Whaling 33557 226033532 2008-07-16T15:08:15Z Jonathanmills 3500227 on THIRD thoughts, I am deleting that image. Whale was killed in Greenland, and two out of three pictures being Greenland-focussed is inappropriate at the top of this article [[Image:18th century arctic whaling.jpg|thumb|400px|right|Eighteenth century engraving showing Dutch whalers hunting [[Bowhead Whale]]s in the [[Arctic]].]] [[Image:Greenland_sperm_whale_1762.jpg|thumb|400px| This sperm whale was killed in Greenland in 1762 and its blubber processed at the [[Greenland Dock]], London.]] '''Whaling''' is the hunting of [[whale]]s and dates back to at least 6,000 BC. ==History of whaling== {{main|History of whaling}} Whaling began in prehistoric times, and was initially confined to (near) [[coastal waters]]. Early whaling affected the development of many cultures.{{Fact|date=August 2007}} Although prehistoric hunting and gathering is generally considered to have had low ecological impact, early whaling in the [[Arctic]] altered freshwater ecology.<ref>{{cite journal | url = http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=341790 | last = Douglas | first = M. S. V. | coauthors = Smol, J. P., Savelle, J. M. & Blais, J. M. | journal = Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA | date= 2004 | title = Prehistoric Inuit Whalers affected Arctic Freshwater Ecosystems | doi = 10.1073/pnas.0307570100 | volume = 101 | issue = 6 | pages = 1613–1617 | pmid = 14745043}}</ref> The development of modern whaling techniques was spurred in the 19th century by the increase in demand for [[whale oil]],<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.whalingmuseum.org/kendall/old_nb/old_nb_index.html | title = From Old Dartmouth to Modern New Bedford | publisher = New Bedford Whaling Museum | accessdate = 2006-12-03}}</ref> sometimes known as "train oil", and in the 20th century by a demand for [[margarine]] and later [[whale meat]]. ==Modern whaling== Whale oil is little used today,<ref>{{cite journal | last = Sagoff | first = Mark | date= 1991 | journal = The Hastings Center Report | title = Zuckerman's Dilemma: A Plea for Environmental Ethics | volume = 21 | pages = 32–40 | url = http://www.jstor.org/pss/3562889 | accessdate = 2008-04-18 | doi = 10.2307/3562889}}</ref> so modern commercial whaling is primarily the hunting of whales for food, while whaling for scientific-research purposes has also become an important practice, particularly since the [[International Whaling Commission|International Whaling Commission (IWC)]] moratorium on commercial whaling in 1986. The primary species hunted are the [[Common Minke Whale]] and [[Antarctic Minke Whale]], two of the smallest species of [[baleen whales]]. Recent scientific surveys estimate a population of 179,000 in the central and northeast Atlantic and 700,000 around Antarctica.<ref> {{cite web |url= http://www.iwcoffice.org/conservation/estimate.htm |title= Whale Population Estimates |date=2008-05-26 |accessdaymonth= 02 |accessmonthday= 17 |accessyear= 2008 |author= [[International Whaling Commission]] }}</ref> [[Image:Domino whale-bone hg.jpg|right|thumb|200px|Dominoes made from whale bones]] International cooperation on whaling regulation began in 1931 and culminated in the signing of the [[International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling|International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW)]] in 1946, whose aim is to "provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and thus make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry".<ref>http://www.iwcoffice.org/commission/convention.htm</ref> The IWC was set up under the terms of the ICRW for the purpose of making decisions on quota levels and other relevant matters based on the findings of its Scientific Committee. Countries which are not members of IWC are not bound by its regulations and conduct their own management programs. The members of the IWC voted on [[23 July]] [[1982]] to apply a [[moratorium]] to all commercial whaling beginning in the 1985-86 season. Since 1992, the IWC's Scientific Committee has requested that it be allowed to give quota proposals for some whale stocks, but this has so far been refused by the Plenary Committee. [[Norway]] legitimately continues to hunt [[Minke Whale]]s commercially under IWC regulations, as it has lodged an official objection to the moratorium. ===Canada=== Canadian whaling is carried out by various [[Inuit]] groups around the country in small numbers and is managed by the [[Department of Fisheries and Oceans]]. The meat obtained from this whaling is commercially sold through shops and supermarkets. This meat is typically not available in southern metropolitan centers such as [[Vancouver]], [[Toronto]], or [[Montreal]] but is more available in northern communities where whale meat is a component of the traditional diet. There is considerable consternation amongst conservationists about the hunt. The [[Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society]] says "Canada has pursued a policy of marine mammal management which appears to be more to do with political expediency rather than conservation." [[Canada]] left the [[IWC]] in 1982 and as such is not bound by the moratorium on whaling. ===Caribbean=== [[Image:whalemeat.jpg|right|thumb|200px|Boy in [[Bequia]] carrying meat of a Humpback Whale caught in 2007]] Some whaling (in reality mostly [[dolphin drive hunting|dolphin hunting]]) is conducted from [[Grenada]], [[Dominica]] and [[Saint Lucia]]. Species hunted are the [[Short-finned Pilot Whale]], [[Pygmy Killer Whale]] and [[Spinner Dolphin]]s. Throughout the Caribbean, around 400 [[Pilot Whale]]s are caught annually and their meat sold locally. The hunting of small [[cetacean]]s is not regulated by the IWC. In [[Saint Vincent and the Grenadines]] on the island of [[Bequia]] the International Whaling Commission allows natives of the island to catch up to four Humpback Whales per year using traditional hunting methods and equipment. ===Faroe Islands=== {{main|Whaling in the Faroe Islands}} Whaling (''re.'' dolphin hunting, as pilot whales are ''dolphins'') in the [[Faroe Islands]] has been practiced since at least the 10th century. It is regulated by Faroese authorities but not by the IWC, who do not regulate the catching of small cetaceans. Around 950 [[Long-finned Pilot Whale]]s (''Globicephala melaena'') are caught annually, although mainly during the summer. Occasionally, other species are hunted as well, such as the [[Northern Bottlenose Whale]] and [[Atlantic White-sided Dolphin]]. The hunts, called grindadráp in Faroese, are non-commercial and are organised on a community level; anyone can participate. The hunters first surround the pilot whales with a wide semicircle of boats. The boats then drive the Pilot Whales slowly into a bay or to the bottom of a fjord. Most Faroese consider the hunt an important part of their culture and history and arguments about the topic rarely fail to raise strong emotions. Animal-rights groups criticize the hunt as being cruel and unnecessary. The hunters claim in return that most journalists do not exhibit sufficient knowledge of the catch methods or its economic significance. ===Greenland=== Greenland Inuit whalers caught around 175 whales per year, making them the third largest hunt in the world after [[Norway]] and [[Japan]], though their take is only about one quarter of either Japan's or Norway's, which