Zakir Naik
1937703
226088618
2008-07-16T19:48:16Z
Jeff5102
568874
[[WP:UNDO|Undid]] revision 226041493 by [[Special:Contributions/148.168.40.4|148.168.40.4]] ([[User talk:148.168.40.4|talk]]) please,don't use forum discussions as a source.
{{Infobox_Philosopher <!-- Preacher Category -->
|region = Islamic Preacher
|color = lightsteelblue
|image_name = Zakir_naik.jpg
|image_size = 150px
|image_caption = Zakir Abdul Karim Naik
|name = '''Zakir Naik'''
|birth = {{Birth date and age|1965|10|18}}<br>[[Mumbai]], [[India]] {{flagicon|IND}}
|death =
|school_tradition = [[Islam]]
|main_interests = [[Dawah|Islamic Dawah]]
|notable_ideas =
|influences = [[Ahmed Deedat|Sheikh Ahmed Deedat]]
|influenced =
|signature =
|box_width = 20em
| website = [http://www.irf.net/ www.irf.net]
}}
'''Zakir Abdul Karim Naik''' ([[Arabic language|Arabic]]: '''زاكر نايك''') (born: [[October 18]], [[1965]]) is an [[India]]n [[public speaker]], and [[writer]] on the subject of [[Islam]] and [[comparative religion]]. By profession, he is a [[Physician|medical doctor]], attaining a [[Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery]] (MBBS) from [[Maharashtra]], but since 1991 he has focused only on preaching Islam.<ref name="IRF">[http://www.irf.net/irf/drzakirnaik/ Islamic Research Foundation - Introduction (Dr. Zakir Naik)]</ref>
Zakir Naik is also the [[founder]] and [[president]] of the [[Islamic Research Foundation]] (IRF)<ref name="IRF" /><ref name="Mazumdar">{{cite web |url= http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10854375/site/newsweek/|title= Beaming In Salvation|last= Mazumdar|first= Sudip|date= 2006-01-23|work= [[Newsweek International]]|}}</ref> —a non-profit organization that owns and broadcasts the [[free-to-air]] TV channel network [[Peace TV]] from [[Mumbai]], [[India]] and he is also the founder of the [http://www.irf.net/irf/dtp/iisnew.htm Islamic International School] in [[Mumbai]], [[India]].
==Biography==
Zakir Naik was born on [[October 18]], [[1965]] in [[Mumbai]], [[India]]. He is of [[Konkani people|Konkani]] descent.<ref>http://www.tungekar.com/zakirnaik.html</ref>His first educational institution was ''St. Peter's High School'' ([[Indian Certificate of Secondary Education|ICSE]]) situated in Mumbai. After he joined [[Kishinchand Chellaram College]] in the same city. After his higher secondary degree he studied medicine at [[Topiwala National Medical College and Nair Hospital]] in Mumbai. He completed his [[MBBS]] degree from [[University of Mumbai]]. In [[1991]] he gave up his activity as a physician and started working for [[Dawah]] or proselytizing of [[Islam]].<ref>[http://drzakirnaik.com/Home/AboutMe/tabid/54/Default.aspx http://drzakirnaik.com/Home/AboutMe/tabid/54/Default.aspx] - Biography from the website of Zakir Naik constructed by his students.</ref> Naik says he was inspired by Muslim Scholar [[Ahmed Deedat]]<ref name="ArabNews">[http://arabnews.com/?page=9§ion=0&article=84659&d=8&m=7&y=2006 Spreading God’s Word Is His Mission] - Arab News</ref>. According to Naik, the goal is to "concentrate on the educated Muslim youth who have become apologetic about their own religion and have started to feel that their own religion is outdated."<ref name="Hansen">{{cite book
| last = Hansen
| first = Thomas
| title = Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay
| year = 2001
| publisher = Princeton University Press
| language = English
| isbn =0-691-08840-3
| pages=177
}}
</ref> He has authored several books<ref>[http://www.irf.net/irf/drzakirnaik/dznindex.htm Books Authored by Dr. Zakir Naik]</ref><ref>[http://www.peacetv.tv/faq.php FAQs on Islam] by Dr. Zakir Naik</ref> on Islam and [[Comparative religion]] as well as those directed towards removing misconceptions about Islam<ref>[http://www.arabnews.com/?page=1§ion=0&article=71409&d=9&m=10&y=2005&pix=kingdom.jpg&category=Kingdom Media Urged to Counter Anti-Muslim Bias] - Arab news, Sunday 9 October 2005</ref>. His articles are also frequently published in Indian magazines like the [[Islamic Voice (magazine)|Islamic Voice]].<ref>[http://www.islamicvoice.com/march.99/zakir.htm#QUE Prohibition of Alcohol in Islam] - Islamic Voice</ref><ref>[http://islamicvoice.com/august.99/zakir.htm#QUE Was Islam Spread by the Sword?] - by Dr. Zakir Naik</ref><ref>[http://islamicvoice.com/august.2004/zakir.htm#ark Are Ram And Krishna Prophets Of God?] - Islamic Voice</ref>
