japan_e.pdf (English)][http://www.mpci.org/rep-pub/2003/2003japan_badversion.pdf (Japanese)] *[http://www.mpci.org/rep-pub/2003/2003mexico.pdf Mexico (Spanish)] *[http://www.mpci.org/rep-pub/2003/2003newzealand.pdf New Zealand] *Russian Federation [http://www.mpci.org/rep-pub/2003/RussiaE/main.html (English)] [http://www.mpci.org/rep-pub/2003/RussiaR/main.html (Russian)] *[http://www.forestry.gov.uk/website/pdf.nsf/pdf/fullsfi.pdf/$FILE/fullsfi.pdf United Kingdom] *[http://www.fs.fed.us/research/sustain/ United States of America] [[Category:Forestry]] [[Category:Sustainability]] [[de:Nachhaltigkeit (Forstwirtschaft)]] [[fr:Gestion durable des forêts]] [[fi:Kestävä metsähoito]]