take 600 or more whales each year. The IWC treats the west and east coasts of Greenland as two separate population areas and sets separate quotas for each coast. The far more densely populated west coast accounts for over 90 percent of individuals caught. In a typical year around 150 [[Minke Whale|minke]] and 10 [[Fin Whale]]s are taken from west coast waters and around 10 minkes are from east coast waters. ===Iceland=== {{main|Whaling in Iceland}} Unlike Norway, Iceland did not lodge an objection against the IWC moratorium, which came into force in 1986. Between 1986 and 1989 around 60 animals per year were taken under a scientific permit. However, under strong pressure from anti-whaling countries, viewing scientific whaling as a circumvention of the moratorium, Iceland ceased whaling altogether in 1989. Following the 1991 refusal of the IWC to accept its Scientific Committee's recommendation to allow sustainable commercial whaling, Iceland left the IWC in 1992. Iceland rejoined the IWC in 2002 with a reservation to the moratorium. This reservation is not recognized by a number of anti-whaling countries. In 2003 Iceland resumed scientific whaling. Iceland presented a feasibility study to the 2003 IWC meeting to take 100 minke, 100 fin, and 50 sei in each of 2003 and 2004. The primary aim of the study was to deepen the understanding of fish-whale interactions (the strongest advocates for a resumed hunt are fishermen concerned that whales are taking too many fish). The hunt was supported by three-quarters of the Icelandic population. Amid disagreement within the IWC Scientific Committee about the value of the research and its relevance to IWC objectives,<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.iwcoffice.org/conservation/permits.htm#iceland | publisher = [[International Whaling Commission|IWC]] | title = Recent Icelandic Proposal on scientific permits | accessdate = 2007-03-19}}</ref> no decision on the proposal was reached. However, under the terms of the convention, the Icelandic government issued permits for a scientific catch. In 2003, Iceland took 36 minke whales from a quota of 38. In 2004, it took 25 whales (the full quota). In 2005, the government issued a permit for a third successive year - allowing whalers to take up to 39 whales. Iceland resumed commercial whaling in 2006. The annual quota is set to 30 minke whales (out of an estimated 174,000 animals in the central and north-eastern North Atlantic<ref name=IWCEstimate>{{cite web| url = http://www.iwcoffice.org/conservation/estimate.htm | publisher = [[International Whaling Commission]] | title = Whale Population Estimates | accessdate = 2006-12-03}}</ref>) and nine Fin Whales (out of an estimated 30,000 animals in the central and north-eastern North Atlantic<ref name=IWCEstimate /><ref> {{cite web | url = http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=scienceNews&storyID=2006-10-17T142254Z_01_L17824455_RTRUKOC_0_US-ENVIRONMENT-WHALING.xml | publisher = [[Reuters]] | title = Iceland to resume commercial whaling hunts | date = [[2006-10-17]] | accessdate = 2006-12-03}}</ref>). ===Indonesia=== Lamalera, on the south coast of the island of [[Lembata]], and Lamakera on neighbouring [[Solor]] are the last two remaining Indonesian whaling communities. The hunters have religious taboos that ensure that they use every part of the animal. About half of the catch is kept in the village; the rest is traded in local markets using a barter system. In 1973, the [[UN]]'s [[Food and Agriculture Organization]] (FAO) sent a whaling ship and a [[Norway|Norwegian]] whaler to modernize their hunt. This effort lasted three years, and was not successful. According to the FAO report, the Lamalerans "have evolved a method of whaling which suits their natural resources, cultural tenets and style."<ref>{{cite journal | last = Bruemmer | first = Fred | journal = Natural History | title = Sea hunters of Lamalera | publisher = Natural History | date= 2001 | volume = 110 | issue = 8 | pages = 54–59}}{{ISSN|0028-0712}} <!-- was from this link - which is now dead [http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1134/is_8_110/ai_79051531] --> </ref> ===Japan=== {{main|Whaling in Japan}} [[Image:Whale meat on dish.jpg|thumb|250px|A dish of whale meat in Japan]] When the commercial whaling moratorium was introduced by the IWC in 1982, [[Japan]] lodged an official objection. However, in response to US threats to cut Japan's fishing quota in US territorial waters under the terms of the [[Packwood-Magnuson Amendment]], Japan withdrew its objection in 1987 and thus became bound by the moratorium. However, according to the [[BBC]], America went back on this promise, effectively destroying the deal.<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6659401.stm</ref> Since Japan could not resume commercial whaling, it began whaling on a scientific-research basis. The stated purpose of the research program is to establish the size and dynamics of whale populations. The Japanese government wishes to resume whaling in a sustainable manner under the oversight of the IWC, both for whale products (meat etc.) and to help preserve fishing resources by culling whales. Anti-whaling organisations claim that the research program is a front for commercial whaling, that the sample size is needlessly large and that equivalent information can be obtained by non-lethal means, for example by studying samples of whale tissue (such as skin) or faeces. The [[Institute of Cetacean Research|Institute of Cetacean Research (ICR)]], which conducts the research, disagrees, stating that the information obtainable from tissue and/or faeces samples is insufficient and that the sample size is necessary in order to be representative. Japan's scientific whaling program is controversial in anti-whaling countries. Countries opposed to whaling have passed non-binding resolutions in the IWC urging Japan to stop the program. Japan claims that whale stocks for some species are sufficiently large to sustain commercial hunting and blame filibustering by the anti-whaling side for the continuation of scientific whaling. Deputy whaling commissioner, Joji Morishita, told [[BBC News]] that "The reason for the moratorium [on commercial whaling] was scientific uncertainty about the number of whales. ... It was a moratorium for the sake of collecting data and that is why we started scientific whaling. We were asked to collect more data." [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7153594.stm] According to Joji Morhisita of Japanese Fisheries Agency, the Japanese public feel that anti-whaling groups are covertly racist.[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1578812.stm] Norway issue around 1000 quota per year as opposed to Japan's 1,330. Moreover, Norway and Iceland hunt on a commercial basis. According to Morishita, "Singling out whaling is cultural imperialism - some people would say it's racism. Norway and Iceland are also whalers, but the criticism of Japan is stronger." [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1578812.stm] ===Norway=== {{main|Whaling in Norway}} {| class="wikitable" align="right" ! Year ! Quota ! Catch |- ! 1994 | align="right" | 319 | align="right" | 280 |- ! 1995 | align="right" | 232 | align="right" | 218 |- ! 1996 | align="right" | 425 | align="right" | 388 |- ! 1997 | align="right" | 580 | align="right" | 503 |- ! 1998 | align="right" | 671 | align="right" | 625 |- ! 