==Lectures and visits==
Thomas Blom Hansen, a [[sociologist]] at the [[University of Edinburgh]], has written Naik's style of memorizing the [[Qur'an]] and [[hadith]] literature in various languages, and travelling abroad to debate Islam with theologians, has made him extremely popular in Muslim circles. Although he usually speaks to audiences of several hundreds, it is the videotapes of his talks which are widely distributed. His talks are usually recorded in English, to be broadcast at weekends on several cable networks in Mumbai's [[Muslim]] neighborhoods,<ref name="Hansen" /> and on the channel [[Peace TV]], which he co-promotes.<ref name="Mazumdar" /><ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=25960&Itemid=146 | title = Peace TV Reaching 50 Million Viewers – Dr. Zakir Naik |date=February 23, 2007 | author = Syed Neaz Ahmad | work = [[Saudi Gazette]] | accessdate = 2007-05-18 }}</ref> Topics he speaks on include: "Islam and Modern Science", "Islam and Christianity", and "Islam and secularism", among others.<ref name="Hansen" />
Delivering a lecture titled 'Why Westerners embrace Islam' in November [[2002]] at the at King Fahd Hospital auditorium in [[Jeddah]], Zakir Naik said that Islam offers practical solutions to various problems facing the West such as [[Adultery|adultery]], [[Alcoholism|alcoholism]] and [[Filial|filial]] ingratitude. He said ''"It is the only religion that speaks to human intelligence, giving good reasoning and logic, and does not encourage blind faith"'' and that ''"of more than 6,000 verses in the Holy Qur’an, some 1,000 speak on scientific facts"''. Naik also noted that despite strident anti-Islam campaigns, 34,000 Americans have embraced Islam from September 2001 to July 2002. To back his words on anti-Islam campaigns he quoted a report published in the [[Time Magazine]] which said that about 60,000 books against Islam have been written over the past 150 years alone.<ref name="New Muslims in US after 9/11">[http://www.arabnews.com/services/print/print.asp?artid=20066&d=3&m=11&y=2002&hl=New%20Muslims%20on%20the%20rise%20in%20US%20after%20Sept.%2011 New Muslims on the rise in US after Sept. 11 ]</ref> On the status of women in Islam, Naik is quoted to have said that ''"Islam has given them the most respectable position in society. It granted them the right to own property 1,300 years before the West has. In an Islamic society, a woman need not work. It is her husband’s duty to look after her"''.<ref name="New Muslims in US after 9/11">""</ref> In his book titled 'Universal Peace: To Unite a Universal Brotherhood'<ref>[http://books.google.co.in/books?id=Ap9WyyINclUC&dq=%22Mohammed+Talib%22+Universal+Peace Universal Peace: To Unite a Universal Brotherhood] - by Mohammed Talib</ref>, muslim author Mohammed Talib writes that in a similar lecture titled 'Why the West is coming to Islam', Naik lists adultery, surplus women, [[Theft|theft]], [[Rape|rape]], alcoholism, the concept of Old Age Homes etc. as being some of the problems of the western society, and says that Islam has solutions to all of them.<ref>Talib, p17-18.</ref> Naik also notes that the western society likes to reason and investigate logic before being convinced about something. It also likes to analyse a theory which has a falsefication test in order to prove it wrong; the Qur'an too has a falsefication test in {{cite quran|4|82|end=82|expand=no|style=ref}} which says ''Do they not consider the Qur'an with care, had it been from anyone besides Allah there would have been many contradiction in it'' and thus argues that in order to prove the Qur'an wrong all one has to do is find a single contradiction inside it.<ref>Talib, p16.</ref> Naik has also delivered a similar lecture at the Kelab Darul Ehsan Club, [[Kuala Lampur]], [[Malaysia]] in 1998.<ref>[http://www.irf.net/irf/whatsnew/middle/whatsnewdetail.php3?code=6 'Why the West is Coming to Islam'] in Malaysia, 1998</ref>