1999 | align="right" | 753 | align="right" | 591 |- ! 2000 | align="right" | 655 | align="right" | 487 |- ! 2001 | align="right" | 549 | align="right" | 550 |- ! 2002 | align="right" | 671 | align="right" | 634 |- ! 2003 | align="right" | 711 | align="right" | 646 |- ! 2004 | align="right" | 670 | align="right" | 541 |- ! 2005 | align="right" | 797 | align="right" | 639 |- ! 2006 | align="right" | 1052 | align="right" | 546 |- ! 2007 | align="right" | 1052 | align="right" | 592 |} [[Image:NorwegianWhaleCatches.png|thumb|300px|left|Norwegian Minke Whale Quotas (blue line, 1994-2006) and Catches (red line, 1946-2005) in numbers (from official Norwegian statistics)]] [[Norway]] has registered an objection to the International Whaling Commission moratorium, and is thus not bound by it. In 1993, Norway resumed a commercial catch, following a period of five years where a small catch was made under a scientific permit. The catch is made solely from the Northeast Atlantic [[Minke Whale]] population, which is estimated to consist of about 107,000 animals.<ref name="Whaling quota">[[Aftenposten]] Newspaper: [http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article2243265.ece Whaling quota draws fire]</ref> Norwegian Minke Whale catches have fluctuated between 487 animals in 2000 to 592 in 2007. Prior to the moratorium, Norway caught around 2,000 Minkes per year. The North Atlantic hunt is divided into five areas and usually lasts from early May to late August. Norway exports a limited amount of whale meat to the Faroes and Iceland. It has been attempting to export to Japan for several years, though this has been hampered by concerns in the Japanese domestic market about the effects of pollution in the blubber of the North Atlantic [[Minke whale]]. In May 2004, the Norwegian Parliament passed a resolution to considerably increase the number of Minkes hunted each year. The Ministry of Fisheries also initiated a satellite tracking programme of various whale species to monitor migration patterns and diving behaviour. The tagging research program has been underway since 1999.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.iwcoffice.org/_documents/sci_com/2002progreports/SC-54-ProgRep%20Norway.pdf | publisher = [[International Whaling Commission]] | title = Norway. Progress report on cetacean research, January 2001 to December 2001, with statistical data for the calendar year 2001 | accessdate = 2006-12-03}}</ref> Since 2006, when the Norwegian whaling quota was increased by 30%, Norwegian whalers have been allowed to hunt a quota of 1,052 Minke Whales a year. Since the 1993 hunt resumption the Norwegian quota has rarely been fully met.<ref name="Whaling quota"/> ===Russia=== Russians in [[Chukotka Autonomous Okrug]] in the [[Russian Far East]] are permitted under IWC regulation to take up to 140 [[Gray Whale]]s from the North-East Pacific population each year. ===United States=== {| class="wikitable" align="right" ! Season ! Catch<ref>[http://www.iwcoffice.org/meetings/chair2007.htm]</ref> |- |- ! 2003 | align="right" | 48 |- ! 2004 | align="right" | 43 |- ! 2005 | align="right" | 68 |- ! 2006 | align="right" | 39 |- ! 2007 | align="right" | 63 |- | colspan=2 | All catch in 2003-2007 was [[Bowhead whale]]. |} In the United States whaling is carried out by [[Alaska natives]] from nine different communities in Alaska. The whaling program is managed by the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission which reports to the [[National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration]]. The hunt takes around 50 [[Bowhead Whale]]s a year from a population of about 10,500 in Alaskan waters. Conservationists fear this hunt is not sustainable, though the IWC Scientific Committee, the same group that provided the above population estimate, projects a population growth of 3.2% per year. The hunt also took an average of one or two Gray Whales each year until 1996. The quota was reduced to zero in that year due to concerns about sustainability. A review set to take place in the future may result in the hunt being resumed. Bowhead whales weigh approximately 5-10 times as much as [[Minke Whale]]s <ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/guides/456900/456973/html/nn6page1.stm]</ref>. The [[Makah]] tribe in Washington State also reinstated whaling in 1999, despite intense protests from animal rights groups. They are currently seeking to resume whaling of the [[Gray Whale]] <ref>http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Marine-Mammals/Whales-Dolphins-Porpoise/Gray-Whales/Makah-Whale-Hunt.cfm</ref>, a right granted to the Makah by the [[Treaty of Neah Bay]]. ===Ship Collision, Bycatch and illegal trade=== [[Image:Nantucket historical association whaling museum weather vane.jpg|right|thumb|250px|Whale weathervane atop the Nantucket Historical Association Whaling Museum]] WWF says that 90% of all whales being killed are from ship collision followed by catch and then hunting.[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/806343.stm] Moreover, since the IWC moratorium, there have been several instances of illegal whale caching by IWC nations. In 1994, the IWC reported evidence from genetic testing<ref>Baker, Scott. Report to the International Whaling Commission (1994)</ref> of whale meat and blubber for sale on the open market in Japan in 1993.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Baker | first = C. S. | coauthors = Palumbi, S. R. | date= 1994 | journal = Science | title = Which Whales are Hunted? A Molecular Genetic Approach to Monitoring Whaling | volume = 265 | issue = 5178 | pages = 1538–1539 | url = http://www.jstor.org/view/00368075/di002281/00p0269z/0?frame=noframe&userID=822135176@man.ac.uk/01cce4401e16e710d8ad0a8b2&dpi=3&config=jstor | accessdate = 2006-12-03 | doi = 10.1126/science.265.5178.1538 | pmid = 17801528 | format = {{Dead link|date=June 2008}} &ndash; <sup>[http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=author%3ABaker+intitle%3AWhich+Whales+are+Hunted%3F+A+Molecular+Genetic+Approach+to+Monitoring+Whaling&as_publication=Science&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&btnG=Search Scholar search]</sup>}}</ref> In addition to the legally-permitted minke whale, the analyses showed that the 10-25% tissues sample came from non minke, baleen whales species, neither of which were then allowed for take under the IWC rules. Further research in 1995 and 1996 shows significant drop of non-minke baleen whales sample to 2.5%.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Palumbi | first = S. R. | coauthors = Cipriano, F. | date= 1998 | journal = The Journal of Heredity | title = Species identification using genetic tools: The value of nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences in whale conservation | volume = 89 | issue = 5 | pages = 459–464 |url = http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/oceanography/courses_html/OCN331/Palumbi&Cipriano.pdf | accessdate = 2006-12-03 | doi = 10.1093/jhered/89.5.459 | pmid = 9768497}}</ref> In a separate paper, Baker stated that "many of these animals certainly represent a [[bycatch]] (incidental entrapment in fishing gear)" and stated that DNA monitoring of whale meat is required to adequately track whale products.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://whale.wheelock.edu/archives/ask03/att-0087/01-whalingemm.pdf | title = Modern Whaling | authors = Clapham, P. J. & Baker, C. S. | date= 2002 | accessdate = 2006-12-03}}</ref> It was revealed in 1994 that the [[Soviet Union]] had been systematically underreporting the number of whales it took. For example, from 1948 to 1973, the Soviet Union caught 48,477 [[Humpback Whale]]s rather than the 2,710 it officially reported to the IWC.<ref>{{cite news | last = Angier | first = Natalie | title = DNA Tests Find Meat of Endangered Whales for Sale in Japan | publisher = New York Times | date = [[1994-09-13]]}}</ref> On the basis of this new information, the IWC stated that it would have to rewrite its catch figures for the last forty years.<ref>{{cite news | first = David | last = Hearst | title = Soviet Files Hid Systematic Slaughter of World Whale Herds | publisher = Gazette (Montreal) | date = [[1994-02-12]]}}</ref> According to Ray Gambell, the Secretary of the IWC at the time, the organisation had raised its suspicions of underreporting with the former Soviet Union, but it did not take further action because it could not interfere with national sovereignty.<ref>{{cite news | first = David | last = Williams | title = We Didn't Know About the Whale Slaughter | publisher = Agence Fr. Presse | date = [[1994-02-23]]}}</ref> In 1985, an activist organization, [[Earthtrust]], placed undercover employees on Korean fishing vessels who took photographs of both fin and right whales being hunted and processed in violation of the ban.{{Fact|date=June 2008}} ==The arguments for and against whaling== {{See also|International Whaling Commission#Politics}} International debates over whaling have focused on issues of sustainability and conservation as well as ownership and national sovereignty. Also raised in debates is the question of [[cetacean intelligence]] and the level of [[Animal welfare|suffering]] which the animals undergo during harvest. Since the [[International Whaling Commission]] (IWC) 1986 moratorium on commercial whaling, the value of lethal sampling of whales for scientific research in order to establish catch quotas has also been debated. Finally, the value of whaling to fisheries as a method of controlling whales' perceived negative impact on fish stocks is another point of debate. ===Conservation status=== [[Image:Blue Whale population, Pengo.svg|thumb|300px|Blue whale populations have declined dramatically due to unregulated commercial whaling, putting them at risk of extinction.]] Today there is widespread agreement around the world that it is morally wrong to exterminate a species of animal. Prior to the setting up of the IWC in 1946, unregulated whaling had depleted a number of whale populations to a significant extent, and several whales species were severely endangered. Whaling and other threats have led to at least five of the 13 great whales being listed as [[Endangered species#Endangered mammals|endangered]].<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.iucnredlist.org/search/search.php?freetext=whale&modifier=phrase&criteria=common&taxa_species=1&Submit.x=102&Submit.y=13&redlistCategory%5B%5D=EN&redlistAssessyear%5B%5D=all&country%5B%5D=all&aquatic%5B%5D=all&regions%5B%5D=all&habitats%5B%5D=all&threats%5B%5D=all | title = Cetaceans listed as Endangered | publisher = [[IUCN]] Red List of Threatened Species | accessdate = 2007-03-19}}</ref> A past ban which was implemented around the 1960s has helped some of these species of whale to recover. According to IUCN's Cetacean Specialist Group (CSG), "Several populations of southern right whales, humpbacks in many areas, grey whales in the eastern North Pacific, and Blue Whales in both the eastern North Pacific and central North Atlantic have begun to show signs of recovery."<ref>{{cite web | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3024785.stm | publisher = [[BBC News]] | title = Extinction nears for whales and dolphins | date = [[2003-05-14]] | accessdate = 2006-12-04}}</ref> Other whale species, however (in particular the Minke Whale) have never been considered endangered. Despite this, those opposed to whaling argue that a return to full-scale commercial whaling will lead to economic concerns overriding those of conservation, and there is a continuing battle between each side as to how to describe the current state of each species. For instance, conservationists are pleased that the Sei Whale continues to be listed as endangered, but Japan says that the species has swelled in number from 9,000 in 1978 to about 28,000 in 2002, so its catch of 50 Sei whales per year is safe and the classification of endangered should be reconsidered for the North Pacific population. Some North Atlantic states have recently argued that Fin whales should not be listed as endangered anymore and criticize the list for being inaccurate.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.hafro.is/undir.php?ID=19&nanar=1REF=3&fID=3839 | title = Um stofnstærðir langreyðar og hrefnu við Ísland og flokkun IUCN | accessdate = 2006-12-04}}</ref> [[IUCN]] has recorded studies showing that more than 40,000 individuals are present in the North Atlantic Ocean around Greenland, Iceland, and Norway.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.iucnredlist.org/search/details.php/2478/summ | publisher = [[IUCN]] | title = Red List of Threatened Species - Balaenoptera physalus | accessdate = 2006-12-04}}</ref> There is no information about Fin Whales in areas outside of the Northern Atlantic, where they still hold the status of being endangered. Whale conservation statuses as determined by The World Conservation Union ([[IUCN]]) is shown below. Note that in the case of Blue and Gray Whales, the IUCN distinguishes the statuses of various populations. These populations, while not regarded as separate species, are considered sufficiently important with respect to conservation.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.iucnredlist.org/search/details.php/2483/all | publisher = [[IUCN]] | title = Red List of Threatened Species - Balaenoptera musculus (North Atlantic stock} | accessdate = 2006-12-04}}</ref>.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.iucnredlist.org/search/details.php/2482/all | publisher = [[IUCN]] | title = Red List of Threatened Species - Balaenoptera musculus (North Pacific stock} | accessdate = 2006-12-04}}</ref> The [[Data Deficient]] category is not included. {| class="wikitable" !Extinct !Critically Endangered !Endangered !Vulnerable !Lower Risk <br />(Conservation&nbsp;Dependent) !Lower Risk <br />(Near Threatened) !Lower Risk <br />(Least Concern) |- | valign="top" | '''Species''' *''none'' '''Subspecies''' *''none'' '''Subpopulations''' '''or Stocks''' * [[Gray whale]] Northwest Pacific (Asian) stock, as of 2007 * [[Gray Whale]] (Atlantic population), around the turn of the eighteenth century.