In 2004 Naik visited [[New Zealand]]<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.tewahanui.info/pdfs/4/twn04pg04.pdf | title = Scholar clears the air about Islam ‘labels’ | work = [[Te Waha Nui]] | date = September 6, 2004 | accessdate = 2007-05-20 }}</ref> and then Australian capitals at the invitation of [[Islamic Information and Services Network of Australasia]]. In his conference in [[Melbourne]]; according to journalist Sushi Das, "Naik extolled the moral and spiritual superiority of Islam and lampooned other faiths and the West in general", adding that Naik's words "fostered a spirit of separateness and reinforced prejudice". Das also noted that "In Australia, where young Muslims are also searching for identity, a separation mentality is fuelled when radical overseas speakers ''(like Naik)'' spout ill-informed rhetoric" and that "It does nothing to develop harmony." <ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.theage.com.au/news/sushi-das/between-two-worlds/2005/07/27/1122143904716.html | title = Between two worlds | date = July 28, 2005 | work = [[The Age]] | accessdate = 2007-05-20 }}</ref>
On [[August]] 20, 2006 in lecture at an event titled 'Call to Humanity' held at MEN Arena in [[Manchester]], Naik challenged media definitions of terrorism by saying ''When the [[IRA]] started their bombing campaign, did we hear the media using [[Catholic]] terrorism? So why does the international media have a campaign on Islamic terrorism?'' He also said ''""There is no such thing as Muslim terrorism because a true Muslim cannot be a terrorist. A true Muslim does not go around killing innocent people. In Islam, killing one innocent Muslim is like killing all of humanity."'' and that the word fundamentalism has also been used negatively to describe Muslims.<ref>[http://www.theasiannews.co.uk/news/s/517/517149_jihad_not_holy_war.html Jihad not holy war] Asia News, September 1, 2006</ref>
In [[September]] [[2006]], delivering a lecture at the Jeddah Chamber of Commerce and Industry (JCCI) auditorium in Jeddah, Naik explained that terrorism is not a Muslim monopoly and quoting established historical records showed how the assumption after the [[11_July_2006_Mumbai_train_bombings|7/11 Mumbai train bombings]] that "not all Muslims are terrorists but all terrorists are Muslim<ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1794203.cms Terrorism is not a Muslim monopoly
] [[Times of India]], 23 July, 2006</ref>" was untrue. He said that associating killing only with Islam is incorrect and quoted other religious scriptures (including a quotation from the [[Book of Numbers]] in the [[Bible]]) to prove that other religions too ascribe capital punishment for apostasy. Naik is also quoted as having said ''"This is a media conspiracy and a way of pushing people away from Islam. In every religion there are black sheep and the media keep putting these people forward,"''<ref name="Terrorism is not a Muslim Monopoly">[http://www.arabnews.com/?page=1§ion=0&article=87230&d=27&m=9&y=2006&pix=kingdom.jpg&category=Kingdom Terrorism Is Not a Muslim Monopoly], Arab News</ref> <br />
Political Analyst [[Khaled Ahmed]] considers that Zakir Naik, by his claims of Islam's superiority over other religious faiths, practices what he calls "reverse [[Orientalism]]". Once when Naik was asked whether the destruction<ref>[http://www.beliefnet.com/story/70/story_7096_1.html Destruction of Giant Buddhas Confirmed]</ref> of the monumental [[Buddhas of Bamyan]] by [[Islamic terrorists|radical Muslims]]<ref>[http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006\03\19\story_19-3-2006_pg7_38 Pakistani, Saudi engineers helped destroy Buddhas]</ref><ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1466974.cms Laden ordered Bamiyan Buddha destruction]</ref> in [[Afganistan]]<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/19/world/19TALI.html?ex=1215835200&en=668641673495b5fa&ei=5070 