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.iucnredlist.org/search/details.php/8097/all | publisher = [[IUCN]] | title = IUCN Red List of Threatened Species - ''Eschrichtius robustus'' | accessdate = 2007-04-11}}</ref> | valign="top" | '''Species''' *''none'' '''Subspecies''' *''none'' '''Subpopulations''' '''or Stocks''' * [[Bowhead Whale]] ''Spitsbergen stock'' * [[Beluga]] Cook Inlet subpopulation * | valign="top" |'''Species''' *[[Blue Whale]] *[[Sei Whale]] *[[Fin Whale]] *[[North Atlantic Right Whale]] *[[North Pacific Right Whale]] '''Subspecies''' * [[Antarctic Blue Whale]] (''Balaenoptera musculus intermedia'') '''Subpopulations''' '''or Stocks''' *[[Bowhead Whale]] ''Baffin Bay-Davis Strait stock'' *[[Bowhead Whale]] ''Okhotsk Sea subpopulation'' | valign="top" | '''Species''' * [[Humpback Whale]] * [[Sperm Whale]] * [[Beluga]] '''Subspecies''' *''none'' '''Subpopulations''' '''or Stocks''' *[[Bowhead Whale]] Hudson Bay-Foxe Basin stock, *[[Blue Whale]] Balaenoptera musculus musculus, North Atlantic stock | valign="top" | '''Species''' *[[Bowhead Whale]] *[[Gray Whale]] *[[Antarctic Minke Whale]] *[[Arnoux's Beaked Whale]] (''Berardius arnuxii'') *[[Giant beaked whale|Baird's Beaked Whale]] (''Berardius bairdii'') *[[Southern Right Whale]] *[[Pacific Pilot Whale]] (''Globicephala macrorhynchus'') *[[Bottlenose Whale|Northern Bottlenose Whale]] (''Hyperoodon ampullatus'') *[[Bottlenose Whale|Southern Bottlenose Whale]] (''Hyperoodon planifrons'') *[[Orca]] '''Subspecies''' *''none'' '''Subpopulations''' '''or Stocks''' *[[Bowhead Whale]] Bering-Chukchi-Beaufort Sea stock *[[Blue Whale]] ''Balaenoptera musculus musculus'', North Pacific stock *[[Gray Whale]] Northeast Pacific (American) stock | valign="top" | '''Species''' *[[Common Minke Whale]] '''Subspecies''' *''none'' '''Subpopulations''' '''or Stocks''' *''none'' | valign="top" | '''Species''' *[[Pygmy Right Whale]] (''Caperea marginata'') *[[Long-finned Pilot Whale]] (''Globicephala melas'') *[[Pygmy Sperm Whale]] *[[Dwarf Sperm Whale]] *[[Melon-headed Whale]] *[[False-killer Whale]] '''Subspecies''' *''none'' '''Subpopulations''' '''or Stocks''' *''none'' |} ===Value for research=== Since the 1986 IWC ban on whaling, Japan has conducted its whaling by issuing scientific research permits. The value of "lethal sampling" of whales is a highly contentious issue. The stated aim of the Japanese JARPA research program is to establish sustainable whaling in the Antarctic Ocean.<ref name=catalyst>''[[Catalyst (TV program)|Catalyst]]'': [http://abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s1657789.htm Whale Science], 8 June 2006. [[ABC TV|ABC]]. Reporter/Producer: Dr Jonica Newby. (Transcript and full program available online)</ref> Lethal sampling is required to obtain age information, which can be reliably gathered by looking at the ear plug in the head of the dead animal. Japan initially argued that simple population distribution of whale species is enough to determine the level of sustainability of the hunt and argued that certain species of whale, particularly minke whales, are in sufficient number to be hunted. The anti-whaling side countered by arguing that more accurate composition of population distribution in term of age and sex distribution is needed to determine the sustainability, which ironically provided the justification for the Japanese hunt under the scientific research exemption. Within the framework of the RMP computer modelling, age data is not needed to establish a catch limit for whaling, which is the stated goal of the Japanese research.<ref name=catalyst/> The IWC requires information on population structure, abundance and prior whaling history, all of which can be obtained through non-lethal means{{Fact|date=April 2008}} . However, the IWC Scientific Committee acknowledge the usefullness of the data from JARPA here : [http://iwcoffice.org/conservation/jarpa.htm] ''The results from the JARPA programme, while not required for management under the RMP, have the potential to improve management of minke whales in the Southern Hemisphere in the following ways: (1) reductions in the current set of plausible scenarios considered in Implementation Simulation Trials; and (2) identification of new scenarios to which future Implementation Simulation Trials will have to be developed (e.g. the temporal component of stock structure). The results of analyses of JARPA data could be used in this way perhaps to increase the allowed catch of minke whales in the Southern Hemisphere, without increasing depletion risk above the level indicated by the existing Implementation Simulation Trials of the RMP for these minke whales'' All other information can be gathered through non-lethal means. {{Fact|date=November 2007}} Dietary information can be gathered from analysis of whale faeces. Gender, reproductive status, and population profiles can be gathered from non-lethal [[biopsy|biopsies]]. Major discoveries claimed by JARPA 1 include: they have found the [[population structure]] of [[minke whales]] in the Antarctic is healthy; they have detected change in the [[ecosystem]] of Antarctic Ocean; and they have found "very low level" of contaminants in minke whales.<ref name=catalyst/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://luna.pos.to/whale/gen_find.html |title=Current Findings of the Japanese Whale Research Program under the Special Permit in the Antarctic|accessdate=2007-05-19 |format= |work=The Riches of the Sea| author=Edited by the Fisheries Agency}}</ref> Some of the research includes a paper named ''Fertilizability of ovine, bovine, and minke whales spermatazoa intracytoplasmically injected into bovine oocytes''.<ref name=catalyst /> A 2006 episode of the [[Australian Broadcasting Corporation]]'s popular science show ''[[Catalyst (TV program)|Catalyst]]'', which strongly argued against whaling, reported that of the 18 year JARPA I program, which lethally obtained samples from 6800 whales, less than 55 peer-reviewed papers were produced, of which only 14 were relevant to the goals of the JARPA program, and that only four would require lethal sampling.<ref name=catalyst /> Joji Morishita of JARPA has said the number of samples was required in order to obtain statistically significant data. ===Methods=== [[Image:Whaling harpoon.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Whaling harpoon]] [[Image:Hvalskyting.jpg|thumb|left|200px|Whaling harpoon being used to kill a whale]] Farming whales in captivity has never been attempted and would almost certainly be logistically impossible. Instead, whales are killed at sea often using [[explosive]] [[harpoon]]s,<ref>[http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=102%2F371&FIELD1=ORCL&d=pall Bomb lance patents]</ref> which puncture the skin of a whale and then explode inside its body. Anti-whaling groups say this method of killing is cruel, particularly if carried out by inexperienced gunners, because a whale can take several minutes or even (they claim) hours to die {{Fact|date=July 2008}}. In March 2003, Whalewatch, an umbrella group of 140 conservation and animal welfare groups from 55 countries published a report, ''Troubled Waters'', whose main conclusion was that whales cannot be guaranteed to be killed humanely and that all whaling should be stopped. They quoted figures that said 20% of Norwegian and 60% of Japanese-killed whales failed to die as soon as they had been harpooned. John Opdahl of the Norwegian embassy in [[London]] responded by saying that Norwegian authorities worked with the IWC to develop the most humane methods. He said that the average time taken for a whale to die after being shot was the same as or less than that of animals killed by [[Big Five game|big game]] hunters on [[safari]]. Whalers also say that the free-roaming lifestyle of whales followed by a quick death is less cruel than the long-term suffering of factory-farmed animals.