Taliban Explains Buddha Demolition]</ref> was justified<ref>[http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2008/03/14/opinion/opinion_30068112.php Afghans destroy Buddhas, but cry foul over cartoons]</ref>; he replied that there were no Buddhists in Afghanistan and the territory belonged to the Afghans, so they were right in destroying their own property. Then when asked if [[Kaaba]] was similarly located what could the Muslims do if it was destroyed, he replied that under Islam images were banned and gave the example of opium by saying ''"What if all the opium-takers protested that a country had destroyed large stocks of opium?"'' <ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_16-12-2003_pg3_4 | title = Second opinion: Zakir Naik’s ‘reverse orientalism’ —Khaled Ahmed’s TV Review | work = [[Daily Times (Pakistan)|Daily Times]] | date = December 16, 2003 | accessdate = 2007-05-20 }}</ref>
During an interview Naik was asked why non-Muslims were not allowed to preach their religion in [[Islamic State|Islamic states]] like [[Saudi Arabia]]. Naik quoted verse 3:85 from the [[Qur'an]] and said that ''"...as far as the matters of religion are concerned we know for sure that only Islam is the true religion in the eyes of God. In Qur'an 3:85 it is mentioned that God will never accept any religion other than Islam. As far as the second question regarding building of churches or temples is concerned, how can we allow this when their religion is wrong and when their worshipping is wrong? Therefore, we will not allow such wrong things in our Islamic country."''<ref>[http://www.indianexpress.com/story/27206.html Who’s responsible for the stereotypes of Islam?] op ed by Sudheendra Kulkarni, [[Indian Express]], April 1, 2007</ref> Zakir Naik has allegedly also said that it is [[Blasphemy|blasphemous]] for Muslims to wish Christians a "Happy Christmas", as it acknowledges [[Jesus]] as a son of God.<ref>[http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1154525927052&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull UK police to investigate Muslim scholar Azzam Tamimi's call for martyrdom], The Jerusalem Post, August 23, 2006</ref> Naik has also emphasized on the importance of Muslims maintaining a beard and moustache. Indian author [[Khushwant Singh]] however feels Naik sports a [[Goatee|goatee]].<ref>[http://www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20050730/saturday/above.htm The Tribune, Saturday, July 30, 2005 - Khushwant Singh]</ref>
Khushwant Singh believes that Naik's pronouncements are 'juvenile' and said that "they seldom rise above the level of undergraduate college debates". Singh replied to Zakir Naik's statement that ''"Western society claims to have uplifted women. On the contrary, it has actually degraded them to the status of concubines, mistresses, and society butterflies who are mere tools in the hands of pleasure seekers and sex marketers…."'' by saying "Dr. Naik, you know next to nothing about the Western society and are talking through your skull cap. People like you are making the Muslims lag behind other communities." <ref>[http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=06f7254f-ebfd-4aed-93dc-1bc5e61713a4&MatchID1=4625&TeamID1=1&TeamID2=6&MatchType1=1&SeriesID1=1165&MatchID2=4617&TeamID3=3&TeamID4=4&MatchType2=1&SeriesID2=1163&PrimaryID=4625&Headline=Why+Muslims+lag+behind Why Muslims lag behind] - Khushwant Singh; retrieved Dec 26, 2007</ref> Singh also noted that Naik's audiences "... listen to him with rapt attention and often explode in enthusiastic applause when he rubbishes other religious texts ..." <ref>[http://www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20050305/saturday/above.htm One man’s belief is another’s shackle] - Khushwant Singh</ref> Journalist Aataai Gazi Mahbub has questioned whether Naik's ''Peace TV'' truly encourages interfaith amity or pride in one's own religion.<ref>[http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?article_class=7&no=360555&rel_no=1 Does 'Peace TV' Encourage Interfaith Amity?]</ref>
In a lecture at Melbourne University, Naik argued that only Islam, gave women true equality.<ref name="women">[http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/08/29/1093717837783.html Islam's gender debate at the fore]</ref> He extolled on the importance of the [[headscarf]] by arguing that revealing "Western" dress makes women more susceptible to [[rape]].<ref>[http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/the-clash-of-ignorance/2005/08/06/1123125843879.html The clash of ignorance]</ref> Naik said that ''"There are two sisters, equally beautiful, and they are walking down the streets of Melbourne. One is wearing the Islamic hijab, the complete body cover, except hands and face, and the other sister is wearing Western clothes, the mini-skirt or shorts, and around the corner, there is an anti-social element, who is waiting for a catch, who is waiting to tease the girl. I'm asking the question: which girl will he tease? Quite naturally, he will tease the girl wearing the Western clothes."''<ref name="women" /> Naik also said that about 2700 rapes took place daily in the [[United States]]. Under Islam, he said, a man who raped a woman was to be punished with the [[death penalty]].<ref name="women" /> In another lecture titled 'Universal Brotherhood' at [[Bhiwandi]], Mumbai, he was also of the opinion that ''If you implement the Islamic [[Shariah]] in America that is, every man when he looks at a woman, he should lower his gaze, the woman should be properly dressed up in the Hijab and after that, if any man rapes – Capital punishment. I am asking you a question 'will the rate of rape increase, will it remain the same, or will it decrease?' ''He then said ''I have been asking this question to Non-Muslims that 'Suppose someone rapes (unfortunately) your wife, or your mother, and if you are made the Judge and if the rapist is brought in front of you what punishment will you give?’ And believe me all of them said "We will put him to death". Some went to the extent of saying "We will torture him to death". So why do you have these double standards? Someone rapes somebody else’s wife, Capital punishment is barbaric law. Someone rapes your wife you want to give him Capital punishment. Why these double standards?'' He also quoted India's leading tabloid, [[The Times of India]] on [[October]] 20, [[1998]] as having reported the then Home Minister of India, [[L.K. Advani|L.K. Advani's]] putting a death rap for rapes, and recommending an amendment in the law.<ref>[www.irf.net/universalbrotherhood.doc] Transcript of lecture 'Universal Brotherhood' by Dr. Zakir Naik. Source: IRF.net</ref>
In August 2006, Naik's visit and conference in [[Cardiff]] (UK) were the object of controversy when Welsh MP [[Dai Davies (politician)|David Davies]] called for his appearance to be cancelled and described him as a 'hate-monger'; muslims from Cardiff however defended Naik's right to speak in their city. Saleem Kidwai, secretary general of the Muslim Council of Wales, disagreed with Davies, stating that "people who know about him ''(Naik)'' know he is one of the most uncontroversial people you could find. He talks about the similarities between religions and how we should work on the common ground between them" whilst also inviting Davies to discuss further with Naik personally in the conference. The conference went ahead, with more than 1,000 people attending it after the Cardiff council stated it was satisfied that he would not be preaching extremist views.<ref>[http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/tm_method=full&objectid=17572219&siteid=50082-name_page.html Row over Islamic preacher] - WalesOnline.co.uk</ref><ref>[http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0200wales/tm_objectid=17598165%26method=full%26siteid=50082-name_page.html Cleric's address hailed a success]</ref>