{{Fact|date=January 2008}} In response to the UK's opposition to the resumption of commercial whaling on the grounds that no humane method of catching whales exists, or "is on the horizon", the pro-whaling [[High North Alliance]] points to apparent inconsistencies in the policies of some anti-whaling nations by drawing comparisons between commercial whaling and recreational hunting. For instance, the United Kingdom allows the commercial shooting of deer without these shoots adhering to the standards of British [[slaughterhouse]]s, but says that whalers must meet these standards as a pre-condition before they would support whaling. Moreover, [[fox hunting]], in which foxes are mauled by dogs, is legal in many anti-whaling countries including [[Ireland]], the [[United States]], [[Portugal]], [[Italy]] and [[France]] (although not in the [[United Kingdom]]) according to UK Government's Burns Inquiry (2000). Pro-whaling nations argue that they should only have to adhere to the lowest standards (such as for the UK Red Deer hunts), and draw the conclusion that the cruelty argument is a mere expression of cultural bigotry, similar to the [[Western world|Western]] attitude towards the eating of [[dog meat]] in several [[East Asia]]n countries.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.highnorth.no/Library/Ethics/be-uk-wh.htm | publisher = [[High North Alliance]] | title = Behind UK Whale Position Lurks Unregulated Commercial Deer Hunt | accessdate = 2006-12-04}}</ref> ===The economic argument=== [[Image:PICT3989.JPG|thumb|250px|Sailors Monument, Bergen, Norway]] The [[whale watching]] industry and anti-whaling advocates argue that whaling catch "friendly" whales that are curious about boats, as these whales are the easiest to catch. This analysis claims that once the economic benefits of hotels, restaurants and other tourist amenities are considered, hunting whales is a net economic loss. This argument is particularly contentious in [[Iceland]], as it has among the most-developed whale-watching operations in the world and the hunting of [[Minke Whale]]s resumed in August 2003. [[Brazil]], [[Argentina]] and [[South Africa]] argue that whale watching is a growing billion-dollar industry<ref>http://www.ifaw.org/ifaw/general/default.aspx?oid=10196</ref> that provides more revenue and more equitable distribution of profits than commercial whaling by pelagic fleets from far-away developed countries would provide. [[Peru]], [[Uruguay]], [[Australia]], and [[New Zealand]] also support proposals to permanently forbid whaling South of the Equator, as [[Indonesia]] is the only country in the Southern Hemisphere with a whaling industry. Anti-whaling groups claim that developing countries which support a pro-whaling stance are damaging their economies by driving away anti-whaling tourists. <!-- dead link = http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-whales20jun20,0,6356198.story?coll=la-home-headlines --> Pro-whaling advocates argue that the economic analysis assumes unsustainable whaling by arguing that whaling deprives the whale-watching industry of whales, and counter that if whales are hunted on a sustainable basis, there is no competition between the two industries. Furthermore, they point out that most whaling takes place outside of coastal areas where whale watching takes place, and communication between any whaling fleet and whale-watching boats would ensure that whaling and whale watching occurred in different areas. Pro-whaling advocates also argue that whaling continues to provide employment in the fishery, logistic and restaurant industries and that whale blubber can be converted into valuable [[oleochemical]]s while whale carcasses can be [[rendering (food processing)|rendered]] into [[meat and bone meal]]. Poorer whaling nations argue that the need for resumption of whaling is pressing. Horace Walters, from the Eastern Caribbean Cetacean Commission stated, "We have islands which may want to start whaling again - it's expensive to import food from the developed world, and we believe there's a deliberate attempt to keep us away from our resources so we continue to develop those countries' economies by importing from them. "<ref>{{cite web | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/06/sci_nat_spectrum_of_opinion_at_whaling_meeting/html/5.stm | publisher = [[BBC News]] | title = Spectrum of opinion at whaling meeting - A question of food | accessdate = 2006-12-04}}</ref> ===Intelligence=== {{main|Cetacean intelligence|Animal cognition}} While whales possess the largest physical brains of any animal, there is no consensus about the existence, nature and magnitude of cetacean intelligence. This lack of knowledge is partly because of the cost and difficulty of carrying out research with marine mammals.{{Fact|date=November 2007}} Humpback whales have been found to have [[spindle neuron]]s, a type of brain cell previously considered to exist only in dolphins, humans and other primates,<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/2006/1798885.htm?ancient| publisher = [[ABC News (Australia)|ABC News, Australia]] | title = Whale Brains are Part Human | accessdate = 2006-11-28}}</ref> and some species of whale are highly social. There is an argument that whales should not be killed because of their alleged high intelligence.{{Fact|date=November 2007}} The Pro-whaling justification is that pigs, which also possess high intelligence,{{Fact|date=November 2007}} are routinely butchered and eaten, or indeed that intelligence should not be the determining factor of whether an animal is acceptable to eat or not. ===Safety of eating whale meat=== Whale meat products from certain species have been shown to contain [[Pollution|pollutants]] such as [[Polychlorinated biphenyl|PCB]]s, [[mercury (element)|mercury]], and [[dioxin]]s.<ref name="Simmonds">{{cite journal | journal = Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health | last = Simmonds | first = M. P. | coauthors = Haraguchi, K., Endo, T., Cipriano, F., Palumbi, S. R. & Troisi, G. M. | title = Human health significance of organochlorine and mercury contaminants in Japanese whale meat | date= 2002 | volume = 65 | pages = 1211–1235 | url = http://palumbi.stanford.edu/manuscripts/Simmonds%20et%20al%202002.pdf | accessdate = 2006-12-04}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | journal = Environmental Pollution | title = Levels and patterns of persistent organochlorines in minke whale (''Balaenoptera acutostrata'') stocks from the North Atlantic and European Arctic | publisher = Elsevier Science | last = Hobbs | first = K. E. | coauthors = Muir, D. C. G., Born, E. W., Dietz, R., Haug, T., Metcalfe, T., Metcalfe, C. & Oien, N. | volume = 121 | issue = 2 | pages = 239–252 | url = http://www2.dmu.dk/1_Om_DMU/2_Afdelinger/3_AM/4_Expertise/5_Research/6_marine_mammals/Litterature_pdf/ENPO%20minke%20proofs.pdf | accessdate = 2006-12-04 | doi = 10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00218-X | year = 2003}}</ref> Levels of pollutants in toothed-whale products are significantly higher than those of baleen whales,<ref>{{cite journal| last = Endo | first = Tetsuya | coauthors = Haraguchi, K., Hotta, Y., Hisamiche, Y., Lavery, S., Dalebout, M. & Baker, C. S. | title = Total Mercury, Methyl Mercury, and Selenium Levels in the Red Meat of Small Cetaceans Sold For Human Consumption in Japan | journal = Environmental Science and Technology | date= 2005 | volume = 39 | issue = 15 | pages = 5703–5708 | publisher = American Chemical Society | doi = 10.1021/es050215e}}</ref> reflecting the fact that toothed whales feed at a higher [[trophic level]] than baleen whales in the [[food chain]] (other high-up animals such as sharks, swordfish and large tuna show similarly high levels of mercury contamination).