Following a [[Pope Benedict XVI Islam controversy|controversial lecture on Islam]] by [[Pope Benedict XVI]] in [[12 September|September]] [[2006]], in which the pope quoted an argument made by the [[Byzantine Emperor]] [[Manuel II Palaiologos]]: "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." The pope later apologized<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5353208.stm BBC News Article:''Pope sorry for offending Muslims'', last accessed Septermber 17, 2006]</ref> for his statements, however Zakir Naik described the Pope's comments as ''"completely baseless” and not befitting the leader of the Catholic Church"''<ref name="Terrorism is not a Muslim Monopoly">.</ref> and rejected the apology commenting that ''"...The Pope`s apology to the Muslims was at all not an apology rather it was putting salt on the wounds."'' Naik then went on to say that he was ready for an open and public debate with Pope Benedict XVI under live international TV coverage and also stated that he wouldn't mind going to [[Rome]] on his own expense if he was provided with an [[Italy|Italian]] [[visa]].<ref name="Pak Tribune">[http://www.paktribune.com/news/index.shtml?155694 Dr Zakir Naik invites Pope Benedict XVI for open interfaith dialogue] - Pak Tribune, September 29, 2006</ref><ref>[http://sanagency.com/18Oct06.html Pope Benedict’s Provocative Utterances] op ed by Latheef Farook, South Asia News Agency, October 18, 2006</ref> The Pope did not react to the call, and in 2008 Naik scheduled to tour Italy himself, lecturing in Rome, [[Brescia]] and [[Milan]] between July 11 to 15.<ref>[http://www.irf.net/irf/drzakirnaik/middle/introduction.php3?pastfuture=f Dr. Zakir Naik's Schedule of Lectures, July 2008] at IRF.net</ref>.
In November 2007, the IRF organized a 10-day international Islamic conference and exhibition titled ''The Peace Conference'' at the Somaiya grounds in [[Mumbai]]. Lectures on Islam were presented by Naik as well as twenty other speakers.<ref name="Gazette">[http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=200803311990&archiveissuedate=31/03/2008 Justice, peace & unity: The cornerstone of Islam] by By Syed Neaz Ahmad, [[Saudi Gazette]], March 31, 2008</ref> During one of the lectures, Naik provoked anger amongst the [[Shia]] and [[Sunni]] communities at the conference when he mentioned the words ''“Radiallah ta'la anho”'' (meaning 'May Allah be pleased with him') after mentioning the name of [[Yazid I]] and made remarks that [[Karbala]] was a political battle.<ref name="Gazette" /><ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Row_over_Islamic_preachers_remarks_/articleshow/2653996.cms Row over Islamic preacher's remarks]</ref> Others although believed the comment was blown out of proportion<ref>[http://www.arabnews.com/?page=4§ion=0&article=105128 Dr. Zakir Naik’s Remarks on Yazid Spark Anger Among Muslims]</ref> and on being asked about the incident in an interview by [[Saudi Arabia|Saudi Arabia's]] leading tabloid, the [[Saudi Gazette]], he replied ''"...My remark about Yazeed was misunderstood and hence the controversy. However, what I had said at the conference was endorsed by a large section of the scholars from different schools of thought within Islam and Alhamdulillah the controversy now rests in peace."''<ref name="Gazette" />
==References==
{{reflist}}
==External links==
* [http://www.irf.net/ Islamic Research Foundation] (official website)
* [http://www.peacetv.in/ Peace TV] (official website)
* [http://www.paksound.com/Default.aspx?CategoryID=Audio_Lectures&AuthorID=159&PageID=1 Zakir Naik Audio Links] Directory of Naik's Lectures
* [http://naatsharif.com/dr._zakir_naik Lectures by Zakir Naik - ]Download Lectures By Zakir Naik
* [http://www.ahya.org/amm/modules.php?name=Lectures&d_op=viewdownload2&cid=2 Lectures by Zakir Naik] A video collection of Naik's lectures
* [http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=104422 Mumbai Newsline] Here’s Zakir Naik, ‘Fundamentalist, not Fanatic’
[[Category:1965 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Muslim scholars|N]]
[[Category:Konkani Muslims|N]]
[[Category:People from Mumbai]]
[[Category:Indian Sunni Muslims|Naik, Zakir]]
[[ar:زاكر نايك]]
[[bn:জাকির নায়েক]]
[[ml:സാകിര് നായ്ക്ക്]]
[[ps:ذاكر ناېك]]
[[fi:Zakir Naik]]