<ref>http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:zuaCnizYixwJ:www.epa.gov/osp/bosc/presentations/exposures.ppt+minke+mercury+levels+whale+tuna+shark&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=11&gl=uk </ref> [[Organochloride]] [[pesticide]]s HCH and HCB are also at higher levels in toothed species, while Minke Whales show higher levels than most other baleens.<ref name="Simmonds" /> The red meat and blubber of (toothed) Long-finned Pilot Whales in the Faroe islands show high toxin levels,<ref>{{cite journal | last = Dam | first = Maria | coauthors = Bloch, D. | date= 2000 | title = Screening of Mercury and Persistent Organochlorine Pollutants in Long-Finned Pilot Whale (Globicephala melas) in the Faroe Islands | journal = Marine Pollution Bulletin | volume = 40 | issue = 12 | doi = 10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00060-6 | pages = 1090–1099}}</ref> which has a detrimental effect on those who eat it.<ref>{{cite journal | last =Athanasiadou | first = Maria | coauthors = Bergman, A., Fangstrom, B., Grandjean, P., Weihe, P. | date= 2002 | journal = Environmental Health Perspectives | volume = 110 | title = Hydroxylated PCB Metabolites and PCBs in Serum from Pregnant Faroese Women}}</ref> However, in Norway, only the red meat of Minke Whales is eaten and the levels of toxins conform to national limits,<ref>{{cite journal | journal = Fisheries Research | title = Protecting whales by distorting uncertainty : non-precautionary mismanagement? | last = Schweder | first = Tore | volume = 52 | issue = 3 | pages = 217–225 | date= 2001 | id = ISSN 0165-7836 | doi = 10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00263-0}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press/reports/evaluation-of-contaminants-in.pdf | publisher = [[Greenpeace]] | title = Evaluation of contaminants in meat and blubber of Minke Whales |date=April 2002 | last = Hassauer | first = Dr. Martin | coauthors = Oltmanns, J. & Schneider, Dr. K. | accessdate = 2006-12-04}}</ref> while Japanese health-ministry scientists have found that Minkes harvested from the Antarctic, the vast majority of the whale meat eaten in Japan, are similarly within national standards for mercury and PCB levels.<ref>http://www.deerharborcharters.com/2000-2002.html</ref> Whale meat is very high in protein and very low in [[saturated fat]].<ref>{{Citation | title = Nutrition Facts and Information for Whale, beluga, meat, raw (Alaska Native) | newspaper = NutritionData | year = 2008 | date = March 29th | url = http://www.nutritiondata.com/facts-C00001-01c226L.html }}</ref> ===Fishing=== [[Image:Whaling in the Faroe Islands.jpg|400px|thumb|[[August 26]] [[2006]] [[Hvalba]], Faroe Islands]] Whalers say that whaling is an essential condition for the successful operation of commercial fisheries, and thus the plentiful availability of food from the sea that consumers have become accustomed to. This argument is made particularly forcefully in Atlantic fisheries, for example the [[Atlantic cod#North-East Atlantic Cod|cod]]-[[capelin]] system in the [[Barents Sea]]. A [[Minke Whale]]'s annual diet consists of 10 kilograms of fish per kilogram of body mass,<ref>Sigurjonsson and Vikingsson, 1997</ref> which puts a heavy predatory pressure on commercial species of fish. Thus, whalers say that an annual cull of whales is needed in order for adequate amounts of fish to be available for humans. Anti-whaling campaigners say that the pro-whaling argument is inconsistent: if the catch of whales is small enough not to negatively affect whale stocks, it is also too small to positively affect fish stocks. To make more fish available, they say, more whales will have to be caught, putting populations at risk. Additionally, often whale feeding grounds and commercial fisheries do not overlap. Professor [[Daniel Pauly]],<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.fisheries.ubc.ca/members/dpauly/ | title = Dr. Daniel Pauly | accessdate = 2006-12-04}}</ref> Director of the Fisheries Center at the [[University of British Columbia]] weighed into the debate in July 2004 when he presented a paper to the 2004 meeting of the IWC in Sorrento. Pauly's primary research is the decline of fish stocks in the Atlantic, under the auspices of the [[Sea Around Us Project]]. This report was commissioned by Humane Society International, an active anti-whaling lobby. The report stated that although cetaceans and [[pinnipeds]] are estimated to eat 600 million tonnes of food per year, compared with just 150 million tonnes eaten by humans (These are Pauly's figures. Researchers at the Institute for Cetacean Research gave figures of 90 million tonnes for humans and 249-436 million tonnes for cetaceans. <!-- dead link: http://www.icrwhale.org/eng/56Estimation.pdf -->), the type of much of the food that cetaceans eat (in particular, deep sea squid and krill) is not consumed by humans. Moreover, the reports says, the locations where whales and humans catch fish only overlap to a small degree. In an interview with the [[BBC]], Pauly stated that: {{Cquote|The bottom line is that humans and marine mammals can co-exist. There's no need to wage war on them in order to have fish to catch. And there's certainly no cause to blame them for the collapse of the fisheries. It's really cynical and irresponsible for Japan to claim that the developing countries would benefit from a cull of marine mammals. It's the rich countries that are sucking the fish out of the poor countries' own seas. | 20px | 20px | [[Daniel Pauly]] | [[BBC]] }} In the report Pauly also considers more indirect effects of whales' diet on the availability of fish for fisheries. He continues to conclude that whales are not a significant reason for diminished fish stocks. More recent studies have also concluded that there are several factors contributing to the decline in fish stocks, such as pollution and habitat loss.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6108414.stm | publisher = [[BBC News]] | title = 'Only 50 Years Left' for Sea Fish | accessdate = 2006-02-11}}</ref> However, the dietary behaviour of whales differ among species as well as season, location and availability of prey. For example, Sperm Whales' prey primarily consists of mesopelagic squid. However, in Iceland, they are reported to consume mainly fish.<ref>Sigurjónsson, et al 1998</ref> In addition to [[krill]], Minke Whales are known to eat a wide range of fish species including [[capelin]], [[herring]], [[sand lance]], [[mackerel]], gadoids, cod, [[saithe]] and [[haddock]].<ref>Haug et al, 1996</ref> Minke Whales are estimated to consume 633,000 tons of Atlantic herring per year in part of Northeast Atlantic.<ref>Folkow et al, 1997</ref> In the Barents Sea, it is estimated that a net economic loss of five tons of cod and herring per fishery results from every additional Minke Whale in the population due the fish consumption of the single whale.<ref>Schweder, et al, 2000</ref> ===Animal Rights=== From an [[Abolitionism (animal rights)|abolitionist]] [[animal rights]] perspective, environmental concerns, possible cetacean intelligence, and animal welfare concerns are irrelevant. The widely accepted notion<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.wildlifeprotection.net/Cruelty/labmice.html | title = Animals are Sentient - Following Quotes from Scientists & Experts | accessdate = 2008-05-15}}</ref> that whales are [[Sentience|sentient]] is thought to be reason enough not to harm or exploit them in any way.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/?page_id=52 | title = Animal Rights: The Abolitionist Approach, Mission Statement | author = Dr. Gary Francione | accessdate = 2008-05-15}}</ref><!-- ===Public Opinion=== {{sectstub}} [http://www.highnorth.no/Library/Opinion/ga-on-pu.htm Gallup on Public Attitudes to Whales and Whaling] (Source: The High North publication "11 Essays on Whales and Man," second edition, 26 Sept. 1994, Author: Milton Freeman, Senior Research Scholar at the Canadian Circumpolar Institute, University of Alberta, specialising in human ecology, maritime anthropology and environmental policy analysis.) --> ==See also== {{cetaceaportal}} *[[Cetacean bycatch]] *[[Dolphin drive hunting]] *[[Earthtrust]] *[[Fisheries management]] *[[Fishery]] *[[History of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands]] *[[Institute of Cetacean Research]], Japan *[[International Whaling Commission]] *[[New Bedford Whaling National Historical Park]] *[[North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission]] *[[Sandefjord Museum]], whaling museum *[[Seal hunting]] *[[Sea Shepherd Conservation Society]] *[[Whale watching]] ==References== {{reflist|2}} ===General references=== ====Books==== <div class="references-small"> *[[Herman Melville|Melville, H.]], ''The Whale''. London: Richard Bentley, 1851 3 vols. (viii, 312; iv, 303; iv, 328 pp.) Published [[October 18]] [[1851]]. (later re-published in New York as ''[[Moby-Dick]]'') *Muller, C. G., (2006). ''Echoes in the Blue''. Koru Press. ISBN 9780615135946 *Day, D., (1997). ''The Whale War''. Sierra Club Books. ISBN 0871567784 *Mulvaney, K. (2003). ''The Whaling Season: An Inside Account of the Struggle to Stop Commercial Whaling''. Washington D.C.: Island Press. ISBN 1559639784 *Haug, T., Lindstrøm, U., Nilssen, K.T., Røttingen, I. And Skaug, H.J. (1996) ''Diet and food availability for Northeast Atlantic minke whales, Balaenoptera acutorostrata.'' Rep. Int. Whal. Commn. *Folkow, L. P., Haug, T., Nilsen, K. T., Nordøy, E. S. (1997) Estimated prey consumption of minke whales Balaenoptera acutorostrata in Northeast Atlantic waters in 1992-1995. Document ICES CM 1997/GG:01. *Schweder, T., Hagen, G. S. and Hatlebakk, E. (2000) Direct and indirect effects of minke whale abundance on cod and herring fisheries: A scenario experiment for the Greater Barents Sea. NAMMCO Scientific publications </div> ====Websites==== <div class="references-small"> *[http://www.gourmetwhale.com/The gourmet whale] - Pro Whaling Org *[http://nantucket.plumtv.com/stories/how_nantucket_helped_light_world Nantucket Plum Interview] - Nantucket Whaling Oil *[http://www.stopbloodywhaling.org/ StopBloodyWhaling] - anti-whaling site *[http://www.whalewatch.org/ WhaleWatch anti-whaling group homepage] *[http://oceans.greenpeace.org/ Greenpeace] - anti-whaling site *[http://www.seashepherd.org/ Seashepherd] - anti-whaling site *[http://www.cgeorgemuller.com/ C. George Muller (Marine Mammal Biologist and Author)] - anti-whaling site *[http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=710110"For watching or eating, Neither side gives ground in the battle over commercial whaling", ''The Economist'' July 26 2001.] *[http://www.highnorth.no/ High North Alliance] - Pro whaling site *[http://luna.pos.to/whale/icr_papers.html List of research papers submitted by Japan´s ICR to the scientific committee of the IWC ] *[http://www.worldcouncilofwhalers.com/index.htm World Council of Whalers - Pro Whaling NGO ] *[http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=2313082 " A bloody war - Obduracy in the face of hypocrisy" The Economist Dec 30th 2003 ] *[http://www.bigvolcano.com.au/human/whaling.htm Australian Whaling History] *[http://www.earthtrust.org/korea.html Korean Pirate Whaling Expose] *[http://whale.wheelock.edu/archives/whalenet94/0009.html ''Where Does Japan's Whale Meat Come From''. International Fund for Animal Welfare, 22 April 1994.] *[http://journal.nafo.int/archive22-33/J22/Sigurjon.pdf Sigurjonsson, J. and G. A. Vikingsson (1997). Seasonal Abundance of and Estimated Food Consumption by Cetaceans in Icelandic and Adjacent Waters. J. Northw. Atl. Fish.Sci. Vol. 22:271-287] *[http://www.livenews.com.au/Articles/2008/01/10/Greenpeace_applauds_departure_of_Oceanic_Viking Greenpeace applauds departure of Oceanic Viking] </div> ====News articles==== <div class="references-small"> *{{cite web |url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3906775.stm |title = Whales 'absolved' on fish stocks| publisher = [[BBC News]] | date = [[19 July]] [[2004]] | accessdate = 2006-10-25}} - Report on Pauly's finding *{{cite web |url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3153591.stm |title = Iceland divided over whaling| publisher = [[BBC News]] | date = [[15 August]] [[2003]] | accessdate = 2006-10-25}} *{{cite web |url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3542987.stm |title = Whaling 'too cruel to continue'| publisher = [[BBC News]] | date = [[9 March]] [[2004]] | accessdate = 2006-10-25}} - report on the Whalewatch claims that the method of killing is inhumane </div> ==External links== {{commonscat|Whaling}} *[http://jimaku.in/w/W8hJTrSG7sg/VjQG__0TZZU People profiting from the issue of Whaling] *[http://www.insightnewstv.com/d10 Online Documentary about the whale hunters of Lamalera ] *[http://weblog.greenpeace.org/oceandefenders/archive/sowhales/ Christmas 2005: Greenpeace confronts Japanese whalers in the Southern Ocean] *[http://www.icrwhale.org/eng/collision1.pdf Christmas 2005: Open Letter to Greenpeace Japan from The Japanese Institute of Cetacean Research ( PDF )] *[http://oceans.greenpeace.org/en/our-oceans/whaling Greenpeace page about whaling] *[http://www.seashepherd.org/ Sea Shepherd Conservation Society] *[http://www.stopwhaling.org/ IFAW's Stop Whaling Now Campaign] *[http://www.highnorth.no/default.asp High North Alliance] - pro-whaling web page *[http://www.vancouverreview.com/past-greenpeace.html Vancouver Review] - Terry Glavin Harpoons some Greenpeace pieties. *[http://www.conservingwildlife.org/whales.html World Conservation Trust Foundation on whaling] *[http://www.iwmc.org/PDF/Iceland-to-Hunt-Whales.pdf Press release from IWMC on whaling] *[http://iwcoffice.org/conservation/iceland.htm Comment from IWC: Iceland and Commercial whaling] *[http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/index/0,,5014144,00.html Daily Telegraph - Stop the Japanese whaling] *[http://www.greenpeace.org/china/en/savewhales The Great Whale Trail -- Greenpeace China] {{Whaling}} <!-- Categories --> [[Category:Fisheries science]] [[Category:Whaling|*]] [[Category:hunting]] <!-- Interwiki --> [[bs:Lov na kitove]] [[bg:Лов на китове]] [[cs:Lov velryb]] [[da:Hvalfangst]] [[de:Walfang]] [[es:Caza de ballenas]] [[eo:Balenkaptado]] [[fr:Chasse à la baleine]] [[hr:Kitolov]] [[id:Perburuan paus]] [[is:Hvalveiðar]] [[it:Caccia alla balena]] [[nl:Walvisvaart]] [[ja:捕鯨]] [[no:Hvalfangst]] [[pl:Wielorybnictwo]] [[pt:Caça à baleia]] [[ru:Китобойный промысел]] [[simple:Whaler]] [[sh:Kitolov]] [[fi:Valaanpyynti]] [[sv:Valfångst]] [[vi:Săn bắt cá voi]]